Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hawaii Department of Education Safety & Well-being Toolkit An Orientation December 2009 Aloha & Welcome!
Advertisements

Forsyth County Schools
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Data Collection and Analysis. Objectives of Phase II Building relationships with data staff at district and state levelsBuilding relationships with data.
Improvement Plan Training NCLB. No Child Left Behind Program Series: Improvement Plans.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Campus Improvement Plans
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: SDP Toolkit August 16, 2012.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: CNA Toolkit August 21, 2012.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Site-Based Decision Making: A Basic Overview Texas Education Agency – Resource Guide.
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Louisiana Migrant Education Program Parent Advisory Council ** PAC **
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA) and the Title III Year 4 Plan Montague Charter Academy for the Arts and Sciences Prepared and Presented.
Louisiana's Title I, Part C, Migrant Education Program (MEP)
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
What is a PAC November, 2010.
GCEL Conference February 2016
Evaluating the Impact of MEP Programs and Services
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Welcome to <School Name> School
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component

Pilot Overview Cooperative effort: U.S. Department of Migrant Education Five Federal Comprehensive Centers Four states –Arizona –Texas –Michigan –Pennsylvania

Purpose Establish a functional process to conduct a comprehensive needs assessment for Migrant Education Programs to assist with Service Delivery Plan Provide an “end product” that will allow states not in the pilot to use this same process

Theoretical Basis Based on the work of Altschuld and Witkin: Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide (1995) From Needs Assessment to Action: Transforming Needs into Solution Strategies (2000)

Legal Requirements NCLB (Section 1304 – 1306) requires states to submit applications that describe: A comprehensive plan for needs assessment and service delivery that identifies the special educational needs of migrant children How the state’s priorities for the use of funds relate to the state’s need assessment How the state will award subgrants to reflect the results of the comprehensive needs assessment

Program Requirements Program regulations (Section ) and policy guidance states that needs assessment: Must be current Must identify the “special educational needs” of migratory children related to –Migratory lifestyle –Other needs so that children can have effective participation in school Use the best information available Guide the development of service delivery plans Establish statewide priorities for local procedures Provide a basis for allocation of funds

LEA Migrant Supplemental Program Pyramid Demonstration

Tasks for Today Overview of Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot and Process Present Working Group Outputs: –Migrant Student Profile –Areas of Concern Factors Need Indicators Data Sources Determine Preliminary Priorities

Levels of Needs Level I: Service receiver needs (Migrant students & families) Level II: Service provider & policy maker needs (School staff & migrant liaison; administrators, community services staff) Level III: System needs (resources/ procedures/retrieval systems /transportation/supplies/delivery systems)

Needs Assessment Key Terms NEED – gap or discrepancy between the present state (what is) and a desired state (what should be) TARGET GROUP – students, parents, teachers, administrators, and community-at-large NEEDS ASSESSMENT – systematic approach that progresses through a defined series of phases

Key Terms (continued) COMPREHENSIVE –the extensiveness required by law AREA OF CONCERN – general area of need FACTOR – variable or issue that is associated with academic achievement INDICATOR – provides measurable evidence related to a factor that shows an area of concern exists

Roles ADE Department of Migrant Education ADE ADE Data Staff AZ Steering Committee Contractor Comprehensive Center Staff Provide leadership, CNA management plans, finalize needs assessment program, service delivery plan Provide support to project; ensure state requirements are fulfilled Offer guidance and provide data to Contractor and working group Recommendation-making body: final recommendations to AZSDE Conduct in-depth work, particularly in data work, in conjunction with AZSDE Advisement and guidance in process

Three Phase Process Phase I: Explore “what is” Phase II: Gather and analyze data Phase III: Make decisions

Phase I Prepare Management Plan for Work (completed: ADE) Identify Areas of Concern (completed: Working Group) Determine Measurable Indicators (completed: Working Group) Identify Data Sources (completed: Working Group) Decide Preliminary Priorities (Steering Committee)

Phase II Develop Data Collection & Analysis Plan (partially completed: ADE) Gather Data to Define Needs (RMC & ADE staff) Analyze Needs (RMC & ADE staff) Identify & Analyze Causes (RMC & ADE staff) Summarize Findings (RMC & ADE)

Phase III Set Program Priority Needs (Steering Committee) Identify Possible Solutions (Steering Committee) Select Solution Strategies (Steering Committee) Propose Action Plan (Steering Committee) Final Approval (ADE) Prepare Report for USOME (ADE & RMC)

Unique Needs of Migrant Students Focus on migrant student and family needs (Level I) Activity: Look at general needs of struggling students and add the “unique” migrant need Define “unique” or “special educational” needs

“Unique” Needs of Migrant Students General Student: English Language Acquisition Instructional Quality Correct placement Grade level progress Health services Parent/family involvement Knowledge of school system & student rights Migrant Student: ?

Goal Areas from NCLB School Readiness Proficiency in Math & Reading Graduation Plus: Migrant Student Profile

Goal Area of Concern Factor A Factor B Indicator 1 Data Sources Indicator 2 Data Sources Indicator 3 Data Sources Indicator 1 Data Sources Indicator 2 Data Sources Organization Structure of Needs Assessment

Goal: Graduation Area of Concern: High School Completion English Language Proficiency Attendance 1.Percent of orally 1. State students proficient students assessment 2. Percent of 2. State Students proficient assessment In reading 1. Number of 1. Attendance rates students monitored for absences 2. Percent of parents 2. District/school contacted regarding data excessive absences Example of Needs Assessment Work

Data Sources Surveys –2002 Migrant Questionnaire –Additional surveys Databases –COEStar –SAIS –Link with California District Information

Steps in Setting Preliminary Priorities Focus on Level I Needs Consider the “Unique” Needs of Migrant Students & their Families Form Four Groups - One for each Goal Area & for the Student Profile Set the Preliminary Priorities by Area of Concern Set the Preliminary Priorities by Factor Set the Preliminary Priorities by Need Indicator