Simulations of carbon transport in CCM3: uncertainties in C sinks due to interannual variability and model resolution James Orr (LSCE/CEA-CNRS and IPSL,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some questions in current climate and CO 2 studies.
Advertisements

Atmospheric inversion of CO 2 sources and sinks Northern Hemisphere sink Jay S. Gregg.
1 Trend and Year-to-year Variability of Land-Surface Air Temperature and Land-only Precipitation Simulated by the JMA AGCM By Shoji KUSUNOKI, Keiichi MATSUMARU,
Dear colleagues, This is a real-virtual presentation, as I am not present and apologize for this. Many thanks to Stephane for presenting to you this short.
Global trends in air-sea CO 2 fluxes based on in situ and satellite products Rik Wanninkhof, NOAA/AOML ACE Ocean Productivity and Carbon Cycle (OPCC) Workshop.
REMOTE SENSING OF SOUTHERN OCEAN AIR-SEA CO 2 FLUXES A.J. Vander Woude Pete Strutton and Burke Hales.
Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
VARIABILITY OF OCEAN CO 2 PARTIAL PRESSURE AND AIR-SEA CO 2 FLUXES IN THE SUBANTARCTIC ZONE OF THE SOUTHERN OCEAN J. Boutin (1), L. Merlivat (1) and K.
CO 2 in the middle troposphere Chang-Yu Ting 1, Mao-Chang Liang 1, Xun Jiang 2, and Yuk L. Yung 3 ¤ Abstract Measurements of CO 2 in the middle troposphere.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
Southern ocean inversions: interannual variability and sink trend Rachel Law and Richard Matear April CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric.
Estimating parameters in inversions for regional carbon fluxes Nir Y Krakauer 1*, Tapio Schneider 1, James T Randerson 2 1. California Institute of Technology.
Estimating ocean-atmosphere carbon fluxes from atmospheric oxygen measurements Mark Battle (Bowdoin College) Michael Bender & Nicolas Cassar (Princeton)
Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgments: S. Maksyutov, K. Gurney and TransCom-3 modellers TransCom Meeting, Paris; June 2005 Sensitivity CO2 sources and.
Interannual variability in CO2 fluxes derived from 64-region inversion of atmospheric CO2 data Prabir K. Patra*, Shamil Maksyutov*, Misa Ishizawa*, Takakiyo.
TransCom 3 Level 2 Base Case Inter-annual CO 2 Flux Inversion Results Current Status David Baker, Rachel Law, Kevin Gurney, Peter Rayner, TransCom3 L2.
Compatibility of surface and aircraft station networks for inferring carbon fluxes TransCom Meeting, 2005 Nir Krakauer California Institute of Technology.
Atmospheric Research Inverting high temporal frequency data: latest results Rachel Law Peter Rayner, Ying-Ping Wang Law et al., GBC, 16(4), 1053, doi: /2001GB001593,
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
NOCES meeting Plymouth, 2005 June Top-down v.s. bottom-up estimates of air-sea CO 2 fluxes : No winner so far … P. Bousquet, A. Idelkadi, C. Carouge,
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
3D Tracer Transport Modeling and the Carbon Cycle Please read: Tans, P. P., I. Y. Fung, and T. Takahashi, Observational constraints on the atmospheric.
S. Maksyutov, P.K. Patra and M. Ishizawa Jena; 13 May 2003 TDI experiment with NIES model and interannually varying NCEP winds.
Impact of Reduced Carbon Oxidation on Atmospheric CO 2 : Implications for Inversions P. Suntharalingam TransCom Meeting, June 13-16, 2005 N. Krakauer,
Interannual inversions with continuous data and recent inversions with the CSIRO CC model Rachel Law, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Another set of pseudodata.
Ocean-Atmosphere Carbon Flux: What to Consider Scott Doney (WHOI) ASCENDS Science Working Group Meeting (February 2012; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
Global Carbon Cycle Feedbacks: From pattern to process Dave Schimel NEON inc.
1 Oceanic sources and sinks for atmospheric CO 2 The Ocean Inversion Contribution Nicolas Gruber 1, Sara Mikaloff Fletcher 2, and Kay Steinkamp 1 1 Environmental.
Climate Change Projections of the Tasman Sea from an Ocean Eddy- resolving Model – the importance of eddies Richard Matear, Matt Chamberlain, Chaojiao.
Acceleration of the sea surface fCO2 growth rate in the North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre ( ). N. Metzl, A Corbière, G. Reverdin, A.Lenton, T. Takahashi,
The case of polar lows Hans von Storch 13 and Matthias Zahn 2 1. Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Germany. 2. Environmental.
The Global Ocean Carbon Cycle Rik Wanninkhof, NOAA/AOML Annual OCO review, June 2007: Celebrating Our Past, Observing our Present, Predicting our Future:
The speaker took this picture on 11 December, 2012 over the ocean near Japan. 2014/07/29 AOGS 11th Annual Meeting in Sapporo.
Carboeurope Annual Meeting Poznan, 8-12 Oct Recent CO 2 gradients over Europe M.Ramonet, P.Ciais et al.
The seasonal and interannual variability in atmospheric CO 2 is simulated using best available estimates of surface carbon fluxes and the MATCH atmospheric.
A Decline in the Northern Hemisphere CO 2 Sink from John Miller 1, Pieter Tans 1, Jim White 2, Ken Masarie 1, Tom Conway 1, Bruce Vaughn 2,
Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Transient Eddy Fluxes and their Co-variability with the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio-Oyashio Extensions Young-Oh Kwon and Terrence.
Understanding the Ocean Carbon Cycle from Atmospheric Measurements of O 2 and CO 2 Andrew Manning, UEA, UK.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
1 Climate Ensemble Simulations and Projections for Vietnam using PRECIS Model Presented by Hiep Van Nguyen Main contributors: Mai Van Khiem, Tran Thuc,
Preliminary Results of Global Climate Simulations With a High- Resolution Atmospheric Model P. B. Duffy, B. Govindasamy, J. Milovich, K. Taylor, S. Thompson,
Regional Inversion of continuous atmospheric CO 2 measurements A first attempt ! P., P., P., P., and P. Philippe Peylin, Peter Rayner, Philippe Bousquet,
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
P. K. Patra*, R. M. Law, W. Peters, C. Rodenbeck et al. *Frontier Research Center for Global Change/JAMSTEC Yokohama, Japan.
Development of an EnKF to estimate CO 2 fluxes from realistic distributions of X CO2 Liang Feng, Paul Palmer
A direct carbon budgeting approach to study CO 2 sources and sinks ICDC7 Broomfield, September 2005 C. Crevoisier 1 E. Gloor 1, J. Sarmiento 1, L.
Source vs. Sink Contributions to Atmospheric Methane Trends:
WP11 highlights: introduction and overview EU FP6 Integrated Project CARBOOCEAN ”Marine carbon sources and sinks assessment” 5 th Annual & Final Meeting.
Investigating Land-Atmosphere CO 2 Exchange with a Coupled Biosphere-Atmosphere Model: SiB3-RAMS K.D. Corbin, A.S. Denning, I. Baker, N. Parazoo, A. Schuh,
Regional CO 2 Flux Estimates for North America through data assimilation of NOAA CMDL trace gas observations Wouter Peters Lori Bruhwiler John B. Miller.
The Vertical Distribution of Atmospheric CO 2 and the Latitudinal Partitioning of Global Carbon Fluxes Britton Stephens – NCAR Co-authors - Kevin R. Gurney,
Session on Simulating variability of air-sea CO2 fluxes CarboOcean final meeting, Os, Norway, 5-9 October 2009 Funding: EU (GOSAC, NOCES), NASA, DOE, Swiss.
Carboocean Second Annual Meeting Session on Seasonal and Interannual Variations of Air-Sea CO2 Flux.... in the Southern Ocean N.Metzl, LOCEAN-IPSL thanks.
ICDC7, Boulder September 2005 Estimation of atmospheric CO 2 from AIRS infrared satellite radiances in the ECMWF data assimilation system Richard.
Core Theme 5 – WP 17 Overview on Future Scenarios - Update on WP17 work (5 european modelling groups : IPSL, MPIM, Bern, Bergen, Hadley) - Strong link.
1 Development of a Regional Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model Hyodae Seo, Arthur J. Miller, John O. Roads, and Masao Kanamitsu Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
European Union integrated project no Variation in atmosphere-ocean fluxes of CO 2 in the Atlantic Ocean: first results from the Carbo-Ocean observing.
By S.-K. Lee (CIMAS/UM), D. Enfield (AOML/NOAA), C. Wang (AOML/NOAA), and G. Halliwell Jr. (RSMAS/UM) Objectives: (1)To assess the appropriateness of commonly.
Surface Ocean pCO 2 and Air-Sea CO 2 -exchange in Coupled Models Birgit Schneider 1*, Laurent Bopp 1, Patricia Cadule 1, Thomas Frölicher 2, Marion Gehlen.
What can we learn about biological production and air-sea carbon flux in the Southern Ocean from 12 years of observations in the Drake Passage? Colm Sweeney.
VOCALS-UK Len Shaffrey and Thomas Toniazzo Walker Institute, University of Reading John Constable ‘Cloud Study’ 1822.
Seasonal Climate Forecasting for Applied Use in the Western USA Katherine Hegewisch 1, Renaud Barbero 2, John Abatzoglou 1 1 University of Idaho, Department.
LIMITLESS POTENTIAL | LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITIES | LIMITLESS IMPACT Copyright University of Reading CURRENT CHANGES IN EARTH’S ENERGY IMBALANCE
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
Effects of drought and fire on interannual variability in CO2 as derived using atmospheric-CO2 inversion Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgements to: M. Ishizawa,
The Experimental Climate Prediction Center Regional Spectral Model (ECPC-RSM) Contribution to the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program.
Alfredo Ruiz-Barradas Sumant Nigam
Carbon Model-Data Fusion
HIPPO1-3 Large-Scale CO2 Gradients
by Sara Rivero-Calle, Anand Gnanadesikan, Carlos E
Presentation transcript:

Simulations of carbon transport in CCM3: uncertainties in C sinks due to interannual variability and model resolution James Orr (LSCE/CEA-CNRS and IPSL, France) Co-authors: B. Govindasamy & P. Duffy (LLNL/DOE), and J. A. Taylor (ANL/DOE) Funding: LLNL LDRD et LLNL URP sabbatical program TransCom Workshop Jena, Germany 12—15 May 2003

Resolution: ~ 50 km CCM3: T239

Resolution: ~ 300 km CCM3: T42

*How to measure model improvement? Quantitative improvement for T170 Key relationship: *Taylor, K. E., J. Geophys. Res., 106, D7, , 2001 Duffy et al.., Climate Dyn.., submitted, 2003

TRANSCOM-1 Models *Law et al. (1996, GBC)

Fossil Emissions Scenario (TRANSCOM3) *Gurney et al. (2002, Final TRANSCOM3 Report)

Neutral Biosphere Scenario (TRANSCOM) Transcom1 (1996)Transcom3 (2002) *Gurney et al. (2002, Final TRANSCOM3 Report)*Law et al. (1996, GBC)

Rectifier correlated with N.H. Land Sink *Gurney et al (2002): Rectifier is the major uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the Northern Hemisphere C sink 16 different annual mean model responses to purely seasonal forcing Interhemispheric difference in Rectifier (ppmv) N. H. Land Sink (Pg C yr 1 ) *

Objectives of this study 1.Test sensitivity of rectifier to horizontal resolution 2.Investigate interannual variability of rectifier in CCM3 model.

Simulations TRANSCOM-3 Boundary Contidtions: Fossil Emissions: Andres Ocean : observed air-sea flux (Takahashi et al., 1999) “Neutral Biosphere” (or Rectifier from CASA model) Other: Rn-222

Some model details: 18 Vertical levels Climatological SST forcing Three-year spin-up Change horizontal resolution only Simulation Grid Cells SizeApprox Grid Size Years of Simulation T2164x325.6°600 km27 T3196x483.8°450 km21 T42128x642.8°300 km23 T63192x961.9°225 km16 T85256x1281.4°150 km21 T170512x2560.7°75 kmIn Progress T239720x3600.5°50 km

Taylor Diagram: Precipitation (Effect of Resolution)

Resolution effect: 20-year means

Rectifier in CCM3 (T42) has large interannual variability *Normalized to South Pole

Variability = f(resolution) T42T31T21 T85T63

Interannual Variability: Zonal Mean (T42)

TRANSCOM-3 Stations

Interannual Variability: TransCom3 Stations (T42)

Spatial distribution of interannual rectifier? Mean Std. Dev. Range Rectifier: T42 ( )

Causes of interannual variability in the rectifier Mechanisms invoked to explain seasonal rectifier: Changes in local PBL height (Denning, 1995) Changes in wind direction (Taguchi, 1996) Changes in wind speed/”mixing volume” (Taylor, 1998) Meridional transport –Pearman and Hyson (1980) –Keeling et al. (1989)

Interannual Varib. of PBL Height (m): CCM3 T42 Annual Means (1983—2002)

Winter differences drive interannual variability

R 2 for winter monthly anomalies of rectifier vs. surface wind speed (arrows: climatological winter surface winds)

“Neutral Biosphere” : seasonal boundary condition (mol C cm -2 yr -1 ) *TRANSCOM3 Boundary Condition (also used in this study)

Maximum in Rectifier occurs North of maximum in N.B. forcing

Rectification: Horizontal Control Source Sink Source+SinkSource-Sink *Taguchi (1996, JGR, 101, )

Seasonal Prevailing Surface Winds: CCM3, T42 (1983—2002) NE: Region of Maximum Interannual Rectifier SW: Region of High Corr. (wind, pbl, rectifier)

Interannual variability in MBL pCO 2 (Globalview Zonal Mean, Detrended )

Conclusions: Resolution effect: differences but no clear tendency –Systematic bias due to insufficient resolution? –Interannual variability increases with model resolution –Need long high-resolution simulations Interannual variability of the rectifier: large in CCM3 –Importance of interannual variability of horizontal transport –Comparable to the range of TRANSCOM models –Comparable to observed interannual variability of pCO2 in MBL –Atm. CO 2 Growth rate = f(SMS, Interannual Var. in Transport) –Interannual variability in transport likely to differ among models Inversions with AGCM not appropriate Effect of Nudging? Different reanalysis products; different models? Call for new efforts to constrain effect of interannual variability in atmospheric transport on inverse estimates of C sources and sinks