Student Engagement and Liberal Arts at Truman State University Analyzing Faculty/Student Perceptions Spring 2006 Assessment Internship Chris Roberts and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Advertisements

Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
College of Liberal Arts Report on Advising and Retention February 20, 2013.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going? Using Student Surveys to Assess and Improve Literature Courses Kelly Douglass, PhD Asst. Professor, English Riverside.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Westmont College Alumni Survey April 2015 The Alumni Office and the Provost’s Office conducted a survey of Westmont alums who graduated in the past 20.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
Temple University Russell Conwell Learning Center Office of Senior Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies GETTING INVOLVED IN RESEARCH AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY.
Grade Point Average - Your grade point average (GPA) is calculated by dividing the total amount of quality points earned by the total amount of.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Assessing College Wide SLOs using a Student Perception Survey: A Tale of Two SLOs Jeanne Edman and Brad Brazil Cosumnes River College.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Results from the 2013 Undergraduate Alumni Survey Karen Gil, Dean and Distinguished Professor, College of Arts & Sciences Lynn Williford, Assistant Provost,
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Goals and Action Plans for Cultural Immersion Mentee Guide Week 5 The Vira I. Heinz Program for Women in Global Leadership.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Civic and Citizenship Education in Times of Change: Curriculum and its Implementation Some Results of the IEA Studies Civic Education in Iraq: Study Tour.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
Comparative Alumni Research: What Matters in College AFTER College.
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Student/Faculty Interaction Presenter: Dr. Steady Moono Dean of Student Success Montgomery County Community College.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
First Tuesday Series February 2, SACS -- Quality Enhancement Plan SACS requires that universities develop a comprehensive plan to enhance student.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.
Academic Affinity and Beyond Susan DePhilippis Judith Otterburn-Martinez Atlantic Cape Community College, NJ.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Encouraging Thoughtful Career Exploration and Decision-Making Samara Reynolds, Kenan-Flagler Business School Jade Barricelli & Emily Gomez, University.
Global Education Certificate Program Rationale: To support, encourage, and recognize global learning campus wide. To provide a framework for students to.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
CBC News Poll on Discrimination November Methodology This report presents the findings of an online survey conducted among 1,500 Canadian adults.
Cardus Education Survey Formed in Story- Informing the Story
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Our Readiness to Enhance Our Academic Programs Pareena G. Lawrence.
AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): Overview of 2008 Results for Rutgers University.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
+ A Case Study of Teaching Job Interviews in Introductory Public Speaking Chris Cruz-Boone California State University, Bakersfield College to Workplace:
The University of Texas-Pan American
Research amongst Physical Therapists in the State of Kuwait: Participation, Perception, Attitude and Barriers Presented by Sameera Aljadi, PT, PhD Assistant.
Building Relationships for UNLV Students’ Success
General Education Program
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Student Course Evaluation Revision Task Force
The Heart of Student Success
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Student Engagement and Liberal Arts at Truman State University Analyzing Faculty/Student Perceptions Spring 2006 Assessment Internship Chris Roberts and Rebecca Maddox Internship Advisor: David Gillette

Assessment at Truman The Interview Project Project

Our Project: Overview Looking beyond student perceptions Comparing faculty and student ideas of student engagement and liberal arts

Our Project: Method Faculty interviews Compared with student interviews Campus-wide survey

Student Engagement and Liberal Arts Survey Students and faculty were asked to evaluate a number of characteristics within 10 questions Response Range:  Not at all important, of minor importance, somewhat important, important, very important, and extremely important In addition, participants were asked to respond to 2 open-ended questions

Significant Differences Likert-scale range converted to a scale of 1 to 6, with 6 being “extremely important” Group means were analyzed with a t-test Equivalent means were rejected with p-values less than of 137 questions had statistically significant differences between faculty and students

Importance of Class Experiences in Contributing to a Good Liberal Arts Education Faculty more value: Group Projects Independent thinking Speeches and presentations Writing papers (.966 greater than students) Discussions Hands-on labs Interdisciplinary connections Research

Importance of Class Experiences in Contributing to a Good Liberal Arts Education Students more value: Wide range of classes Interesting subject matter A good professor

Differences in Responses Regarding Options to Strengthen Student’s Liberal Arts Education Students believe there should be: More choices (.977 mean difference) Greater consistency and higher standards across professors (.549) More interdisciplinary courses (.634) More connections from LSP courses to major courses Faculty were generally indifferent to mentioned options

Faculty Indifference Towards Options to Strengthen Liberal Arts Program

Faculty Values Research As an in-class experience that contributes to a good liberal arts education As an out-of-class experience that contributes to a good liberal arts education As an out-of-class experience that enhances college experience and individual growth As a student/faculty interaction that contributes to a liberal arts education

Students Value Positive Faculty Characteristics In describing a successful educator and distinguishing good educational experiences, students value: A higher level of comfort and friendship Sociable and friendly faculty Professor enthusiasm Outgoing attitude Availability outside of class Willingness to hear students’ opinions Varied teaching abilities

Graphical Trends Of the 10 major subjects, each one had highest valued and lowest valued questions. These highs and lows were similar amongst students and faculty

Describing a Liberally Educated Person Ability to communicate and interact well with others Ability to think and reason well General academic knowledge, little expertise

Highly Valued Out-of-Class Experiences Contributing to a liberal arts education Cultural events Study abroad Enhancing college experience and growth as individuals Meeting new people Living away from home Study abroad

Least Valued Out-of-Class Experience Greek Life

Options to Strengthen Students’ Liberal Arts Education Additional requirements Encourage faculty/student interaction Eliminate foreign language requirements Real-life application

Distinguishing a Successful Student Takes responsibility for own work Good Grades

Gender Differences Student females more value Religious organizations Residential life Student employment Volunteer and service Study abroad Faculty had 11 of 137 statistically significant mean differences, compared to 79 between students and 70 between faculty and students.

Open-Ended Question: Student/Faculty Interactions Where do most valued interactions take place?  In the classroom and in professors’ offices  Labs, before and after class, research  Small numbers vs. discussion  Students placed high importance on faculty members knowing their names

Faculty Valued Interactions

Student Valued Interactions

Student Engagement and Liberal Arts at Truman State University Chris Roberts and Rebecca Maddox Internship advisor: David Gillette Thank you for attending! for further information, please contact: Chris Roberts at Rebecca Maddox at or David Gillette at