August 2006 IAU Assembly Halo CMEs and Configuration of Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization.
Advertisements

The Solar Wind and Heliosphere (with a space weather emphasis!) V J Pizzo (NOAA/SEC)
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
13. Flare Classification in the Era of Global Coverage of the Sun A. Vourlidas, C. Cohen The GOES SXR characterization of solar flares has been used widely.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Forbush Decrease Prediction Based on Remote Solar Observations M. Dumbović, B. Vršnak Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
The Halo CMEs’ Speeds and Energy of Their Related Active Regions Yang Liu¹, and CDAW Source Identification Team² ¹Stanford University ² Including: E. Cliver,
Statistical Properties of Hot Thermal Plasmas in M/X Flares Using RHESSI Fe & Fe/Ni Line * and Continuum Observations Amir Caspi †1,2, Sam Krucker 2, Robert.
Uses of solar hard X-rays Basics of observations Hard X-rays at flare onset The event of April 18, 2001 Conclusions ITP Santa Barbara, Jan. 18, 2002Hugh.
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
M3 Session AIA/HMI Science Meeting D-1 : M3-Magnetic Field Data Products Data Product Development Session Chairs: R. Larsen/Y. Liu Status: [draft]
1 SDO/HMI Products From Vector Magnetograms Yang Liu – Stanford University
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Threshold of measures of active regions and solar activities Yang Liu – Stanford University
September 2007LWS 2007 Halo CMEs and Configuration of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University
1 Synoptic Maps of Magnetic Field from MDI Magnetograms: polar field interpolation. Y. Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, X. P. Zhao, R. M. Larson – Stanford University.
Solar Activities and Halloween Storms Ahmed Hady Astronomy Department Cairo University, Egypt.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
Observations of December 2006 events Yang Liu – Stanford University
NEWS, RESOURCES, AND MOST RECENT SOLAR WORKING DRAFTS (1) Mauna Loa Solar Observatory Newsletter Feb 2009 (2) Introduction to the Solar and Space Weather.
Solar activity over the last 1150 years: does it correlate with climate? S.K. Solanki 1, I. Usoskin 2, M. Schüssler 1, K. Mursula 2 1: Max-Planck-Institut.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
Influence of Time-dependent Processes and Background Magnetic Field on Shock Properties N. Lugaz, I. Roussev and C. Downs Institute for Astronomy Igor.
ABSTRACT This work concerns with the analysis and modelling of possible magnetohydrodynamic response of plasma of the solar low atmosphere (upper chromosphere,
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD Note; The geographical north pole acts like the south pole of a magnet.
WG3: Extreme Events Summary N. Gopalswamy & A. Vourlidas.
Identifying the Role of Solar-Wind Number Density in Ring Current Evolution Paul O’Brien and Robert McPherron UCLA/IGPP.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
Probing Electron Acceleration with X-ray Lightcurves Siming Liu University of Glasgow 9 th RHESSI Workshop, Genova, Italy, Sep
XRT and EIS Observations of Reconnection associated Phenomena D. Shiota, H. Isobe, D. H. Brooks, P. F. Chen, and K. Shibata
MHD wave propagation in the neighbourhood of a two-dimensional null point James McLaughlin Cambridge 9 August 2004.
White light coronagraph showing prominances and streamers The Coronal Magnetic Field.
Solar weather consists of the Sun’s effects upon its planetary system and the solar activities it causes. Solar activities, such as flares and CMEs, form.
Plasma Heating and Particle Acceleration by Turbulence in Solar Flares Siming Liu Stanford University In collaboration with Vahé Petrosian, Yanwei Jiang,
Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.
Compressibility and scaling in the solar wind as measured by ACE spacecraft Bogdan A. Hnat Collaborators: Sandra C. Chapman and George Rowlands; University.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Global Forces in Eruptive Solar Flares: The Role of the Lorentz Force George H. Fisher, Benjamin J. Lynch, David J. Bercik, Brian T. Welsch, & Hugh S.
Correlation of magnetic field intensities and solar wind speeds of events observed by ACE. Mathew J. Owens and Peter J. Cargill. Space and Atmospheric.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
October-November CMEs Yang Liu – Stanford University
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Y. C.-M. Liu, M. Opher, O. Cohen P.C.Liewer and T.I.Gombosi
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
MDI Global Field & Solar Wind
Observations of December 2006 events
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Sample Characteristics
J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University
Periodic Acceleration of Electrons in Solar Flares
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Presentation transcript:

August 2006 IAU Assembly Halo CMEs and Configuration of Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University

August 2006IAU Assembly Introduction This is a statistical work following Liu & Hayashi (2006) who analyzed the fast halo CMEs in October-November In that work, we found that those fast halo CMEs were associated with special configurations of magnetic field. This is a statistical work following Liu & Hayashi (2006) who analyzed the fast halo CMEs in October-November In that work, we found that those fast halo CMEs were associated with special configurations of magnetic field.

August 2006IAU Assembly Instroduction (cont’)

August 2006IAU Assembly Introduction (cont’) 3D MHD simulation. 3D MHD simulation.

August 2006IAU Assembly Introduction (cont’) We argue that type 2 & 3 magnetic configurations work as an additional factor to ensure a high speed for the 2003 October-November fast halo CMEs when they propagate into the heliosphere, while the related flares’ characteristics may already define the CMEs’ speeds in the first place. We argue that type 2 & 3 magnetic configurations work as an additional factor to ensure a high speed for the 2003 October-November fast halo CMEs when they propagate into the heliosphere, while the related flares’ characteristics may already define the CMEs’ speeds in the first place.

August 2006IAU Assembly Purpose of this work Purpose: to examine whether this conclusion is held generally. Purpose: to examine whether this conclusion is held generally. Assumption: statistically, the halo CMEs with those three type configurations should have a similar speed distribution in the initial phase. Assumption: statistically, the halo CMEs with those three type configurations should have a similar speed distribution in the initial phase. Methodology: compare speed distributions of those three type CMEs. Methodology: compare speed distributions of those three type CMEs.

August 2006IAU Assembly Data We looked for the halo CMEs from the CMEs list of Gopalswamy’s group. 104 halo CMEs in the time interval from 2000 to 2004 were chosen. The solar sources were identified by that group. We looked for the halo CMEs from the CMEs list of Gopalswamy’s group. 104 halo CMEs in the time interval from 2000 to 2004 were chosen. The solar sources were identified by that group. Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 number percentage39%46%15%

August 2006IAU Assembly

August 2006IAU Assembly Distribution of CMEs versus flare class.

August 2006IAU Assembly Weak correlation was found between the speed of type 3 CMEs and the peak X- ray flux of the associated flares.

August 2006IAU Assembly Conclusions Types 2 & 3 CMEs appear to be faster than type 1. Types 2 & 3 CMEs appear to be faster than type 1. It is shown that the background magnetic configuration associated with halo CMEs does play a role in determining the speeds of the CMEs. It is shown that the background magnetic configuration associated with halo CMEs does play a role in determining the speeds of the CMEs. A weak correlation was found between the speed of type 3 CMEs and the peak of X-ray flux of the associated flares. A weak correlation was found between the speed of type 3 CMEs and the peak of X-ray flux of the associated flares.