Combustion Driven Compaction of Nanostructured SmCo/Fe Exchange spring magnetic materials can potentially increase the energy-products of permanent magnets.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 12 Additional Analytical Methods. Analytical Methods Technique Type Technique application Subdivisions Specific application DescriptionDestruction.
Advertisements

Bragg’s Law nl=2dsinΘ Just needs some satisfaction!! d Θ l
Novel approach to plasma facing materials in nuclear fusion reactors V. Livramento1, J.B. Correia1, D. Nunes3, P.A. Carvalho3, H. Fernandes2, C. Silva2,
Nanostructured Rare-Earth Transition-Metal Permanent Magnets
High Performance Bonded Neo Magnets using High Density Compaction J. Herchenroeder, D. Miller, N. K. Sheth, C. Foo, D. Brown and K. Nagarathnam.
Chapter 20 Magnetism.
XRD Line Broadening With effects on Selected Area Diffraction (SAD) Patterns in a TEM MATERIALS SCIENCE &ENGINEERING Anandh Subramaniam & Kantesh Balani.
Chapter 28. Magnetic Field
X-Ray Crystallography The most important technique for mineralogy The most important technique for mineralogy Direct measurement of atomic arrangement.
Polarization of Light Waves
Crystallography and Diffraction Techniques Myoglobin.
The Effect of Pressure on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Spark Plasma Sintered Silicon Nitride Anne Ellis, Leah Herlihy, William Pinc,
Chem Single Crystals For single crystals, we see the individual reciprocal lattice points projected onto the detector and we can determine the values.
I am not an expert on any of this!
ME 355 Sp’06W. Li1 POWDER METALLURGY SUBMITTED BY : P MUKESH KUMAR TH SEMESTER MECHANICAL ENGINEERING C. V. RAMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING.
Nanostructured Metallic Materials Processing and Mechanical Properties Sung Whang.
Prof. J Viplava Kumar MME,MGIT
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Force on an Electric Charge Moving in a Magnetic Field.
Lesson 9 Dipoles and Magnets. Class 27 Today we will: learn the definitions of electric and magnetic dipoles. find the forces, torques, and energies on.
Deformation and Strengthening Mechanisms
MSE-630 Magnetism MSE 630 Fall, 2008.
Scattering Experiments
SYNTHESIS AND CONSOLIDATION OF NANOPOWDERS: APPROACHES AND METHODS Cracow, 2014 Michail Alymov ISMAN.
Objective Magnetic Domains Domain Wall motion Domain Size 1 Microstructure-Properties: I Example Problems Fall, 2001 Prof. A. D. Rollett.
Chapter 19 Magnetism. clicker A wire of resistance 2 Ohms has been shaped in to a pentagon. What is the equivalent resistance between points A and B.
It is against the honor code to “click” for someone else-violators will loose all clicker pts. HITT RF Remote Login Procedure: 1. PRESS AND HOLD THE DOWN.
George C. Hadjipanayis Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716, USA Trans-Atlantic Workshop on Rare-Earth.
CUMULATIVE SYNTHESIS OF SUPERHARD COATINGS S.A. Kinelovskii 1,4, S.A. Gromilov 2,4, M.A. Korchagin 3, Yu.N. Popov 4, and K.K. Maevskii 1 1- Lavrent'ev.
Chapter 7 X-Ray diffraction. Contents Basic concepts and definitions Basic concepts and definitions Waves and X-rays Waves and X-rays Crystal structure.
Magnetic Material Engineering. Chapter 6: Applications in Medical and Biology Magnetic Material Engineering.
Permanent Magnets based on Fe-Pt Alloys P.D. Thang, E. Brück, K.H.J. Buschow, F.R. de Boer Financial support by STW.
Development of Domain Theory By Ampere in The atomic magnetic moments are due to “electrical current continually circulating within the atom” -This.
Ayhan EROL, Ahmet YONETKEN and Mehmet CAKMAKKAYA
Nanostructured Materials for Thermoelectric Power Generation Richard B. Kaner 1, Sabah K. Bux 1,3, and Jean-Pierre Fleurial 3 1 Department of Chemistry.
Synthesis and Characterization of Permanent Magnetic Nanocomposites Kunpeng Su, Xuehong Cui, Zhongwu Liu, and Dechang Zeng Introduction Suction cast magnets.
States of Matter By: Ms. Buroker. Let’s Review …. Shall We?
Magnetic Properties Scott Allen Physics Department University of Guelph of nanostructures.
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory More Thin Film X-ray Scattering: Polycrystalline Films Mike Toney, SSRL 1.Introduction (real space – reciprocal.
PHYS 430/603 material Laszlo Takacs UMBC Department of Physics
Chapter 19 Magnetism. Magnets Poles of a magnet are the ends where objects are most strongly attracted Poles of a magnet are the ends where objects are.
Project 13 Proposal, October 111 Project 13: Nanodispersion Strengthened Aluminium Luke N. Fischer Faculty Supervisor: Professor Rishi Raj Co-Supervisor:
Magnetic Fields What causes material to be magnetic? Does just spinning make a magnet?
Magnetism. Magnets ► A magnet has polarity - it has a north and a south pole; you cannot isolate the north or the south pole (there is no magnetic monopole)
Mechanics Electricity & Magnetism Thermal & Modern.
Resolution Limits for Single-Slits and Circular Apertures  Single source  Two sources.
  Satyendra Prakash Pal DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #15 Monday, Mar. 17, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Atomic Excitation by Electrons X-ray Scattering Bragg’s Law De Broglie Waves.
Lecture 27 Magnetic Fields: II
Maxime Matras J. Jiang, N. C. Craig, P. Chen, F. Kametani, P. J. Lee, U. P. Trociewitz, H. Kandel, C. Scheuerlein *, E. E. Hellstrom, and D. C. Larbalestier.
The Structure and Dynamics of Solids
Lecture 18 Chapter 32 Outline Gauss Law for Mag Field Maxwell extension of Ampere’s Law Displacement Current Spin/ Orbital Mag Dipole Moment Magnetic Properties.
Preferred orientation Stereographic projections of pole density random single crystal oriented polycrystalline material.
Characterization of Nanomaterials 1- Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) It is one of the most widely used techniques in the characterization of the morphology,
Introduction Electrical Steels (Soft Magnetic Materials) Core Losses : The energy that is dissipated in the form of heat within.
Materials Science Chapter 8 Deformation and Fracture.
Chapter 21 Magnetism. Magnets Poles of a magnet are the ends where objects are most strongly attracted Two poles, called north and south Like poles repel.
LC Circuit Section 22.5 There is a characteristic frequency at which the circuit will oscillate, called the resonance frequency.
Magnetic Domains in Soft Ferromagnets
Adviser: Dr. Shengmin Guo
Innovative Martensite-Free Precipitation Hardened Tool Steel Composites with Improved Fracture Toughness   Waleed Elghazaly (1), Omyma Elkady (2), Saied.
Preparation Stationary Sample Holders
Tomoyuki Johzaki*, *Hiroshima University Energy density (Bx2+By2)1/2
Intermetallics as innovative CRM-free materials
Engineering materials lecture #12
Biological nanocomposite materials
Force on an Electric Charge Moving in a Magnetic Field
Force on an Electric Charge Moving in a Magnetic Field
Applications 14.
Magnetism.
Phase identification Identification of crystalline substance and crystalline phases in a specimen is achieved by comparing the specimen diffraction spectrum.
Presentation transcript:

Combustion Driven Compaction of Nanostructured SmCo/Fe Exchange spring magnetic materials can potentially increase the energy-products of permanent magnets Powder consolidation has the ability to form composite magnets with arbitrary 3D shapes and sizes, less $ for expensive hard phase, possibility of mechanical fiber reinforcements

Approach Obtain high coercivity by ball- milling hard phase Increase magnetization of the ball- milled hard phase by mixing with soft-phase Obtain exchange coupling between the hard and the soft phase by compaction

Challenges for compacted nanocomposites Preserve original phases during compaction Achieve strong coupling across interfaces Here compare results for consolidation by three different methods: Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP), Plasma Pressure Compaction (P 2 C), and Combustion Driven Compaction (CDC)

Powder Precursors Sm 2 Co 17 (= Sm(Co 0.67 Fe Cu 0.07 Zr ) 7.5 )* or SmCo 5 for the hard phase [d ~ 1  m] High crystallinity acicular-Fe nanoparticles for soft phase [length ~ 200 nm, d ~ 20 nm] SmCo and Fe powder precursors were mixed together by gentle milling [*Courtesy of C. Chen, Electron Energy Corporation] [Courtesy of J. Nakano, Toda Corporation]

Acicular Fe Nanoparticles TEM of commercial acicular-Fe particles with an average length of 200 nm and average diameter of 20 nm Hydrogen reduction at 400 °C used to remove surface Fe 3 O 4

Consolidation Methods Plasma Pressure Compaction (P 2 C) Compaction done at Materials Modification, Inc., 600°C, 45 MPa, 5 min Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) Compaction done at Wright- Patterson AFB 550°C, 21.6 MPa, 5 min r

Combustion Driven Compaction Compaction done at Utron, Inc. Reach 2 GPa maximum pressure after 500 ms Fast and low temperature compaction 95% of theoretical density

Plasma Pressure Compaction (P 2 C): 73 MPa; 5 mins; 600 o C Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP): 435 kPa; 5 mins; 550 o C Combustion Driven Compaction (CDC): 2 GPa; 500 ms; “room temperature” CDC: Retains H C but here loses M because not aligned Different Compaction Methods

X-ray Diffraction and CDC Average Grain size estimates based on Scherrer analysis Powder : 190 nm Pellet : 138 nm No SmCo phase decomposition occurred during CDC (unlike with HIP and P 2 C) Reduced grain-size after compaction 22

Different Compaction Methods Plasma Pressure Compaction (P 2 C): 73 MPa; 5 mins; 600 o C Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP): 435 kPa; 5 mins; 550 o C Combustion Driven Compaction (CDC): 2 GPa; 500 ms; “room temperature” CDC: Retains H C but here loses M because not aligned

Pre-Alignment of Powder Powder aligned in pulsed field (3 one second pulses of 10 T) H = 10 T Green-compact formed by Cold Isostatic Pressing (at 35 kpsi)* Further densification using Combustion Driven Compaction (CDC) *Courtesy of S. Sankar, Advanced Materials Corporation

CDC and Alignment CDC c-axis Compaction done at Utron, Inc. Studied unaligned, and samples with 2 different alignment directions: c-axis CDC ParallelPerpendicular

CDC: via green-compact Compacted parallel to c-axis (BH) max = 1.2 x 10 5 J/m 3 (15.5 MGOe) Compacted perpendicular to c-axis (BH) max = 2.5 x 10 5 J/m 3 (31.3 MGOe) Density ~ 95% in both cases

Estimating Alignment Retention Estimate alignment retained during compaction (CDC), using X-ray Pole Figure analysis For a particular Bragg angle, diffraction from corresponding plane is recorded 2 2  Intensity (arb. units) Sm 2 Co 17 X-rays Diffracted beam  

Pole Figures For sample compacted in perpendicular orientation (002) sample (110) (002) (110) planes are perpendicular to (002), and are ~randomly oriented In (002) pole figure, I is largest near the edges, suggesting c- axis nearly parallel to the sample surface.

Return to Home Page