MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AFSWG Mtg 15 Aug 2003 Elwyn Baynham RAL Safety Overview Work done by RAL Group Contributors Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov.
Advertisements

Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP
MICE OsC – 22 nd June 2010 Liquid-hydrogen system and absorber M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold S Ishimoto W Lau I Mullacrane P Warburton.
1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.
MICE Superconducting Solenoids: Status and Update RAL: T W Bradshaw M Courthold J Rochford M Hills D Baynham Oxford: J Cobb W Lau S Yang MICE.
Plans for 201-MHz Cavities Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory November 18, 2010.
Hydrogen Hazard Summary and Preliminary FMECA and HAZOP Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
1 Status of Hydrogen System Development MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tom Bradshaw, Elwyn Baynham, Mike Courthold,
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Thoughts on Incorporating HPRF in a Linear Cooling Channel Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory NuFact09—IIT.
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
1 MICE at RAL MICE Collaboration RAL, 2 November 2003 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering.
MICE Hazard Overview and Analysis Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov.
MICE Safety Review Process and Schedule Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Columbia Meeting June 2003.
Paul drumm; 1 st December 2004; PM&TB Report 1 Project Management & Technical Board Reports.
MICE RF Module Safety Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting February 12, 2005.
CM26 – 26 th March 2010 Step IV: Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
paul drumm; 3rd December 2004; AFC MM 1 Cost & Schedule Review I Terms of reference: –To review the Cost and schedule of the MICE Muon beam –To review.
1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
Absorber/vacuum windows and absorber assembly 1.Window Requirements 2.MICE experimental constraints 3.Welded vs. non-welded windows 4.Installation 5.Testing.
Flammable Gas Electrical Safety Concerns for detectors: Power per channel Feedthroughs Seals.
MTA Cryostat & cooling loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group Preparation of the Mucool/MICE.
Safety Review: RF Issues Derun Li Absorber Safety Review December 9-10, 2003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
Μ-beam Absorber 1Absorber 2Absorber 3RF 1RF 2 Vacuum LH2 Warm window Windows in MICE: Option 1 (as currently designed) ISIS Safety officer’s comment: If.
11/26/2002Edgar L Black IIT MICE Video Conference November 27, 2002 Summary of safety implementation for proposal.
Talk outline 1 st talk: –Magnetic forces –Quench in the absorber cryostat 2 nd talk: –Shielding of magnetic fringe fields.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
A presentation at the MICE Video Conference on Wednesday the 5 th of May 2004 Response to the Safety review comments by Wing Lau -- Oxford.
March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.
Hydrogen Delivery System – R&D Activities T W Bradshaw M Courthold M Hills J Rochford Daresbury Controls Group etc…
Hydrogen system status Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
Absorber Design Details Mary Anne Cummings MICE MEETING Columbia June 13, 2003.
Mucool Test Area Cryostat & cooling-loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group MuCool / MICE.
MICE Hydrogen System MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN, 29 March-2 April 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,
MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.
Mechanical Safety Systems and DSEAR Compliance
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House.
Patrick Thornton, SNS/FPE June 9, 2008
Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL Safety considerations at RAL July 9, RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting 1.
MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Hardware Status o Introduction o Preliminary list o Plan for action o Summary Jean-Sebastien.
MICE Hydrogen Safety Functions IEC61508 Compliance & Emergency Procedures MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
1 MICE Mtg Oct 2002 Elwyn Baynham RAL Implementation of MICE at RAL Work done in Engineering and ISIS Departments Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Contributors.
The MICE Hydrogen System Safety Review Introduction Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford.
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Collaboration Meeting RAL October 2004.
Issues with variable thickness absorbers Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Video Conference, 22 Jan
MCTF 8/17/06 A. Bross MTA Activities and Plans MCTF August 17, 2006 A. Bross.
CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
LH2 Safety Issues for MICE 1.O2/LH2 separation 2.No Ignition sources near LH2 3.Adequate ventilation 4.Affects: Windows: absorbers and vacuum Primary and.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Apr MUTAC 2005 LH2 Absorber Window R & D Program Mary Anne Cummings MUTAC Review LBL April 26, 2005.
Johan Bremer, 22th-26th September 2008 Cryogenics Operations 2008, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1 CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN Safety aspects.
MICE LH2 Absorber Safety Mary Anne Cummings Edgar Black (IIT) Abingdon, UK Oct. 30, 2003.
MICE Detector Integration A. Bross Mice Video Meeting August 27, 2003.
1 MICE absorbers work package MPB – 27/10/15 Mike Courthold Mark Tucker Phil Warburton Steve Watson.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
NPDG Liquid Hydrogen Target: Design and Safety Features
MICE Safety Review Meeting 4th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab
Status of Hydrogen System Development
Presentation transcript:

MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference

The Review Last week (Dec 9-10) we had our first formal review of the safety issues involved in the MICE experiment at LBL The Review Committee: D. Allspach (FNAL) G. Benincasa (CERN) M. Seely (Jlab) L. Starritt (NASA/WSTF) J. Weisend (SLAC) Chair J. Wells (RAL) MICE AFC Safety Issues: Hydrogen: Flammability, detonation, low temperature, O 2 cryopumping, large liquid-gas expansion ratio RF cavities: Dark currents, Be windows Magnets: Large fringe fields, quenching Topics: Magnets M. Green Detectors A. Bross LH2 Absorber M. A. Cummings Magnetic forces J. Rochford LH2 System E. Baynham R & D, testing, certification W. Lau RF System D. Li Hazard Summary E. Baynham

The LH 2 Issues Compact structure of the cooling channel means the absorber and LH 2 system have to be designed with all other components and safety hazards in mind For safe operation, have designed with the redundant requirements: 1)LH 2 and O 2 separation 2)The avoidance of any ignition sources in contact with hydrogen. The four key features of the design with respect to safety are: 1)Window thicknesses specified based on safety factors of 4.0 for the absorber and vacuum windows at maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP). Vacuum windows required to withstand 25 psi outside pressure without buckling. 2)Two layers of shielding between the outside atmosphere and the LH 2 ; the outer surface at room temperature to minimize the freezing of O 2 on the absorber- system windows. 3)Separate vacuum volumes provided for the RF cavities, magnets, and LH 2 absorbers. 4)Hydrogen evacuation systems using valved vents into external buffer tanks.

Accommodating LH 2 1.Sufficient clearance for LH 2 venting into evacuation tanks (21 liters liquid  liters at STP) 2.RF: Window provides spark barrier; vacuum between RF and LH 2 vacuum vessel 3.LH 2 -Air flammability limits: 4-75% ; detonability limits 18-59%  conventional seals and vacuum vessels can provide sufficient barriers between them. 4.All safety interlocks mechanical – based on expeditious venting of LH 2 into evacuation tank RAL safe LH 2 operation

Absorber coil system Ambient temperature on vacuum shields and outer channel wall Quench force on windows is small Static forces are decoupled from the LH 2 absorber Heat from quench and static sources are insufficient to cause boil-off Clearance for possible LH 2 rupture into vacuum volume sufficient to prevent cascading window rupture Absorber Vacuum Volume: Magnet bore Large end plate Absorber Window: Vacuum Window: He inlet: Outer wall

LH 2 System Safety and design considerations: Hydride bed storage option Safety containment/Hydrogen Zones Pipework and implementation Interlocks: evacuation system and burst disks Heat and temperature Ventilated Hood Absorber vacuum Lab Outside

Experiment certification Window certifications Absorber pre-assembly and testing Absorber/coil assembly, testing and certification Assembly into MICE cooling channel and certification Hydrogen fill LH2 absorber Coil assembly Transverse absorber/coil removal from channel Metal hydride beds with buffer tanks

Off-normal conditions 1)RF cavity vacuum or detector vacuum air leak 2)Absorber vacuum window leak 3)Absorber leak 4)Hydrogen freezing 5)Large heat leak to the absorber 6)Loss of refrigeration or loss of electrical power 7)Quench of the focusing solenoid 8)Rupture of the hydrogen window 9)Rupture of both hydrogen and safety windows Exception handling for LH 2 : Expeditious H 2 evacuation (relief valves, pumping) MICE shut-down Hydride bed temperature regulation Magnets: passive shielding; restricted access; forces analysized and structurally accommodated RF: shielding of beamline, cryo equipment and detector electronics; water valve interlock; restricted access Safety design based on recovery from 2 independent system failures Off-normal conditions, LH 2 :

Review Outcome Unqualified success: Positive first review: no show-stoppers or omissions Excellent advice and feedback Detailed suggestions for development in three areas: Gas-handling and venting R & D of the metal hydride system Windows development (seals, monitoring) Good discussion on interlocks and monitoring Instructive discussion of “instrinsically safe” and proper response thresholds for off-normal conditions Can now proceed with the technical design