1 The Scientific Context for NGAO Mark Morris, representing the NGAO Scientific Advisory Team (NSAT): Tommaso Treu, Laird Close, Michael Liu, & Keith Matthews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Advertisements

High-contrast imaging with AO Claire Max with help of Bruce Macintosh GSMT Science Working Group December 2002.
Extremely Large Telescopes and Surveys Mark Dickinson, NOAO.
Speaker: Laird Close University of Arizona ADAPTIVE OPTICS IN ASTRONOMY THE PROBLEM: Since Newton’s time it was realized that the mixing of hot and cold.
Ben R. Oppenheimer, Sasha Hinkley, Anand Sivaramakrishnan, Remi Soummer, Douglas Brenner Ian Parry, David King, Steve Medlen PROJECT 1640.
NGAO Systems Engineering Status Team Meeting #3 (Video) R. Dekany 13 December 2006.
Strategic Planning for Adaptive Optics at Keck Claire Max and Mike Liu on behalf of Keck AO Working Group Antonin Bouchez (Caltech), Rich Dekany (Caltech),
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
Extragalactic AO Science James Larkin AOWG Strategic Planning Meeting September 19, 2004.
W. M. Keck Observatory Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Irvine Meeting September 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Planets around Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs Michael Liu Bruce Macintosh NGAO Workshop, Sept 2006.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics Preliminary Design & Path Forward Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire.
Keck NGAO Science Requirements Claire Max UC Santa Cruz Caltech NGAO Meeting November 14, 2006.
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting February 20, 2008.
Science Team Management Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Extragalactic Science Case 1.People who worked on this study 2.Example science cases: – Low redshifts: black hole masses in nearby galaxies – Intermediate.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
The Need for Contiguous Fields NGAO Team Meeting, Waimea January 22, 2007 Claire Max.
1 NGAO Instrumentation Studies Overview By Sean Adkins November 14, 2006.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
TIGER The TIGER Instrument Overview Phil Hinz - PI July 13, 2010.
NGAO Science Instrument Reuse Part 2: Update and required feedback NGAO IWG Anna Moore, Sean Adkins NGAO Team Meeting January 22, 2007.
Keck NGAO Science Case Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting 13 January 25, 2008.
NGAO Astrometric Science and Performance Astrometric Performance Budget Team: Brian Cameron, Jessica Lu, Matthew Britton, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 3, 2007.
The Path to NGAO Core Science Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
The Next-Generation Adaptive Optics System at Keck Observatory Introduction & Overview Michael Liu & Claire Max on behalf of the NGAO study group.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
Galactic Science: Star and Planet Formation
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Science Advisory Team: Introductions & NSAT Charge Taft Armandroff, Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Hilton Lewis June 11,
Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max Science Case Presenters: Brian Cameron,
The Future of AO at Keck Sept 2004 Mike Brown, for the AOWG and Keck AO team.
Astrometry for NGAO Brian Cameron, Matthew Britton, Jessica Lu, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire Max, and Chris Neyman NGAO Meeting #6 April 25, 2007.
NGAO Build to Cost Summary Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max & the NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 14, 2009.
NGAO High-Contrast Performance Budget (WBS aka Companion Sensitivity) Initial WFE budget and status report NGAO Team meeting #4, WMKO Kamuela.
Science Requirements Impacting AO Architecture Claire Max Architecture Meeting July
High Redshift Galaxies: Encircled energy performance budget and IFU spectroscopy Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) Facility Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team:
1 NGAO Science Instrument Reuse Part 1: NIRC2 NGAO IWG December 12, 2006.
Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies Claire Max NGAO Team Meeting March 7, 2007.
PALM3K Review PALM3K Review Caltech Nov 12 th, 2007.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting November 6, 2007.
NGAO Wavefront Error Performance Budgets R. Dekany 13 May 2010.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
Understanding the Physics of the Bulge/Black-Hole Connection with GSMT Stephen Eikenberry University of Florida 3 November 2007.
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
Searching for Brown Dwarf Companions to Nearby Stars Michael W. McElwain, James E. Larkin & Adam J. Burgasser (UC Los Angeles) Background on Brown Dwarfs.
Early scientific goals for the MMT’s multi-laser-guided adaptive optics Michael Lloyd-Hart, Thomas Stalcup, Christoph Baranec, N. Mark Milton, Matt Rademacher,
Science with AO A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team. Topics Sample scientific programs. Observing strategies. Technical issues. Keck AO, K'
CELT Science Case. CELT Science Justification Process Put together a Science Working Group –Bolte, Chuck Steidel, Andrea Ghez, Mike Brown, Judy Cohen,
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Scientific/Performance Requirements1 PACS Science and Performance Requirements A. Poglitsch.
Adaptive Optics for Astronomy Kathy Cooksey. AO Basics Photons –Travel in straight lines Wavefront –Line perpendicular to all photons’ paths Atmospheric.
Keck Observatory in the TMT Era Keck Strategic Planning meeting September 18, 2009.
Data Reduction with NIRI Knut Olsen and Andrew Stephens Gemini Data Workshop Tucson, AZ July 21, 2010 Knut Olsen and Andrew Stephens Gemini Data Workshop.
Keck Observatory Overview Peter Wizinowich W. M. Keck Observatory AOSC May 31, 2004.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
Submillimeter Observations of Debris Disks Wayne Holland UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal Observatory Edinburgh With Jane Greaves, Mark Wyatt, Bill.
Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.
Galaxy formation and evolution with a GSMT: The z=0 fossil record 17 March, 2003.
NIRSS: the Near-Infrared Sky Surveyor WFIRST Meeting 2011 February 3 Daniel Stern (JPL/Caltech)
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
The Science Case Hubble Space Telescope CELT+AO HDF.
Probing the IMF Star Formation in Massive Clusters.
Presentation transcript:

1 The Scientific Context for NGAO Mark Morris, representing the NGAO Scientific Advisory Team (NSAT): Tommaso Treu, Laird Close, Michael Liu, & Keith Matthews

What is the NSAT? A group of active members of the Keck users community, representing the UC system, Caltech, U Hawaii, & the NASA community. Convened in 2009 by the WMKO directors (originally 8 members) CHARGES: –provide science advice to the NGAO project, with an emphasis on further development of the science cases and science requirements –help to ensure that the NGAO facility will provide the maximum possible science return for the investment and that NGAO will meet the scientific needs of the Keck community –determine optimal observing and operations strategies –provide advice on design trades, science priorities –support funding efforts by contributing to proposals –elicit broad community input and support for the project Meetings ~1/month by teleconference, with participation by the observatory directors and the NGAO team 2

3 Context for NGAO – growing demand for LGS-AO on large telescopes ➜ the clear advantage of sky coverage. Peer-reviewed publications: Note the dominance of Keck, but other observatories are knocking hard on the door… 3

4 Adaptive optics usage at WMKO has increased dramatically over the past decade, and is still rising … 4

5 All major research communities are employing LGS AO … 55 Total LGS Solar Sys Galactic Extra- galactic 2010 to date: 6 months

6 Key Science Cases – Requirements Drivers 1. High-redshift galaxies, internal structure and dynamics at z = 1 – 3 2. Black hole masses in nearby AGNs: resolving the Keplerian velocity increase within the black holes’ sphere of influence 3. General Relativity at the Galactic center: precision stellar orbits to discover and measure post-Newtonian effects. 4. Planetary companions to low-mass stars & brown dwarfs: taking advantage of the favorable contrast, & using a coronagraph 5. Asteroid and KBO companions : size, shape, composition & orbits of companions to minor planets with the aim of reconstructing their history 6 These push limits of AO system, instrument, and telescope. Determine the most demanding performance requirements.

7 Simulation of radial velocities observed along the major axis of an emission-line disk surrounding a black hole in a galaxy center.

Observational Attributes:  near-diffraction limited performance in the near-IR (K Strehl ~80%). On Keck, this provides the highest spatial resolution available at any of its operating wavelengths. Very high Strehl  key enabler of the science envisioned with NGAO.  substantially increased sky coverage, compared to existing AO systems  AO corrections at wavelengths as short as 7000 Å  imaging with a reconstructable and only moderately variable PSF over the entire science field (~20”)  photometry, astrometry, deconvolution  integral field spectroscopy at R~4000 from 0.7 to 2.4 µm, with three pixel scales: 10, 35, and 50 (or 70) mas, with 5.6” x 3” FOV at 50 mas sampling. - AO-fed medium-resolution NIR IFS unique among AO systems under development. 88

9 Calcium triplet 850 nm How is NGAO different from Keck’s AO today? NGAO: same Strehl at Ca Triplet as LGS today in H band NGAO: better Strehl at J band than LGS today in K band NGAO: much higher sky coverage NGAO: same Strehl at Ca Triplet as LGS today in H band NGAO: better Strehl at J band than LGS today in K band NGAO: much higher sky coverage

10 NGAO changes the AO observing experience Routinely exquisite correction Rarely ‘marginal’ performance Monte Carlo performance estimate simulating 44 nights observing (Galaxy Assembly science case), drawing random values for r 0, wind speed, sodium abundance, and zenith angle (KAON 716, Figure 12) Includes comparison with M. Liu’s measured K2 LGS data ( = 17%), the KAON 721 predict for K2 LGS ( = 20%), and NGAO predict ( = 70%)

11 -=- Sky coverage -=- Many science cases, particularly extragalactic ones such as Galaxy Assembly and Star Formation History are strongly affected by NGAO’s sky coverage Need to look at random places in the sky Out of the plane of the Galaxy In select “Deep Fields” that were chosen by others to have very few stars Need to accumulate a good statistical sample of galaxies in order to draw conclusions

12 MOAO correction of IR tip-tilt stars has large benefit for sky coverage Example: Keck NGAO, galaxy assembly science case, zenith angle 30 deg, median seeing at Mauna Kea Current Keck TT Current Keck EE 50 NGAO TT NGAO EE 50

13 NGAO: dramatic improvements in SNR for IFU spectra of distant galaxies Cooled AO system to reduce thermal background (K-band) Increased instrument throughput (34% vs. 19%) Higher spatial resolution means better point source sensitivity 13 Antennae Galaxies Local H  image LGS AO z =2.5 NGAO z = 2.5 SNR in H 

14 Advantages of NGAO for Resolved Stellar Populations 1.Reduced confusion from halos of adjacent stars: means better photometry on more stars 2.Color magnitude diagrams give better discrimination using I – K colors than using J – K or H – K colors (next slides) 3.Improved astrometry lets you better determine cluster membership (next slides) Olsen Blum and Rigaut 2003 GSMT simulation of NGC 1835

15 Resolved Stellar Populations Visible-light AO = better discrimination between stellar populations due to longer lever-arm of I-K vs. J-K for color-magnitude diagrams. 15

16 Resolved Stellar Populations High Strehl ratios reduce confusion = more stars, better astrometry 16 KKH 98 NGC 6297 (Anderson et al. 2008)

Four Major Wide Field AO Systems are under Development Tradeoffs: spatial resolution, strehl, PSF uniformity 17

NGAO Will Be the Leader in High Performance Narrow Field AO 18 contrast, Strehl, sky coverage NGAO more robust

A broad array of other investigations is enabled by NGAO, some of which have been used as additional science drivers  Gravitationally lensed galaxies  QSO host galaxies  Circumnuclear disks in galaxies  Extended gaseous structures at high redshifts  Resolved stellar populations in extragalactic systems  The internal dynamics of star clusters, young and old  Debris disks  Young stellar objects, protostellar disks, & jets  Stellar winds: bubbles, bow shocks, & pinwheels  Planetary & preplanetary nebulae – launching of bipolar flows  Jovian planet atmospheres: climate and wind dynamics  Planetary rings, satellites, and their interactions 19

11 So far, 40 astronomers have helped develop the NGAO Science Cases Ádámkovics, Mate Ammons, Mark Auger, Matt Barth, Aaron Bouchez, Antonin Cameron, Brian *Close, Laird de Pater, Imke Eisner, Joshua Emery, Joshua Fassnacht, Chris Ghez, Andrea Greene, Tom Hammel, Heidi Hillenbrand, Lynne Jonsson, Patrik Koo, David Larkin, James Law, David Liu, Michael Lu, Jessica Macintosh, Bruce Marchis, Franck Marshall, Phil *Matthews, Keith Max, Claire McGrath, Liz Melbourne, Jason Melling, Laura Metchev, Stanimir *Morris, Mark *Nierenberg, Anna Noll, Keith Novak, Greg Olsen, Knut Steidel, Chuck Suyu, Sherry *Treu, Tommaso Vegetti, Simona Weinberg, Nevin * Current NSAT Members New science cases from other scientists are always welcome

21 Competitive Landscape: JWST JWST advantages –JWST will have better sensitivity than NGAO (low backgrounds) at K band, but lower at J –Diffraction limited imaging between 2.4 and 5  m –Multiplexed slit spectroscopy (x 100) –Spectral resolution R = 2700 Keck NGAO advantages –Better spatial resolution than JWST at wavelengths below 2  m  JWST pixels under-sample the diffraction limit at wavelengths shorter than 2  m –Spectroscopy at spatial resolutions < 0.1” –Spectroscopy at spectral resolutions R > 2700

22 NGAO complementarity to TMT Technology groundbreaking for NFIRAOS In TMT era, Keck NGAO can play key role in screening targets for follow-up with scarce TMT time TMT advantages –Higher spatial resolution –Higher sensitivity –Wide field with partial correction (IRMS) Keck NGAO advantages –Higher sky coverage (LGS AO corrected tip-tilt stars) –Half-decade head start –Synoptic studies –More CIT & UC community access for NGAO For AGN black hole mass measurements, NGAO using Ca II triplet is comparable with TMT in K band (CO bandhead).

23 Summary  NGAO’s very high Strehl over a substantial field of view, coupled with a dramatic improvement in sky coverage, would bring considerable scientific return, and enable both major progress in existing investigations as well as new kinds of scientific investigations.  All areas of astronomy would profit from this capability; the number of significant science cases so far indicates that the demand for this capability will be enduring, even into the era of JWST and TMT.