1 Value of Life Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: 12-706 / 73-359 / 19-702.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Section 3/6/2009  VSL  Static vs. Dynamic Efficiency (Example: optimal extraction of a non-renewable resource)  Defining/ measuring scarcity  Definitions.
Advertisements

OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ERS Risk Assessment, Economic Analysis, and Foodborne Illness Regulations Conference Dominic J. Mancini, OMB-OIRA.
1 Are you sure your improvements are cost-effective? Edward Broughton, PhD, MPH, PT University Research Co. April 11, 2014
Interface Between Risk Assessment and Economics: Economic Valuation Methods Presentation to IRAC Conference Risk Assessment, Economic Analysis, and Foodborne.
Exploring uncertainty in cost effectiveness analysis NICE International and HITAP copyright © 2013 Francis Ruiz NICE International (acknowledgements to:
HERU is supported by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates and the University of Aberdeen. The author accepts full.
The Benefits of Reducing Sodium Consumption in the US Adult Population Academy Health Annual Research Meeting June 9, 2008 Kartika Palar, MA Roland Sturm,
New Proposed Seatbelt Rule for Motorcoaches September 15, 2010 American Bus Association Webinar Series.
Statistics and Data Analysis Sicko and the US’s 37 th Ranked Health Care System.
Recommendations for Conducting Cost Effectiveness: Elements of the Reference Case Ciaran S. Phibbs, Ph.D. February 25, 2009.
A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE COST- UTILITY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL INTERVENTIONS Quality of improved life opportunities (QILO)
Spring Valuation of Transportation Safety Value of Life Human Capital Direct Costs Output Losses Net Consumption Gross Output Willingness to Pay.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /22/2004.
1 Extreme Events Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: /
1 Social Discount Rate Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /20/2004.
1 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Life Years Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: /
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /4/2002.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /6/2002.
COST–EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS AND COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture /14/2005.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /7/2002.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /5/2003.
1 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /3/2003.
AGEC 608 Lecture 17, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 17 Objective: Review the main aspects of cost- effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA).
1 Cost-Utility Analysis Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture /9/2005.
In-Class Case Study: Clean Air Regulation Scott Matthews Lecture 18 Nov 11, /
The Benefits of Risk Factor Prevention in Americans Aged 51 Years and Older Dana P. Goldman, Federico Girosi et al. American Journal of Public Health November.
Economic Evaluations, Briefly… CHSC 433 Module 6/Chapter 13 UIC School of Public Health L. Michele Issel, PhD, R N.
1 Cost-effectiveness of improving medical services in low-resource settings Edward Broughton, PhD, MPH, PT University Research Co. May 21, 2014
Valuation of Intangibles. Measuring the value of outcomes (or social surplus) Two basic methods – Revealed preference (observing what people actually.
Cost-Effectiveness Problem l You have a $1.5 billion budget to spend on any combination of these programs:
Life Expectancy Life Expectancy-1960 Life Expectancy-1990.
Future Incidence, Prevalence and Cost of Diabetes: An applied example of using a population prediction tool to inform public health Laura Rosella Nancy.
The Economic and Health Effects of Biomedical Innovation Peter R. Orszag Vice Chairman, Corporate and Investment Banking Chairman, Financial Strategy and.
IN THE NAME OF GOD Flagship Course on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing; Module 4: : How to construct.
The Impact of Injuries on American Indians in the Dakotas Aberdeen Area 2008 John Weaver.
Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds Professor of Health Economics
U.S. EPA DISCLAIMER EPA strongly cautions that these study results should not be used to draw conclusions about local exposure concentrations or risk.
Estimating Outcomes in Decision Analysis Brian Harris MPP Candidate Goldman School of Public Policy University of California, Berkeley.
Phaedra Corso, Ph.D. Associate Professor College of Public Health University of Georgia Program Evaluation from an Economic Perspective.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 6: Cost-effectiveness analysis – Part.
Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Joanne Spetz 31 May 2006.
انواع ارزيابي های اقتصادي سيدرضا مجدزاده مرکز تحقيقات بهره برداری از دانش سلامت و دانشکده بهداشت دانشگاه علوم پزشکي و خدمات بهداشتي درماني تهران.
Measures of Central Tendency And Spread Understand the terms mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation.
Air Resources Board Research Division Economic Valuation of Air Quality Benefits Bart Croes, Chief Research Division.
Chapter 4: Cost-Benefit Analysis Chapter 4 Cost-Benefit Analysis Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
GEF Session 10B From Diye to Value of Statistical Life: A Case Study for the Islamic Republic of Iran Morteza Rahmatian California State University, Fullerton.
Measures of Central Tendency Foundations of Algebra.
Quality of life of alcohol-related diseases and road accidents in Switzerland: An economic assessment France Priez The University of North Carolina at.
Measuring Environmental Benefits. In principle, benefits can be represented by consumer surplus, or the area under the demand curve: Market good sold.
Crash Facts and Teen Drivers Driver Risk Prevention Curriculum State of New Hampshire Departments of Education and Safety Division of Program Support.
GEF Caspian EVE 2005/UNDP and WBI Morteza Rahmatian, Value of Statisical Life Session 10A Value of Statistical Life Morteza Rahmatian California State.
Health Economic Course Series
® © 2011 National Safety Council Overview. © 2011 National Safety Council 2 Unintentional Injuries #1 cause of death for people 1 to 42 years old #5cause.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
Conceptual Addition of Adherence to a Markov Model In the adherence-naïve model, medication adherence and associated effectiveness assumed to be trial.
Cost and Benefits. Introduction Is treatment X worth it?
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 6.4 Ideas of Risk and Life Expectancy LEARNING GOAL Compute and interpret various measures of risk as they apply.
As we wait for class to start, please sign in for today’s attendance tracking: Text to 37607: NewYork25 netID Go online to AEM 4160 class website Click.
National Road Safety Strategy Update Joe Motha General Manager Safety Research and Education Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
A Lifetime Price Tag on Smoking
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” Workshop April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Roman Ladus Session 6 Measuring Impacts 1.
Lecture 12 Pricing Pharmaceuticals
Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions Basic Concepts
Measures of Central Tendency
Measures of Central Tendency
Sergio Bautista-Arredondo National Institute of Public Health Mexico
Value of Life and Traffic Injury Costs
North Dakota Driver Risk Prevention Curriculum Guide
Beneficence.
Presentation transcript:

1 Value of Life Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / /

and Administrivia  PS 5 due next wednesday  Project 2 - same rules as last time, etc.

and “Value of Life”  Economists don’t like to say they put a value on life  They say they “Study peoples’ willingness to pay to prevent premature mortality”  Translation: “how much is your life worth”?

and Economic valuations of life  Miller (n=29) $3 M in 1999 USD, surveyed  Wage risk premium method  WTP for safety measures  Behavioral decisions (e.g. seat belt use)  Foregone future earnings  Contingent valuation  Note that we are not finding value of a specific life, but instead of a statistical life

and DALY/QALY measures  Disability adjusted life years or quality- adjusted life years  These are measures used to normalize the quality-quantity tradeoff discussed last time.  E.g., product of life expectancy (in years) and the quality of life available in those years.

and Another CEA Example  Automated defribillators in community   What would costs be?  What is effectiveness?

and Risk Analysis  Study of the interactions between decision making, judgment, and nature  Evidence : cost-effectiveness of risk reduction opportunities varied widely - orders of magnitude  Economic efficiency problems

and Example - MAIS scale  Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) is an anatomically based system that classifies individual injuries by body region on a six point ordinal scale of risk to life.  AIS does not assess the combined effects of multiple injuries.  The maximum AIS (MAIS) is the highest single AIS code for an occupant with multiple injuries.

and MAIS Table - Used for QALY Conversions Comprehensive Fatality / Injury Values Injury Severity1994 Relative Value MAIS MAIS MAIS MAIS MAIS Fatality1.0

and Sample QALY comparison  A: 4 years in a health state of 0.5  B: 2 years in a health state of 0.75  QALYs: A=2 QALY; B=1.5 QALY  So A would be preferred to B.

and Cost-Effectiveness of Life-Saving Interventions  From “500 Life-saving Interventions and Their Cost-Effectiveness”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 15, No. 3,  ‘References’ (eg #1127) are all other studies  Model:  Estimate costs of intervention vs. a baseline  Discount all costs  Estimate lives and life-years saved  Discount life years saved  CE = C I -C B /E I -E B

and Specific (Sample) Example  From p Ref no  Intervention: Rear outboard lap/shoulder belts in all (100%) of cars  Baseline: 95.8% of cars already in compliance  Intervention: require all cars made after 9/1/90 to have belts  Thus costs only apply to remaining 4.2% (65,900) cars  Target population: occupants over age 4  Others would be in child safety seats  What would costs be?

and Example (cont)  1986 Costs (from study): $6 cost per seat  Plus added fuel costs (due to increased weight) = total $791,000 over life of all cars produced  Effectiveness: expect 23 lives saved during 8.4 year lifetime of fleet of cars  But 95.8% already exist, thus only lives saved  Or lives per year (of use of car)  But these lives saved do not occur all in year 0 - they are spread out over 8.4 years.  Thus discount the effectiveness of lives saved per year into ‘year 0’ lives..

and Cost per life saved  With a 5% discount rate, the ‘present value’ of lives for 9 years = (less than 0.966)  Discounted lives saved =  This is basically an annuity factor  So cost/life saved = $791,000/0.817  Or $967,700 per life (in “$1986/1986 lives”)  Using CPI: 145.8/ > $1,287,326 in $1993  But this tells us only the cost per life saved  We realistically care more about quality of life, which suggests using a quality index, e.g. life- years saved.

and Sample Life Expectancy Table 35-year old American expected to live 43.6 more years (newer data than our study) Source: National Center for Health Statistics,

and Cost per life-year saved  Assume average age of fatality in car accident was 35 years  Life expectancy tables suggested a 35 year old person would on average live to age 77  Thus ‘42’ life years saved per fatality avoided  1 life-year for years (ann. factor)  $1993 cost/life-year = $1,287,326/17.42  With 2 sig. figures: ~$74,000 as in paper  Note $1,287,326 is already in cost/life units -> just need to further scale for life-years by 17.42

and Example 2 - Incremental CE  Intervention: center (middle) lap/shoulder belts  Baseline: outboard only - (done above)  Same target population, etc.  Cost: $96,771,000  Incremental cost : $96,771,000 - $791,000  Effectiveness: 3 lives/yr, discounted  Incremental Effectiveness: =  Cost/life saved = $95.98 million/20.51 = $4.7 million ($1986) => $6.22 million in $1993  Cost/life-year = $6.22 million/17.42 = $360,000

and Overall Results in Paper  Some had $10B  Median $42k per life year saved  Some policies implemented, some only studied  Variation of 11 orders of magnitude!  Some maximums - $20 billion for benzene emissions control at tire factories  $100 billion for chloroform standards at paper mills

and Comparisons

and Agency Comparisons  $1993 Costs per life year saved for agencies:  FAA (Aviation): $23,000  CPSC (Consumer Products): $68,000  NHTSA (Highways):$78,000  OSHA (Worker Safety): $88,000  EPA (Environment): $7,600,000!  Are there underlying causes for range? Hint: are we comparing apples and oranges?