Applications of GIS to Water Resources Engineering Francisco Olivera Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 5: Storage Concepts Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI October 2013.
Advertisements

Terrain Analysis of the Iberian Peninsula Using HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 By Francisco Olivera Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Applications of GIS to Water Resources Engineering Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Rice University.
Global Hydrology Francisco Olivera Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin 19 th ESRI International User Conference GIS Hydro.
Floodplain Mapping Using AV-RAS Esteban Azagra and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Hydrologic Cycle and Watersheds. Hydrologic Cycle Components Precipitation Infiltration Percolation Runoff Evapotranspiration.
Development of a Hydrologic Model and Estimation of its Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources David R
Hydrologic Analysis Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
DEM-Based Stream and Watershed Delineation
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
CRWR-PrePro: A System of GIS Tools for HEC-HMS Modeling Support
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Hydrologic Model Integration
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Using CRWR-PrePro Francisco Olivera, PhD Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
DEM’s, Watershed and Stream Network Delineation DEM Data Sources Study Area in West Austin with a USGS 30m DEM from a 1:24,000 scale map Eight direction.
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
Introduction to HEC-HMS
A Cell to Cell Routing Model A Cell to Cell Routing Model By : Rajeev Raina CVEN 689 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor : Dr. Francisco Olivera.
GIS Applications in Regional and Global Hydrology Jay Famiglietti 1,2, Stephen Graham 1, Corinna Prietzsch 1, Karen Mohr 1 David Maidment 2, Francisco.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
WUP-FIN training, 3-4 May, 2005, Bangkok Hydrological modelling of the Nam Songkhram watershed.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
Stream and Watershed Delineation from DEM’s David Maidment, Ph.D. and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas.
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
Geospatial Stream Flow Model (GeoSFM) USGS FEWS NET EROS Data Center Sioux Falls, SD U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
CRWR-PrePro Stream and Watershed Delineation Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Introduction to GIS David R. Maidment
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Approaches to Continental Scale River Flow Routing
Watershed Analysis.
Global Hydrology and Resampling Flow Direction Data April 22, 1999
Digital Elevation Models and Hydrology
Global Hydrologic Data Development
Hydrologic River Routing
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM)
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Surface Runoff and Hydrograph Components
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
Hydrology CIVL341.
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters
Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

Applications of GIS to Water Resources Engineering Francisco Olivera Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering - Seminar September 12, 2001 – College Station, Texas

Geographic Information Systems

The Problem zTo analyze hydrologic processes in a non- uniform landscape. zNon-uniformity of the terrain involves the topography, land use and soils, and consequently affects the hydrologic properties of the flow paths. Watershed divide Watershed point Flow path Watershed outlet Opportunity

The Solutions zLumped models: Easy to implement, but do not account for terrain variability. zSpatially-distributed models: Require sophisticated tools to implement, but account for terrain variability.

Overview zSoil Water Balance zFlow Routing Methods zResults

Soil Water Balance Model Precipitation: P Evaporation: E Soil moisture: w Surplus: S Temperature: T Net Radiation: R n

Soil Water Balance Model Given: w fc : soil field capacity (mm) w pwp : soil permanent wilting point (mm) P : precipitation (mm) T : temperature (°C) R n : net radiation (W/m 2 ) Evaporation: Soil moisture and surplus: Calculated: w : actual soil moisture (mm) S : water surplus (mm) E : actual evaporation (mm) E p : potential evaporation (mm)

Global Data Precipitation and temperature data, at 0.5° resolution, by D. Legates and C. Willmott of the University of Delaware. Net radiation data, at 2.5° resolution, by the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBR). Soil water holding capacity, at a 0.5° resolution, by Dunne and Willmott. Precipitation (Jan.)Temperature (Jan.) Net Radiation (Jan.)Soil Water Holding Capacity

Monthly Surplus – Niger Basin February May August November Period between storms: 3 days.

Monthly Surplus – Niger Basin 10 days between storms 1 day between storms3 days between storms 30 days between storms Effect of disaggregation of monthly precipitation into multiple storms.

Overview zSoil Water Balance zFlow Routing Methods zResults

Flow Routing Models zCell-to-cell zElement-to-element zSource to sink Source Flow-path Sink Cell Sub-Basin Junction Reach Sink

Cell-to-Cell Model zSets a mesh of cells on the terrain and establishes their connectivity. zRepresents each cell as a linear reservoir (outflow proportional to storage). One parameter per cell: residence time in the cell. zFlow is routed from cell-to-cell and hydrographs are calculated at each cell. K1K1 K2K2 K3K3 K4K4 K5K5

Mesh of Cells zCongo River basin subdivided into cells by a °  ° mesh. zWith this resolution, 69 cells were defined.

Low Resolution River Network zLow resolution river networks determined from high resolution hydrographic data. B C D 12 3 A 4

Low Resolution River Network zHigh resolution flow directions (1-Km DEM cells) are used to define low resolution river network (0.5° cells).

Cell Length zThe cell length is calculated as the length of the flow path that runs from the cell outlet to the receiving cell outlet. B C D 12 3 A 4

Element-to-Element Model zDefines hydrologic elements (basins, reaches, junctions, reservoirs, diversions, sources and sinks) and their topology. zElements are attributed with hydrologic parameters extracted from GIS spatial data. zFlow is routed from element-to- element and hydrographs are calculated at all elements. zDifferent flow routing options are available for each hydrologic element type. Sub-Basin Junction Reach Sink Sub-Basin

Sub-Basins and Reaches zCongo River basin subdivided into sub-basins and reaches. zSub-basins and reaches delineated from digital elevation models (1 Km resolution). zStreams drain more than 50,000 Km 2. Sub-basin were defined for each stream segment.

Hydrologic System Schematic zHydrologic system schematic of the Congo River basin as displayed by HEC-HMS.

Hydrologic System Schematic zDetail of the schematic of the Congo River basin.

Delineated Streams

Guadalquivir Basin

HMS Schematic of the Guadalquivir Basin

Source-to-Sink Model zDefines sources where surplus enters the surface water system, and sinks where surplus leaves the surface water system. zFlow is routed from the sources directly to the sinks, and hydrographs are calculated at the sinks only. zA response function is used to represent the motion of water from the sources to the sinks. Source Flow-path Sink Source Flow-path

Sinks zSinks are defined at the continental margin and at the pour points of the inland catchments. zUsing a 3°x3° mesh, 132 sinks were identified for the African continent (including inland catchments like Lake Chad).

Drainage Area of the Sinks zThe drainage area of each sink is delineated using raster- based GIS functions applied to a 1-Km DEM (GTOPO30). GTOPO30 has been developed by the EROS Data Center of the USGS, Sioux Falls, ND.

Land Boxes zLand boxes capture the geomorphology of the hydrologic system. zA 0.5°x0.5° mesh is used to subdivide the terrain into land boxes. zFor the Congo River basin, 1379 land boxes were identified.

Surplus Boxes zSurplus boxes are associated to a surplus time series. zSurplus data has been calculated using NCAR’s CCM3.2 GCM model over a ° x ° mesh. zFor the Congo River basin, 69 surplus boxes were identified.

Sources zSources are obtained by intersecting: ydrainage area of the sinks yland boxes ysurplus boxes zNumber of sources: yCongo River basin: 1,954 yAfrican continent: 19,170

Response Function zPure translation zTranslation, flow attenuation, dispersion and decay Q sink =   Q i =   [ I i (t) * U i (t) ] Source - i Flow-path - i Sink  (t) U i (t) t t  (t) t U i (t) t

Overview zSoil Water Balance zFlow Routing Methods zResults

Global Monthly Surplus Animation prepared by Kwabena Asante

Global River Network

Hydrographs - Congo River Runoff Flow

Hydrographs - Amazon River Runoff Flow

Watershed Geomorphology V = 1 m/s D = 150 m 2 /s Niger River Basin: A = 2’260,000 Km 2, B = 226 Km 2, and C = 22,600 m 2.

Flooding t.u. Campus Animation prepared by Esteban Azagra

Flooding t.u. Campus Animation prepared by Esteban Azagra