THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. Analytic Hierarchy Process ► Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multicriteria decision-making system. ► AHP was developed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DECISION MODELING WITH Multi-Objective Decision Making
Advertisements

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) - by Saaty
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Chapter 15 Multicriteria Decision Problems n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical.
1 1 Slide Chapter 10 Multicriteria Decision Making n A Scoring Model for Job Selection n Spreadsheet Solution of the Job Selection Scoring Model n The.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
Lecture 08 Analytic Hierarchy Process (Module 1)
Introduction to Management Science
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western EMGT 501 HW Solutions Problem Problem
Multi Criteria Decision Modeling Preference Ranking The Analytical Hierarchy Process.
I’M THINKING ABOUT BUYING A CAR BUT WHICH ONE DO I CHOOSE? WHICH ONE IS BEST FOR ME??
1 The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 Overview of the AHP 1.Set up decision hierarchy 2.Make pairwise comparisons of attributes and alternatives 3.Transform.
KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & MINERALS DHAHRAN SAUDI ARABIA DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING ARE 520: Advanced Construction and Maintenance.
Introduction to Management Science
1 EXAM SCHEDULING PROBLEM: AN AHP MODEL FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION Zehra KAMIŞLI ÖZTÜRK Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty Eskisehir/TURKEY
A semantic learning for content- based image retrieval using analytical hierarchy process Speaker : Kun Hsiang.
Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 14 - SELF TEST 20.
ARE-520 Advance construction and Maintenance Modeling By
Strategic Project Alignment With Team Expert Choice
Supplier Evaluation and Selection
Computerized Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Projects Planning and Implementation By Ali Reda Al-Jaroudi Presented by: Jihad Farhat.
9-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Multicriteria Decision Making
«Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process» DAGKINIS IOANNIS, Dr. NIKITAKOS NIKITAS University of.
Presented by Johanna Lind and Anna Schurba Facility Location Planning using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Specialisation Seminar „Facility Location Planning“
1 1 Slide © 2001 South-Western College Publishing/Thomson Learning Anderson Sweeney Williams Anderson Sweeney Williams Slides Prepared by JOHN LOUCKS QUANTITATIVE.
Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP )
THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS INTRODUCTION. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is an alternate approach to expected utility. AHP successfully addresses.
Jason Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS School of Business
Quantitative Analysis for Management Multifactor Evaluation Process and Analytic Hierarchy Process Dr. Mohammad T. Isaai Graduate School of Management.
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 17 Multicriteria Decisions n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical Solution and.
The Decision Making Process with EC2000-Keypad and Internet Versions.
Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis, 3e, by Cliff Ragsdale. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning Multicriteria Decision Making u Decision.
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a mathematical theory for measurement and decision making that was developed by Dr. Thomas L. Saaty during the.
1 Chapter 16 The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which was developed by Thomas Saaty when he was acting as an adviser.
Chapter 9 - Multicriteria Decision Making 1 Chapter 9 Multicriteria Decision Making Introduction to Management Science 8th Edition by Bernard W. Taylor.
The 6th European Conference on Intellectual Capital
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION BASED ON HYBRID AHP-GP MODEL SUZANA SAVIĆ GORAN JANAĆKOVIĆ MIOMIR STANKOVIĆ University of Niš, Faculty of Occupational Safety.
A dvanced M edical D evices, I nc. Advanced Decision Modeling, LLC OPTIMIZED STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL DECISION MAKING © 2012 Advanced Decision Modeling.
THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS CAR PURCHASE EXAMPLE.
Multi-Criteria Analysis - preference weighting. Defining weights for criteria Purpose: to express the importance of each criterion relative to other criteria.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e \by Render/Stair/Hanna M1-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Analytic Hierarchy.
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Preliminary Analysis of Alternatives for the Long Term Management of Mercury John Vierow Science Applications International Corp. Reston, VA May 1, 2002.
Applied Mathematics 1 Applications of the Multi-Weighted Scoring Model and the Analytical Hierarchy Process for the Appraisal and Evaluation of Suppliers.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Do your decision conferences turn out like this?
Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System by Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making Norihiro Saikawa Department of Computer and Information.
To Accompany Russell and Taylor, Operations Management, 4th Edition,  2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Supplement S7 Supplier Selection.
AHP based group decision making using keypads Faculty of organization and informatics University of Zagreb Croatia doc.dr.sc. Nina Begičević, Ph.D. prof.dr.sc.
Farmers Preference of Conservation Agricultural Practices, Case Study: Tentuli Village, India C. Chan-Halbrendt (Presenter) Dept. of Natural Resources.
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Aha! Analytics 2278 Baldwin Drive Phone: (937) , FAX: (866) An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
Supplement S7 Supplier Selection.
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
A Scoring Model for Job Selection
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
The Decision Making Process with EC2000-Keypad and Internet Versions
Analytic Hierarchy Process Prepared by Lee Revere and John Large
Analytical Hierarchy Process
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Quantitative Techniques for Decision Making-4 (AHP)
Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
Expert Choice 2000 Decision Solutions
Agenda for This Week Monday, April 25 AHP Wednesday, April 27
Multicriteria Decision Making
AHP (Analytic Hierarchy process)
Presentation transcript:

THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Analytic Hierarchy Process ► Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multicriteria decision-making system. ► AHP was developed by Thomas L. Saaty. ► It is used to solve complex decision- making problems. ► AHP has been applied in variety of decisions and planning projects in nearly 20 countries. ► AHP is implemented in the software of Expert Choice ©.

Typical application areas ► Resource allocation ► Hiring, evaluating and promoting employees ► TQM ► Strategic planning ► Relocation decisions ► Vendor selection ► Evaluating mergers and acquisitions

How widespread is its use?..a few of the thousands of organizations using AHP and EC IBMNASA GoodyearIRS Ford Motor Co. FBI Citibank Department of Defense Xerox World Bank BoeingTexaco AT&T Eastman Kodak General Motors Inter-American Bank

A few of the many Universities using/teaching AHP/EC Harvard University Colorado State University Yale University University of Cambridge MIT Duke University American University Purdue University Naval War College Katz School of Business George Washington University Wharton School of Business Michigan State University Johns Hopkins University Stanford University University of Maryland

Expert Choice (EC) ► EC helps you organize the various elements of a problem into a hierarchy. ► EC guides you in judging, via pair-wise comparisons, the relative importance of the objectives and the preference for the alternatives that you have defined. ► EC derives priorities by combining intangible information from your experience and intuition, and tangible information such as data.

Analytic Hierarchy Process Select the Best Toothbrush Manufacturer Cost Cost ReliabilityReliability Delivery Time Cornell Brush Pik PicobuyCornell PicobuyCornell PicobuyCornell PicobuyCornell PicobuyCornell Picobuy Overall Goal Criteria DecisionAlternatives ► Step 1: Structure a hierarchy. Define the problem, determine the criteria and identify the alternatives.

Analytic Hierarchy Process ► Step 2: Make pairwise comparisons. Rate the relative importance between each pair of decision alternatives and criteria.

Analytic Hierarchy Process ► Step 2 (cont’d): AHP uses 1-9 scale for the prioritization process. Numerical ratings Verbal judgments 1 Equally important (preferred) 3 Moderately more important 5 Strongly more important 7 Very strongly more important 9 Extremely more important

Analytic Hierarchy Process ► Step 2 (cont’d): Intermediate numerical ratings of 2, 4, 6, and 8 can be assigned. If someone could not decide whether one criterion (alternative) is moderately more important than the other one or strongly more important than the other one, 4 ( moderately to strongly more important ) can be assigned.

Analytic Hierarchy Process ► Step 3: Synthesize the results to determine the best alternative. Obtain the final results. ► The output of AHP is the set of priorities of the alternatives.

An Example with AHP

Choosing the most satisfied school ► Goal: To select the most satisfied school. ► Criteria: learning, friends, school life, vocational training, college prep. and music classes. ► Alternatives: School A, school B, and school C.

Goal Satisfaction with School Learning Friends School Vocational College Music Life Training Prep. Classes School A School C School B Hierarchy:

School Selection L F SL VT CP MC Learning Friends 1/ / School Life 1/3 1/7 1 1/5 1/5 1/6.03 Vocational Trng. 1 1/ /3.13 College Prep. 1/ Music Classes 1/ / Weights Pairwise comparisons:

Comparison of Schools with Respect to the Six Characteristics Learning A B C Priorities A 1 1/3 1/2.16 B C 2 1/ Friends A B C Priorities A B C School Life A B C Priorities A B 1/5 1 1/5.09 C Vocational Trng. A B C Priorities A B 1/9 1 1/5.05 C 1/ College Prep. A B C Priorities A 1 1/ B C 1 1/ Music Classes A B C Priorities A B 1/6 1 1/3.09 C 1/

Composition and Synthesis Impacts of School on Criteria Composite Impact of Schools ABCABC L F SL VT CP MC School A:.16* * * * * *.14=.37

Overall final outcome ► School B is the best school with an overall priority of 0.38, followed by school A.