Ke2 and Kmu2 Mengkai Shieh Northwestern University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Barbara Sciascia – LNF 1 K  semileptonic BR measurement B. Sciascia 4 may 2006 KpmKSL joint meeting.
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2005 Status of analysis.
Status of the  ee analysis Mauro Raggi, LNF INFN 29 th August 2013 NA48/2 rare decay session NA62 Collaboration meeting Liverpool.
 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
1 Search for the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay,   → p     HyangKyu Park University of Michigan, Ann Arbor for the HyperCP collaboration.
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
HBD studies in Run9 200GeV p+p collisions Jiayin Sun 1.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Reconstruction neutral decay modes (E391) Doroshenko M.(KEK) E391 collaboration Outlines: Data summary Analysis strategy Reconstruction K3p,K2p,Kgg decays.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
A. Dabrowski, June Ratio(ke3/pipi0) 1 Final Results Γ(Ke3)/ Γ(pipi0) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Collaboration Meeting 08 June.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
A. Dabrowski, October Ratio(ke3/pipi0); Ratio(kmu3/pipi0) 1 “Final” Γ(Ke3) / Γ(pipi0) Γ(Kmu3) / Γ(pipi0) Γ(Kmu3) / Γ(ke3) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Status: WW,ZZ->H->  Catalin, Kevin, Tony, Dovid.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.
A. Dabrowski, April 20th 2007 Γ(Ke3/pipi0); Γ(Kμ3/pipi0) 1 Kaon Semileptonic Decays Measurements Γ(Ke3) / Γ(π ± π 0 ) Γ(Kμ3) / Γ(π ± π 0 ) Γ(Kμ3) / Γ(Ke3)
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
July 19th, 2003EPS HEP Aachen R. Fantechi Tests of Chiral Perturbation Theory in K S rare decays at NA48 Riccardo Fantechi INFN - Sezione di Pisa.
Anne Dabrowski 26 February Semileptonic Analysis from Low Intensity Run Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48 Collaboration Meeting 26 February.
Search for the decay B c  B s  Masato Aoki September 13, B s  J/  channel 1.Pion reconstruction efficiency 2.Cut variables and optimization.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
-- Th. S. Bauer (NIKHEF) -- ECT Hera-B Physics results 1.Data of the year 2000 limited statistics 2.Commissioning: trigger and detector.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Preliminary Measurement of the Ke3 Form Factor f + (t) M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, C. Gatti Introduction: Form Factor Parametrization Fitting Function and.
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
Tracking Variable Study Follow up Ryan Kelley Boris Mangano Vivek Sharma.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
The K L   0  0 decays in KLOE Introduction  pairing Discriminant variables K L   0  0 counting : 3,4,5  ’s samples Control samples for efficiencies.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Search for a new light boson in  decays J.Stepaniak, M.Berłowski, NCBJ Warsaw For WASA-at-COSY Collaboration Meson2014,Krakow
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
analisys: Systematics checks
Charged Kaon Semileptonic Decays: K±  π0μ±ν and K±  π0e±ν and their Ratio at the NA48/2 experiment K0μ3 form factors at NA48 experiment Anne Dabrowski.
A Preliminary Comparative Analysis of SuperB Backwards EMC
ITS “parallel” tracking
First observation of K+ → p+p0e+e-
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
W. Wester, CDF, Fermilab, Beauty 2005, Assisi
Jaewon Park University of Rochester
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Study of Hb`b, c`c and gg in the `H channel
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Ke2 and Kmu2 Mengkai Shieh Northwestern University

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Physics Motivation Measure Br Ratio of Ke2 more precisely Measure Br Ratio of Ke2 more precisely Test Lepton Universality Test Lepton Universality

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Data Sample Eventually, full run based on Ke2 and Kmu2 triggers Eventually, full run based on Ke2 and Kmu2 triggers Today, only Monte Carlo and data based on minimum bias run (only Q1 trigger) so no trigger issues. Today, only Monte Carlo and data based on minimum bias run (only Q1 trigger) so no trigger issues.

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Initial Cuts 1 track 1 track 1 cluster 1 cluster e/p > 0.9 e/p > 0.9 HAC Energy < 10 GeV HAC Energy < 10 GeV LKR Energy > 2 GeV LKR Energy > 2 GeV 2 GeV< track p < 80 GeV 2 GeV< track p < 80 GeV Track and cluster correspond Track and cluster correspond Fiducial cuts 12cm < r < 110cm Fiducial cuts 12cm < r < 110cm 5 sigma timing cut 5 sigma timing cut

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Tuning of Cuts Look at Monte Carlo results Look at Monte Carlo results Maximize signal events Maximize signal events Minimize background Minimize background K->pi0ev(Br 5%)K->pi0ev(Br 5%) K->pipi0(Br 21%)K->pipi0(Br 21%)

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Monte Carlo Results Ke2 (signal), Br: 1.55 X 10-5 Ke2 (signal), Br: 1.55 X 10-5 Ke3 (background), Br: 0.05 Ke3 (background), Br: 0.05 Kpipi0 (background), Br: 0.21 Kpipi0 (background), Br: 0.21 Kmu2 (normalization) Kmu2 (normalization)

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Ke2, Ke3 MC Vertex Ke2 acceptance relatively flat, Ke3 drops sharply. Ke2 acceptance relatively flat, Ke3 drops sharply. Can use vertex to make a good cut. Can use vertex to make a good cut.

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Ke2, Ke3 MC p T Can cut for pt > 0.2 Can cut for pt > 0.2

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Ke2, Ke3 MC M fake Mfake calculated with electron mass Mfake calculated with electron mass Can cut for Mfake > 0.45, Mfake 0.45, Mfake < 0.525

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Ke2, Ke3 MC p e Can cut on electron p Can cut on electron p Ke3 gone for p > 52 GeV Ke3 gone for p > 52 GeV

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University 2-Dimensional Cuts Look at 2-Dim acceptance plots to determine cuts for maximizing signal events while effectively cutting out the background. Look at 2-Dim acceptance plots to determine cuts for maximizing signal events while effectively cutting out the background.

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Acc vert vs Acc pt

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Acc vert vs Acc Mfake

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Kpipi0 MC p T

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Kpipi0 MC M fake

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Kpipi0 MC p pi

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Data Tuning Tuning Minimum bias runsMinimum bias runs 25 Aug Vus run 25 Aug Vus run Runs 15746, Runs 15746, Intensity 1/8, trigger Q1/4. Intensity 1/8, trigger Q1/4. Total of 1860 bursts. Total of 1860 bursts. Future Ke2, Kmu2 triggers Future Ke2, Kmu2 triggers

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Extra Cuts (vertex>2000||pt>.2)&&mfake>0.45 &&mfake 2000||pt>.2)&&mfake>0.45 &&mfake<0.525&&pt<.25 Acc for Ke2 =.511 Acc for Ke2 =.511 Acc for Ke3 = 0 Acc for Ke3 = 0

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Data

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Data

Pisa M. Shieh, Northwestern University Data/Conclusion flux and trigger efficiency cancel flux and trigger efficiency cancel We get N e and   from the data and acceptances from the Monte Carlo. We get N e and   from the data and acceptances from the Monte Carlo. Left and right sides are not equal, therefore, we still have background that we need to eliminate. Left and right sides are not equal, therefore, we still have background that we need to eliminate. If we use the more rigid cuts instead of the looser box cut for vertex and pt (vertex>2000 && pt>.2), we get the following values: N_e=10, acc_e=.296, and above equation becomes: If we use the more rigid cuts instead of the looser box cut for vertex and pt (vertex>2000 && pt>.2), we get the following values: N_e=10, acc_e=.296, and above equation becomes: right side=.96x10^-5, left side=1.7x10^-5 May need to investigate pipi0 more to make a better selection. May need to investigate pipi0 more to make a better selection.