Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEP Data Analysis and Data Products for EMMREM Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, Texas Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner.
Advertisements

On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Extreme CME Events from the Sun Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Extreme Space Weather Events (ESWE) workshop, Boulder, CO May 14-17, 2012.
MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
M. J. Reiner, 1 st STEREO Workshop, March, 2002, Paris.
Solar Energetic Particles and Shocks. What are Solar Energetic Particles? Electrons, protons, and heavier ions Energies – Generally KeV – MeV – Much less.
Radio Diagnostics of Energetic Electrons from Solar Flares, CMEs and Shocks: Nicole Vilmer LESIA Observatoire de Paris UMR 8109 CNRS, UPMC, Université.
“The Role of Atomic Physics in Spectroscopic Studies of the Extended Solar Corona” – John Kohl “High Accuracy Atomic Physics in Astronomy”, August.
SEP Acceleration Mechanisms Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof Johns Hopkins U./Applied Physics Lab. ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop Kennebunkport,
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM WORKSHOP 1 Observations Questions.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: introduction.
Introducing Solar Radiophysics. Dynamic spectrum & Frequency drift A dynamic spectrum describes the flux density in terms of frequency and time. The.
CME Interactions and Particle Acceleration N. Gopalswamy (NASA/GSFC) 2003 February 11 Elmau CME workshop, Group-C Presentation (B. Klecker’s Group)
SSL UC Berkeley 2010 June ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop When and Where are Impulsive SEPs Accelerated? Linghua Wang, Bob Lin, S ä m Krucker Space Sciences.
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
January Nobeyama radioheliograph visit Microwave Signatures of Fast CMEs Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USA.
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM SESSION 1B Discussion of.
Solar Origin of energetic particle events Near-relativistic impulsive electron events observed at 1 AU M. Pick, D. Maia, S.J. Wang, A. Lecacheux, D. Haggery,
Influence of Time-dependent Processes and Background Magnetic Field on Shock Properties N. Lugaz, I. Roussev and C. Downs Institute for Astronomy Igor.
Overview of White Light & Radio Signatures of CMEs Angelos Vourlidas Naval Research Laboratory.
Pietro Zucca, Eoin Carley, Shaun Bloomfield, Peter Gallagher
Shock wave formation heights using 2D density and Alfvén maps of the corona ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type.
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Solar Energetic Particle Events: An Overview Christina Cohen Caltech.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Radio diagnostics of electron acceleration in the corona and in the IP medium Radio observations of the late/gradual/second phase of flares: implications.
STEREO: Beyond 3D. Why the Sun? The sun provides energy for the development of life on our planet. Our orbit looks calm and peaceful, but there is nothing.
Solar Radio Monitoring at Nançay Observatory - spectrography and imaging K.-L. Klein, A. Kerdraon, A. Lecacheux
Why Solar Electron Beams Stop Producing Type III Radio Emission Hamish Reid, Eduard Kontar SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow,
1 20 January 2005: Session Summary SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah, 31 July - 4 August Invited Talks Riley: what was the Alfven speed in the corona at.
Type III radio bursts observed with LOFAR and Nançay radioheliograph Jasmina Magdalenić 1, C. Marqué 1, A. Kerdraon 2, G. Mann 3, F. Breitling 3, C. Vocks.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
1 SEP “Campaign Events” for SHINE 2003 Question: Can we identify solar/interplanetary factors that drive SEP spectral and compositional variability at.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
Radio Emission from the Sun, Heliosphere, & Planets T. S. Bastian NRAO.
Solar origin of SEP events and dynamical behaviour of the corona Monique Pick, Dalmiro Maia, and S. Edward Hawkins LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon,
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Type IV Radio Bursts and Source Regions Observed by NoRH: Results Sara Petty, CUA/ GSFC Advisor: Dr. Nat Gopalswamy Type IV Radio Bursts Revisited Research.
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Solar observations with single LOFAR stations C. Vocks 1. Introduction: Solar Radio radiation 2. Observations with single LOFAR stations 3. Spectrometer.
ENLIL Modeling for the interaction event: Effect of Interacting CMEs on SEP Intensity NASA/GSFC H. Xie, N. Gopalswamy, P. Makela, S. Yashiro.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
Solar energetic particle simulations in SEPServer How to deal with scale separation of thirteen orders of magnitude R. Vainio, A. Afanasiev, J. Pomoell.
Complexity of Solar Eruptions Nat Gopalswamy, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
R. Miteva1, K.-Ludwig Klein1, Ines Kienriech2,
Physics of Solar Flares
T. Manuel-Hernández, E. Aguilar-Rodriguez and A. Gonzalez-Esparza
Ian Richardson HILARY CANE Bruny Island and Tycho von Rosenvinge
Solar Radio Imaging Array SIRA
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, P. Mäkelä, S. Yashiro, I. Usoskin
Karl-Ludwig Klein & Rositsa Miteva
Steven R. Spangler University of Iowa
Steven R. Spangler University of Iowa
Coronal and interplanetary radio emission as a tracer of solar energetic particle propagation Karl-Ludwig Klein (F Meudon)
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Solar Sources of Wide Coronal Mass Ejections during the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24 Sachiko Akiyama1,2, Nat Gopalswamy2, Seiji Yashiro1,2 , and Pertti.
Evidence for magnetic reconnection in the high corona
Presentation transcript:

Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth

Plan of the talk Type II bursts & CMEs Type II bursts, SEPs & CMEs Metric & IP type II bursts  Wind/WAVES & SOHO/LASCO Data  IP: 15 MHz – 20 kHz (3Ro – 1 AU); 15-1MHz DH

Type II Radio Bursts Discovered by Payne-Scott et al. (1947) at metric wavelengths (<150 MHz). -Malitson et al. (1973) in the IP medium using spaceborne radio instruments (see reviews by Cane, Reiner, Gopalswamy in AGU monograph 119) Plasma Emission Process is responsible: - [ Fast CMEs drive] MHD shocks - Shock accelerates electrons (~10 keV) - Nonthermal electrons generate Langmuir waves at local plasma frequency (fp) - Langmuir waves scatter off of ions or combine to produce radio emission at fp (fundamental) and 2fp (harmonic)

Radio Sky Interplanetary (bounded by Red lines) coronal Nelson & Labrum, 1985)

LASCO CME DH Type II Type II SA Event (Type III Bursts) F H CME-driven metric & DH type II

An IP Type II & its CME Type II f = 3MHz  n = 2.8x10 4 cm -3 (harmonic emission) Type II bursts track the CME through the IP medium Type III

DH Type II burst starts when the CME reaches ~ 2 Ro The RAD2 spectral range (14-1 MHz) Wind/WAVES correspond to 2-10 Ro  Type II bursts can identify shock- driving CMEs in the near- Sun IP medium. Too much delay: due to accelerating CMEs CME delay: Disk events

All, FW &DH CMEs > 5000 CMEs during ~150 Fast & Wide (FW) CMEs ~150 DH Type II bursts ~ 50 FW frontside western CMEs ~ 50 Major SEP events 1-3% of all CMEs are important for SEPs Electron accelerators are also ion accelerators

DH type IIs, fast and wide CMEs and major SEP events: similar solar- cycle variation. Close correlation implies physical relationship: the same CME-driven shock accelerates electrons that produce DH type II bursts, and SEPs. The number of DH type II bursts is the largest because eastern events are also included. Minor differences due to other parameters like Alfven speed. Solar Cycle Variation of Energetic Events

Speeds of CMEs associated with Metric & DH type IIs Average CME speeds increase in this order:. General population (G). Metric type II related (M). DH type II related (D) Similar tendency for width and acceleration of CMEs D M G Lara et al. 2003, GRL, in press Since DH type II bursts are 100% associated with CMEs, these properties suggest that metric type IIs are also due to CMEs, but less energetic

Two Shocks from the same source? “Alfven-speed hump” expected based on B, n profiles in the quiet corona (Hollweg, 1978; Krogulec et al, 1994; Mann et al. 1999) Include active region: 3 regions of interest (Gopalswamy et al. 2001) Easy to drive shocks on either side of the “Alfven-speed hump” Gopalswamy et al. JGR (2001). Easier to shock the corona in the transverse direction? (Gopalswamy, Kaiser & Pick, 2000). Type IIs occurring to the right of the hump are likely to be strong and indicative of IP shocks. Metric domain fp

Example of the metric – DH type II (02/12/22) Hiraiso – metric type II WAVES type II

The CME propagates thru a tenuous medium where Va is expected to be high

Summary Any short-lived driver with ~ 350 km/s may drive a shock close to the Sun, but not beyond. Blast wave: 1. Speed declines with time, 2. Weakens further at the Alfven speed hump. (No blast waves observed in situ; “driver- less” shocks are due to limb CMEs!) CME-driven: 1. CMEs accelerate low in the corona. 2. Depending on CME speed and initial height, CME can drive shocks in the corona & IP medium (cause metric & IP type II) 3. CME can drive a shock in the metric corona, lose it around Va peak and drive again in the IP medium. If it does not drive again (CMEs of moderate speed), situation similar to blast wave. 4. Solar wind works against shock-driving capacity of CMEs in the IP medium 5. SEP release height (Kahler et al., 1994) coincides with Va peak