Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

NUCP 2371 Radiation Measurements II
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Детектори - II 4-ти курс УФЕЧ Спирачно лъчение (bremsstrahlung) Z 2 electrons, q=-e 0 M, q=Z 1 e 0 A charged particle of mass M and charge q=Z.
Click to edit Master title style IEEE short course Calorimetry Erika Garutti (DESY Hamburg, Germany) Michele Livan (University of.
Particle interactions and detectors
Detection of Gamma-Rays and Energetic Particles
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Particlesymbolrest energy in MeV electron e muon  neutral pion  charged pion   proton p neutron.
Calorimetry and Showers Learning Objectives Understand the basic operation of a calorimeter (Measure the energy of a particle, and in the process, destroy.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Particle Detection and Identification
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Calorimetry: Energy Measurements
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
ZEUS Calorimeter (1) At HERA high energetic electrons (e) collide with high energetic protons (P). The ZEUS detector measures the properties of the particles.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Energy Measurement (Calorimetry) Why measure energy ? I) Not always practical to measure momentum. An important contribution.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
1 Tianchi Zhao University of Washington Concept of an Active Absorber Calorimeter A Summary of LCRD 2006 Proposal A Calorimeter Based on Scintillator and.
1 Calorimetry - 2 Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007.
First energy estimates of giant air showers with help of the hybrid scheme of simulations L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow,
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Jackson Choate.  High-energy electrons and photons lose energy primarily through Bremsstrahlung and pair production, respectively.  Bremsstrahlung.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Seeing the Subatomic Stephen Miller Saturday Morning Physics October 11, 2003.
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
Interactions of Particles with Matter
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Introduction to CERN Activities
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
PHYSICS 225, 2 ND YEAR LAB NUCLEAR RADIATION DETECTORS G.F. West Thurs, Jan. 19.
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF SIMULATIONS L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Spring, 2009Phys 521A1 Neutrons Neutrons interact only strongly; they also decay, but not quickly; τ(n) ~ 886 s Cross-section depends on energy –slow neutrons.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
The Hybrid Scheme of Simulations of the Electron- photon and Electron-hadron Cascades In a Dense Medium at Ultra-high Energies L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov.
1 FK7003 Lecture 17 – Interactions in Matter ● Electromagnetic interactions in material ● Hadronic interactions in material ● Electromagnetic and hadronic.
Eduardo Nebot del Busto (1) CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2) The University of Liverpool, Department of physics, Liverpool, U. K (3) The Cockcroft Institute,
Learning Objectives Calorimetry and Showers
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
Adam Para, Fermilab, February 16, Who Cares? What is the Problem? 2 Dual Readout Total Absorption calorimeter has very good energy resolution.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
G. Sullivan – Quarknet, July 2003 Calorimeters in Particle Physics What do they do? –Measure the ENERGY of particles Electromagnetic Energy –Electrons,
Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Photon energy.
Lecture 8 – Detectors - II
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
“Performance test of a lead glass
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Calorimeters in HEP Add hermiticity CC event - calibration
Experimental Particle Physics
Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Particle Detection Particle Accelerators
Particles going through matter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part III) Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA

2 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Calorimeter Basics Full absorption detector Full absorption detector Idea is to convert incoming particle energy into detectable signals Idea is to convert incoming particle energy into detectable signals Light or electric current Light or electric current Should work for charged and neutral particles Should work for charged and neutral particles Exploits the fact that particles entering matter deposit their energy in particle cascades Exploits the fact that particles entering matter deposit their energy in particle cascades Electrons/photons in electromagnetic showers Electrons/photons in electromagnetic showers Charged pions, protons, neutrons in hadronic showers Charged pions, protons, neutrons in hadronic showers Muons do not shower at all in general Muons do not shower at all in general Principal design challenges Principal design challenges Need dense matter to absorb particles within a small detector volume Need dense matter to absorb particles within a small detector volume Lead for electrons and photons, copper or iron for hadrons Lead for electrons and photons, copper or iron for hadrons Need “light” material to collect signals with least losses Need “light” material to collect signals with least losses Scintillator plastic, nobel gases and liquids Scintillator plastic, nobel gases and liquids Solution I: combination of both features Solution I: combination of both features Crystal calorimetry, BGO Crystal calorimetry, BGO Solution II: sampling calorimetry Solution II: sampling calorimetry

3 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Calorimeter Basics (2) Sampling calorimeters Sampling calorimeters Use dense material for absorption power… Use dense material for absorption power… No direct signal No direct signal …in combination with highly efficient active material …in combination with highly efficient active material Generates signal Generates signal Consequence: only a certain fraction of the incoming energy is directly converted into a signal Consequence: only a certain fraction of the incoming energy is directly converted into a signal Typically 1-10% Typically 1-10% Signal is therefore subjected to sampling statistics Signal is therefore subjected to sampling statistics The same energy loss by a given particle type may generate different signals The same energy loss by a given particle type may generate different signals Limit of precision in measurements Limit of precision in measurements Need to understand particle response Need to understand particle response Electromagnetic and hadronic showers Electromagnetic and hadronic showers

4 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Electromagnetic Cascades in Calorimeters Electromagnetic showers Electromagnetic showers Particle cascade generated by electrons/positrons and photons in matter Particle cascade generated by electrons/positrons and photons in matter Developed by bremsstrahlung & pair- production Developed by bremsstrahlung & pair- production Compact signal expected Compact signal expected Regular shower shapes Regular shower shapes Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Strong correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower spread Strong correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower spread RD3 note 41, 28 Jan 1993 C. Amsler et al.C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Physics Letters B667, 1 (2008) and 2009 partial update for the 2010 edition

5 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Electromagnetic Cascades in Calorimeters Electromagnetic showers Electromagnetic showers Particle cascade generated by electrons/positrons and photons in matter Particle cascade generated by electrons/positrons and photons in matter Developed by bremsstrahlung & pair- production Developed by bremsstrahlung & pair- production Compact signal expected Compact signal expected Regular shower shapes Regular shower shapes Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Strong correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower spread Strong correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower spread RD3 note 41, 28 Jan 1993 C. Amsler et al.C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Physics Letters B667, 1 (2008) and 2009 partial update for the 2010 edition

6 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Electromagnetic Cascades in Calorimeters Electromagnetic showers Electromagnetic showers Particle cascade generated by electrons/positrons and photons in matter Particle cascade generated by electrons/positrons and photons in matter Developed by bremsstrahlung & pair- production Developed by bremsstrahlung & pair- production Compact signal expected Compact signal expected Regular shower shapes Regular shower shapes Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Strong correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower spread Strong correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower spread RD3 note 41, 28 Jan 1993 G.A. Akopdzhanov et al.G.A. Akopdzhanov et al. (Particle Data Group), Physics Letters B667, 1 (2008) and 2009 partial update for the 2010 edition P. Loch (Diss.), University of Hamburg 1992

7 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Hadronic Cascades in Calorimeters Hadronic signals Hadronic signals Much larger showers Much larger showers Need deeper development Need deeper development Wider shower spread Wider shower spread Large energy losses without signal generation in hadronic shower component Large energy losses without signal generation in hadronic shower component Binding energy losses Binding energy losses Escaping energy/slow particles (neutrinos/neutrons) Escaping energy/slow particles (neutrinos/neutrons) Signal depends on size of electromagnetic component Signal depends on size of electromagnetic component Energy invested in neutral pions lost for further hadronic shower development Energy invested in neutral pions lost for further hadronic shower development Fluctuating significantly shower-by- shower Fluctuating significantly shower-by- shower Weakly depending on incoming hadron energy Weakly depending on incoming hadron energy Consequence: non-compensation Consequence: non-compensation Hadrons generate less signal than electrons depositing the same energy Hadrons generate less signal than electrons depositing the same energy 30 GeV electrons 30 GeV pions P. Loch (Diss.), University of Hamburg 1992

8 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Shower Features Summary Electromagnetic Electromagnetic Compact Compact Growths in depth ~log(E) Growths in depth ~log(E) Longitudinal extension scale is radiation length X 0 Longitudinal extension scale is radiation length X 0 Distance in matter in which ~50% of electron energy is radiated off Distance in matter in which ~50% of electron energy is radiated off Photons 9/7 X 0 Photons 9/7 X 0 Strong correlation between lateral and longitudinal shower development Strong correlation between lateral and longitudinal shower development Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Small shower-to-shower fluctuations Very regular development Very regular development Can be simulated with high precision Can be simulated with high precision 1% or better, depending on features 1% or better, depending on features Hadronic Hadronic Scattered, significantly bigger Scattered, significantly bigger Growths in depth ~log(E) Growths in depth ~log(E) Longitudinal extension scale is interaction length λ >> X 0 Longitudinal extension scale is interaction length λ >> X 0 Average distance between two inelastic interactions in matter Average distance between two inelastic interactions in matter Varies significantly for pions, protons, neutrons Varies significantly for pions, protons, neutrons Weak correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower development Weak correlation between longitudinal and lateral shower development Large shower-to-shower fluctuations Large shower-to-shower fluctuations Very irregular development Very irregular development Can be simulated with reasonable precision Can be simulated with reasonable precision ~2-5% depending on feature ~2-5% depending on feature

9 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Electromagnetic Signals Signal features in sampling calorimeters Signal features in sampling calorimeters Collected from ionizations in active material Collected from ionizations in active material Not all energy deposit converted to signal Not all energy deposit converted to signal Proportional to incoming electron/photon Proportional to incoming electron/photon C.f. Rossi’s shower model, Approximation B C.f. Rossi’s shower model, Approximation B Only charged tracks contribute to signal Only pair-production for photons Energy loss is constant Signal proportional to integrated shower particle path Signal proportional to integrated shower particle path Stochastical fluctuations Stochastical fluctuations Sampling character Sampling character Sampling fraction Sampling fraction Describes average fraction of deposited energy generating the signal Describes average fraction of deposited energy generating the signal

10 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Signal Formation: Sampling Fraction Characterizes sampling calorimeters Characterizes sampling calorimeters Ratio of energy deposited in active material and total energy deposit Ratio of energy deposited in active material and total energy deposit Assumes constant energy loss per unit depth in material Assumes constant energy loss per unit depth in material Ionization only Ionization only Can be adjusted when designing the calorimeter Can be adjusted when designing the calorimeter Material choices Material choices Readout geometry Readout geometry Multiple scattering Multiple scattering Changes sampling fraction Changes sampling fraction Effective extension of particle path in matter Effective extension of particle path in matter Different for absorber and active material Different for absorber and active material Showering Showering Cannot be included in sampling fraction analytically Cannot be included in sampling fraction analytically Need measurements and/or simulations Need measurements and/or simulations

11 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Signal Formation: Sampling Fraction Characterizes sampling calorimeters Characterizes sampling calorimeters Ratio of energy deposited in active material and total energy deposit Ratio of energy deposited in active material and total energy deposit Assumes constant energy loss per unit depth in material Assumes constant energy loss per unit depth in material Ionization only Ionization only Can be adjusted when designing the calorimeter Can be adjusted when designing the calorimeter Material choices Material choices Readout geometry Readout geometry Multiple scattering Multiple scattering Changes sampling fraction Changes sampling fraction Effective extension of particle path in matter Effective extension of particle path in matter Different for absorber and active material Different for absorber and active material Showering Showering Cannot be included in sampling fraction analytically Cannot be included in sampling fraction analytically Need measurements and/or simulations Need measurements and/or simulations C. Amsler et al.C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Physics Letters B667, 1 (2008) and 2009 partial update for the 2010 edition

12 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Signal Formation: Sampling Fraction Characterizes sampling calorimeters Characterizes sampling calorimeters Ratio of energy deposited in active material and total energy deposit Ratio of energy deposited in active material and total energy deposit Assumes constant energy loss per unit depth in material Assumes constant energy loss per unit depth in material Ionization only Ionization only Can be adjusted when designing the calorimeter Can be adjusted when designing the calorimeter Material choices Material choices Readout geometry Readout geometry Multiple scattering Multiple scattering Changes sampling fraction Changes sampling fraction Effective extension of particle path in matter Effective extension of particle path in matter Different for absorber and active material Different for absorber and active material Showering Showering Cannot be included in sampling fraction analytically Cannot be included in sampling fraction analytically Need measurements and/or simulations Need measurements and/or simulations Showering changes the electron sampling fraction mostly due to the strong dependence of photon capture (photo- effect) on the material (cross-section ~ Z 5 ) leading to a non-proportional absorption of energy carried by soft photons deeper in the shower! P. Loch (Diss.), University of Hamburg GeV 30 GeV 80 GeV Electrons

13 P. Loch U of Arizona February 09, 2010 Signal Extraction Example: charge collection in noble liquids Example: charge collection in noble liquids Charged particles ionizing active medium when traversing it Charged particles ionizing active medium when traversing it Fast passage compared to electron drift velocity in medium Fast passage compared to electron drift velocity in medium Electrons from these ionizations are collected in external electric field Electrons from these ionizations are collected in external electric field Similar to collection of 1-dim “line of charges” with constant charge density Similar to collection of 1-dim “line of charges” with constant charge density Resulting (electron) current is base of signal Resulting (electron) current is base of signal Positive ions much slower Positive ions much slower Can collect charges or measure current Can collect charges or measure current Characteristic features Characteristic features Collected charge and current are proportional to energy deposited in active medium Collected charge and current are proportional to energy deposited in active medium Drift time for electrons in active medium Drift time for electrons in active medium Determines charge collection time Determines charge collection time Can be adjusted to optimize calorimeter performance Can be adjusted to optimize calorimeter performance