Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger October 7, 2003 Cycle 2 Group 1A Frank Fadenholz Jennifer Fadenholz Christian Woods Angel Taylor.
Advertisements

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
Experimental Design Fr. Clinic II Dr. J. W. Everett.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
Level Team Team Members Note by Dr. Henry: List your team members’ names on this slide.
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Flow through Packed Beds Brad Parr Brett Plemons E435.
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.
EDPE_2013 Dubrovnik, Croatia 1 Problem of Obtaining Boost Converter Bifurcation Model for Hysteretic Behaviour Željko Stojanović Department of Electrical.
Transfer Functions Chapter 4
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering Investigation of hot deformation characteristics of AISI 4340 steel using processing map.
Prognosis of Gear Health Using Gaussian Process Model Department of Adaptive systems, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, May 2011, Prague.
Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform Greg Droge, Dr. Bonnie Heck Ferri, Jill Auerbach.
HOMEWORK 08D Block diagrams Problem 1: Problem 2:
Lecture 4: Important structures of simple systems 1.
ME 335 Boğaziçi University A Study on Motor Speed Control.
Scientific Method MIQ’s Why do scientists follow the scientific method? What are the steps to the Scientific method? How can I remember the steps in order?
Chapter 7 Adjusting Controller Parameters Professor Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan.
Inquiry lab layout. Experimental design What will we test How will we test Why are we testing.
Cruise Control 3 RETURN OF THE SPEED CONTROL JEFF FERGUSON, TOM LEICK.
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
7th International Scientific Conference on “Energy and Climate Change”
University of Baghdad College of engineering Ele. & Com. Dept. 3 rd Year Matlab Report of By Ahmed Alaa Part I Part II.
CHAPTER VI BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND LINEARIZATION
Overhead Controller Design Project Name Department and University Date Class Name.
1 Steady-State Error M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada.
Heat Transfer System By Team Awesome: Sub-team Awesomer.
Heat Transfer System By Team Awesome: Sub-team Awesomer.
Reporter: Julian Ronacher
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
CHAPTER VI BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND LINEARIZATION
آشنايی با اصول و پايه های يک آزمايش
Steady-State Errors System & Control Engineering Lab.
Reporter: Julian Ronacher
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Control Systems With Embedded Implementation (CSEI)
G1 and G2 are transfer functions and independent of the
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Review of Period 1 Team Formal Reports
ELEG 3124 Signals and Systems
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Numerical Simulation of East China Sea Tsunami by Boussinesq Equation
Engineering Systems: Applications FN3K 11
MBSE Usability Activity Team Library Ideal State Exemplar
Flow through Packed Beds
Reporter: Julian Ronacher
دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده
Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond
G1 and G2 are transfer functions and independent of the
UNIVERSITÁ DEGLI STUDI DI SALERNO FACOLTÀ DI INGEGNERIA
Introduction results Forced Convection Excel Linear Regression tool
Presentation transcript:

Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Yellow Team b Jimy George b Jeff Lawrence b Taylor Murphy b Jennifer Potter

Outline b System Background Description, SSOC, Step ResponseDescription, SSOC, Step Response b FOPDT Theory b Model Theory b Results b Conclusions

Flow System Setup

Block Diagram

Steady State Operation

SSOC

Step Response: 70%-85%

FOPDT Model b Transfer Function

FOPDT Model b Model Equation Excel Parameters –t d = Time step occurs –A = Height of Step –inbl = Initial Input –outbl= Initial Steady Value

Experimental and Model Results K (lb/min/%) =0.26 Tau (sec) =0.46 t0 (sec) =0.42

Experimental and Model Results…cont K (lb/min/%) = 0.27 Tau (sec) = 0.47 t0 (sec) = 0.47

Results

Results … cont

MODEL PARAMETERS DECREASING STEADY STATE GAINK2.5 V/% DEAD TIMEt o 0 s TIME CONSTANT  0.6 s / 1.2 s / 2.4 s EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS DECREASING STEADY STATE GAINK2.5 V/% DEAD TIMEt o 0 s TIME CONSTANT  0.2 s OVERALL RESULTS MODEL PARAMETERS STEADY STATE GAIN,K =0.25 lb/min/% DEAD TIME,t o = 0.45 s TIME CONSTANT,  0.48 s EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS STEADY STATE GAIN,K =0.25 lb/min/% DEAD TIME,t o = 0.39 s TIME CONSTANT,  0.51 s OVERALL RESULTS

b Experimental Error Standard Deviations STEADY STATE GAIN,K = ± 0.01(lb/min/%) DEAD TIME,t o = ± 0.08 (sec) TIME CONSTANT,  ± 0.03 (sec) MODEL Error Standard Deviation STEADY STATE GAIN,K = ± 0.01 (lb/min/%) DEAD TIME,t o = ± 0.02 (sec) TIME CONSTANT,  ± 0.04 (sec)