CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Workshop for Watershed Management Using Web-Based Decision Support Tools Bernard A. Engel Jin-Yong Choi.
Advertisements

Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Celso Ferreira¹, Francisco Olivera², Dean Djokic³ ¹ PH.D. Student, Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University ( ² Associate.
Floodplain Mapping Using AV-RAS Esteban Azagra and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Applications of GIS to Water Resources Engineering Francisco Olivera Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering.
Development of a Hydrologic Model and Estimation of its Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
N ON- P OINT S OURCE P OLLUTION Analysis and Prediction in ArcView David Munn Texas A&M University/Dept. of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Hydrologic Analysis Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
By Jennifer VerWest. Differences between Flat and Average/Steep Terrain Flat Terrain Steep/Average Terrain.
CVEN 689 Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Estimating Salt Concentration at Ungaged Locations from Parameters derived using GIS Ganesh Krishnamurthy Water.
PREPRO2004 BY ASHISH AGRAWAL. PREPRO2004 Why we need this tool? Why we need this tool? Inputs, Outputs and How it works? Inputs, Outputs and How it works?
DEM-Based Stream and Watershed Delineation
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
Presented by Jason Afinowicz Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, Texas A&M University CVEN 689 Applications of GIS to Civil Engineering.
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
CRWR-PrePro: A System of GIS Tools for HEC-HMS Modeling Support
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling Analysis and Prediction David Munn.
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Hydrologic Model Integration
Lab 3 hydrological application using GIS. Deriving Runoff Characteristics ArcGIS Flow Diagram Load DEM Fill sinks Compute flow direction Compute flow.
Revisit of the Halloween Flood from 2013 Juhn-Yuan Su C E 394K Dr. D. R. Maidment Fall 2014.
Texas A&M University, Department of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of GIS in Civil Engineering Professor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Student: Brad.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Hands on training on surface hydrologic analysis using GIS Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
A Cell to Cell Routing Model A Cell to Cell Routing Model By : Rajeev Raina CVEN 689 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor : Dr. Francisco Olivera.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
The Effects of Vegetation Loss on the Two Elk Creek Watershed as a Result of the Proposed Vail Category III Ski Area Development CE 394 K.2 By Dave Anderson.
WMS Investigation: Travel Time Variability with Method, Area, and Slope Ryan Murdock May 1, 2001.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
Stream and Watershed Delineation from DEM’s David Maidment, Ph.D. and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas.
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Automatic Generation of Parameter Inputs and Visualization of Model Outputs for AGNPS using GIS.
The Effect of Urbanization to the surface-water runoff The comparison between the urbanized and undeveloped zones.
Determining Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Cypress River Basin By: Hema Gopalan GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K) Fall 2001.
CRWR-PrePro Stream and Watershed Delineation Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
Waller Creek Sub-basin HMS Review Original project idea scrapped Difficult to find adequate GIS data No measured flow data to validate model results.
The Effects of Impervious Cover on a Hydrologic System BRUSHY CREEK WATERSHED By Ruth Haberman.
HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics
Global Hydrologic Data Development
Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Hydrologic Analysis of the Hyrum Reservoir watershed
Relating Actual Runoff to Potential Runoff
Elaine B. Darby GIS – Fall 2005
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve Number Method. The soils data and land use data must both be in raster or vector format, but not both. The CN lookup table defines which soil type and land use equal which curve number. The user may use the default table or create one to be imported to the tool. This step calculates a curve number and average impervious cover for each sub-basin. Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera CVEN 689 Applications of GIS to Civil Engineering ABSTRACT Traditional methods of calculating parameters for hydrologic analysis are tedious and time consuming. Commonly data is derived from contour maps (USGS or survey data), land use maps, and soil maps. This process may be greatly expedited by the use of a geographic information system (GIS) and hydrologic preprocessing tools. PrePro2004, developed by Dr. Francisco Olivera, is a preprocessing tool for ESRI’s ArcGIS 9.0 which uses the spatial capabilities of GIS to create input data for HEC- HMS. Tools such as PrePro2004 reduce the amount computation time, which may save hours of work and reduce the cost of hydrologic studies. This project investigates the use of PrePro2004 to develop a hydrologic model within HEC-HMS compared to compare common manual methods. PREPRO 2004 BASIC STEPS 1.Gather data 2.Fill sinks, create FDIR grid, create FACC grid 3.Construct stream network 4.Add inlet, outlet, and/or reservoir 5.Delineate watershed 6.Extract HMS elements 7.Calculate parameters 8.Calculate curve numbers 9.Export data to IDM 10.Export IDM to HMS 11.Setup HMS project Step 1: Project Study Area. DEM, mask, and stream vector data were used as primary input. Step 2: Flow direction grid based on 8-direction pour-point method. Each cell drains to one of 8 adjacent cells in direction of steepest decent. Step 5: Delineate watershed based on flow direction and flow accumulation grids as well as stream data developed in step 3. Step 11: Basin model successfully input into HEC-HEC by use of ASCII files. APPLICATION PrePro2004 was used to delineate streams and watershed for Spring Creek, prior to the confluence with Lick Creek, in College Station Texas. The use of ProPro2004 was done concurrently with hand delineation and input parameter calculations as part of a flood hazard study for the Castlegate Subdivision in College Station, TX. The DEM was obtained from the USGS seamless website. Stream vector data was downloaded from US EPA Lower Brazos arc data. A grid mask was made based on the hand delineated study area to reduce computation time. Soils and landuse vector data were obtained from the City of College Station GIS department. Zoning data was used for landuse data for this application. HSG soils data (blue and green) and land use (pinks) were obtained for College Station. Basin comparison: PrePro2004 v. Hand Delineation RESULTS It was found that PrePro2004 greatly reduced computation time for the development of watershed parameters of HEC-HMS on a large scale watershed system. Hand delineation and development of parameters took days, where PrePro2004 analysis only took a few hours. Although the hand delineation and calculation of parameters will always be slightly different due to its ability of capture storm drainage pipes and curb and gutter systems, it is interesting to note that the two methods yielded similar watershed outlines (Figure 14). Other parameters, such as average slope and curve number, also were extremely similar for the two methods. CONCLUSION PrePro2004 works best for large non-urbanized systems. Urban settings may be more correctly modeled by adding more user defined outlets, creating additional sub-basins. It is difficult to accurately define watersheds with PrePro2004 on a small, development scale and for highly urbanized settings. Using a preprocessing tool such as PrePro2004 greatly reduces the time to develop watershed parameters for use in a hydrologic modeling system. Time saved in development of hydrologic models may reduce the overall project costs, increasing the profit margin for hydrologic studies. Study Area Pond: Greens Prairie SH6 HEC-HMS electronically simulate precipitation- runoff processes of dendritic watershed systems