Education in Michigan: Present & Future Direction Sharif Shakrani Professor of Measurement & Quantitative Methods, and Co-Director of The Education Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
AT-RISK YOUTH: A DATA PORTRAIT Washtenaw County -- March 2014.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Reauthorizing Perkins: Rigorous Academics and Career Pathways NTPN Conference October 1, 2005.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA Off-the-Record Meeting Thursday, September 26th, 2014.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Good things that are happening for kids. Texas Students Rank #1, #2, & #3 in the nation! When comparing students by subgroups, Texas 4 th and 8 th graders.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
Dalton Middle School Data Review
2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.
Michigan School Report Card Update

Presentation transcript:

Education in Michigan: Present & Future Direction Sharif Shakrani Professor of Measurement & Quantitative Methods, and Co-Director of The Education Policy Center at MSU Education Policy Fellowship Program January 12, 2009

High Schools Accountability Models Expand NCLB accountability provisions to grades 9, 10 and 11; Accountability for graduation rates. Democrats, Republicans and Business Leaders agree that: “The biggest education issue confronting the United States over the next 10 years is the goal of getting all high school graduates ready for college and the changing workplace.”

U.S. Department of Education Proposals for Reauthorization of NCLB (2008 modified sections) a.Improve Graduation Rates b.Ensure That Students Graduate Ready to Succeed c.Promote Rigor in High School Coursework d.Increase Funding for High Schools That Serve Low-Income Students e.Provide Additional Staffing Freedom at the Most Troubled Schools f.Augment Charter School Options g.Enhanced Supplemental Educational Services (SES) h.Provide Equitable Services to Private School Students and Teachers

Title I, Part A – Disadvantaged Children Meet High Academic Standards: Graduation Promise Fund Establishes, identifies and provides services to middle school students who are most at risk of dropping out Provides counseling services to students at risk of dropping out

Title I, Part A – Disadvantaged Children Meet High Academic Standards: College and Work-Ready Standards and Assessments Provides incentives to states to review, revise standards aligned with skills and knowledge necessary for success in college and the workforce States would align assessments to standards, ensure that they measure problem-solving and application of knowledge, and meet high technical quality standards

High School Averaged Freshman Graduation Rates* YEAR ’01-02’03-04’04-05’05-06 Michigan Ohio Illinois Indiana U.S.A * The rate is the number of graduates divided by the count of freshman 4 years earlier. The averaged freshman enrollment count is the sum of the number of 8 th graders 5 years earlier, 9 th graders 4 years earlier, and the number of 10 th graders 3 years earlier divided by three. SOURCE: The Condition of Education 2006, U.S. Department of Education, NCES , pp

Graduation Rates for the Metro Detroit Area, Michigan, and the Nation, Metro Detroit Area* MichiganNation All Students72%77%74% Male Female White Black Hispanic**5855 Male Breakdown: White Black Hispanic**5248 Female Breakdown: White8786 Black Hispanic**6359 Population Configuration for Michigan & Nation (in Percent) White Black Hispanic Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (2006) The Center for Education Performance and Information (CEPI), Michigan State Government (2007) *Metro Detroit Area: Oakland, Wayne, & Macomb counties **Insufficient number to make a valid estimate. Sharif Shakrani MSU,

Key Proficiency %: Percentage of students who met or exceeded the proficiency standard Eco Dis: Economically Disadvantaged SD: Students with Disabilities ELL: English Language Learners

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 5 th Grade English Language Arts (Reading and Writing) MEAP Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 5 th Grade Mathematics MEAP Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 5 th Grade Science MEAP Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 8 th Grade English Language Arts (Reading and Writing) MEAP Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 8 th Grade Mathematics MEAP Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 8 th Grade Science MEAP Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

NAEP 2005 – 2007 Free & Reduce-Price School Lunch Program Mathematics – Grade 8 AdvancedProficientBasicBelow Basic Eligible Not Eligible Eligible Not Eligible Eligible Not Eligible Eligible Not Eligible Michigan Illinois Indiana Ohio Nation Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 11 th Grade English Language Arts (Reading and Writing) MME Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 11 th Grade Mathematics MME Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

Achievement of Michigan Students on Core Subject Areas 11 th Grade Science MME Results School Year Proficiency % % 100YesNo% 100YesNo Total Male Female White Black Hispanic Asian Eco Dis: No Yes SD: No Yes ELL: No Yes Sharif Shakrani, MSU

1.Improve the English language skills (reading and writing) of students in the fourth grade. “Children learn how to read by the fourth grade and read to learn beyond that level.” The Baltimore Sun, Improve the mathematical skills of middle school students “Presently, fewer than two in ten eighth graders are on target to be ready for college-level work by the time they graduate from high school.” ACT, The Forgotten Middle, Improve the mathematics and science course-taking pattern at the high school level for all students. “The biggest education issue confronting the United States over the next 10 years is the goal of getting all high school graduates ready for college and the changing workplace.” U.S. Congressional Report on Education, 2007 Key Priorities in Educational Achievement in Michigan