TransCom 3 Level 2 Base Case Inter-annual CO 2 Flux Inversion Results Current Status David Baker, Rachel Law, Kevin Gurney, Peter Rayner, TransCom3 L2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Amospheric inversions: Investigating the recent inter-annual flux variations ! P. Peylin, C. Rödenbeck, P. Rayner, experimentalists, … Inverse models Data.
Advertisements

Improving Understanding of Global and Regional Carbon Dioxide Flux Variability through Assimilation of in Situ and Remote Sensing Data in a Geostatistical.
Interannual variability in terrestrial carbon exchange using an ecosystem-fire model and inverse model results Sergey Venevsky (1), Prabir K. Patra (2),
Tropical vs. extratropical terrestrial CO 2 uptake and implications for carbon-climate feedbacks Outline: How we track the fate of anthropogenic CO 2 Historic.
Atmospheric Inversion results Philippe Peylin LSCE, France Rachel Law CSIRO, Australia Kevin Gurney, Xia Zhang Arizona State University/Purdue University,
Niall P. Hanan 1, Christopher A. Williams 1, Joseph Berry 2, Robert Scholes 3 A. Scott Denning 1, Jason Neff 4, and Jeffrey Privette 5 1. Colorado State.
Southern ocean inversions: interannual variability and sink trend Rachel Law and Richard Matear April CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric.
Virtual Tall Towers and Inversions or How to Make Productive Use of Continental CO 2 Measurements in Global Inversions Martha Butler The Pennsylvania State.
TransCom 3 Level 2 Base Case Inter-annual CO 2 Flux Inversion Results Current Status David Baker, Rachel Law, Kevin Gurney, Peter Rayner, TransCom3 L2.
Estimating parameters in inversions for regional carbon fluxes Nir Y Krakauer 1*, Tapio Schneider 1, James T Randerson 2 1. California Institute of Technology.
SENSITIVITY OF OBSERVATIONAL DATA TO TIME DEPENDANT INVERSION Takashi Maki Senior Coordinator for Chemical Transport Modeling Atmospheric Environment Division.
T3 evolution Level 1: Annual mean control inversion (Nature paper) Annual mean flux sensitivity and model-to-model (Tellus) Annual mean data sensitivity.
Estimation of daily CO 2 fluxes over Europe by inversion of atmospheric continuous data C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire.
Estimating ocean-atmosphere carbon fluxes from atmospheric oxygen measurements Mark Battle (Bowdoin College) Michael Bender & Nicolas Cassar (Princeton)
Simulations of carbon transport in CCM3: uncertainties in C sinks due to interannual variability and model resolution James Orr (LSCE/CEA-CNRS and IPSL,
Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgments: S. Maksyutov, K. Gurney and TransCom-3 modellers TransCom Meeting, Paris; June 2005 Sensitivity CO2 sources and.
TransCom Continuous Experiment CSU NASA PCTM Scott Denning, John Kleist.
Interannual variability in CO2 fluxes derived from 64-region inversion of atmospheric CO2 data Prabir K. Patra*, Shamil Maksyutov*, Misa Ishizawa*, Takakiyo.
Geostatistical structural analysis of TransCom data for development of time-dependent inversion Erwan Gloaguen, Emanuel Gloor, Jorge Sarmiento and TransCom.
Compatibility of surface and aircraft station networks for inferring carbon fluxes TransCom Meeting, 2005 Nir Krakauer California Institute of Technology.
Atmospheric Research Inverting high temporal frequency data: latest results Rachel Law Peter Rayner, Ying-Ping Wang Law et al., GBC, 16(4), 1053, doi: /2001GB001593,
Prabir K. Patra, Shamil Maksyutov, A. Ito and TransCom-3 modellers Jena; 13 May 2003 An evaluation of an ecosystem model for studying CO2 seasonal cycle.
Monthly Mean Carbon Flux Estimates: Some Network Considerations Lori Bruhwiler, Anna Michalak, Wouter Peters, Pieter Tans NOAA Climate Monitoring and.
Upper-Air Inter-Comparison Experiment Update Presented By Philippe Peylin on behalf of Christopher Pickett – Heaps & Peter Rayner.
Testing the consistency of T3L2 Cyclo-stationary fluxes with  13 C observations John Miller 1, Scott Denning 2, Neil Suits 2, Kevin Gurney 2, Jim White.
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
OBSERVATIONAL DATA SCREENING TECHNIQUE USING TRANSPORT MODEL AND INVERSE MODEL IN ESTIMATING CO2 FLUX HISTORY Takashi MAKI,Kazumi KAMIDE and Yukitomo TSUTSUMI.
NESTED GLOBAL INVERSION WITH A FOCUS ON NORTH AMERICA: COMPARISON WITH BOTTOM-UP RESULTS IN CANADA Jing M. Chen, University of Toronto Main Contributors:
NOCES meeting Plymouth, 2005 June Top-down v.s. bottom-up estimates of air-sea CO 2 fluxes : No winner so far … P. Bousquet, A. Idelkadi, C. Carouge,
Modeling CO 2 and its sources and sinks with GEOS-Chem Ray Nassar 1, Dylan B.A. Jones 1, Susan S. Kulawik 2 & Jing M. Chen 1 1 University of Toronto, 2.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
S. Maksyutov, P.K. Patra and M. Ishizawa Jena; 13 May 2003 TDI experiment with NIES model and interannually varying NCEP winds.
Inversion of continuous data over Europe : a pseudo-data analysis. C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire des Sciences.
Impact of Reduced Carbon Oxidation on Atmospheric CO 2 : Implications for Inversions P. Suntharalingam TransCom Meeting, June 13-16, 2005 N. Krakauer,
Cyclo-stationary inversions of  13 C and CO 2 John Miller, Scott Denning, Wouter Peters, Neil Suits, Kevin Gurney, Jim White & T3 Modelers.
Interannual inversions with continuous data and recent inversions with the CSIRO CC model Rachel Law, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Another set of pseudodata.
Ocean-Atmosphere Carbon Flux: What to Consider Scott Doney (WHOI) ASCENDS Science Working Group Meeting (February 2012; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
1 Oceanic sources and sinks for atmospheric CO 2 The Ocean Inversion Contribution Nicolas Gruber 1, Sara Mikaloff Fletcher 2, and Kay Steinkamp 1 1 Environmental.
ICDC7, Boulder, September 2005 CH 4 TOTAL COLUMNS FROM SCIAMACHY – COMPARISON WITH ATMOSPHERIC MODELS P. Bergamaschi 1, C. Frankenberg 2, J.F. Meirink.
The seasonal and interannual variability in atmospheric CO 2 is simulated using best available estimates of surface carbon fluxes and the MATCH atmospheric.
Light Aircraft CO 2 Observations and the Global Carbon Cycle Britton Stephens, NCAR EOL and TIIMES Collaborating Institutions: USA: NOAA GMD, CSU, France:
Understanding the Ocean Carbon Cycle from Atmospheric Measurements of O 2 and CO 2 Andrew Manning, UEA, UK.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
THERE’S A RECTIFIER IN MY CLOSET: Vertical CO 2 Transport and Latitudinal Flux Partitioning Britton Stephens, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Exploiting observed CO:CO 2 correlations in Asian outflow to invert simultaneously for emissions of CO and CO 2 Observed correlations between trace gases.
Aircraft CO 2 Observations and Global Carbon Budgeting Britton Stephens, NCAR EOL and TIIMES Collaborating Institutions: USA: NOAA GMD, CSU, France: LSCE,
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
Research Vignette: The TransCom3 Time-Dependent Global CO 2 Flux Inversion … and More David F. Baker NCAR 12 July 2007 David F. Baker NCAR 12 July 2007.
P. K. Patra*, R. M. Law, W. Peters, C. Rodenbeck et al. *Frontier Research Center for Global Change/JAMSTEC Yokohama, Japan.
Development of an EnKF to estimate CO 2 fluxes from realistic distributions of X CO2 Liang Feng, Paul Palmer
Atmospheric O 2 Measurements in HIPPO (HIAPER Pole-to- Pole Observations of Atmospheric Tracers) Britton Stephens, NCAR EOL and TIIMES.
Regional CO 2 Flux Estimates for North America through data assimilation of NOAA CMDL trace gas observations Wouter Peters Lori Bruhwiler John B. Miller.
The Vertical Distribution of Atmospheric CO 2 and the Latitudinal Partitioning of Global Carbon Fluxes Britton Stephens – NCAR Co-authors - Kevin R. Gurney,
ICDC7, Boulder September 2005 Estimation of atmospheric CO 2 from AIRS infrared satellite radiances in the ECMWF data assimilation system Richard.
CO 2 retrievals from IR sounding measurements and its influence on temperature retrievals By Graeme L Stephens and Richard Engelen Pose two questions:
Detection and Quantification of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Greenhouse Gas Dry Mole Fraction Enhancements from Urban Emissions: Results from INFLUX NOAA.
HIPPO: Global Carbon Cycle Britton Stephens, NCAR EOL and TIIMES.
FastOpt CAMELS A prototype Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Wolfgang Knorr 1, Marko Scholze 2, Peter Rayner 3,Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Inverse Modeling of Surface Carbon Fluxes Please read Peters et al (2007) and Explore the CarbonTracker website.
Earth Observation Data and Carbon Cycle Modelling Marko Scholze QUEST, Department of Earth Sciences University of Bristol GAIM/AIMES Task Force Meeting,
Aircraft CO 2 Observations and the Missing Carbon Sink Britton Stephens, NCAR EOL and TIIMES Collaborating Institutions: USA: NOAA GMD, CSU, France: LSCE,
On the Robustness of Air-Sea Flux Estimates of Anthropogenic Carbon from Ocean Inversions Sara Mikaloff Fletcher, Nicolas Gruber, Andrew Jacobson, Scott.
Hauglustaine et al. - HYMN KO Meeting th October Forward modelling with the LMDz-INCA coupled climate-chemistry model; Inverse modelling and data.
ESF workshop on methane, April 10-12, years of methane : from global to regional P. Bousquet, S. Kirschke, M. Saunois, P. Ciais, P. Peylin, R.
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
Effects of drought and fire on interannual variability in CO2 as derived using atmospheric-CO2 inversion Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgements to: M. Ishizawa,
current status and plans
Atmospheric CO2 and O2 Observations and the Global Carbon Cycle
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
HIPPO1-3 Large-Scale CO2 Gradients
Presentation transcript:

TransCom 3 Level 2 Base Case Inter-annual CO 2 Flux Inversion Results Current Status David Baker, Rachel Law, Kevin Gurney, Peter Rayner, TransCom3 L2 modelers*, and the producers of the GLOBALVIEW-CO 2 data product * (P. Bousquet, L. Bruhwiler, Y-H Chen, P. Ciais, I. Fung, K. Gurney, M. Heimann, J. John, T. Maki, S. Maksyutov, P. Peylin, M. Prather, B. Pak, S. Taguchi, Z. Zhu) 15 June 2005

TransCom 3 Base-case Inversions Inversion TypeFluxesDataReferences Long-term meanRS1S1 Gurney, et al (2002), Nature, 415 Gurney, et al (2003), Tellus, 55B SeasonalR*12S 1 *12Gurney, et al (2004), GBC, 18 Inter-annualR*12*YS 2 *12*YBaker, et al (2005), GBC, in review R = 22 regions S 1 = 78 stations (GLOBALVIEW-CO 2, 2003) S 2 = 76 stations (GLOBALVIEW-CO 2, 2004) Y = 16 years ( ) IAV paper submitted Dec 2004 Reviews back early Feb 2005 Revision resubmitted April 2005

Base Case Assumptions Nov 2002 [for T3 L3] (14 years) GLOBALVIEW- CO 2 (2002), 76 sites [chosen to have >68% data coverage ]; interpolated data used to fill all gaps. Data uncertainties calculated from GV rsd (  GV ) as:  2 = (0.3 ppmv ) 2 +  GV 2 [non-seasonal] June (15 years) GLOBALVIEW- CO 2 (2003), 78 sites; the previous 76 + CPT_36C0 + HAT_20C0; also SYO_00D0 changed to SYO_09C0 New seasonally- and interannual-varying data uncertainties

Base Case Assumptions Nov 2002 [for T3 L3] A priori fluxes – same as in Level 1, constant across year A priori flux errors – twice Level 1 June 2004 A priori fluxes – Kevin’s seasonally-varying ones from the seasonal inversion A priori flux errors a) Kevin’s seasonally- varying ones b) ditto for land regions,  2 =  2 L1 + (0.5 PgC/yr ) 2 for ocean regions

Base Case Assumptions Changes since June 2004 Added the CSU model results back in (13 models total) Included 2003 data from GLOBALVIEW-CO 2 (2004)

Method Find optimal fluxes x to minimize where: x are the CO 2 fluxes to be solved for, H is the transport matrix, relating fluxes to concentrations z are the observed concentrations, minus the effect of pre-subtracted tracers (fossil fuel, and seasonal CASA & Takahashi) R is the covariance matrix for z, x o is an a priori estimate of the fluxes, P xo is the covariance matrix for x o Solution:

Time-dependent basis functions for 13 transport models were submitted in Level 2: CSU (Gurney) † GCTM (Baker) GISS-UCB (Fung) GISS-UCI (Prather) JMA-CDT (Maki) MATCH (Chen) † not used before, but now added back in = 13 models used MATCH (Law) MATCH (Bruhwiler) NIES (Maksyutov) NIRE (Taguchi) TM2 (LSCE) TM3 (Heimann) PCTM (Zhu)

EUROPE: Monthly Flux Deseasonalized Flux “IAV” = Deseasonalized Flux, Mean Subtracted Off IAV with error ranges 13-model mean 1  internal error1  model spread

Computation of the inter-annual variability (IAV), long-term mean, and seasonality from the monthly estimate, x mon x mon = x deseas + x seas = x mean + x IAV + x seas x deseas computed by passing a 13-point running mean over x mon x seas = x mon - x deseas (zero annual mean seasonal cycle) x mean = the mean of x deseas x IAV = x deseas - x mean (zero mean, ) Corresponding errors also computed

1  Estimation Uncertainties and Transport Errors

Chi-square Significance Test We try to reject the null hypothesis that the estimated IAV is due solely to the combined effect of both transport error and random estimation error, superimposed on zero IAV Compare the variance of x IAV with the combined variance the transport and random errors: use  2 test ( =14; 15 independent years – 1 for mean)

Probability from  2 test that null hypothesis is correct

Total Flux (Land+Ocean) June 2004 results <

Total Flux (Land+Ocean) < ~0.01 June 2005 results

Land & Ocean Fluxes < (0.37) June 2004 results

June 2005 results Land & Ocean Fluxes < <0.001< (~0.03) (~0.05)(~0.03)

(~0.02) <0.001(~0.05) <0.001 (~0.02)

June 2004 results (0.116)

<0.001 <0.01 (~0.02) (~0.11) June 2005 results

June 2004 results < <

< ~0.01 (~0.02) <0.01 < (~0.11) June 2005 results

Comparison of the Mean Fluxes “IAV” = current IAV inversion

Mean Seasonal Cycle Prior Prior, no def. G

Mean Seasonal Cycle Prior G

Seasonal Cycle Amplitude [PgC/yr]

Conclusions Inter-model differences in long-term mean fluxes are larger than in the flux inter-annual variability IAV for latitudinal land & ocean partition is robust (except for Southern S. America); continent/basin partition of IAV in north is of marginal significance; in tropics, IAV is significant for the Tropical Pacific and Australasia The IAV for the 22 regions is significant for only a few land regions and about half the ocean regions. Probable physical drivers for Tropical Asia (fires) & East Pacific (El Niño); other regions less clear… Good agreement between the three types of inversions (annual-mean, seasonal, inter-annual) in mean & seasonality