DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY A Multidisciplinary evaluation framework and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
Advertisements

Online Education: A Summary INST 5240 Mimi Recker Utah State University.
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY A Multidisciplinary tool for the evaluation of.
Tampere University of Technology Digital Media Institute/Hypermedia Laboratory 1 Jukka Huhtamäki Pekka Ranta Seppo Pohjolainen Hypermedia Laboratory P.O.
DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY An EVA Tool for Evaluation of Web-based Courses.
The Rogers School District is committed to providing an environment of educational excellence where all belong, all learn, and all succeed.
Evaluating the Quality of Social Media in an Educational Context Kirsi Silius, Meri Kailanto & Anne-Maritta Tervakari Hypermedia Laboratory ITK’
Manuel Benito Gómez Ramón Ovelar Beltrán Virtual Campus of the University of the Pays Basque (UPV/EHU) ITC Master, a partnership project between 9 universities.
DAF Project Dialogic Assessment and Feedback Martina A. Doolan & Paul Morris Introduction DAF is part of a.
E-Learning Brian Mulligan, BE, MED, MIEI Chartered Engineer Institute of Technology Sligo Irish Learning Technology Association
Online education: a review. Introduction Many confusing terms  Online learning, flexible learning, open learning, telematics, Web-based education, distance.
Formative and Summative Evaluations
How is e-learning quality assessed in Finland: FVU’s Referee service Petra Rutanen University of Oulu Dept. of Electrical and Information Engineering E-XCELLENCE+
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN E-LEARNING PLATFORM USING CMS
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ Developing Web-Based Tools and Support Model for Lifelong Learning and Learning Evaluation Processes in Higher Education ICT- Framework.
University of Jyväskylä – Department of Mathematical Information Technology Computer Science Teacher Education ICNEE 2004 Topic Case Driven Approach for.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
For education and learning Learning Environments/ ICT in Education
EQNet Travel Well Criteria.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology FVU Seminar 20 June 2005.
Benefits of Blended e-Learning in Education
McWeadon Education, USA
BY MD PHOLO Integrating Explicit Problem- Solving Teaching Into ActiveMath.
6 th semester Course Instructor: Kia Karavas.  What is educational evaluation? Why, what and how can we evaluate? How do we evaluate student learning?
Evaluation and analysis of the application of interactive digital resources in a blended-learning methodology for a computer networks subject F.A. Candelas,
 A set of objectives or student learning outcomes for a course or a set of courses.  Specifies the set of concepts and skills that the student must.
Mediamaisteri Group 2005 © Mediamaisteri Group Open Source Solutions in eLearning Mediamaisteri Group PL 82 (Pyynikintie 25) Tampere
SOCRATES PROGRAMME OnLineMath&Sciences Project Results by 31 January 2007 and Planning October 2005 – September 2007.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Tie Into Practice Technology Integration Example: A Research Paper Website Jennifer Jarvis and Connie Keating.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Page 2 What is is an educational network, supported by the European Commission under the Socrates programme Its purpose is to help Comenius.
Poll Everywhere
EStream – Best Practice in the Use of Streaming Media © A. Knierzinger, C. Weigner Increasing the use of Streaming technology in school education in Europe.
Anna Linnakylä Researcher Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä Finland Petri Lounaskorpi Pedagogical Consultant Municipality of Konnevesi Finland Involving.
Company LOGO Presenter: Hlengiwe Mfeka – 03 July 2013.
Intel ® Teach Program Thinking with Technology Course Pn. Idawati Che Mat Jabatan Teknologi Pendidikan
Building Best Practices In Online Courses Summer Institute 2003.
ICT in teachers’ work Research co-operation between City of Tampere, Hypermedia Laboratory of University of Tampere, and Microsoft Project manager Heljä.
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY AS A MAINSPRING OF PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SELF-DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL UNIVERSITY TEACHERS Oksana A. Gavrilyuk Krasnoyarsk State.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June 2005.
Quality Evaluation methodologies for e-Learning systems (in the frame of the EC Project UNITE) Tatiana Rikure Researcher, Riga Technical University (RTU),
ELearning in Higher Education in Europe - Why is Quality an Issue? Erika Löfström University of Helsinki, Finland BIP, Akdeniz University, Antalya August.
© University of Wales, Bangor 2000 Learning and Business: Supporting Lifelong Learning and the Knowledge Worker through the Design of Quality Learning.
Modes of Education. Dialogue Lecture/Instruction Facilitation.
Digital Learning India 2008 July , 2008 Mrs. C. Vijayalakshmi Department of Computer science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology – IIT.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Using UDL to Set Clear Goals and Support Every Student’s Learning.
Video Technologies in Finnish Universities – the Present and the Future Sami Andberg Educational Centre for ICT University of Helsinki, Finland.
CHAPTER I INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
Windows on the world: The role of new technologies in teaching and learning English Alan Pulverness Norwich Institute for Language Education.
Phases of Curriculum Design: Evaluation Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model Dr. Katherine Korkidis April 19, 2009.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology WebCT Executive Seminar EDEN.
Action Research: Inquiry Versus Direct Instruction Ashley Valentino.
Agenda Debrief on past module development Tools for online content development Module development template Timeline Suggested guidelines for developing.
Education Transform Resources
Able to transfer and adapt their skills Able to understand the consequences of their actions Able to use software and devices efficiently Responsible.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
21 st century Teaching and Learning District Educator Deborah Harris EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Adriane Wheat.
Fdtl5 FDTL5 project V-ResORT : A Virtual Resource for Online Research Training.
Q Education Transform Resources. Intel® is Committed to Transforming Education for the Next Generation Intel supports education transformation 
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June.
VIRTUAL/REMOTE LABS By Dr. Sandip Kumar Raut Lecturer in Tabla
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
HCI Evaluation Techniques
Literacy.
Designing & Conducting Formative Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY A Multidisciplinary evaluation framework and tool for the evaluation of usability, pedagogical usability, accessibility and informational quality of web-based courses Kirsi Silius Anne-Maritta Tervakari Seppo Pohjolainen Tampere University of Technology (TUT) Finland

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 2 Viewpoints of evaluation user group usability accessibility presentation of information presentation of information reliability of information reliability of information pedagogical usability pedagogical usability value added quality of information fluency of use instructional quality benefits experts

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 3 Usefulness of web-based learning environments based on Nielsen (1993), modified by Tervakari & Silius Utility Easy to learn Efficient to use Usability Easy to remember Few errors Subjectively pleasing Value added Support for organisation of the teaching process Support for learning, tutoring and scaffolding process and support for the achievement of learning objectives Support for the development of learning skills (interaction with other actors and growth of learners` autonomy Organisation of teaching process Development of quality of teaching Development of learners’ learning skills Testing and development of educational ICT Pedagogical usability Usefulness Social acceptability System acceptability Practical acceptability Cost Compatibility Reliability Etc. Nielsen, J Usability Engineerings. Boston (MS.): Academic press.

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 4 The main phases of survey at TUT –Context analysis: to find significant background factors, which have strong impact to the instructional value of the certain web-based learning environment. –Assessment of implementation of web courses using multidisciplinary framework based on usability, pedagogical usability, accessibility and informational quality –Advantages and disadvantages of web-based learning in various contexts. What are the critical factors of quality in web-based learning? –Value added of web-based courses in various contexts.

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 5 web-based course common usefulness of web-based course usefulness from teacher’s viewpoint learners their personal contexts Usefulness in certain teaching and learning context organisation, science, subjects, actors etc.. teachers their personal contexts experts or evaluators evaluation of web-based course with the tool teaching and designing of web-based course studying usefulness from learners’ viewpoint value-added? advantages? disadvantages? usefulness of certain web-based course in certain teaching and learning context Common usefulness society, culture etc. context independent factors

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 6 Evaluation sections

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 7 design and/or development of web-based course development of web-based course feedback to teachers and designers resources implementation of web-based course experts’ evaluation and questionnaires for real users analysis of data by experts web-based course training of designers and teachers for evaluating their web- based courses with the tool Iterative evaluation evaluation by teachers and designers as well as questionnaires for real users with the tool analysis of data by teachers and designers

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 8 Purpose of this evaluation tool This tool is not –for making ranking lists of web-based courses –for evaluate the validity or substantiveness of the content This tool is to –help teachers to pay attention to properties of their web pages which might need some improvement

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 9 Start of evaluation

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 10 Choose sections

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 11 Questions to be answered

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 12 Report 1: Results of the evaluation

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 13 Report 2: Guides and tips

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 14 Report 3: Own answers

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 15 Filter out unrelevant questions

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 16 Browse through guides and tips

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 17 Guides and tips

DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 18 Futher development More criteria and guidelines into pedagogical usability section More references into all sections Questionnaires for real users The tool will help to match data collected from evaluators and real users