SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION YANWEI XUE University of Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Advertisements

Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
Adaptive Grid Reverse-Time Migration Yue Wang. Outline Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and Objective Reverse Time MethodologyReverse Time Methodology.
Selecting Robust Parameters for Migration Deconvolution University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
3D Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry Kai Lu King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Surface Wave Prediction and Subtraction by Interferometry + Deconvolution Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D OBS Data Weiping Cao, University of Utah Oct
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Jianhua Yue, Yue Wang, Gerard Schuster University.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Interferometric Prediction and Least Squares Subtraction of Surface Waves Shuqian Dong and Ruiqing He University of Utah.
3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
1 Interferometric Interpolation and Extrapolation of Sparse OBS and SSP Data Shuqian Dong and G.T.Schuster.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Interferometric Extraction of SSP from Passive Seismic Data Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
1 LEAST SQUARES DATUMING Yanwei Xue Sep. 18, 2009.
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
1 Fast 3D Target-Oriented Reverse Time Datuming Shuqian Dong University of Utah 2 Oct
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
3-D Migration Deconvolution: Real Examples Jianhua Yu University of Utah Bob Estill Unocal.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
1 OBS->OBS Extrapolation Interferometry Shuqian Dong and Sherif Hanafy Coarse OBS Virtual SWP.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Velocity Estimation of Friendswood’s Weathering Zone using Fermat’s Interferometric Principle By Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat University of Utah.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Processing Seismic Reflection Data of La Bajada Fault Ryan Lester.
3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Bob Estill ( Unocal) Jianhua Yu (University of Utah)
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
The Earth’s Near Surface as a Vibroseis Signal Generator Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah.
Jianhua Yu University of Utah Robust Imaging for RVSP Data with Static Errors.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
Enhancing Migration Image Quality by 3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Gerard Schuster Jianhua Yu, Jianxing Hu University of Utah andGXT
Migration of intermediate offset data from two-boat-survey Zongcai Feng Nov 3, 2015.
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
WAVEFIELD PREDICTION OF WATER-LAYER-MULTIPLES
Processing of KAUST Golf Data
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Inverse scattering internal multiple elimination
Processing of the Field Data using Predictive Deconvolution
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
Uses of filters To remove unwanted components in a signal
LSMF for Suppressing Multiples
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION YANWEI XUE University of Utah

Outline Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Theory of Interferometric Filtering Theory of Interferometric Filtering 2D Field Data Results 2D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results Conclusions Conclusions

d Time (s) Receiver (m) A seismogram with surface waves and reflections 0 Problem: Surface waves blur the seismograms. d surf Surface waves =+ d ref Reflection waves Solution: Filter the surface waves by Non- Linear Filter (NLF) and interferometric method

Outline Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Theory of Interferometric Prediction Theory of Interferometric Prediction 2D Field Data Results 2D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results Conclusions Conclusions

Prediction of Surface Waves Near-Offset Surf. Wave A B Mid-Offset Surf. Wave AB Near-Offset Surf. Wave A B A B AB A B A B

Basic Strategy Surface waves are removed completely? No Input data d d Output data Yesr Interferometric prediction ^ s^ s ^^d Least squares subtraction ^ ^ ^

Time (s) Receiver (m) Nonlinear Local Filter

Outline Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Theory of Interferometric Filtering Theory of Interferometric Filtering 2D Field Data Results 2D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results Conclusions Conclusions

Time (s) Receiver (m) Raw Data

Remove Surface Waves by NLF Time (s) Receiver (m)

Remove Surface Waves by Int.+NLF Time (s) Receiver (m)

Time (s) Receiver (m) Raw Data

Time (s) Receiver (m) Remove Surface Waves by F-K

Remove Surface Waves by Int.+NLF Time (s) Receiver (m)

Time (s) Receiver (m) Surface Waves Predicted by F-K

Surface Waves Predicted by Int.+NLF Time (s) Receiver (m)

Outline Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Theory of Interferometric Filtering Theory of Interferometric Filtering 2D Field Data Results 2D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results Conclusions Conclusions

Line 9 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves 04.0 Time (s) Receiver(m) Receiver (m)04.0 Time (s) Receiver (m)

Line 11 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves 04.0 Time (s) Receiver (m) 04.0 Time (s) Receiver (m)

Line 13 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves 04.0 Time (s) Receiver (m) 04.0 Time (s) Receiver (m)

Line 14 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves Time (s) Receiver (m) Time (s) Receiver (m)

Outline Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Theory of Interferometric Filtering Theory of Interferometric Filtering 2D Field Data Results 2D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results Conclusions Conclusions

Conclusions This approach is effective for surface wave removal in both 2D and 3D cases.This approach is effective for surface wave removal in both 2D and 3D cases. Advantages:Advantages: Limitations:Limitations: Better than FK method for irregular acquisition geometry.Better than FK method for irregular acquisition geometry. No need for a near surface velocity model.No need for a near surface velocity model. Sensitive to the choice of NLF parameters.Sensitive to the choice of NLF parameters. Parameter selection can be expensive.Parameter selection can be expensive. Future Work:Future Work: Eliminate need for non-linear local filter.Eliminate need for non-linear local filter. More tests on 3D data.More tests on 3D data.

Acknowledgement I thank the sponsors of 2006 UTAM consortium for their financial support.

THANKS!