Complexity of simulating quantum systems on classical computers Barbara Terhal IBM Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APRIL 2010 AARHUS UNIVERSITY Simulation of probed quantum many body systems.
Advertisements

Detecting atoms in a lattice with two photon raman transitions Inés de Vega, Diego Porras, Ignacio Cirac Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics Garching.
GENERALIZED STABILIZERS Ted Yoder. Quantum/Classical Boundary How do we study the power of quantum computers compared to classical ones? Compelling problems.
Spin chains and channels with memory Martin Plenio (a) & Shashank Virmani (a,b) quant-ph/ , to appear prl (a)Institute for Mathematical Sciences.
Thermalization Algorithms: Digital vs Analogue Fernando G.S.L. Brandão University College London Joint work with Michael Kastoryano Freie Universität Berlin.
CONFIGURABLE QUANTUM NETWORKS FOR ADVANCED COMPUTING (CoQuNAC) Irfan Siddiqi Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Department of Physics, University of.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Boris Altshuler Columbia University Anderson Localization against Adiabatic Quantum Computation Hari Krovi, Jérémie Roland NEC Laboratories America.
Andy Ferris International summer school on new trends in computational approaches for many-body systems Orford, Québec (June 2012) Multiscale Entanglement.
Indistinguishable Particles  A (r),  B (r): Two identical particles A and B in a certain states r Since the particles are indistinguishable, this requires:
Bose-Fermi solid and its quantum melting in a one-dimensional optical lattice Bin Wang 1, Daw-Wei Wang 2, and Sankar Das Sarma 1 1 CMTC, Department of.
Functional renormalization – concepts and prospects.
Entanglement Renormalization Frontiers in Quantum Nanoscience A Sir Mark Oliphant & PITP Conference Noosa, January 2006 Guifre Vidal The University of.
Nuclear de-excitation Outline of approach… Source of radiation Propagation of radiation field Detection of radiation ?? nucleus.
Functional renormalization group equation for strongly correlated fermions.
Quantum Mechanics from Classical Statistics. what is an atom ? quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum field theory.
Quantum Cryptography Prafulla Basavaraja CS 265 – Spring 2005.
A Fault-tolerant Architecture for Quantum Hamiltonian Simulation Guoming Wang Oleg Khainovski.
Simulating Physical Systems by Quantum Computers J. E. Gubernatis Theoretical Division Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Subir Sachdev Yale University Phases and phase transitions of quantum materials Talk online: or Search for Sachdev on.
The Ising Model of Ferromagnetism by Lukasz Koscielski Chem 444 Fall 2006.
Study of Quantum Phase Transition in Topological phases in U(1) x U(1) System using Monte-Carlo Simulation Presenter : Jong Yeon Lee.
6. Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
CLARENDON LABORATORY PHYSICS DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD and CENTRE FOR QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Quantum Simulation Dieter.
Entanglement Area Law (from Heat Capacity)
F.F. Assaad. MPI-Stuttgart. Universität-Stuttgart Numerical approaches to the correlated electron problem: Quantum Monte Carlo.  The Monte.
Spin and Charge Pumping in an Interacting Quantum Wire R. C., N. Andrei (Rutgers University, NJ), Q. Niu (The University of Texas, Texas) Quantum Pumping.
Introduction to Tensor Network States Sukhwinder Singh Macquarie University (Sydney)
Entanglement entropy and the simulation of quantum systems Open discussion with pde2007 José Ignacio Latorre Universitat de Barcelona Benasque, September.
Max Planck Institut of Quantum Optics (Garching) New perspectives on Thermalization Aspen (NON) THERMALIZATION OF 1D SYSTEMS: numerical studies.
Merlin-Arthur Games and Stoquastic Hamiltonians B.M. Terhal, IBM Research based on work with Bravyi, Bessen, DiVincenzo & Oliveira. quant-ph/ &
Glasma Definition: The matter which is intermediate between the Color Glass Condensate and the Quark Gluon Plasma It is not a glass, evolving on a natural.
Adiabatic quantum computation and stoquastic Hamiltonians B.M. Terhal IQI, RWTH Aachen A review of joint work with S. Bravyi, D.P.DiVincenzo and R. Oliveira.
Barriers in Hamiltonian Complexity Umesh V. Vazirani U.C. Berkeley.
Phase Separation and Dynamics of a Two Component Bose-Einstein Condensate.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Evolution of Many Particle Systems 3.
Finite Temperature Path Integral Method for Fermions and Bosons: a Grand Canonical Approach M. Skorobogatiy and J.D. Joannopoulos MIT.
1 Dorit Aharonov Hebrew Univ. & UC Berkeley Adiabatic Quantum Computation.
Tensor networks and the numerical study of quantum and classical systems on infinite lattices Román Orús School of Physical Sciences, The University of.
1 The Topological approach to building a quantum computer. Michael H. Freedman Theory Group Microsoft Research.
Introduction to MERA Sukhwinder Singh Macquarie University.
CENTER FOR EXOTIC QUANTUM SYSTEMS CEQS Preskill 1983 Kitaev 2002 Refael 2005 Motrunich 2006 Fisher 2009 Historically, Caltech physics has focused on the.
A Monomial matrix formalism to describe quantum many-body states Maarten Van den Nest Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics Montreal, October 19 th 2011.
A simple nearest-neighbour two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation Stephen Bartlett Terry.
Javier Junquera Introduction to atomistic simulation methods in condensed matter Alberto García Pablo Ordejón.
Quasi-1D antiferromagnets in a magnetic field a DMRG study Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Lausanne Switzerland G. Fath.
Copyright© 2012, D-Wave Systems Inc. 1 Quantum Boltzmann Machine Mohammad Amin D-Wave Systems Inc.
Experimental Quantification of Entanglement in low dimensional Spin Systems Chiranjib Mitra IISER-Kolkata Quantum Information Processing and Applications.
Utrecht University Gerard ’t Hooft and Isaac Newton Institute, December 15, 2004.
An Introduction to Quantum Computation Sandy Irani Department of Computer Science University of California, Irvine.
KITPC Max Planck Institut of Quantum Optics (Garching) Tensor networks for dynamical observables in 1D systems Mari-Carmen Bañuls.
Physical Fluctuomatics (Tohoku University) 1 Physical Fluctuomatics 13th Quantum-mechanical extensions of probabilistic information processing Kazuyuki.
1924: de Broglie suggests particles are waves Mid-1925: Werner Heisenberg introduces Matrix Mechanics In 1927 he derives uncertainty principles Late 1925:
Functional Integration in many-body systems: application to ultracold gases Klaus Ziegler, Institut für Physik, Universität Augsburg in collaboration with.
Flat Band Nanostructures Vito Scarola
Quantum Boltzmann Machine
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Dept. ECM, UB 16 de maig de 2009 Intoduction to topological order and topologial quantum computation.
On the spectrum of Hamiltonians in finite dimensions Roberto Oliveira Paraty, August 14 th Joint with David DiVincenzo and Barbara IBM Watson.
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Universitat de Barcelona Universität Potsdam 10 December 2009 Simulation of the Laughlin state in an optical lattice.
Physics 5333 Spring 2015 (Chapter 1: getting started)
Quantum Information and Everything.
Algorithmic simulation of far-from- equilibrium dynamics using quantum computer Walter V. Pogosov 1,2,3 1 Dukhov Research Institute of Automatics (Rosatom),
Schrödinger Theory of the Electronic Structure of Matter from a ‘Newtonian’ Perspective Viraht Sahni.
Generalized DMRG with Tree Tensor Network
Quantum mechanics from classical statistics
Chapter V Interacting Fields Lecture 5 Books Recommended:
Quantum computation with classical bits
Classical Principles of Electromagnetism
Computational approaches for quantum many-body systems
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

Complexity of simulating quantum systems on classical computers Barbara Terhal IBM Research

Computational Quantum Physics Computational quantum physicists (in condensed-matter physics, quantum chemistry etc.) have been in the business of showing how to simulate and understand properties of many-body quantum systems using a classical computer. Heuristic and ad-hoc methods dominate, but the claim has been that these methods often work well in practice. Quantum information science has and will contribute to computational quantum physics in several ways: Come up with better simulation algorithms Make rigorous what is done heuristically/approximately in computational physics. Delineate the boundary between what is possible and what is not. That is: show that certain problems are hard for classical (or even quantum) computers in a complexity sense.

Physically-Relevant Quantum States local interactions are between O(1) degrees of freedom (e.g. qubits)

Efficient Classical Descriptions

Matrix Product States

1 st Generalization: Tree Tensor Product States

2 nd Generalization: Tensor Product States or PEPS

Properties of MPS and Tree-TPS

Properties of tensor product states PEPS and TPS perhaps too general for classical simulation purposes

Quantum Circuit Point of View Past Light Cone Max width

Quantum Circuit Point of View

Area Law

Classical Simulations of Dynamics

Lieb-Robinson Bounds Bulk Past Light Cone B A Lieb-Robinson Bound: Commutator of operator A with backwards propagated B decays exponentially with distance between A and B, when A is outside B’s effective past light-cone.

Stoquastic Hamiltonians

Examples of Stoquastic Hamiltonians Particles in a potential; Hamiltonian is a sum of a diagonal potential term in position |x> and off-diagonal negative kinetic terms (-d 2 /dx 2 ). All of classical and quantum mechanics. Quantum transverse Ising model Ferromagnetic Heisenberg models (modeling interacting spins on lattices) Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian (describing atom-laser interaction), spin-boson model, bosonic Hubbard models, Bose-Einstein condensates etc. D-Wave’s Orion quantum computer… Non-stoquastic are typically fermionic systems, charged particles in a magnetic field. Stoquastic Hamiltonians are ubiquitous in nature. Note that we only consider ground-state properties of these Hamiltonians.

Stoquastic Hamiltonians

Frustration-Free Stoquastic Hamiltonians

Conclusion