Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ground Motion Measurements at ESA M. Albrecht (Notre Dame) F. Gournaris (UCL)
Advertisements

LCABD WP 4.2 Review, 24 th September Mark Slater Motivation Final Results from 2006 Upgrades for 2007 Conclusions The Collaboration LCABD WP 4.2.
1/8 T. Kume, Y. Honda, and T. Tauchi High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) T. Suehara, H. Yoda, M. Oroku, T. Yamanaka and Y. Kamiya The univ.
MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
Wed 15 Jul 2009 ATF2 weekly meeting Oxford MONALISA 1 MONALISA at ATF2 First installation report 15 July 09.
ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham*, Edward Botcherby*, Paul Coe*, Grzegorz Grzelak*, Ankush Mitra*, Johannes Prenting.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.
StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded.
IPBPM piezo-mover system and plans for in situ monitoring of calibration and stability Current status and plan for ATF2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team with 3D views and data from Hubert Gerwig, Richard Rosing and Juha Kemppinen Pre-alignment.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
1 ATF2 - IP Chamber Design and manufacturing of Chamber with high precision piezo actuators for high resolution BPMs Status / progress report – 26 June.
Status on MONALISA presented by D. Urner 6 th stabilization day 9. June 09.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
ATF2 ILC Final Focus Test Beam Line at KEK-ATF References : ATF2 Proposal, KEK Report ATF2 Proposal Vol.2, KEK Report ホームページ:
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
CLIC MDI stabilization update A.Jeremie G.Balik, B.Bolzon, L.Brunetti, G.Deleglise A.Badel, B.Caron, R.Lebreton, J.Lottin Together with colleagues from.
New IP chamber for ATF2 goal 2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire Université Paris 11, Orsay, France ATF2 Technical Review KEK, 3-4.
MONALISA an Update David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters First installations fall 2006 First results spring A B.
BPM support and beam pipe length FD support status A.Jeremie.
MONALISA David Urner Oxford University. Straightness Monitor Build from Distance Metres Decision taken this workshop to move from existing extraction.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Issues on Closed Orbit Feedback for NSLSII NSLS-II Stability Workshop April 18-20, 2007 Li-Hua Yu.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.
July 15, 2009 Interferometer Installation Report Mike Hildreth, Kurt Jung, Mickey McDonald Université de Notre Dame du Lac.
Main beam Quad Stabilisation: Status of the stabilisation test program at CERN CLIC-stabilization day S. Janssens Contribution to slides by:
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
ATF2 Report ALCW Kiyoshi KUBO, for ATF2 Collaboration.
Current Status of LASER FRAME for KEK-Nano BPM (Tentative results of resolution test) Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
ATF2 weekly meeting 4 July 2007 MONALISA: Attachment of Vacuum Vessels for ATF2 David Urner.
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
Wed 24 Jun 2009ATF2 weekly meeting Oxford MONALISA 1 MONALISA Double Bellow System Forces test results Oxford: June 2009.
10-meter Interferometer Results M. Woods (special thanks to Steve Myers and Tim Slaton) Jan. 31, 2000 Commissioning Setup System Noise Monte Carlo simulation.
May 31, 2005Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF (M. Ross) Plans for nanometer cavity BPM studies Energy Spectrometer evaluation (Hildreth) Integration.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beam Stability Overview NSLS-II CFAC Meeting May 8, 2007 S. Krinsky.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
Alignment and stability session
David Urner Oxford University/JAI
Summary FD Support System
LCABD WP 4.2 – Spectrometer and BPM Studies
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Member of ATF2 Magnet Team
Topics on Vibration Issues
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
IP configuration session
Atomic Force Microscope
Presentation transcript:

Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision

Goal: Development of active feedback systems to monitor and stabilize for example final focus quadrupoles or the beam position monitors in the energy chicane. –Develop laser interferometric methods to monitor relative position of two objects at Nanometer scale resolution. For separations of order 10m. Frequency range 100Hz – 0.01 Hz –Develop and implement algorithms for active stabilization. KEK: Integrated spectrum of vertical motion

Measurement of Relative Motion Typical situation: –Need straightness monitor to measure relative motion. (Leave for development later). –Need distance meter to project out. (Develop first). Quadrupole ~10m Reference Structure Reference Structure Vertical & angular position measurement of ref. structure Straightness monitor to measure relative vertical movement between ref. structures

A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters at ATF (KEK) Accuracy few tens of nanometer for vertical displacement between KEK and SLAC BPM. KEK BPM SLAC BPM Floor node

A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters Project 6-D coordinates from one BPM via middle triangle to the other BPM. KEK BPM SLAC BPM Floor node

A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters KEK BPM SLAC BPM Floor node Red lines: Michelson interferometer displacement meter nm resolution. Multilateration requires absolute distance meter with  m resolution: FSI. Both systems with same setup!

Spider web Design with Opto- Geometrical Simulation: Simulgeo Resolution of distancemeter: 1nm Mount precision of distancemeter: 1nm Angle precision of distancemeter holder: 10  rad. SLAC BPM: reference KEK BPM variable (6D): Position: x:32 y:19 z:2 nm Angle: x:0.01 y:0.01 z:0.1  rad ~1  m absolute distance resolution needed to determine constants required to solve geometry.

Vacuum system considerations Develop small force vacuum mount using double bellow system. Allows small motion (~0.5 mm) of BPM- system Test stand to measure remaining force on BPM frame. Long vacuum tube for interferometer Attached to BPM. Holds retro reflector. Firm connection

Stabilization Actively stabilize setup using input from interferometers: –Both Nano-BPM setups are mounted on actuators. –Use movers on SLAC setup for coarse angle adjustment. –Use piezo movers on KEK setup for small adjustments. We measure the relative motion of the two reference frames of the SLAC and KEK BPM’s –Closed loop feedback system relates the KEK reference bar to the KEK nano-BPM’s. –Closed loop feedback system relates the SLAC carbon fibre frame to the SLAC nano-BPM’s. –Overall feedback loop has to integrate 3 measurements!

Snowmass Work out what upstream energy chicane demands. List of systems which would benefit from accurate position knowledge. Final focus quadrupole vibrations