Decision-Making and Strategic Information Workshop on M&E of PHN Programs July 24-August 11, 2006 Addis Ababa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focusing an Evaluation Ben Silliman, Youth Development Specialist NC 4-H Youth Development.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
From Research to Advocacy
Developing and Implementing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan
Johns Hopkins University School of Education Johns Hopkins University Evaluation Overview.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Creating an Early Childhood System Karen Ponder February 9, 2010 Arizona Early Childhood Task Force.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Evaluation.
GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
Testing a Strategic Evaluation Framework for Incrementally Building Evaluation Capacity in a Federal R&D Program 27 th Annual Conference of the American.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Begin with the End in Mind
Module 1: Key concepts in data demand & use
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Group Work 2 Lessons Learned in Social Protection in Health Group No. 9 Facilitator: Elly Van Kanten.
University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 3: Engaging stakeholders.
Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 2: Developing an evaluation plan.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Funding Opportunity: Supporting Local Community Health Improvement Sylvia Pirani Director, Office of Public Health Practice New York State Department of.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Strategic Planning Session David Rudder, Ph.D. Rudder Consultants, LLC. May 17, 2006.
Program Evaluation EDL 832 Jeffrey Oescher, Instructor 6 June 2013.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning and programming Planning and prioritizing Part 1 Strengthening Statistics Produced.
Cathy Burack and Alan Melchior The Center for Youth and Communities The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University Your Program.
Stakeholder Analysis.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
The Big Picture The Role of Evaluation in Public Health Luann D’Ambrosio, MEd.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Review: Alternative Approaches II What three approaches did we last cover? What three approaches did we last cover? Describe one benefit of each approach.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap Session 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data- informed decision making  Understand.
MAFF Workshop on INTERNATIONAL BEST Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) PRACTICES 24 August 2010.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Introduction to Program Evaluation Frances Stillman, EdD Institute for Global Tobacco Control Johns.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Session VI Evaluation & Wrap Up. Evaluation Activities directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the effectiveness.
Data Driven Planning and Decision-making for Continuous School Improvement: Developing a Program Evaluation Plan Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
EVALUATION RESEARCH To know if Social programs, training programs, medical treatments, or other interventions work, we have to evaluate the outcomes systematically.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
Using Data for Decision Making. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: 1. Raise awareness of the importance of using.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
.  Evaluators are not only faced with methodological challenges but also ethical challenges on a daily basis.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Use of Information for Decision Making
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

Decision-Making and Strategic Information Workshop on M&E of PHN Programs July 24-August 11, 2006 Addis Ababa

Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Identify basic purpose of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) Understand the components and uses of strategic information Identify key elements in decision-making process List common barriers to using M&E data for decision-making and ways to overcome them

Monitoring versus Evaluation MONITORING = Tracking changes in program performance over time EVALUATION = Attributing program outcomes to their causes

Illustration of Program Monitoring Program start Program end TIME-> Program indicator

Illustration of Program Impact Program start Program end TIME-> Change in program outcome With program Without program Program impact

Purpose of Monitoring and Evaluation The purpose of monitoring and evaluation is to measure program effectiveness.

What Information Do Decision Makers Need M&E Data to Provide? Process: –Was the program carried out as planned? –How well was it carried out? Results: –Did the expected change occur? –How much change occurred? Impact: –Is the change attributable to the program? –Does the change mean program “success”?

STRATEGIC INFORMATION

Data Versus Information Can be used interchangeably, but: Data often refers to raw data, or unprocessed information Information usually refers to processed data, or data presented in some sort of context

Definition of Strategic Information Monitoring & Evaluation Evidence-based Research Surveillance Management Information System (MIS) Routine Health Information System (RHIS)

Components of Strategic Information

Uses of Strategic Information Strategic Information is the foundation upon which all planning and program design decisions are based. Strategic information facilitates program improvement, evaluates progress, and ensures policy compliance.

Strategic Information & Program Life Cycle ASSESSMENT What is the nature of the (health) problem? EVALUATION How do I know that the strategy is working? How do I judge if the intervention is making a difference? STRATEGIC PLANNING What primary objectives should my program pursue to address this problem? MONITORING How do I know the activities are being implemented as designed? How much does implementation vary from site to site? How can be program become more efficient or effective? DESIGN What strategy, interventions and approaches should my program use to achieve these priorities ?

UNDERSTANDING decision-making

What is Decision-Making? The process of choosing from among various alternatives using information

What Determines Utilization of SI for Decision-Making? SYSTEMS APPOACH TECHNICAL APPOACH INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR POLITICS CULTURE SOCIETY

Understanding Decision-Making Decision makers Decisions

Understanding Decision-Making Decisionmakers SectorHealthEducationCommercialFunctionPolicyPlanningBudgeting Service delivery AdvocacyEvaluationLevelNationalRegionalLocal

Types of Decisions Decisions Policy-making… Work plan development … Resource allocation Budget Human resources Infrastructure

Understanding decision-making Why? Who else? How? Decisionmakers Decisions

Understanding Decision-Making DecisionmakersDecisions Why? Who else? How? Whatinformation?

Use of data and other information for decision- making occurs within a given context.

Who is Involved in Decision- Making? Different types of decision makers View activities from different perspectives Have different degrees of understanding of the program Need different information Want different information Need or want information at different levels of complexity Have different intensities of interest

Examples: Decision Makers and Information Needs

How are Decisions Made? Rational/Scientific Political Routine

When Is Decision-Making Not Political? Submitted Answer to AEA Presidental Address Challenge in 1989 by R. Turpin No one cares about the program No one knows about the program No money is at stake No power or authority is at stake No one in the program And, no one in the program is making decisions about the program, or is otherwise involved in, knowledgeable about, or attached to the program

Class Activity: Data Use & Decision- Making Why are decisions made in your organization? Who makse decisions in your organization? How are decisions made in your organization? Discuss and present a time when data was used to make decisions... … and a time when other factors outweighed data utilization in decision-making

UTILIZATION-FOCUSED EVALUATION

Utilization-Focused Evaluation Doing evaluations that are useful and actually used Evaluations are largely unused As are research results New directions in accountability Increasing demand for professional evaluations Need to bring use into practice

Standards for Evaluation Utility - serve practical information needs of intended users Feasibility - be realistic, prudent, diplomatic and frugal Propriety - conducted legally, ethically, and with regard to those involved in and affected by the evaluation Accuracy - reveal and convey technically accurate information

Class Discussion What are the kinds of situations that pose special challenges to the utilization of M&E data for program decision-making? What factors should be considered in order to foster the utilization of M&E findings by intended users?

Increasing Use of M&E Data: Ad-hoc Evaluations Develop realistic recommendations for program improvement Explore multiple uses of study data Continuously remind decision makers of findings & recommendations Share findings & recommendations with broad audiences Assign evaluation staff to assist in implementing recommendation

Increasing Use of M&E Data: Outcome Monitoring Provide timely reports Involve program staff in definition of outcome measures and data collection Maintain high face validity of outcome data Demonstrate use of outcome information Repeat outcome measures on regular basis Mandate performance monitoring

“Seven Use-Deadly Sins of Evaluators” (per Patton, 1997:54) Act as the primary decision-makers Identify vague, passive audiences as users, instead of real people Target organizers as users, instead of individuals Focus on decisions, instead of decision-makers Assume the evaluation’s funding agency is automatically the primary stakeholder Wait until findings are in to identify intended users and intended uses Distance themselves from people and politics

Closing Comments Information must be based on quality data in order to be useful Information must be communicated effectively in order to be useful Information must be used to be good M&E

References Patton, Michael Quinn Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.