Setting the stage for how we got here and why we are here… SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND FOR SOIL MONITORING ON NATIONAL FORESTS AND RANGELANDS Setting the stage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definition of Rangelands and Forests Paul Geissler Alison Hill.
Advertisements

Develop and Validate Minimum Core Criteria and Competencies for AgrAbility Program Staff Bill Field, Ed.D., Professor National AgrAbility Project Director.
Other support information Following NIH guidelines.
USDA FOREST SERVICE Technology & Development Program National Soil Quality Monitoring Field Guide.
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Charley Peterson Resource Monitoring and Assessment Program Pacific Northwest Station, Portland, Oregon Progress on achieving consistency and compatibility.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
F I A New Orleans, Louisiana 2013 The Nation’s Forest Census A Vision for FIA Over the Next Five Years Greg Reams FIA Program Leader USDA Forest Service.
Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity Jan W. Van Wagtendonk, Ralph R. Root and Carl H. Key Presenter Alpana Khairom.
Carbon Information Needed to Support Forest Management Bob Davis, Director Of Planning, Watershed And Air, USDA Forest Service 0.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
AUDIT OF FOREST MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE FOREST INVENTORY, SETTING FOREST AREA, MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE, FOREST USE PERMIT AND USE OF FOREST.
One Size Does Not Fit All BUT … Inventory Needs, Purposes and Applications of the National Forests FIA User Group Meeting March 7, 2012 Baltimore, MD.
Harvesting Practices and Mountain Goat Habitat in the Babine Watershed A Background Review Prepared for:By: Megan D’Arcy, R.P.Bio.
Predicting Nitrogen Fertilizer Response in Douglas-fir Plantations Kim Littke Rob Harrison.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Grantseeking Basics Welcome to the Foundation Center’s.
Streamside Grazing in Indiana. Indiana Streams: Are a precious natural resource Provide clean water for a variety of human uses as well as habitat for.
Program Expansions A Brief History Early 20 th Century – Timberland End of 20 th Century – Forestland In the 21 st Century – –Today – Land Use Change –Tomorrow.
Iron County Grant Writing Workshop August 20, 2003 By: Will Andresen Iron County UW-Extension.
Embracing Tree Health Monitoring. TREE HEALTH MONITORING PROJECT PARTNERS.
F I A San Antonio, Texas 2015 The Nation’s Forest Census FIA Leadership Change, the Farm Bill & Strategic Plan Greg Reams FIA National Program Leader USDA.
Research Data Management Philip Tarrant Global Institute of Sustainability.
Software Engineering Experimentation Software Engineering Specific Issues (Mostly CS as well) Jeff Offutt
Meet The U.S. Forest Service “Caring for the Land and Serving People”
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Police Sector Council Leadership Workshop February 1-3, 2011 Executive Selection Shelagh Morris Director – Corporate Services Guelph Police Service 1.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
WELCOME THE 12 TH ANNUAL MARCES/MSDE CONFERENCE: Value Added Modeling and Growth Modeling with Particular Application to Teacher and School Effectiveness.
1 Manufacturing Processes and Validation for Next Generation Implants.
RESULTS Spacing Reporting December Background Spacing activity is conducted on young stands soon after free growing on pre-existing silviculture.
Chip Scott. Today’s Topics NIMAC Background NIMAC Background States States National Forest System National Forest System International International Toolkit.
Measuring Forest Sustainability: How Forest Harvesting Affects Key Indicators of Soil Quality Alicia L. Kiyvyra FS 533.
Specialty Crop Block Grant Program –Farm Bill CFDA –
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
GEO ADC meeting, Sep 22-23, 2008 Slide # 1 AG AG Forest Mapping and Change Monitoring LoycheWilkie,Mette (FAO) Adam Gerrand (FAO) Ivan Petiteville,
Board of Directors & Technical Committee Thursday, March 29, 2012 Data Management (Contract) Field Data Collection & Database Development Solution Presented.
AIR QUALITY MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Dusanka Stanojevic Directorate for.
PNW/Tongass NF Collaboration A short discussion of the TLMP follow-on studies that end this year A short discussion of the TLMP follow-on studies that.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
I.Information Building & Retrieval Learning Objectives: the process of Information building the responsibilities and interaction of each data managing.
2012 Spring Business Meeting Seattle, Washington.
Theatre professions Part 1
Shelley Row, P.E. Director, Office of Transportation Operations FHWA National Meeting May 8, 2000 Washington, D.C.
U.S. Forest Inventory and Analysis Program On the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Forest Inventory FIA Progress Update.
The Performance Management And Appraisal System (PMAS) Principal Performance Appraisal.
USEPA REGION 4 Quality Management Plan ( For training purposes only)
Fuel Treatment Making a Difference Steve Harbert Tim Rich Burn Boss Refresher February Burn Boss Refresher 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Model Certification Jodi Staebell Operational Director, Ecosystem Restoration Planning Center of Expertise.
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
ICP Forests Progress Report ICP Forests Progress since 28th session of WGE Revision of the monitoring system Data quality assurance Database management.
Erv Gasser Natural Resource Specialist nps Baer Field Manager National Interagency BAER Team Leader - North team National Park Service, Seattle, Wa BAER.
Sep 13, 2006 Scientific Computing 1 Managing Scientific Computing Projects Erik Deumens QTP and HPC Center.
NAFORMA Acchievements, key findings,recommendations and the way forward Nurdin Chamuya (Head FRMA, TFS) and Soren Dalsgaard (CTA NAFORMA FAO), Meeting.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Temperate Network Fred Dieffenbach.
At-Large Review Briefing 1 May | 2 Roles and Responsibilities SIC Oversight Accept Report* Approve Plans* Staff Prepare RFP Run Examiner Selection.
(2) Scientific processes. The student uses scientific methods during field and laboratory investigations. The student is expected to: (A) plan and implement.
Understanding Site-Specific Factors Affecting the Nutrient Demands and Response to Fertilizer by Douglas-fir Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2010.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
Using the Tool for schools to quality assure an assessment instrument.
Soil Quality Standards Randy L. Davis National Soils Program Leader USDA Forest Service March 30, 2006.
Soil Management Randy L. Davis National Soils Program Leader USDA Forest Service March 30, 2006.
1 Manufacturing Processes and Validation for Next Generation Implants.
1 Gouritz WMA Study: Wetlands Mark Rountree Fluvius Environmental Consulting
Software Engineering Experimentation
The Scientific Method.
Responsibilities & Tasks Week 2
Graphing in Science.
Presentation transcript:

Setting the stage for how we got here and why we are here… SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND FOR SOIL MONITORING ON NATIONAL FORESTS AND RANGELANDS Setting the stage for how we got here and why we are here… Sharon DeHart Former R1 Soils Program Manager Current Assistant Director Forest Service Job Corps

Timeline  1991 – Dan Neary

Timeline  1994 – Carl Trettin

Timeline  1995 – Marty Jurgensen

Dakota Prairie Grasslands  1999 – Arrived at the Dakota Prairie Grasslands No completed mapping No completed mapping No monitoring program No monitoring program Writing of Grasslands Management Plan Writing of Grasslands Management Plan

Help Is On The Way  Iron Springs  2001 Fire  Magpie Creek  Space Aliens

Region 1 Soil Program Manager  In 2001 there are no significant lawsuits pending.  Work on monitoring in Region 1

National Soil Scientist Meeting 2001  Randy runs off to the Hill  Meredith Webster: Soils/BAER  Washington, DC breaks the heat record

Lawsuits  The public begins suing the FS over soil productivity issues because we cannot document: that 15% areal extent is really where productivity declines that 15% areal extent is really where productivity declines that a 15% increase in bulk density is where tree growth is limited that a 15% increase in bulk density is where tree growth is limited that we have been to each unit that we have been to each unit that out sampling protocol is correct that out sampling protocol is correct that our sampling protocol is statistically valid that our sampling protocol is statistically valid blanket standards for disparate soil conditions blanket standards for disparate soil conditions

 Conducted a Region 1-wide study on the best monitoring methods to use for post- fire salvage logging.  Those monitoring methods were melded with the work Steve Howes had started in Region 6.  Jim Keys and Randy Davis found funds to develop a protocol so that soils would be recognized as a resource.

2005  R1 Regional Forester Gail Kimbell requested assistance from R & D, Universities, BC Ministry of Forests, and NFS to develop a plan to help reduce the number of lawsuits dealing with soils issues.  We included Timber and Range, Forest Engineers, Intermountain Forest Tree Nutrition Cooperative, R4, R6, R8, FIA

2006  Developed a easy, cost-effective, statistically defensible, protocol that ties into Region 6 and BC Ministry of Forests assessments  Made sure we were developing and maintaining a common language

2007   Work began on a Field Guide to Soil Disturbance – From a proposal by Steve Howes and Jeff TenPas Carolyn Napper at San Dimas lead the effort to go to every Region in the FS to get pictures of soil disturbance   Steve Howes, Dick Miller, et al. working on a Risk Rating System   Steve Howes submitted a proposal to have San Dimas develop a standardized curriculum   Tom Rice, Emmanuel Hudson/Darrius Truss (R8) and Randy Davis – working on a standardized database for soil monitoring data   R & D continuing work on validation

2008  Needed to ensure that we have the state-of-the- knowledge on soil monitoring, soil productivity, and soil quality

What did the pebble say to the big rock? Someday do you think I’ll be a little boulder?