Think-aloud usability experiments or concurrent verbal accounts Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Advertisements

Chapter 2 The Process of Experimentation
Extended Cognitive Walkthrough Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
COMP5047 – Design Focus groups – brainstorming for design Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
6.811 / PPAT: Principles and Practice of Assistive Technology Wednesday, 16 October 2013 Prof. Rob Miller Today: User Testing.
CS305: HCI in SW Development Evaluation (Return to…)
Each individual person is working on a GUI subset. The goal is for you to create screens for three specific tasks your user will do from your GUI Project.
WHAT IS INTERACTION DESIGN?
Extended Cognitive Walkthrough Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
Data gathering.
Evaluation Howell Istance. Why Evaluate? n testing whether criteria defining success have been met n discovering user problems n testing whether a usability-related.
©N. Hari Narayanan Computer Science & Software Engineering Auburn University 1 COMP 7620 Evaluation Chapter 9.
© De Montfort University, 2001 Questionnaires contain closed questions (attitude scales) and open questions pre- and post questionnaires obtain ratings.
Evaluation. formative 4 There are many times throughout the lifecycle of a software development that a designer needs answers to questions that check.
Empirical Methods in Human- Computer Interaction.
Observing users.
About the final report and feedback on demonstrations Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
An evaluation framework
Feedback from Usability Evaluation to User Interface Design: Are Usability Reports Any Good? Christian M. Nielsen 1 Michael Overgaard 2 Michael B. Pedersen.
Business research methods: data sources
About the draft report Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 19
GOMS and keystroke predictive methods Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
ICS 463, Intro to Human Computer Interaction Design: 8. Evaluation and Data Dan Suthers.
About the final report and feedback on demonstrations Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
Usability Methods: Cognitive Walkthrough & Heuristic Evaluation Dr. Dania Bilal IS 588 Spring 2008 Dr. D. Bilal.
Week 3 Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
Interviews By Darelle van Greunen.
Evaluation Framework Prevention vs. Intervention CHONG POH WAN 21 JUNE 2011.
Week 5 – 2015 HCI – COMP3315 Judy Kay CHAI: Computer Human Adapted Interaction research group Human Centred Technology Cluster for Teaching and Research.
Chapter 11: An Evaluation Framework Group 4: Tony Masi, Sam Esswein, Brian Rood, & Chris Troisi.
Presentation: Techniques for user involvement ITAPC1.
Data gathering. Overview Four key issues of data gathering Data recording Interviews Questionnaires Observation Choosing and combining techniques.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2013 / Semester 1 / week 9 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Overview of the rest of the semester Building on Assignment 1 Using iterative prototyping.
Human Computer Interaction
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 6 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 6- Diaries.
Overview of the rest of the semester Iteratively design interface to help people log their food intake over the long term.
Usability Testing CS774 Human Computer Interaction Spring 2004.
COMP5047 Pervasive Computing: 2012 GOMS and keystroke predictive methods Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information.
Cognitive Walkthrough Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
Extended Cognitive Walkthrough Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
Usability Testing Chapter 6. Reliability Can you repeat the test?
1 ISE 412 Usability Testing Purpose of usability testing:  evaluate users’ experience with the interface  identify specific problems in the interface.
CS2003 Usability Engineering Usability Evaluation Dr Steve Love.
COMP5047 Pervasive Computing: 2012 Think-aloud usability experiments or concurrent verbal accounts Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research.
Virtual University - Human Computer Interaction 1 © Imran Hussain | UMT Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT) Lecture 40 Observing.
The product of evaluation is knowledge. This could be knowledge about a design, knowledge about the user or knowledge about the task.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2006.
Usability Evaluation, part 2. REVIEW: A Test Plan Checklist, 1 Goal of the test? Specific questions you want to answer? Who will be the experimenter?
Overview and Revision for INFO3315. The exam
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 592 Spring 2005.
AVI/Psych 358/IE 340: Human Factors Data Gathering October 3, 2008.
COMP5047 Pervasive Computing: 2012 Extended Cognitive Walkthrough Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information.
Chapter 23 Deciding how to collect data. UIDE Chapter 23 Introduction: Preparing to Collect Evaluation Data Timing and Logging Actions –Automatic Logging.
User Interface Evaluation Introduction Lecture #15.
Usability Evaluation or, “I can’t figure this out...do I still get the donuts?”
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2007.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 587 Fall 2007.
Evaluation / Usability. ImplementDesignAnalysisEvaluateDevelop ADDIE.
School of Engineering and Information and Communication Technology KIT305/607 Mobile Application Development Week 7: Usability (think-alouds) Dr. Rainer.
Day 8 Usability testing.
User Interface Evaluation
Usability Evaluation, part 2
Usability Evaluation.
Chapter 23 Deciding how to collect data
Evaluation.
Empirical Evaluation Data Collection: Techniques, methods, tricks Objective data IRB Clarification All research done outside the class (i.e., with non-class.
Human-Computer Interaction: Overview of User Studies
Presentation transcript:

Think-aloud usability experiments or concurrent verbal accounts Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Overview Empirical methods Think-aloud Benefits Disadvantages Naturalised think-aloud

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Postconditions for this week (incl studio)‏ Describe the uses of Think Alouds Describe the processes for conducting one Describe advantages and limitations Ability to use Think-aloud as relevant and for your project Justify the use of Think-aloud in the overall testing of a pervasive computing application

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Think aloud protocols –ask user to `think aloud' as they use the interface –often used with video, audio taping –otherwise MUST make notes –helps observer interpret what is going on –gives qualitative data mainly –3-5 users may be enough (Nielsen)‏

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Case study Test usability of console in lecture theatre What is intended functionality? Formulate some concrete tasks – write these as instructions

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Classification of think-aloud formative versus summative predictive v empirical laboratory v naturalistic qualitative v quantitative

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Design cycle User Centred Design Prototype construction Usability study –Define concrete tasks to use in evaluation –Decide just what data to collect –Test design of experiment for timing (trial it)‏ –Recruit users –Run study Goto top

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Recruiting users How representative are they? –similarity to intended user population –Age –Gender –experience in area –interest/motivation –computer literacy What effect does user population have for conclusions?

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Stages of running an evaluation Preparation Introduction The test Questionnaire/interview Debriefing Analysis, reflection, summarising, reporting, conclusions for action Steps 1- 5 done for each user test, as run Step 6 is applied mainly after several users

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Preparation set up room set up machine check machine check user instructions do a mental run-through be sure not to waste user's time because of your lack of preparation

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Introduction Welcome user, explain purpose of test –make clear system tested not user –confidentiality –anonymity of reporting –opt out at any time –what is recorded Invite any other questions to here –explain procedure –if appropriate, do demo –invite questions

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them The test User works through experiment.... –recording –ensure user feels supported –show pleasure at problems identified –critical to help user if stuck Questionnaire/interview –open and closed

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them What data should you collect? Observe –direct/indirect –take notes –video/audio/software monitor –software logs for timing Questionnaire: –open –closed

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Debriefing Thank user Remind them of usefulness of results Pause to make sure all data collected All notes written May ask user to confirm details collected

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Pitfalls Defining the right concrete tasks –Test all key aspects –Multiple tasks for same aspects Instructions to the users –Do NOT lead the user

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Benefits of think aloud `show what users are doing and why they are doing it while they are doing it in order to avoid later rationalisations' (Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic press 1993, p195)‏ cheap slows users down –studies show users work faster with fewer errors due to care on critical elements

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Problems of think aloud not directly quantitative add cognitive load to users user's `theories' must be interpreted with care slows users down

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Facilitating think aloud What are you thinking now? What do you think that message means? (only after the user has noticed the message and is clearly spending time on it)‏ don't help user except with How do you think you can do it? if user appears surprised, Is that what you expected to happen?

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Naturalised think-aloud Multi-user interaction –two (or more) users work on task –conversation is natural –observer collects dialogue

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Problems with observing users Hawthorn effect People rationalise (Telling more than we can know)‏ Qualitative data

HAI2008. Lifelong ambient companions: challenges and steps to overcome them Summary Relatively inexpensive Can identify major flaws And may indicate causes of user problems May give access to user's mental model Alters activity => meaningfulness