Mercury Jet Studies Tristan Davenne Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Joint UKNF, INO, UKIERI meeting 2008 University of Warwick, Physics Department 3-4 April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP2: Targets Proposed Outline Work Programme Chris Densham.
Advertisements

LS-Dyna and ANSYS Calculations of Shocks in Solids Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
Proposal for a programme of Neutrino Factory research and development WP-3 The Target The Neutrino Factory Target Lead Author - J R J Bennett CCLRC, RAL.
Target density Goran Skoro 12 November A Simple Model for Pion Yield from the Target Assume that the number of pions produced per proton hitting.
Shock simulations in solid targets Chris Densham Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Collimator Damage Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Cockcroft Institute “All Hands Meeting”, January 2006.
UKNFWG 12 January 2005Chris Densham Shock Waves in Solid Targets Preliminary Calculations.
MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.
Mercury Beam Dump Simulations Tristan Davenne Ottone Caretta STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK November-2008.
KT McDonald Target Studies Weekly Meeting July 10, Power Deposition in Graphite Targets of Various Radii K.T. McDonald, J. Back, N. Souchlas July.
Laser Doppler Vibrometer tests Goran Skoro UKNF Meeting 7-8 January 2010 Imperial College London UKNF Target Studies Web Page:
Solid Targets for the Neutrino Factory J R J Bennett Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK
LS-Dyna and ANSYS Calculations of Shocks in Solids Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
BNL Review - December 12, 2005 MERIT Experiment Window Study - Proton Beam Windows - Optical Windows N. Simos, PhD, PE Energy Sciences & Technology Department.
1 Thermal Shock Measurements and Modelling for Solid High-Power Targets at High Temperatures J. R. J. Bennett 1, G. Skoro 2, S. Brooks 1, R. Brownsword,
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
Modelling shock in solid targets Goran Skoro (UKNF Collaboration, University of Sheffield) NuFact 06 UC Irvine, August 24-30, 2006.
Simulation of High-Intensity Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory MERIT Experiment Status NFMCC Collaboration Meeting FNAL March 17-20, 2008.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of Hg Jet Target and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University Stonybrook.
MERIT Beam Collimator Design Nicholas Olesen 9 August 2006.
3D Target Simulations with Front Tracking/Ghost Fluid Method Wurigen Bo (Sept. 9, 2009) Brookhaven National Lab.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
 Stephen Brooks / UKNF meeting, Warwick, April 2008 Pion Production from Water-Cooled Targets.
1 3D Simulations for the Elliptic Jet W. Bo (Aug 12, 2009) Parameters: Length = 8cm Elliptic jet: Major radius = 0.8cm, Minor radius = 0.3cm Striganov’s.
Mercury Beam Dump Simulations Tristan Davenne Ottone Caretta Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 1 st joint meeting of EUROnu WP2 (Superbeam)
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Targetry Meeting May 1 - 2, Oxford, GB Target Simulations Roman.
Mercury Beam Dump Simulations Tristan Davenne Ottone Caretta STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 2 nd Princeton-Oxford High Power Target Meeting 6-7.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review March 16-17, 2006, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Computational.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Recent Results from MERIT NUFACT09 Illinois Institute of Technology July 22, 2009.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Calculations 1 st Princeton/Oxford High-Power Targets Workshop Oxford May 1-2, 2008.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 17-19, 2008, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target.
FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.
Static & dynamic stresses from beam heating in targets & windows T. Davenne High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Science and Technology.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
LS-Dyna and ANSYS Calculations of Shocks in Solids Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
1 cm diameter tungsten target Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
Progress on Solid Target Studies J. R. J. Bennett Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target.
1 Simulations of Tungsten Powder Experiment at HiRadMat CERN Tristan Davenne, Peter Loveridge, Joe O’Dell, Otto Caretta, Mike Fitton & Chris Densham (High.
Thermomechanical characterization of candidate materials for solid high power targets Goran Skoro, R. Bennett, R. Edgecock 6 November 2012 UKNF Target.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
WIRE: many pulses effects Goran Skoro (University of Sheffield) Target Meeting 6 April 2006.
Summary Why consider a packed bed as a high power target?
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Cavitation Models Roman Samulyak, Yarema Prykarpatskyy Center for Data Intensive Computing Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
Reducing shock in the Neutrino Factory target Goran Skoro (University of Sheffield) UKNF Meeting 11 January 2006.
Initiative in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK.
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
UKNF 12 January 2005 Target Studies J R J Bennett RAL.
Collimation for the Linear Collider 15 th Feb 2005 Chris Densham RAL Elastic Stress Waves in candidate Solid Targets for a Neutrino Factory.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
J-PARC neutrino experiment Target Specification Graphite or Carbon-Carbon composite cylindrical bar : length 900mm, diameter 25~30mm The bar may be divided.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Project Review December 12, 2005, BNL, Upton NY MHD Studies of Mercury Jet Target Roman Samulyak.
Parameters of the NF Target Proton Beam pulsed10-50 Hz pulse length1-2  s energy 2-30 GeV average power ~4 MW Target (not a stopping target) mean power.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
Simulation of High-Power Mercury Jet Targets for Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider R. Samulyak, 1,2 H.C. Chen, 1 H.G. Kirk, 2 K.T. McDonald 3 1 Stony.
1 February 07, 2008 Simulation Status of Mercury Jet Target HeeJin Park.
Packed Bed Target Design Concept (for EURONu) Tristan Davenne, Ottone Caretta, Peter Loveridge, Chris Densham (RAL); Andrea Longhin, Marco Zito (CEA Saclay)
Mixing Length of Hydrogen in an Air Intake Greg Lilik EGEE 520.
ENG/BENE, ENG Plenary, 16 March 2005 The New UK Programme for Shock Studies J R J Bennett RAL.
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Tungsten Powder Test at HiRadMat Scientific Motivation
Beam Window Studies for Superbeams
Parameters of the NF Target
MERIT Beam Collimator Design
Presentation transcript:

Mercury Jet Studies Tristan Davenne Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Joint UKNF, INO, UKIERI meeting 2008 University of Warwick, Physics Department 3-4 April 2008

Instantaneous Energy Deposition Result of ‘instantaneous’ energy deposition 1.Increase in temperature causes pressure rise (analagous to Youngs Modulus linear relationship between stress and strain) 2.Strain energy is built up in the fluid due to compression (area under graph) Ref (Sievers & Pugnat) 3.Strain energy will be released as kinetic energy 4.Expansion velocity is proportional to energy deposition Strain energy Sievers & Pugnat 2000 considered a parabolic radial energy deposition in 2cm diameter mercury target and reported a radial velocity at surface of mercury jet due to proton beam is 36m/s

Numerical simulation of Sievers & Pugnat Result Click on image above to watch video of 2cm mercury target responding to concentric parabolic energy deposition Parabolic energy deposition

Pressure and velocity response of 2cm diameter mercury target

Autodyne result for peak radial velocity vs peak energy deposition

- MERIT target – energy deposition from MARS B = 15 T Goran Skoro Beam – 67 mradTarget – 33 mrad gg

Autodyne Model of Merit Jet beam energy = 24GeV bunches in a pulse = 4 pulse duration = 2.3us total energy deposition in mercury in a pulse = 8kJ

Autodyne Model of Merit Jet Beam at 33mrads to 10mm diameter mercury jet

Autodyne Model of Merit Jet Max radial Velocity 93m/s click on image below to watch video of mercury jet being hit by the proton beam

Influence of magnetic field current density [A/m 2] induced in a mercury cylinder travelling at 15m/s through a 15T solenoid, mercury conductivity 1.04x10 6 S/m x

Conclusions Autodyne was used to model the response of a 2cm diameter mercury target to a parabolic energy deposition. A radial velocity of order 100m/s was predicted. This compares to 36m/s predicted by Sievers & Pugnat The relationship between radial velocity and energy deposition can be approximated by a linear expression in the range of energy deposition of interest. Autodyne was used to model the MERIT experiment with no magnetic field. Data from MARS calculated by Goran Skoro was used as an input. For the case of 24GeV, 30 Terra protons per bunch the radial velocity of mercury is predicted to be 93m/s. Proposed Aims Understand discrepancy between Sievers result and Autodyne result. (could be difference in input parameters) Calculate surface pressure on mercury jet due to 15T solenoid. (started looking at this) Calculate effect of magnetic field on radialy travelling lumps of mercury as a function of lump size. Consider possibility of combining dynamics and magnetic fields software packages.