BrightWater® – A Step Change in Sweep Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DESIGNING A WATERFLOOD Designing a water flood involves both technical and economic consideration. Economic analysis are based on estimates of water.
Advertisements

Challenge: How are oil and gas extracted? Teachers notes.
The influence of wettability and carbon dioxide injection on hydrocarbon recovery Saif Al Sayari Martin J. Blunt.
Outline of Presentation
Modelling Rate Effects in Imbibition
Brazilian Oil, Gas & Offshore Delegation
Preformed Particle Gel (PPG) for Conformance Control
Heavy Oil Recovery Techniques
Drilling Engineering Association Project Proposal DEA #113 – Phase 2 “Drilling Gumbo Shale – A Study of Environmentally Acceptable Muds to Eliminate Shale.
Salt Tolerant Synthetic Polymers Effects on adsorption and retention
Phase Behavior Solid Organic Precipitation and Mobility Characterization Studies in Support of Enhanced Viscous Oil Recovery On Alaska North Slope
Dual Mesh Method in Upscaling Pascal Audigane and Martin Blunt Imperial College London SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 3-5 February 2003.
Simulation of Polymer Gel Injection Well Treatments Chuck Norman Tiorco, Inc. Tiorco de Argentina.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CO2 FLOOD UTILIZING ADVANCED RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND HORIZONTAL INJECTION WELLS IN A SHALLOW SHELF CARBONATE APPROACHING.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft WAG Mechanisms at macroscopic/ field level Presentation at FORCE WAG Seminar Stavanger, 18 Mar 2009 Anders Gjesdal.
Petroleum & Natural Gas Eng. Dept.
Dr. Mohammed M. Amro Petroleum Engineering Dept. King Saud University Effect of Scale and Corrosion Inhibitors on Well Productivity in Reservoirs Containing.
Pioneer Natural Resources
CIPC Application of X-Ray CT for Investigation of CO 2 and WAG Injection in Fractured Reservoirs D. Chakravarthy, V. Muralidharan, E. Putra and.
Texas A&M UniversityFeb, 2004 Application of X-Ray CT to Investigate Effect of Rock Heterogeneity and Injection Rates During CO 2 Flood Process Deepak.
Upscaling of Foam Mobility Control to Three Dimensions Busheng Li George Hirasaki Clarence Miller Rice University, Houston, TX.
Imperial College, PETROLEUM ENGINEERING AND ROCK MECHANICS GROUP 10 th January 2003 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING AND ROCK MECHANICS GROUP Pore Scale Modeling.
Chapter 1 RESERVOIR.
Microgel Technology for Water Shutoff Applications Alain Zaitoun, Poweltec Guido Poggesi, REP WorkShop EOR, IAPG, Neuquen, 3-5 November 2010.
Williston Basin Petroleum Conference Advances in Technology Panel Efficient Fracture Stimulation Rick Ross – Whiting Petroleum Corporation 1.
Theme Maximizing Asset Value with IOR / EOR
Classification: Internal Introduction to flow diversion technologies Force workshop, Stavanger, January
Toby’s & Jake’s notes combined
DOC ID © Chevron 2007 Chemical EOR Implementation for the Captain Field, UK 30 th IEA EOR Symposium and Workshop September 2009 Anette Poulsen, Chevron.
Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Process
07/ This document is the property of SNF. It must not be reproduced or transfered without prior consent Enhanced Oil Recovery Optimizing Molecular.
Unconventional Rod Nelson Schlumberger IPAA 75 th Annual Meeting Oct 28, 2004.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Low Salinity Waterflooding: Opportunities and Challenges for Field Pilot Tests Dagmar Spangenberg, Peimao Zhang.
CPGE Department Seminar, Apr 18, 2011 Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX How the pore scale affects the.
GullfaksVillage2012 IOR with a diverging agent from China Petter Eltvik Discipline leader Gullfaks Classif ication: Interna l
Rhodia/Poweltec Visosifying Surfactant for Chemical EOR EOR Workshop “Mario Leschevich”, 3-5 Nov Mikel Morvan, Guillaume Degré, Rhodia Alain.
Modelling the field potential of in- depth waterflood diversion with Brightwater Mechanism of Brightwater activation and diversion Preferred modelling.
CBE 555: Chemical EngineeringConnections: Impact of Chemical Engineering on the Outside World Tertiary Oil Recovery Steve Ng Kim Hoong 16 October 2007.
 Can be used in liquid form for Chemical & Waterflood EOR; or used in vapor-form for Thermal or N2+CO2 Gas Injection EOR  Cleans the well bore, opens.
China University of Petroleum, Beijing In-depth Profile Control Property of Pre-crosslinked Polymer Dispersion Jiao Lu, Bo Peng, Mingyuan Li, Meiqin Lin,
Underbalanced Perforating. èEarly tests by Exxon showed that flow patterns and perforation geometry prevent the cleaning out of an appreciable percentage.
Adel Sharif University of Surrey
PWRI JIP Meeting Advantek International Presentation.
Waterflood Management Case Study - Goal  Change waterflood strategy early in waterflood to maximize recovery: 12 months of waterflood performance Predicted.
Schlumberger / Client Confidential
SPE AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR FILTER CAKE FORMATION IN FRACTURES Randy Seright New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center.
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry
0 International Joint Study on CO2-EOR - Study on Applicability of CO2-EOR to Rang Dong Field, offshore Vietnam - Sunao Takagi, Komei Okatsu IEA Collaborative.
Larry Shultz Presents TexasEOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY using proprietary solvents to precipitate out the asphaltenes and segregate out and liquify the paraffin waxes while restoring flow to the reservoir with a low boiling point liquid - see
Larry Shultz Presents TexasEOR.com Solvent-Assisted Frac, Waterflood and N2 or CO2 Gas Injection EOR Technology Primer using Reservoir Robots in the Intelligent Oilfield - per
Lecture 11 Oilfield Development
Introduction to Well Completions
IOR in the North Sea Average recovery around 45% Remaining 55% Half due to non swept volumesHalf due to residual oil saturation 1 % increase in oil recovery.
Acid Placement and Diversion
Influence of Clay Content on Surfactant-
Feasibility Study on DCA Microspheres for Deep Profile Control Technology in High Permeability of High Temperature and High salt Reservoirs Changchun Yang.
Gas Condensate PVT – What’s Really Important and Why?
A review of In-Situ Combustion Operations in India, its Assessment and the Way ahead 1 1.
Deposition Notes and Stream Life History Notes
CO2 EOR and Sequestration Technologies in PetroChina
Pouyan Ebrahimi, Javier Vilcáez Abstract ID: GSA
Unconventional Reservoirs
on Petroleum and Refinery
Establishing Patterns Correlation from Time Lapse Seismic
Introduction to Effective Permeability and Relative Permeability
Thermal Heavy Oil Recovery (THOR)
Heavy Oil Recovery Techniques
AMAN ULLAH ROLL NO O1 PRESENTATION TOPIC TIGHT RESERVIOR AND HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.
Presentation transcript:

BrightWater® – A Step Change in Sweep Improvement - What is it? - What isn’t it? - Where did it come from? Where can it go?

Poor Reservoir Sweep Efficiency Bypass Oil

BrightWater can help to improve Reservoir Sweep Efficiency, and produce the bypass Oil

Outline What is BrightWater? How does BrightWater improve waterflood? Any field success? How to use in mature fields? Candidate selection Tests Implementation. Conclusions

What is BrightWater® BrightWater is a technology that improve the sweep efficiency of water flood by using a Novel robust particulate system for in–depth waterflood conformance control Designed to overcome injectivity and cost limitations of classical polymer treatments. (i.e., injected as small particles then can become larger with time in the presence of a “trigger” - temperature)

BrightWater® History Contributor Involvement BrightWater®, as a BP project, started in 1997 It was considered as a speculative, but high-reward project, and was proposed as a Joint Venture project to the “MoBPTeCh” consortium which has now disbanded. Nalco was identified as best potential development/supply partner, and joined as equal contributors. BP 1998 Mobil, BP, Texaco, Chevron + Nalco Now: BP, Chevron, Nalco

BrightWater® – what it’s not BrightWater material is NOT a classic viscous polymer During injection it has viscosity very close to water It cannot be damaged by shear during injection It is not active initially Totally different from conventional gel jobs. No CAPEX – Simple to deploy

No Capex BW Particulate Dispersant ½” NPT fitting to be used for EC9368A injection ½” NPT fitting to be used for EC9360A injection Well Head Well House Floor 2” Well Line Dispersant BW Particulate

What is BrightWater® BrightWater is particles The median of the particle size distribution is about 0.3 to 0.5 microns BrightWater particle is supplied as a dispersion in hydrocarbon solvent The active content in the dispersion is about 30%

What is BrightWater® Bright WaterTM material is a tightly bounded, thermally activated particle injected as a dilute slug which flows with the water and pops open deep in the reservoir and blocks the swept zones. 0.1 to 1 micron 1 to 10 microns Warmth This allows chase water to be diverted into zones that were previously poorly swept.

Inert BrightWater Material

BrightWater Particles Pre-activated – Activated This magnification is 10x greater than this one Before Expansion Scale bar is 500 nanometers After Expansion Scale bar is 5000 nanometers A polymer particle which is able to propagate through rock pores without injectivity loss Under the influence of heat the particle expands to a size which can block rock pore throats.

Diluted, inert BrightWater (after injection) Activated Time and temperature

5000 ppm 3900 ppm 4500 ppm

What is BrightWater® The injected sub-micron particles are inert - they give virtually no viscosity or adsorption - they are far smaller than the pores they move through The expanded particles are “sticky” - they have increased solution viscosity, showing they now interact with each other - they act to restrict water flow rate in the reservoir - the restriction can be permanent showing they are interacting with the porous rock

BrightWater are Small Crosslinked polymer particles (particle size) to propagate deep into reservoir (pore size)

What is BrightWater® The time before activation can be selected The strength of the block can be selected A complete block is not usually the aim or necessary

So how does BrightWater work in the reservoir?

Still at reservoir temp Cooled by injection Usually there is a temperature front set up by cold water injection Temperature Front Still at reservoir temp Cooled by injection

Still at reservoir temp Cooled by injection Usually there is a temperature front set up by cold water injection BW Temperature Front Still at reservoir temp Cooled by injection

Setting BrightWater at a temperature front

Setting at a temperature front can be very convenient and is the ideal and usual mode for hot reservoirs But we may not need a temperature front We can select the grade to control the setting time, and set at any temperature up to 80-90C

Setting BrightWater in an isothermal case

Typical treatment objectives: Vertical conformance improvement by diverting water from a thief layer Vertical and horizontal sweep improvement by diverting water from a channel Slow down water cycling - allow use of increased injection pressure - allow use of increased drawdown at producers

BrightWater List of Field Trials Minas, Indonesia (Chevron, 2001) Arbroath, North Sea, UK (BP, 2002) Milne Point and Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, USA (BP) (several, 2004-5) Strathspey field, North Sea, UK (Chevron, 2006) Argentina (several, 2006) Pakistan (BP, 2006-7) Alaska (several, 2007) Being considered: more treatments in Indonesia Australia, Alaska and Gulf of Mexico, USA

Alaska Bright Water Applications

BP Alaska Field Trial Trial of pattern treatment, three adjacent injectors, 03-13, 16-11 and 16-16 treated in 2004 - 05 High water cut at low to medium total Pore Volume injected Patterns mature to Miscible Injectant with breakthrough time 3 to 4 months The FS2 Trial consisted of 3 patterns. 03-13, 16-11, and 16-16. These are in the south east portion of Prudhoe and isolated on the north by a fault, truncation on the east, and edge of the field on the south.

Design Process Candidate selection : criteria; know the reservoir BrightWater formulation selection Treatment volume and cost estimation Implementation plan : QA, Contingency, monitoring Post treatment plan Looking through our files we noted that many of the gaps were similar among the reviewed projects, so sorted them into bins with common themes and called them “high level lessons learned”. One common theme was, “Projects that participated in Planning Assists were better prepared for their Subsurface Technical Reviews. Next numerous projects thought that the term alternatives applied to surface facilities only and therefore generated only one development alternative with one set of production profiles. Many project’s Subsurface “front-end loading” efforts are compromised by very aggressive project schedules and/or insufficient resources. Also, too often Projects do not allow enough time or resources to implement the Review Team’s critical suggestions before their next phase gate. And in a few cases, the recovery estimates and forecasts were based on inappropriate reservoir models.

Characteristics of good Candidate Reservoirs Sandstone reservoirs Vertical or horizontal high permeability contrast, Actual sweep efficiency less than anticipated. Presence of bypass oil. Thief > 150 md; no direct interwell fractures. Fluid transit time between injector and producers > 50 days Injection water temperature lower than reservoir temperature (Temperature gradient between injector and producer desired but not necessary). Down-hole temperature above 50 C.

BrightWater Potential Tests desired Bottle test (injection water, temperature) – to select BrightWater formulation, if needed. Sandpack Test – to confirm pop time at temperature, if needed. Interwell water breakthrough estimate: field data; tracer, pressure test - to select BrightWater formulation or identify area of potential bypassed oil, if needed. Block Test (actual core material) – to select BrightWater concentration. Needed only for very high or very low perm rock Simple temperature model (distance between wells; reservoir and injection water temperature, rate and duration of water injection) - to estimate thief zone temperature profile. Simple reservoir model – to estimate potential oil recovery. (Required)

Difference between BW and Polymer

Conclusions BrightWater is a new robust pre-crosslinked polymer particle that can expand in size at design temperature and time. There are successful field implementations (onshore and offshore) Increase oil production and recovery. Bullhead into injection line easily, even from a great distance or into subsea completion. No facilities upset.

The Early stage Research team members BP Harry Frampton Jim Morgan ChevronTexaco Steve Cheung Rick Ng Billy Surles Les Munson Nalco Energy Services K.T. Chang Dennis Williams

Thank you ! Questions?