Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Theoretical Perspective(s) Angela V. Olinto CfCP, DAA, EFI University of Chicago.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Science FoundationThe Kavli Foundation APS April 2008 Meeting - St. Louis, Missouri Results from Cosmic-Ray Experiments Vasiliki Pavlidou.
Advertisements

GZK cutoff and constraints on the Lorentz invariance violation Bi Xiao-Jun (IHEP) 2011/5/9.
Status of Top-Down Models for the Origin of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays I. Observation of ultra-high energy cosmic rays before the Pierre Auger Observatory.
High Energy Neutrinos from Astrophysical Sources Dmitry Semikoz UCLA, Los Angeles & INR, Moscow.
Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Ray Nuclei and Neutrinos
Nuclei As Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Oleg Kalashev* UCLA, INR RAS GZK 40: The 3rd International Workshop on THE HIGHEST ENERGY COSMIC RAYS AND THEIR.
An update on the High Energy End of the Cosmic Ray spectra M. Ave.
Magnetic Field Workshop November 2007 Constraints on Astrophysical Magnetic Fields from UHE Cosmic Rays Roger Clay, University of Adelaide based on work.
The Pierre Auger Observatory Nicolás G. Busca Fermilab-University of Chicago FNAL User’s Meeting, May 2006.
New Physics from Cosmic Neutrinos: Extra Dimensions and Black Holes Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 1 st ANITA Collaboration Meeting, UCI 24 November 2002.
What can we learn from the GZK feature? Angela V. Olinto Astronomy & Astrophysics Kavli Institute Cosmol.Phys. Enrico Fermi Institute University of Chicago.
AGASA update M. Teshima ICRR, U of CfCP mini workshop Oct
ANITA Meeting UC Irvine 23 November 2002 EHE Cosmic Rays, EHE Neutrinos and GeV- TeV Gamma rays David Kieda University of Utah Department of Physics.
What is cosmic radiation and where does it come from? Frederik Rühr, Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Universität Heidelberg IRTG Seminar, 26. Oktober 2007.
Survey of the Universe Greg Snow U Nebraska Lincoln CROP.
07/05/2003 Valencia1 The Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays Introduction Data Acceleration and propagation Numerical Simulations (Results) Conclusions Isola.
The Pierre Auger Observatory & Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Nick Cowan UW Astronomy January 2006.
Science Potential/Opportunities of AMANDA-II  S. Barwick ICRC, Aug 2001 Diffuse Science Point Sources Flavor physics Transient Sources 
Ultra high energy cosmic rays: highlights of recent results J. Matthews Pierre Auger Observatory Louisiana State University 19 August August.
The National Science FoundationThe Kavli Foundation Mapping the Ultra-high--energy Cosmic-ray Sky with the Pierre Auger Observatory Vasiliki Pavlidou for.
Survey of the Universe We live in an expanding Universe What’s within 50 Megaparsecs = 150 Million Light Years from us? Why is this distance relevant to.
Deflections of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays by Intergalactic Magnetic Fields Based on astro-ph/ with Klaus Dolag (Dipartimento di Astronomia -
New Views on the Universe Angela V. Olinto Astronomy & Astrophysics Kavli Institute Cosmol. Phys. Enrico Fermi Institute University of Chicago Vèmes Rencontres.
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
Ultra high energy cosmic rays Donna Kubik Spring, 2005.
Accelerators in the KEK, Tsukuba Mar. 14, Towards unravelling the structural distribution of ultra-high-energy cosmic ray sources Hajime.
Nebular Astrophysics.
Probing Extreme Universe through Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Yamamoto Tokonatsu Konan University, Japan Introduction UHECR observation Recent results.
CCHJ Apr Results from the High Resolution Fly’s Eye Charles Jui HiRes Collaboration University of Utah APS Meeting, Long Beach April 30, 2000.
Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Research with the Pierre Auger Observatory Methods, Results, What We Learn, and expansion to Colorado Bill Robinson.
Petten 29/10/99 ANTARES an underwater neutrino observatory Contents: – Introduction – Neutrino Astronomy and Physics the cosmic ray spectrum sources of.
Design and status of the Pierre Auger Observatory J. C. Arteaga Velázquez 1, Rebeca López 2, R. Pelayo 1 and Arnulfo Zepeda 1 1 Departamento de Física,
A CLUSTER OF ULTRAHIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS Glennys R. Farrar Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics New York University Research supported by NSF, NASA.
Testing Lorentz Invariance with UHECR Spectrum Li Ye IHEP, CAS, Sep. 26, 2008.
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: Strangers Shrouded In Mystery Scott Fleming High Energy Series 24 Feb
Astrophysics of high energy cosmic-rays Eli Waxman Weizmann Institute, ISRAEL “New Physics”: talk by M. Drees Bhattacharjee & Sigl 2000.
Mar 9, 2005 GZK Neutrinos Theory and Observation D. Seckel, Univ. of Delaware.
Cosmic Rays GNEP Teacher Workshop Steve Shropshire, July 2007.
Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Radiation and what it teaches us about astro- and fundamental physics Günter Sigl GReCO, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS.
Lepton - Photon 01 Francis Halzen the sky the sky > 10 GeV photon energy < cm wavelength > 10 8 TeV particles exist > 10 8 TeV particles exist Fly’s.
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays -- Origin and Propagation of UHECRs -- M.Teshima Max-Planck-Institut f ü r Physik, M ü nchen Erice Summer School July
Humberto Salazar (FCFM-BUAP) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, CTEQ- Fermilab School Lima, Peru, August 2012 Ultrahigh Cosmic Rays: The highest energy.
Paul Sommers Fermilab PAC Nov 12, 2009 Auger Science South and North.
High Energy Cosmic Rays Eli Waxman Weizmann Institute, ISRAEL.
Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Fluxes Günter Sigl GReCO, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS  Neutrinos: A.
1 Upsilon production and decay to UHECR neutrinos from GRB and AGN associated with strong magnetic field International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia 2008.
WILGA k61/10 Search for cosmic rays from gamma ray bursts Marcin Molak Faculty of Physics Warsaw University of Technology.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
Diffuse Emission and Unidentified Sources
Solving the Mystery of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays : 1938 to 2007 cosmic rays: James W. Cronin Inaugural Conference: Institute for Gravitation and the.
Status of the Pierre Auger Observatory Aaron S. Chou Fermilab Fermilab Users’ Meeting June 3, 2003.
November 1 - 3, nd East Asia Numerical Astrophysics Meeting KASI, Korea Shock Waves and Cosmic Rays in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe.
Propagation and Composition of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays
1 CEA mercredi 26 novembre 2007 Latest news from the Pierre Auger Observatory Nicolas G. Busca - APC - Paris 7.
March 22, 2005Icecube Collaboration Meeting, LBL How guaranteed are GZK ’s ? How guaranteed are GZK ’s ? Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Extreme Astrophysics the the > 10 GeV photon energy < cm wavelength > 10 8 TeV particles exist > 10 8 TeV particles exist they should.
Astrophysics of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays Paul Sommers Cracow, Poland January 10, 2004.
Astroparticle Physics (3/3)
Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: The disappointing model Askhat Gazizov LNGS, INFN, Italy in collaboration with Roberto Aloisio and Veniamin Berezinsky April.
UHE Cosmic Rays from Local GRBs Armen Atoyan (U.Montreal) collaboration: Charles Dermer (NRL) Stuart Wick (NRL, SMU) Physics at the End of Galactic Cosmic.
 What are Cosmic Rays? A short history What do we know now about CRs  What are Extensive Air Showers? A short history How to detect EAS? Back to CR –
AGASA results Anisotropy of EHE CR arrival direction distribution M. Teshima ICRR, U of Tokyo.
Signatures of Protons in UHECR Transition from Galactic to
Pierre Auger Observatory Present and Future
Haoning He(RIKEN/UCLA/PMO)
ultra high energy cosmic rays: theoretical aspects
Predictions of Ultra - High Energy Neutrino fluxes
A. Uryson Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, Moscow
Studies and results at Pierre Auger Observatory
Presentation transcript:

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Theoretical Perspective(s) Angela V. Olinto CfCP, DAA, EFI University of Chicago

Outline n The Basics n The Recent Past n The Present n The Future (Perspectives)

The Basics ©S. Swordy Cosmic Rays exist! Still not clear where they come from Because of... Galactic Magnetic Fields But at Ultra High Energies... should be able to point back and see the SOURCES!

Ultra High Energy CRs trajectories O’Neil, A.O., Blasi ‘01 From Diffusive to Straight Line Isola, Lemoine, Sigl ‘02

Isotropic Distribution of Arrival Directions HiRes >10 18 eV AGASA >10 19 eV Still at ~10 20 eV (if protons)  extragalactic sources  interact with CMB  GZK feature! The Basics

High Energy Proton sees CMB as High Energy Gamma Rays! GZK Cutoff Greisen ‘66, Zatsepin & Kuzmin ‘66 p+  cmb   +  p +  0  n +  + The Basics  -resonance multi-pions

Extragalactic UHE Particles Protons, nuclei and gamma rays lose energy in intergalactic space Proton energy vs. distance (J. Cronin) Energy loss on Cosmic Microwave Background Protons: Photo Pion production off CMB p+  cmb    p/n+  Fe: photo-dissociation Infrared Background Photons: e + e - Radio Background The Basics

GZK Feature Blasi, A.O. ‘01 The Basics  E 3 Flux E 

The Recent Past 3 x eV “Super-GZK” event Hadronic Primary! Proton? Fe? Not  ? But only 1 event! Fly’s Eye 1992

AGASA The Recent Past A Theorist’s Field Day ~ 10 events above eV

Isotropic + small scale clustering? galactic plane supergalactic plane AGASA>4 x eV Red squares : events above eV, green circles : events of (4 – 10)x10 19 eV The Recent Past

Bottom-Up ZeVatrons Astrophysical Accelerators reach ZeV’s Energy: ≥ eV is the 1st challenge (If 1 TeV is hard imagine 10 9 TeV!!) Propagation: the 2 nd challenge B igm (determines the spectrum and arrival direction) Acceleration = Macroscopic motions transferred to particles a la Fermi Hillas plot: require particles to be contained, ie, Gyroradius < size of Accelerator Not many objects left: Neutron Stars AGNs Radio Lobes Clusters Colliding Galaxies/Clusters Gamma Ray Bursts The Recent Past

Hillas Plot Gyroradius < size of Accelerator The Recent Past

Neutron Stars: Young Neutron Star Winds? Crab Nebula with Chandra A Galactic Fe option! (A.O., Epstein, Blasi ’99, Blasi, Epstein, A.O. ’00) The Recent Past

Local Source Solution New Component From Local Source! E -2 E -1 The Recent Past

YNSWs COMPOSITION: Heavy, Fe SPECTRUM: Hard & No GZK feature GALACTIC correlations at highest energies But if Extra Galactic…protons Very Energetic (High B and  ) YNSWs cause extragalactic UHECRs, Rare events with E -1 spectrum  A Milky Way event ~ 10 6 flux  higher E > eV Association with GRBs... (Arons ‘02, Konigl et al ‘02) The Recent Past

AGNs: Central Regions High energy Photons observed - E max ≈ eV but too many losses (Norman,Melrose, Achterberg ‘95) GZK plus Cosmography hurt. Dead Quasars maybe but GZK cut! (Bolt & Ghosh ‘99) Radio Lobes E max ≤ eV (Rachen & Bierman ‘93) E max ≤ eV (Bierman ‘00) But, in general they are Too far!! Except for M87, Need very specific B Gal & B igm Other Extragalactic Sources: But GZK plus local Hot Spot!!!!!! The Recent Past

The Hot Spot The Recent Past

Cluster Accretion Shocks E max ≈ eV (Kang, Ryu, & Jones ‘96) Even if energy is close, they don’t get out (Blasi ‘99) Galactic Winds E max ≈10 19 eV (Jokopii & Morfill ‘85) Gamma Ray Bursts (Vietri ‘95, Waxman ‘95) Transient Relativistic Shocks Similar p &  emissivity But need more for UHECRs  E/E ~1 or needs B igm ≥ G E 20 /d 30 /l NO Clusters The Recent Past

BOTTOM -UP Galactic Neutron Stars Extragalactic Radio Lobes Gamma Ray Bursts Protons, Iron, nuclei? Hard Spectrum Strong Designer Magnetic Fields to Isotropize Clustering to be understood The Recent Past

Half & Half Aproach: New Particles from Astrophysical Zevatrons For Ex: Uhecrons - Heavy-quark composites (Chung, Farrar, & Kolb ‘98) FE shower development says: Not above 50 GeV (Albuquerque, Farrar, & Kolb ‘98) Monopoles (Weiler & Kephart‘96) No also: (FE shower development) Unless… (Wick, Kephart, Weiler & Bierman‘00) UHE Neutrinos scatter off background: Z-pole (Fargion ‘99, Weiler ‘99) Needs Very High Energy (High Flux) Neutrino Source (Sigl et al ‘02) Tests: No Clustering!!! Photon primaries The Recent Past

Top-Down Energy >> eV is Easy! (Usually start at eV or higher!!) Flux is the challenge!! (determined by typical separation scales ~ H 0 -1 ) & Composition!! Topological Defects generated in the early Universe through the Kibble Mechanism – as symmetries are broken. (Hill 83, Hill, Schramm 82, Hill, Schramm, & Walker 87, Bhattacharjee, Hill, Schramm 92, Sigl, Bhattacharjee, Schramm 94) Super Conducting Strings (Hill, Schramm &Walker ‘85) Cosmic Strings (Bhattacharjee & Rana ‘90) Monopolia(Hill 83, Bhattacharjee & Sigl 95) String Cusps(Brandenberger ‘87) Monop-String Network(Berezinsky Martin &Vilenkin97) Necklaces(Berezinsky & Vilenkin 97) Vortons(Masperi & Silva 98) Super Heavy Relic particles long lived – weakly interacting = CDM M x > GeV Metastable (Kuzmin &Rubakov 97; Berezinsky, Kachelriess, &Vilenkin 97) Dark Matter – Halo Distribution - small percentage decays today - Cryptons, … (Chung, Kolb, & Riotto 98, Kuzmin & Tkachev 98) The Recent Past

Super Heavy Relics Berezinsly, Blasi, Vilenkin `99 The Recent Past

Cosmic Necklaces Berezinsly, Blasi, Vilenkin `99 The Recent Past

Top-Down Signatures Composition: Photons >> Protons Spectrum: Hard QCD fragmentation NOT Power law like the Zevatrons! Cosmography: Halo Distribution!! (SHRs & Local TDs) or ~ Homogeneous No Clustering! Unless CDM clumps

Violation of Lorentz Invariance The Recent Past

HiRes Spectrum HiRes Collab ‘02 The Present

HiRes vs. AGASA Spectrum HiRes Collab ‘02 The Present

Exposures - systematics? Teshima ‘02 The Present

Systematic Errors below eV? Teshima ‘02 The Present

AGASA vs. HiRes I mono, HiRes II mono Teshima ‘02 The Present

UHECR: Discovery vs. Measurement Fly’s Eye & AGASA - may have Discovered a New Source of UHECRs HiRes - may have Measured the GZK cutoff "There are two possible outcomes: If the result confirms the hypothesis, then you've made a MEASUREMENT. If the result is contrary to the hypothesis, then you've made a DISCOVERY." Enrico Fermi The Present Auger - will Discover or Measure The Spectrum at EHEs

Theorists’ Attitudes n Theorist A n Theorist B n Theorist C n Theorist D

Theorist B

HiRes Collab ‘02 Theorist B Energy rescalings from 10 to 33%

HiRes Collab ‘02 Theorist B

Theorist B example  2 (one power law) =  2 (GRB) / 2 No AGASA data + re-scaling to Yakutsk data Bahcall & Waxman ‘02 DeMarco et al ‘02

Theorist C Blanton, Blasi, A.O. ‘01 Photo-Pion Production has large uncertainty with low statistics!!!!!!

Theorist C Blanton, Blasi, A.O. ‘01 + Evolution matters

DeMarco, Blasi, & A.O. ‘02 AGASA is better at probing the GZK feature than HiRes ‘02 Theorist C Even with larger aperture Statistics are too low

Auger x AGASA DeMarco, Blasi, A.O. ‘02 Theorist C

HORIZONTAL SHOWERS will probe Neutrino Cross Sections Above the Standard Model Tau showers from the Earth or the Andes Theorist D

Neutrino Fluxes Tyler, A.O., Sigl, ‘01 Theorist D

HE Cross Section Tyler, A.O., Sigl, ‘01 Limits on Large Extra Dimensions w/ Production of Mini Black Holes p-Branes… Feng, Shapere ‘01 Anh, Cavaglia, A.O.’02 and … Theorist D

Neutrinos at Auger Letessier-Selvon ‘00 Theorist D

EUSO Extreme Universe Space Observatory UHE Neutrinos! Theorist D

OWL Ni Fluorescence from ABOVE! = 30 x Auger 3000 events/year E > eV !!! UHE Neutrinos! Theorist D

JC pointing the way for ~10 yrs Theorist A

Just 1570 to go! Drives the Truck!

Theorist A’s other options

Hybrid Events & Horizontal Events Sun 9 Dec. 02:56: Auger sees first hybrid event Los Leones Bay 4 Tank Huron

The night before Jim Cronin’s event... !

11 Fold Event eV

Fly’s Eye saw 0 !! But there are GZK ’s!!    (10 19 eV) ≤ cm 2 Auger can reach ~   SM  probe interactions beyond Standard Model   (10 19 eV) ≥   SM ~ cm 2 Auger can also detect  decays!  ( eV) produce  ’s Andes (50 km) or Ground (upward  ’s)    Full mixing  GZK  ‘s !!! (Tyler, A.O., Sigl, ‘01)

The Telescope Array