Self Study: Some Things to Consider The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey September 20, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Interpreting and Applying the 14 Standards
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Standards 2.5, 3.3.1, & The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Sustaining Change in Higher Education J. Douglas Toma Associate Professor Institute of Higher Education University of Georgia May 28, 2004.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Preparing and Planning for Self Study Washington & Jefferson College November 2010.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Accreditation Who? Regional Accrediting Agency: NWCCU (Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities). What? Self-study followed by on-campus.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
School for Academic Administrators: Learning Objectives Rodney A. Webb, Associate Vice-President, Academic January 24, 2005.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Overview of accjc stanard IV
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Self Study: Some Things to Consider The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey September 20, 2010

Proposed Path Overview of Accreditation Self Study – The process – The products The Standards The Research Questions The Work Teams Summing Up

What is accreditation? A means of demonstrating compliance with Federal rules and regulations in a variety of areas.

What is accreditation? A means of providing quality assurance in the areas of – Student learning and achievement – Curriculum development and support – Faculty – Facilities and equipment – Finance, administration, and governance – Integrity and compliance

What is REaccreditation? A Focused Process A defined time for an entire institution to come together to examine the “big questions” such as: – Is the institution’s mission still appropriate? – Is the institution making decisions in concert with its mission? – Does the institution have and allocate resources in a fashion that enables it to meet its mission? – Do the governance and administrative structures facilitate the learning process? – Are student and faculty support structures adequate?

What “camera” is used? Institutional Self Study

What is the subject? The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey

What lenses are used? The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey Institutional Effectiveness (Institutional Assessment) Educational Effectiveness (Assessment of Student Learning)

Mission Planning Resource Allocation Leadership Governance Administration Integrity Standards 1 through 6

Admissions & Retention Student Support Services Faculty Educational Offerings General Education Related Educational Activities Standards 8 through 13

Fundamental (lens) Elements

Mission & Goals Planning, Resource Allocation Institutional Resources Leadership & Governance Administration Integrity Admissions & Retention Student Support Services Faculty Educational Offerings General Education Related Educational Activities Assessment of Student Learning

What is REaccreditation? A PARTICIPATORY process involving – The Richard Stockton College community Faculty Staff Students Board – the larger educational community Engaged with/by the College the Middle States Region

What are the Products? A document More than one headache and late night Our Self Study

What are the Products? dynamic A dynamic document Bridges of communication and cooperation A greater awareness A renewed commitment A clarification of why we are a part of The Richard Stockton College A glimpse of where we and the College would like to be

The Standards “Characteristics of Excellence” – “Middle States’ accreditation is an expression of confidence in an institution’s mission and goals, its performance, and its resources.” --- Characteristics – The articulation of the qualities, behaviors, support structures, and outcomes that the member institutions of the of the Middle States Commission on Higher Education believe must be demonstrated by an accredited post-secondary institution.

The Standards are intended be viewed as an interrelated whole emphasize functions rather than structures may not necessarily apply fully to all institutions may be grouped when engaging in self-study.

The Research Questions Gather evidence that demonstrates – Compliance with the Commission’s standards – Commitment to institutional self-understanding and improvement. Provide structure and focus

The Research Questions Gather evidence that demonstrates: – “What evidence is there …” – “How effective is …” – “To what extent …” – “How consistent …” – “How comprehensively …” – “How successful …” – “How well …” – “What mechanisms exist …” – “What methods are employed …” – “How sufficient …”

The Research Questions Gather evidence that demonstrates: – “What evidence is there …” – “How effective is …” – “To what extent …” – “How consistent …” – “How comprehensively …” – “How successful …” – “How well …” – “What mechanisms exist …” – “What methods are employed …” – “How sufficient …” Compared to what? How will we know: – “sufficient” – “successful” – “effective” – “comprehensive”?

Compared to: Institutional Mission and Associated Goals Help students develop the capacity for continuous learning and adapt to changing circumstances Insist on curriculum breadth, as well as depth. Insist on excellence in teaching and dedication to learning. Participate in the development of new ideas. Commitment to faculty-wide involvement in general education. Provide the resources and atmosphere which will make exceptional effort possible and appreciated.

Compared to: Institutional Mission and Associated Goals Depth of study in the major. Offer students a real understanding of the ideas and methods of their disciplines. Co-curricular activities complement the academic curriculum. Value diversity and the differing perspectives it brings. Recognize the limitations of resources and respond by a prudent and flexible allocation of those resources. Positive development of southern New Jersey. Quality graduate programs.

The Research Questions Provide Structure and Focus – 1,4,6: Mission and Goals; Leadership and Governance; Integrity – 2,3,5: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal; Institutional Resources; Administration – 7: Institutional Assessment – 8,9: Student Admissions and Retention; Student Support Services; – 11, 12, 13: Educational Offerings; General Education; related Educational Activities – 10: Faculty – 14: Assessment of Student Learning

So far … The what and why of reaccreditation. What self study could/should be. The standards The self study research questions

The Work Teams

Focus 1: Mission, Goals, Leadership, Governance, Integrity Standard 1: Mission and Goals The institution’s mission – clearly defines its purpose within the context of higher education – indicates who the institution serves – and what it intends to accomplish.

Plan Goals Strategies Resource Allocation Assessment

Otherwise …

Wants Pressures Terrific Ideas

Focus 1: Leadership, Governance, Integrity Working together and sharing is a good thing. Working together and sharing the responsibility to ensure that decisions made are in concert with and promote the institution’s mission is a MUST.

Focus 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, Institutional Renewal, Institutional Resources, Administration Standard 2 – An institution conducts ongoing planning and resource allocation based on its mission and goals, – develops objectives to achieve them, – and utilizes the results of its assessment activities for institutional renewal. – Implementation and subsequent evaluation of the success of the strategic plan and resource allocation – support the development and change necessary to improve and to maintain quality.

Plan Goals Strategies Resource Allocation Assessment

Focus 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, Institutional Renewal, Institutional Resources, Administration Stockton 2020 Balanced Scorecard

The Balanced Scorecard Cycle Top Down Bottom Up SWOT / Vision Initiatives Alignment Measures How and Why Objectives Themes / Pillars Reporting Results

Focus 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, Institutional Renewal, Institutional Resources, Administration Central threads running through all accreditation requirements: – Planning must be systematic – Planning must be rooted in an institution’s mission – Planning must be predicated on analytical and evaluative information – Planning must be used for institutional decisions, including resource allocation

Focus 3: Institutional Effectiveness Gather evidence that demonstrates: – “What evidence is there …” – “How effective is …” – “To what extent …” – “How consistent …” – “How comprehensively …” – “How successful …” – “How well …” – “What mechanisms exist …” – “What methods are employed …” – “How sufficient …” Compared to what? How will we know: – “sufficient” – “successful” – “effective” – “comprehensive”?

Focus 3: Institutional Effectiveness How will we know? Standard 7: The institution has developed and implemented an assessment plan and process that evaluates its overall effectiveness in – achieving its mission and goals – implementing planning, resource allocation, and institutional renewal processes – Using institutional resources efficiently – Providing leadership and governance – Providing administrative structures and services – Demonstrating institutional integrity – Assuring that institutional processes and resources support appropriate learning and other outcomes for its students and graduates.

Focus 3: Institutional Effectiveness Mission & Goals Planning, Resource Allocation Institutional Resources Leadership & Governance Administration Integrity Admissions & Retention Student Support Services Faculty Educational Offerings General Education Related Educational Activities Assessment of Student Learning

Focus 3: Institutional Effectiveness How will we know? Standard 7: The institution has developed and implemented an assessment plan and process that evaluates its overall effectiveness

Focus 3: Institutional Effectiveness How will we know? Standard 7: The institution has developed and implemented an assessment plan and process that evaluates its overall effectiveness I’ma Gonna

Plan Goals Strategies Resource Allocation Assessment

Focus 4: Student Admissions, Retention, Support Services Congruence, Coordination, Cooperation – What is our mission? – How does our recruitment plan align with that mission? – Have we provided those whom we recruit a reasonable chance to succeed? – To what degree do our published program outcomes map to the actual program curriculum offerings?

Focus 5: Faculty The degree to which The Richard Stockton College faculty members have the knowledge, skills, and support to: – Help students develop the capacity for continuous learning and adapt to changing circumstances – Insist on curriculum breadth, as well as depth. – Insist on excellence in teaching and dedication to learning. – Participate in the development of new ideas. – Commit to faculty-wide involvement in general education. – Facilitate depth of study in the major. – Offer students a real understanding of the ideas and methods of their disciplines. – Value diversity and the differing perspectives it brings. – Recognize the limitations of resources and respond by a prudent and flexible allocation of those resources. – Develop and offer quality graduate programs.

Focus 6: Curriculum “Curriculum” – As an idea, curriculum stems from the Latin word for race course, referring to the course of deeds and experiences through which children grow to become mature adults

Focus 6: Curriculum Standard 11 Offerings appropriate to mission Offerings of appropriate rigor “Program goals that are stated in terms of student learning outcomes” Congruence between curricular offerings and learning resources and facilities

Focus 6: Curriculum Standard 13 Programs and activities characterized by a particular content, focus, location, mode of delivery, or sponsorship. – Exist because of a “choice” to commit to a specific focus Special populations Geographic locations beyond the “main campus” – Carnegie Library Center, Atlantic City, NJ Delivery modes other than what one would characterize as “traditional” Curriculum “packages” other than what one would characterize as “traditional” – Credit and noncredit Contractual arrangements with other entities

Focus 6: Curriculum Standard General Education “Curriculum stems from the Latin word for race course, referring to the course of deeds and experiences through which children grow to become mature adults.” --- Wikipedia “Institutions should identify and provide a recognizable core of general education that expresses the educational philosophy of the institution for each undergraduate degree program or cluster of degree programs.” --- Characteristics

Focus 6: Curriculum General Education at The Richard Stockton College General Studies constitutes the college curriculum's "commons," the place where students and faculty with various specializations explore the world of knowledge, ideas, and issues, often in an interdisciplinary way. Students take General Studies courses throughout their undergraduate career. The program constitutes the core of the liberal arts tradition that together with the major supports an excellent education. Students learn new perspectives, develop critical thinking skills, and discover new areas of interest.

Focus 7: Learning Assessment Standard 14: After all is said and done, the institution’s students have the knowledge, skills, and competencies consistent with institutional goals at graduation have achieved appropriate higher education goals.

Focus 7: Learning Assessment Standard 14: After all is said and done, the institution’s students have the knowledge, skills, and competencies consistent with institutional goals – An individual “presents” as a former Richard Stockton College student at graduation have achieved appropriate higher education goals. – Richard Stockton College has fulfilled its “promise” of creating the environment necessary for and conducive to achieving the student learning outcomes it has determined to be necessary to receive a credential from Richard Stockton College.

Summing Up

Something to keep in mind What appears to be soooo clear to us …

Something to keep in mind may not be seen the same way by those not as close to and/or involved in

The view from... SAS MSCHE Commission MSCHE Committee on Evaluation Reports Visiting Team Institution Work Team Individual Participant “The Evidence”

The view from... SAS MSCHE Commission MSCHE Committee on Evaluation Reports Visiting Team Institution Work Team Individual Participant “The Evidence” To reaffirm accreditation. The periodic review report is due June 1, 2017.

Don’t Forget … This is YOUR process Participation makes it a rich process There are already some extraordinary things going on Some excellent evidence is already available The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey has a history of working with exceptional MSCHE liaisons ….

I am sure you will do just fine! Thank you