M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Advertisements

PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
1 Angular Momentum from diffuser Beam picks up kinetic angular momentum (L kin ) when it sits in a field –Canonical angular momentum (L can ) is conserved.
FODO-based Quadrupole Cooling Channel M. Berz, D. Errede, C. Johnstone, K. Makino, Dave Neuffer, Andy Van Ginneken.
MICE analysis meeting - (01/06/2006) 1 few words on emittance growth in step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
M.apollonioMICE Analysis meeting 23/1/20071 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford Radius of diffuser and sizes for PID.
1 Emittance Calculation Progress and Plans Chris Rogers MICE CM 24 September 2005.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
MICE analysis meeting - (4/5/2006) 1 some reflections on scraping, PID sizes and Transmittance M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
18 June 2004AFC meeting1 MICE  functions and so on Work in progress…. Observation by Ulisse Bravar at CERN meeting that beam not matched in baseline (Proposal.
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
A Few Words on Emittance Chris Rogers MICE vc 27/05/05.
MICE analysis meeting - (21/09/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
1 Statistics Toy Monte Carlo David Forrest University of Glasgow.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
MICE CM - Fermilab, Chicago - (11/06/2006) 1 A (short) history of MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Simulated real beam into simulated MICE1 Mark Rayner CM26.
MICE Beam Line Design Oct 24 th 2005 Dean Adams, Kevin Tilley Based on TURTLE element definitions by K Walaron, T Roberts and K Tilley.
30 June 2004MICE VC1 MICE  functions Since last VC report: –New Mike Green configurations for decreased spacing between focus and matching coils of 400mm,
M.apollonioImperial College - London1 M. Apollonio University of Oxford the MICE diffuser: issues and operation MICE beamline review Nov. 16 th 2007 Imperial.
1 Emittance Calculation Progress and Plans Chris Rogers Analysis PC 18 August 2005.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
04/01/2006MICE Analysis Meeting1 MICE phase III M. Apollonio, J. Cobb (Univ. of Oxford)
Helical Cooling Channel Simulation with ICOOL and G4BL K. Yonehara Muon collider meeting, Miami Dec. 13, 2004 Slide 1.
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
1 Tracker Window & Diffuser Radius vs Scraping Aperture Chris Rogers Analysis PC 6th April 06.
M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
Quadrupole Transverse Beam Optics Chris Rogers 2 June 05.
MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)1 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford sizes for PID & shields.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.
1 Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow May 5 th 2009.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
PID Detector Requirements for Emittance Measurement Chris Rogers, MICE PID Review, Thursday Oct 12.
30 June 2004MICE VC Farley’s paper on absorbers Very rough notes, rather late at night.... not as pedagogic as I would wish. ‘Standard’ treatment of dE/dX.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Simulating the RFOFO Ring with Geant Amit Klier University of California, Riverside Muon Collaboration Meeting Riverside, January 2004.
Re-tuning MICE June 1 st 2010 Tim Carlisle. Intro At the moment MICE coil currents optimized for: central Pz = 0 RF No LH2 want to rematch M1 & M2 in.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Lecture 3 Transverse Optics II
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
MICE S TEP IV P HYSICS ‘D ELIVERABLES ’ V. Blackmore MAP 2014 Spring Meeting 30 th May, /15 AKA “What will we learn from Step IV?”
Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.
Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations
Beam-Line Analysis m. apollonio 7/7/2010 CM27 - RAL 1.
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
Design of the MANX experiment
Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI
Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)2 amplitude: is a single particle concept  Consider first a 2D case  field strength (1) (3) (2) c=cos(  )

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)3 x x’ area=  A A: for a linear system this is a constant of the motion (Liouville’s theorem)  : describes the optical properties of the channel x z envelope motion of a particle in the lattice

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)4  : optical Twiss parameters

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)5 if the beam is gaussian and matched there is a relation between V and B here B and  describe beam envelope properties. B can be inferred from V and A too A is still a single particle amplitude BUT describes a level of constant probability for a gaussian distributed beam V: covariance matrix of the beam

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)6 x emittance: RMS amplitude property of the beam it can be derived from the COVARIANCE MATRIX of the beam emittance/amplitude are normalized multipling by a factor p/mc optical parameters: from the covariance matrix OR from our knowledge of the magnetic field x’

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)7 from 2D to 4D  (x,x’,y,y’)   solenoidal field introduces couplings (assume  x =  y )

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)8 we can still think about single particle amplitude but we need to be a little more careful and take into account (x-y) correlations the definition of 4D A from a cov. mat. V is different w.r.t. the 2D case because of a (possible) non-zero canonical angular momentum

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)9 NORMALIZED amplitudes (x,x’,y,y’)  (x,p x,y,p y ) l = /2mc  N  T =  p V1+ l 2  T =  p V1+ l 2 the single particle amplitude is independent from the beam we can use this variable to characterize cooling and transmission through the channel

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)10 profile plot reg-2 ~ centre of 1 st tracker reg-92 ~ centre of 2 nd tracker cooling

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)11  =3.0 cm rad P Z =200 MeV/c,  abs =42 cm cooling N2/N1  =2.0 cm rad N2/N1

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)12  amplitude vs aperture p = 200 MeV/c R (cm)  (cm) A n max (cm) Absorber RF Tracker A n MAX = p/mc R 2 /   in a focus/unif. field the max allowed amplitude has a very simple expression  in a general case it is more complicated but still the same concept  we can study transmission as a function of amplitude A n MAX = p/mc R 2 / 

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)13 P Z =200 MeV/c,  abs =42 cm  =0.6cm rad  =1.0cm rad transmission through MICE step VI

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)14 MICE STEP VI ~90m of MICE Channel RF ABS tracker A (m rad)

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)15 A n MAX physical aperture R  we can define the max allowed amplitude at the end of the channel  useful for the acceleration stage in the NF

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)16 conclusion  amplitude has been introduced as a single particle property  MICE is a capable of measuring single particle kinematic parameters which, combined with the optical functions, allow to define the amplitude of each muon  idependent from beam  useful to study the specific effects of scraping... TRANSMISSION ... and COOLING:  definable as an increase of the phase space density (rather than an emittance reduction)  useful to understand the fraction transmissable to the stage after the NF front-end