Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

Assessment types and activities
The Teacher Work Sample
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Vivian Mun, Ed.D. Accreditation What is a rubric? A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” (for.
Assessment in the MYP CENTURY MIDDLE SCHOOL. What is Assessment? Assessment is integral to all teaching and learning. MYP assessment requires teachers.
Chapter 8 Criteria and Validity PERSIAN GROUP. ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون.
Consistency of Assessment
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
University of Delaware What Is PBL? Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education.
University of Delaware Workshops on Problem-Based Learning International Islamic University Malaysia Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh.
Introduction to Assessment in PBL University of Delaware Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh.
University of Delaware Writing & Assessing Problem-Based Materials Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education.
University of Delaware Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh and Barb.
University of Delaware Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs. Instructor-Centered Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George.
Deborah E. Allen, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences George H. Watson, Sr. Associate Dean of Arts and Sciences Hal White, Professor of Chemistry.
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Contributions by Sue Groh and Hal White.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh.
University of Delaware Problem-Based Learning: Getting Started Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education.
Assessing Student Learning
Month, XX YEAR (Arial 10) Evaluating Student Learning – Ted Scholz.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Contributions by Sue Groh and Hal White.
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
Grappling with Grading Assessment & Rubrics
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
ASSESSMENT Formative, Summative, and Performance-Based
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
Richards Middle School Columbus, Georgia
Formative Assessment.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
EDU 385 EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN THE CLASSROOM
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Beyond Multiple Choice: Using Performance and Portfolio Assessments to Evaluate Student Learning.
Student Assessment Workshop #5 CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Learner-Centered Teaching In Engineering/Technology Classrooms Steven A. Freeman Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
What is design? Blueprints of the instructional experience Outlining how to reach the instructional goals determined during the Analysis phase The outputs.
Rubrics.
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
Effective Grading Strategies Alison Morrison-Shetlar Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning Adapted from the book Effective Grading by Barbara Walvoord.
The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 15, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses Barbara Duch, MSERC Susan Groh, Chemistry & Biochemistry.
University of Delaware Workshops on Problem-Based Learning International Islamic University Malaysia Problem-Based Learning: Getting.
Criterion-Referenced Testing and Curriculum-Based Assessment EDPI 344.
Assessing Learners The Teaching Center Department of Pediatrics UNC School of Medicine The Teaching Center.
Identifying Assessments
The Transformation of Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development and Course Design – Part 1 George Watson (with acknowledgement to.
Formative Assessment. Fink’s Integrated Course Design.
University of Delaware How to get started with PBL: moving to a new paradigm Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson
The New Face of Assessment in the Common Core Wake County Public Schools Common Core Summer Institute August 6, 2013.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Grading based on student centred and transparent assessment of learning outcomes Tommi Haapaniemi
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
University of Delaware What Is Problem-Based Learning? Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education.
Workshop 2014 Cam Xuyen, October 14, 2014 Testing/ assessment/ evaluation BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Introduction to Assessment in PBL
Introduction to Assessment in PBL
Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses
Introduction to Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education University of Delaware Workshop at Lycoming College August 19, 2002

Session Outline Classroom assessment: what’s important? Connecting assessment with learning objectives: examples Assessment methods and strategies Other types of assessment

What Is Assessment? “An assessment is an activity, assigned by the professor, that yields comprehensive information for analyzing, discussing, and judging a learner’s performance of valued abilities and skills.” Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, 2000 In this definition we see roles for assessment beyond simply monitoring and judging the acquisition of knowledge: there is also a need for an analysis of student learning: How is it happening? Where are the barriers to full understanding? What is working well for the student - can those approaches be exploited more fully? What assessment activities are best suited for generating this type of information? Well-designed assessments can help us understand how our students are learning: the real audience for that information, however, should be the students themselves. One of the goals of problem-based learning, after all, is to develop in students the ability to become independent learners. They, even more than we as instructors, need to understand not only how they’re learning at present, but what they can do to improve that learning. This requires a discussion: feedback from student to instructor to diagnose the student’s learning, followed by feedback from instructor to student both about how well they’re doing and about how to improve in the future. We will look briefly at the practice of using rubrics both to set standards of expectation and to provide feedback to students.

First Principle for Assessing Student Learning Assessment of student learning must be directly connected to the learning objectives of your course. You should make these connections clear to students in your syllabus.

Classroom Assessment Should Also: be based on understanding how students learn accommodate individual differences be clearly explained to students (grading criteria) be valid and have a reliable process allow for timely feedback allow faculty and students to reflect on learning be an integral part of course development From: Brown, Race, & Smith (1996). 500 Tips on Assessment

“Learning drives everything.” Assessment Decisions “Learning drives everything.” - Barbara Walvoord 1. What do you want your students to learn? 2. How will you tell if they’ve learned it?

1. What do you want your students to learn? “Grading drives everything.” - Students Define goals through learning objectives Content issues Process/skill issues Attitudes Develop ways to assess those goals

Types of Learning Objectives Content-oriented: subject-specific Basic knowledge and understanding of specific concepts, techniques, etc. in the discipline Process-oriented: global skills Effective communication: verbal and written Acquiring and evaluating information Working effectively with others Higher-order, critical thinking

2. How will you tell if they’ve learned it? Summative assessment Traditional grading for accountability Usually formal, comprehensive Judgmental Formative assessment Feedback for improvement/development Usually informal, narrow/specialized Suggestive

Assessment and Learning Objectives Bringing content and process together Content Knowledge Process Skills Assessment

Matching Assessment with Objectives Student Outcomes Exam Survey Project Portfolio Observation Know information Use information Extend knowledge Plan Study Communicate knowledge Analyze/interpret data Use reasoning G. Uno (1997) Handbook on Teaching Undergraduate Science Courses

An Example: Probing Critical Thinking Skills in a Chem Exam Goal: to design a question that: goes beyond simple knowledge or comprehension uses novel situation or “real world” context involves multiple concepts requires recognition of concepts involved (analysis), their roles here (application), and how several ideas come together (synthesis)

Traditional Exam Questions Calculate the vapor pressure of a solution of 5.8 g of NaCl in 100 g of water. Bloom Level: Knowledge Explain why a solution of NaCl will have a lower vapor pressure than pure water. Bloom Level: Comprehension

A Higher-order Exam Question The relative humidity inside a museum display case can be maintained at 75.3% by placing within the case a saturated solution of NaCl (containing excess solid NaCl). Explain, in molecular level terms, why the humidity remains constant - even when water-saturated air (100% humidity) diffuses into the case.

Assess at Several Bloom Levels Example: Analysis of exam components Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation # of points total 9 9 (F) +36 45 (D-) +22 67 (C+) +20 87 (A-) +9 96 (A) +4 100

Rubrics: Combining Formative and Summative Assessment Rubric: a set of specific criteria against which a product is to be judged Criteria reflect learning objectives for that activity. Several achievement levels are identified for each criterion. Expected qualities or features of work at each level are clearly described for each criterion.

Rubric Design Achievement Levels Criteria Objective 1 Objective 2 Excellent Good Needs Work Not acceptable Objective 1 Accepted Minor Major Rejected revision revision Objective 2 Expert Advanced Intermediate Novice Objective 3 6-5 4-3 2-1 0

Rubric Construction Achievement Levels Criteria State an objective Excellent Good Needs Work Not acceptable State an objective Describe characteristic features of each level of achievement

Rubric for Planning of a Middle School Science Unit Excellent Good Average Poor Appropriate; Appropriate; Incomplete Few standards, listed for listed for list/ some less inappropriately each lesson most lessons appropriate listed State & national standards Developmental level of lesson Includes nature of science, inquiry in Assessment Appropriate; Appropriate; Most lessons are Few lessons are misconceptions misconceptions appropriate; appropriate addressed in addressed in misconceptions misconceptions all lessons most lessons addressed in few not addressed all lessons most lessons many lessons few lessons Variety of Used in most Used but with Little use of activities, areas but little planning assessment well-integrated missed in some or integration throughout unit

Advantages of Rubric Use Clarifies expectations; sets public standards Efficient, specific feedback concerning areas of strength, weakness Convenient evaluation of both content and process learning objectives Encourages self-assessment: use as guideline Minimizes subjectivity in scoring; numerical values facilitate use in judging Focal point for ongoing feedback for improvement

Other Ideas for Rubric Use Have students participate in setting criteria, performance descriptions Use old student work as “data” Have students use rubric to rate own work; submit rating with assignment Others?

Examples: Linking Assessment to Learning Objectives Group Discussion and Report Out 10 minutes

Other Ideas for Assessment in PBL Courses Group problem on exams (in-class or take home) Grade product from problem Ask questions related to problem on exam Concept maps Presentations or debates Posters other?

Assessment of Individual Contributions to the Group Get input from both peers and instructor Assess more than once Focus on constructive feedback

Sample Peer Evaluation Form Scale: 5: Almost always 4: Usually 3: Frequently 2: Sometimes 1: Never Name of Group Member: Your Name: 1. Contributes to effective group functioning ____ 2. Fulfills his/her role responsibility ____ 3. Asks questions that help the group ____ 4. Listens respectfully to group members ____ 5. Asks groups members for help or clarification ____ 6. Completes assigned tasks on time ____ 7. Contributes ideas that help the group ____ 8. Comes to class and group meetings on time ____ Overall rating of this person ____ 5: Excellent 4: good 3: satisfactory 2: needs work 1: poor

Sample Peer Evaluation Form Describe the one feature of (this person or your group) that you think has contributed the most to the success of the group. Describe one way in which (this person or your group) could improve in order to help the group work better.

Questions and Reflections