1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 19th Lecture 16.01.2007 Christian Schindelhauer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Order-k Voronoi Diagram in the Plane
Advertisements

The Capacity of Wireless Networks Danss Course, Sunday, 23/11/03.
Scalable and Dynamic Quorum Systems Moni Naor & Udi Wieder The Weizmann Institute of Science.
1 SOFSEM 2007 Weighted Nearest Neighbor Algorithms for the Graph Exploration Problem on Cycles Eiji Miyano Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan Joint.
ENS 207 engineering graphics
 Distance Problems: › Post Office Problem › Nearest Neighbors and Closest Pair › Largest Empty and Smallest Enclosing Circle  Sub graphs of Delaunay.
1 Greedy Forwarding in Dynamic Scale-Free Networks Embedded in Hyperbolic Metric Spaces Dmitri Krioukov CAIDA/UCSD Joint work with F. Papadopoulos, M.
Compact and Low Delay Routing Labeling Scheme for Unit Disk Graphs Chenyu Yan, Yang Xiang, and Feodor F. Dragan (WADS 2009) Kent State University, Kent,
Random Geometric Graph Diameter in the Unit Disk Robert B. Ellis, Texas A&M University coauthors Jeremy L. Martin, University of Minnesota Catherine Yan,
By Groysman Maxim. Let S be a set of sites in the plane. Each point in the plane is influenced by each point of S. We would like to decompose the plane.
Size of giant component in Random Geometric Graphs
Ad-Hoc Networks Beyond Unit Disk Graphs
XTC: A Practical Topology Control Algorithm for Ad-Hoc Networks
Delaunay Triangulation Computational Geometry, WS 2006/07 Lecture 11 Prof. Dr. Thomas Ottmann Algorithmen & Datenstrukturen, Institut für Informatik Fakultät.
CPSC 689: Discrete Algorithms for Mobile and Wireless Systems Spring 2009 Prof. Jennifer Welch.
Lecture 3: Polygon Triangulation Computational Geometry Prof. Dr. Th. Ottmann 1 Polygon Triangulation Motivation: Guarding art galleries Art gallery theorem.
By Eyal Dushkin [Ed] Chapter 1. I. Introduction Reminder – Voronoi Diagrams  Let S be a set of sites in the plane.  Each point in the plane.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 21st Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Trade-Offs and Topology Control 6th Week.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 18th Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
CPSC 689: Discrete Algorithms for Mobile and Wireless Systems Spring 2009 Prof. Jennifer Welch.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Distributed Coloring in Õ(  log n) Bit Rounds COST 293 GRAAL and.
Rectangle Visibility Graphs: Characterization, Construction, Compaction Ileana Streinu (Smith) Sue Whitesides (McGill U.)
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Theory of Interferences, Trade-Offs between.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 16th Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks – Roger Wattenhofer –3/1Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks – Roger Wattenhofer – Topology Control Chapter 3 TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
Lecture 10 : Delaunay Triangulation Computational Geometry Prof. Dr. Th. Ottmann 1 Overview Motivation. Triangulation of Planar Point Sets. Definition.
Geometric Spanners for Routing in Mobile Networks Jie Gao, Leonidas Guibas, John Hershberger, Li Zhang, An Zhu.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Theory of Data Flow and Random Placement.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Mobility (III) 12th Week
Dept. of Computer Science Distributed Computing Group Asymptotically Optimal Mobile Ad-Hoc Routing Fabian Kuhn Roger Wattenhofer Aaron Zollinger.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 17th Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
1 Two-step Routing and Apex Angle Routing for Delaunay Triangulations PhD Candidate: Weisheng Si Supervisor: Prof. Albert Y. Zomaya School of Information.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 20th Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
Multihop Paths and Key Predistribution in Sensor Networks Guy Rozen.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 22nd Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
1 Midpoint Routing algorithms for Delaunay Triangulations Weisheng Si and Albert Y. Zomaya Centre for Distributed and High Performance Computing School.
Introduction Outline The Problem Domain Network Design Spanning Trees Steiner Trees Triangulation Technique Spanners Spanners Application Simple Greedy.
Art Gallery Theorem Computational Geometry, WS 2006/07 Lecture 8, Part 1 Prof. Dr. Thomas Ottmann Algorithmen & Datenstrukturen, Institut für Informatik.
CS Dept, City Univ.1 The Complexity of Connectivity in Wireless Networks Presented by LUO Hongbo.
1 HEINZ NIXDORF INSTITUTE University of Paderborn Algorithms and Complexity Christian Schindelhauer Algorithms for Radio Networks Winter Term 2005/2006.
7.1 and 7.2: Spanning Trees. A network is a graph that is connected –The network must be a sub-graph of the original graph (its edges must come from the.
GRAPH SPANNERS by S.Nithya. Spanner Definition- Informal A geometric spanner network for a set of points is a graph G in which each pair of vertices is.
Expanders via Random Spanning Trees R 許榮財 R 黃佳婷 R 黃怡嘉.
1 Oblivious Routing in Wireless networks Costas Busch Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Joint work with: Malik Magdon-Ismail and Jing Xi.
1 Oblivious Routing in Wireless networks Costas Busch Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Joint work with: Malik Magdon-Ismail and Jing Xi.
Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks – Roger Wattenhofer –3/1Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks – Roger Wattenhofer – Topology Control Chapter 3 TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
On Graphs Supporting Greedy Forwarding for Directional Wireless Networks W. Si, B. Scholz, G. Mao, R. Boreli, et al. University of Western Sydney National.
1 HEINZ NIXDORF INSTITUTE University of Paderborn Algorithms and Complexity Christian Schindelhauer Algorithms for Radio Networks Winter Term 2005/2006.
Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks – Roger Wattenhofer –4/1Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks – Roger Wattenhofer – Topology Control Chapter 4 TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
Efficient Computing k-Coverage Paths in Multihop Wireless Sensor Networks XuFei Mao, ShaoJie Tang, and Xiang-Yang Li Dept. of Computer Science, Illinois.
A light metric spanner Lee-Ad Gottlieb. Graph spanners A spanner for graph G is a subgraph H ◦ H contains vertices, subset of edges of G Some qualities.
HEINZ NIXDORF INSTITUTE University of Paderborn Algorithms and Complexity Algorithms for Radio Networks Exercise 7 Stefan Rührup
Peer-to-Peer Networks 03 CAN (Content Addressable Network) Christian Schindelhauer Technical Faculty Computer-Networks and Telematics University of Freiburg.
1 HEINZ NIXDORF INSTITUTE University of Paderborn Algorithms and Complexity Christian Schindelhauer Algorithms for Radio Networks Winter Term 2005/2006.
Great Theoretical Ideas in Computer Science for Some.
Architectures and Applications for Wireless Sensor Networks ( ) Topology Control Chaiporn Jaikaeo Department of Computer Engineering.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Fast.
3/3/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2015 Delaunay Triangulations I Carola Wenk Based on: Computational.
/ 24 1 Deploying Wireless Sensors to Achieve Both Coverage and Connectivity Xiaole Bai Santosh Kumar Dong Xuan Computer Science and Engineering The Ohio.
Introduction Wireless Ad-Hoc Network  Set of transceivers communicating by radio.
1 HEINZ NIXDORF INSTITUTE University of Paderborn Algorithms and Complexity Christian Schindelhauer Algorithms for Radio Networks Winter Term 2005/2006.
CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2017
Peer-to-Peer Networks 07 Degree Optimal Networks
Does Topology Control Reduce Interference?
Peer-to-Peer Networks 07 Degree Optimal Networks
Structural graph parameters Part 2: A hierarchy of parameters
Department of Computer Science University of York
Introduction Wireless Ad-Hoc Network
Clustering.
Presentation transcript:

1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 19th Lecture Christian Schindelhauer

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Options for topology control Topology control Control node activity – deliberately turn on/off nodes Control link activity – deliberately use/not use certain links Topology control Flat network – all nodes have essentially same role Hierarchical network – assign different roles to nodes; exploit that to control node/link activity Power controlBackbonesClustering

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Geometric Spanners with Applications in Wireless Networks 1.Introduction –Definition of Geometric Spanners –Motivation –Related Work 2.Spanners versus Weak Spanners 3.Spanners versus Power Spanners 4.Weak Spanners versus Power Spanners –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent = Dimension –Weak Spanners are not always Power Spanners if Exponent < Dimension –Fractal Dimensions 5.Applications in Wireless Networks 6.Conclusions

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Geometric Spanner Graphs  weak c-Spanner Graphc-Spanner Graph (c,  )-Power- Spanner Graph

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Geometric Spanners with Applications in Wireless Networks 1.Introduction –Definition of Geometric Spanners –Motivation –Related Work 2.Spanners versus Weak Spanners 3.Spanners versus Power Spanners 4.Weak Spanners versus Power Spanners –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension –Weak Spanners are not always Power Spanners if Exponent < Dimension –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent = Dimension 5.Applications in Wireless Networks 6.Conclusions

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Spanners versus Weak Spanners  Fact –Every c-Spanner is also a c-Weak Spanner  Theorem –There are Weak Spanner which are no Spanners  Proof Idea [Eppstein]: use fractal construction

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Geometric Spanners with Applications in Wireless Networks 1.Introduction –Definition of Geometric Spanners –Motivation –Related Work 2.Spanners versus Weak Spanners 3.Spanners versus Power Spanners 4.Weak Spanners versus Power Spanners –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension –Weak Spanners are not always Power Spanners if Exponent < Dimension –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent = Dimension 5.Applications in Wireless Networks 6.Conclusions

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Spanners versus Power Spanners  Theorem –For  > 1, every c-Spanner is also a (c ,  )-Power Spanner  Proof: –Consider a path P in the c-spanner with stretch factor c –This path is already a  -Power Spanner graph with stretch factor c  :

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No (Weak) Spanners versus Power Spanners  Theorem –For  >1 there is a graph family of (c,  )-Power Spanners which are no weak C- Spanners for any constant C.  Proof: –...

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Geometric Spanners with Applications in Wireless Networks 1.Introduction –Definition of Geometric Spanners –Motivation –Related Work 2.Spanners versus Weak Spanners 3.Spanners versus Power Spanners 4.Weak Spanners versus Power Spanners –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension –Weak Spanners are not always Power Spanners if Exponent < Dimension –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent = Dimension 5.Applications in Wireless Networks 6.Conclusions

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension (I)  Lemma –Let G be a weak c-spanner. Then, there is a path from nodes u to v in this graph G which as a subgraph of G is a weak 2c-spanner.  Proof sketch –Wlog. let |u-v| = 1 –Start with a weak c-spanner path from u to v –If two nodes x,y in this path are closer than 1/2 and the interior points of the sub-path (x,..,y) are outside the disk with center x and radius c/2 then construct the weak c-spanner path P’ from x to y and substitute the sub-path (x,..,y) with this sub-path P’ –Repeat this process for nodes with distance 1/4, 1/8,... –The new path is then within a circle of radius 2c with center u

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension (II)  Lemma  Proof sketch –Consider the D-dimensional spheres of radius c –If the path is a weak spanner then for all pairs u,v of the path nodes the weak spanner property is valid, hence |u,v|>1/2 –How many nodes can be gathered in the sphere of radius 1/2? –Consider spheres of radius 1/4. These spheres do not intersect. –For an upper bound divide the volume of the radius c-sphere by the volumes of the small spheres  Analogous for shorter edges

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension (III)  Theorem –For δ>D let G = (V, E) be a weak c-spanner with V ⊂ R D. Then G is a (C, δ)-power spanner for  Proof sketch: –Choose edge lengths from [2 i,2 i+1 ] –Sum over the edge lengths up to length c |u,v| and use: –This leads to a converging sum for δ<D

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Weak Spanners are not Power Spanners if Exponent < Dimension  Theorem –To any δ < D, there exists a family of geometric graphs G = (V, E) with V  R D which are weak c-spanners for a constant c but not (C, δ)-power spanners for any fixed C.

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent = Dimension  Theorem –Let G = (V, E) be a weak c-spanner with V  R D. Then G is a (C, D)-power spanner for C := O(c 4D ).  Proof strategy: 1.For a two nodes (u,v) with |u,v|=1 –Consider a bounding square of side length 4c 2.For k = 0,1,2,.. –Consider edges of lengths [c  -k-1,c  -k [ for some constant  >1 3.In each iteration use “clean-up” to produce empty space 4.If long edges exist, then at least one empty square of volume  (  -Dk ) exist.

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Geometric Spanners with Applications in Wireless Networks 1.Introduction –Definition of Geometric Spanners –Motivation –Related Work 2.Spanners versus Weak Spanners 3.Spanners versus Power Spanners 4.Weak Spanners versus Power Spanners –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent > Dimension –Weak Spanners are not always Power Spanners if Exponent < Dimension –Weak Spanners are Power Spanners if Exponent = Dimension 5.Applications in Wireless Networks 6.Conclusions

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Conclusions  Complete characterization of the relationships of Spanners, Weak Spanners and Power Spanners

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No Delaunay Graph  Definition –Triangularization of a point set p such that no point is inside the circumcircle of any triangle  Facts –Dual graph of the Voronoi-diagram –In 2-D edge flipping leads to the Delaunay- graph  Flip edge if circumcircle condition is not fulfilled planar graphs 5.08-spanner graph –Problem: Might produce very long links

University of Freiburg Institute of Computer Science Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture No YG 6 Yao-Graph  Choose nearest neighbor in each sector  c-spanner, –with stretch factor –Simple distributed construction –High (in-) degree

20 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Thank you Wireless Sensor Networks Christian Schindelhauer 19th Lecture