CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.B United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Advertisements

Cleaner Production- A Move Towards Sustainability
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
GReening business through the Enterprise Europe Network EN Giovanni FRANCO European Commission Enterprise and Industry EN
GENERAL IDEAS IN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
Chapter 20 Introduction to Systems Development and Systems Analysis Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 20-1.
Systems Analysis and Design 9th Edition
Workforce Planning Training for Supervisors Presentation Subtitle/Description Presenter’s Name Date.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Cleaner Production Assessment (Chapter 4)
Chapter 2.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
CP methodology adapted to Stockholm Convention Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.C United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology.
Chair, Department of Management & Marketing
Energy Efficiency Methodology
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Accounting Information Systems, 9/e, Romney/Steinbart 16-1 Accounting Information Systems 9 th Edition Marshall.
Barriers to Energy Efficiency 1 Barriers to Energy Efficiency Energizing Cleaner Production Management Course.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
Energy Audit- a small introduction A presentation by Pune Power Development Pvt. Ltd.
Energy Management Proposed At KTPS. Objectives for Energy Management Generate energy at lowest possible price Manage energy use at highest energy efficiency.
Sales and Marketing Productivity Team 1 Added Value Analysis TOOL USED IN SALES AND MARKETING PRODUCTIVITY PROJECTS.
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Energy Efficiency Opportunities (EEO) Program 2nd International Conference on the Global impact of Energy Management Systems: ‘Creating the right environment.
Sustainable Consumption and Production
Project Risk Management. The Importance of Project Risk Management Project risk management is the art and science of identifying, analyzing, and responding.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Equity Housing Group Risk Management. 05 August 2002 © MazarsEquity Housing Group: Risk Management 2 Agenda Introduction: what is Risk Management? The.
Cleaner Technology - CT for Factories Cleaner Technology Unit Bureau of Industrial Environment Technology Department of Industrial Works Copyrights of.
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
Chapter 11: Project Risk Management
Identifying Source Reduction Opportunities and Engineering Trade-Offs Kenneth R. Stone Engineering Trade-Offs Team Leader Kenneth R. Stone Engineering.
© 2009 Capaccio Environmental Engineering, Inc. “Helping Industry and the Environment Prosper” Pollution Prevention Saves Money By Reducing Operational.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
ERT 417 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY W ASTE M INIMIZATION & M ANAGEMENT.
CP methodology adapted to UNFCCC Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.A United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry.
A Cleaner Production Project in the South African Paper Industry – Lessons learnt Iain Kerr, MSc (Env. Biotech.) University of KwaZulu Natal, School of.
Copyrights I Global Manager Group | Revision 0.1 Feb 2009 | 1 GMG DEMO OF ISO: ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDITOR TRAINING PRESENTATION KIT.
Environmental auditing
The Triple Bottom Line Approach – Environmental Domain Morana Belamaric 12 June 2007.
Systems Analysis and Design 8 th Edition Chapter 2 Analyzing the Business Case.
 System Development Life Cycle System Development Life Cycle  SDLC Phases SDLC Phases Phase 1: Preliminary Investigation Phase 2: Feasibility Study.
MATERIAL BALANCE METHODOLOGY Julia Brown Manager, Process Development.
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Briefing Notes.
Project Risk Management Planning Stage
International Life Cycle Partnership To bring science-based life cycle approaches into practice worldwide UNEP/SETAC Life-Cycle Initiative Life Cycle Management.
AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
OVERVIEW OF TOOLS & TECHNIQUES: GREEN PRODUCTIVITY R. C. Monga 2nd World Conference on Green Productivity 10 December 2002.
The Risk Management Process
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
Plan Waste Assessment MWM01A. What is the purpose of a waste assessment?  The main aims of a waste assessment are to:  Identify each waste stream on.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Energy Auditing – Energy Conservation and Efficiency Measures PRESENTER Mr. A. Hamukale BENG, Meng,MBA,PEEIZ,REng.
NAMA potential of Vietnam Vuong Xuan Hoa Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Climate Change.
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
1 Workshop “Energy Efficiency management in chemical Industry sector" Thessaloniki, Greece Use of CARE +Tools in Bulgaria energy management.
Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-2 Lecture -16 & 17.
Introduction to the training package Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 1 United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry.
Energetická náročnost budov
Clean Technology (PB386) Click to edit Master title style Numfon Eaktasang, Ph.D.
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
Seminar On Energy Audit Submitted To: Submitted By:
Prof. Maria Loizidou Nicosia, Hilton Park Hotel, 15th June, 2006
Safety Accountabilities
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Clean Technology (PB386) Click to edit Master title style Numfon Eaktasang, Ph.D.
Technology Planning.
Presentation transcript:

CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.B United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry and Economy ACME A pplying C LEANER PRODUCTION to M ULTILATERAL E NVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS

The “CP Methodology” has been adapted to the Basel Convention with focus on identifying opportunities to minimize the use and/or discharge/ emission of hazardous/toxic substances in industries. INTRODUCTION CP approach to Basel Convention ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 2 / 32

CP methodology is tailored to focus on materialistic wastes including hazardous / toxic wastes from a industry. The methodology explains: What should be done in theory. How it is done in practice. METHODOLOGY Focus on hazardous and toxics wastes ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 3 / 32

1/ The Cleaner Production (CP) strategy: - prevention of waste; - systematic approach; - integrated into business processes; - aimed at continuous improvement. 2/ Several existing CP audit methodologies. 3/ Real practice experience from CP assessments carried out in the past. METHODOLOGY Methodology based on 3 elements ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 4 / 32

Companies can avoid/minimise the generation of the hazardous/toxic wastes through the same 6-step Cleaner Production approach with little adaptation Under each step there are several tasks. Each task describes what a company should do to avoid/minimise the generation of the hazardous/toxic wastes. METHODOLOGY How to use it? ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 5 / 32

STEP 1 Planning and Organization STEP 2 Assessment STEP 3 Identification of Options STEP 5 Implementation and Monitoring STEP 6 Continuous Improvement STEP 4 Feasibility Analysis of Options METHODOLOGY CP methodology adapted to Basel 1a - Meeting with top management 1b - Form a Team and inform staff 1c - Pre-assessment to collect general information 1d - Select focus areas 1e - Prepare assessment proposal for top management approval 2a - Staff meeting and training 2b - Prepare focus area flow charts 2c - Walkthrough of focus areas 2d - Quantify inputs and outputs and costs to establish a baselines 2e - Quantify losses through a material and energy balance 3a - Cause analysis 3b - Identify possible options 3c - Screen options for feasibility analysis 4a - Technical, economic and environmental evaluation of options 4b - Rank feasible options for implementation 4c - Prepare implementation and monitoring proposal for top management approval 5a - Implement options and monitor results 6a - Prepare proposal to continue with hazardous/toxic waste reduction for management approval. ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 6 / 32

Purpose of step 1: - To obtain top management commitment - Plan and organize the detailed study Without an approved plan, there is no commitment! Output of step 1: A written proposal with selected steps and tasks to avoid/minimise the generation of the hazardous / toxic wastes, approved by top management. STEP 1 Planning and Organization ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 7 / 32

If you are top management Purpose of this first meeting is to get the commitment of company middle managers, staff and/or external facilitators to carry out a pre-assessment and write a proposal for a detailed assessment. If you are a company middle manager or external facilitator Purpose of this first meeting is to get top management’s approval for a pre-assessment and writing of a proposal for a detailed assessment. STEP 1A Meeting with top management ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 8 / 32

A Team of people should be formed with: 1.Person who knows the major raw materials used and environmental impacts of the same. e.g. Environment Manager or Chief Laboratory Analyst 2.Person who knows the production process. e.g. the Head of Production 3.Person with access to general company information and material cost data. e.g. the company’s Accountant or Finance Manager 4.A communications or training person. 5.A top management representative who normally is not part of the Team’s day-to-day work. STEP 1B Form a team and inform staff ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 9 / 32

The main purpose of the pre-assessment at company level is to collect and review general information: - to identify the major raw material used and their characteristics, the majors outputs (wastes and emissions) and their characteristics; - to identify potential area of waste minimization; - to write a realistic proposal to top management. STEP 1C Pre-assessment to collect information Information collected should include: - General company details, organization chart with the different departments and main functions; - General production flow chart for the whole company with the main inputs and outputs for each production step; - Production data for the past 3 years; - Energy and other resource consumption data and costs for the past 3 years; - An inventory of major equipment; - Overview of information collected for each process step / for each department; - Hazardous/toxic material used and emitted/discharged. ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention – 10 / 32

A focus area can be: - The entire plant. - A department, production line, or process step, such as the chemical pulping or the filtration. - Specific equipment or raw material, such as chemical reactor, filter press, hazardous chemicals, etc. STEP 1D Select focus areas ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 11 / 32

Assessment proposal for top management approval: It is important to obtain top management commitment because an energy assessment costs money and staff time and can interrupt the production process. This proposal can be prepared within the company or by an external facilitator who has been involved in tasks 1a to 1d. The assessment proposal should include: Objectives, Scope (i.e. focus area), Outputs, Approach, Methodology, Team, Time planning, Budget. STEP 1E Prepare assessment proposal ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 12 / 32

STEP 2 Assessment Purpose of step 2: To assess hazardous/toxic material used and/or discharged / emitted for the focus area(s). Output of step 1: - An overview of the quantity of hazardous / toxic material used and/or discharged / emitted; - Estimate of costs required for the assessment for the focus area(s). Then it becomes easier to identify options to avoid/minimise the use and/or discharge/emission of the hazardous/toxic materials in step 3! ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 13 / 32

Organizing staff meeting and training before commencing the Assessment: - to inform staff about the assessment (particularly from focus area but preferably everyone from top management to production staff throughout the plant); - to inform their roles to get their support. STEP 2A Staff meeting and training ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 14 / 32

Preparation of flow chart for each of the selected focus areas: - List the different steps of the focus area; - List the most important inputs (resources) for each step; - List the most important outputs for each step; - List the intermediate and final products between the steps. STEP 2B Prepare focus area flow charts ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 15 / 32

Conduction of detailed walkthrough of the focus areas, usually starting at the first step of the process flow chart and finishing at the last step. The purpose of the walkthrough is to: - Better understand the focus area; - Get feedback from production staff about problems… - Write down any visible losses of energy and materials; - Obtain information about quantities and costs for the inputs and outputs of each focus area step. STEP 2C Walkthrough of focus areas ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 16 / 32

Establishing baseline by quantifying inputs and outputs consisting of: - Quantities (e.g. tons of raw materials per day) - Costs (e.g. $ per ton of raw materials) - Other characteristics (e.g. moisture content, temperature and pressure of the process, etc.) STEP 2D Establishing a baseline ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 17 / 32

Quantification of losses through material and energy balance Whatever goes into a process must come out somewhere else. Based on the process flow chart and quantified inputs and outputs prepared in the previous tasks, “balance” the inputs and outputs. STEP 2E Quantify losses ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 18 / 32

STEP 3 Identification of Options Purpose of step 3: To identify opportunities to avoid/minimize the losses and improve energy efficiency for the selected focus areas. Output of step 3: List of options that will be investigated on their feasibility in step 4. ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 19 / 32

Once losses have been identified, it is important to Identify the ‘cause’. The best way to analyze the causes is: - by answering the questions: Why are these losses occurring? Why is this material hazardous/toxic? - through a brainstorm session with the Team and other staff from the focus areas. STEP 3A Determine causes of losses ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 20 / 32

Identification of Possible options: Through brainstorm session with the Team and other staff from the focus areas. Options can fall in the following categories: - Good housekeeping - Improved process management - Production process / equipment modification - New technology / equipment - Input material substitution - On-site reuse / recovery - Production of useful by-product. - Product modification STEP 3B Identify possible options ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 21 / 32

The easiest way of screening is by categorising the options as follows: - Options that can be implemented directly; - Options that require further analysis; - Options that can be considered at a later stage. STEP 3C Screen options for feasibility analysis ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 22 / 32

Purpose of step 4: - to determine which options are technically, financially and environmentally feasible; - in what order they should be implemented. Output of step 4 : - a proposal that is approved by top management, with recommended options for implementation; - procedure to do this; - a list of options that require further investigation or which are not feasible. STEP 4 Feasibility Analysis of Options ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 23 / 32

Techno - economic and environmental evaluation of options Team should : - Investigate which options are technically, economically and environmentally feasible. - Identify other possible reasons for implementing the option. - Think of possible barriers to implementing the option. STEP 4A Evaluation of options ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 24 / 32

Prioritizing options for Implementation: 1.Options to be implemented in the short term e.g. within one year 2.Options recommended for implementation but in the longer term 3. Option recommended for further investigation, or to be considered at a later stage / non feasible options STEP 4B Rank feasible options for implementation ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 25 / 32

Proposal for Implementation and Monitoring Plan to top management should include: - An introduction - Number of options identified - Options investigated for feasibility - Feasible options - Options requiring further investigation - Non feasible options STEP 4C Implementation and monitoring proposal ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 26 / 32

Options recommended for implementation in the short term: - Total estimated investment required, annual ongoing costs, annual savings and payback period -Total estimated environmental benefits - Most important other reasons for implementation - Most persistent and difficult barriers and proposed solutions - Table with list of options STEP 4C Implementation and monitoring proposal Environmental management plan for the hazardous/ toxic substances which could not be eliminated from use and/or generation. ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 27 / 32

Purpose of step 5: - to implement feasible options in order of priority; - monitor results of implemented options; - discuss findings with top management. Output of step 5: - reduction in quantity of the use and/or discharge/emissions of the hazardous/toxic substances; - improved energy efficiency and reduced GHG emissions from implemented options; - agreement with top management about the next steps. STEP 5 Implementation and Monitoring ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 28 / 32

The monitoring should include: - Economic results. - Environmental results. - Other results (e.g. any other benefits from the option like improved legal compliance, reduced injuries etc. and barriers encountered if any). STEP 5A Implement options and monitor results ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 29 / 32

Purpose of step 6: To ensure that the company continues with improving the environment through a systematic way that is integrated in company processes. Output of step 6 : - continuation of implementing the identified options; - integration of CP assessment into company processes. STEP 6 Continuous Improvement ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 30 / 32

Preparation of proposal to continue the avoidance / minimization of the use and/or discharge / emission of harzardous / toxic substances Assessment proposal: - for the assessment of new selected focus areas; - feasibility analysis of the additional options selected for further investigation. Implementation and monitoring proposal: - for additional options selected for implementation; - environmental improvement options. STEP 6A Prepare a proposal to continue ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 31 / 32

CONCLUSION End of session 9.B Thank you for your attention… Any questions? ACME - Session 9.B - CP methodology adapted to Basel Convention - 32 / 32