1 Overview of NACUBO Cost of College Model January 7, 2004 Presented by: Nancy D. Suttenfield Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Report Oakland University Senate November 13, 2008.
Advertisements

Campus Based Tuition Increase Proposal for FY Robert N. Shelton Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost The University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Town Hall Meeting Budget Update and Planning April 11, 2007.
University Budget Basics December First - The Basics  Fiscal year  Fund Types - Unrestricted vs. Restricted  Object Codes  Responsibility 
Budgeting 101 for New Administrators University of Maryland, College Park Cynthia R. Hale Associate Vice President for Finance and Personnel Office of.
University Faculty Senate 159 th Plenary Friday, October 21, 2011 Purchase State College.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
AN OVERVIEW OF CSU FUNDS Rodney Rideau Director of the Budget, California State University Franz Lozano, Director/Budget Officer, San Francisco State University.
October 28, 2011 Michelle Quinn Sr. Vice President for Administration University of Northern Colorado MANAGING THE MONEY.
Budgets in the CSU CSU 101 March 8-11, 2009 Monterey Shawn Bibb, Vice President Administration and Finance Cal State East Bay.
Budget Office Division of Business and Finance DEVELOPING A UNIVERSITY-WIDE BUDGET An Overview of the External Budget Development Process.
Institutional Memberships November Institutional Memberships New Operational Guideline: Memberships Paid by University Funds can be found at
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget
FOOD ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ECONOMICS
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
9/25/2013. AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  F&A Definition and Category Application  Application of F&A Cost Rates  The Distribution Basis.
Non-Lapsing Balances USHE Response Interim Commissioner David L. Buhler January 23, 2008.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE National Institute of Food and Agriculture Nonprofit Indirect Cost Training – One Rate Method.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
1 SHEEO Summer 2004 Financing Online Education: Building Sustainable Enterprises Laura M. King Vice Chancellor of Finance Minnesota State Colleges and.
BUDGETING – CRADLE TO BOARD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA CAUBO – Pre-conference June 23, 2007.
Implementation of full costing in Sweden John Fürstenbach EUA Workshop May Warszawa From contributions to administration to to full cost accounting.
Trends in Higher Education Series Trends in College Pricing 2007.
© 2006 The Curators of the University of Missouri1 Providing Accountability Through Data and Process – The Program Audit Robert Mullen, Associate Director,
FY2008 Service Center Billing Rate Proposal Training Dates:Monday, February 26, 2007 Friday, March 2, 2007 Presented by: Rick Keller, Director – Cost Accounting.
The board of each community college district shall within or before the first quarter of each fiscal year, adopt an annual budget which it deems necessary.
PRESENTATION TO FACILITIES INFORMATION SYSTEM USERS OCTOBER 2013 CORPORATE CONTROLLER’S OFFICE JODY MURAWSKI COST ANALYSIS BEVERLY LIPSKI, BILL RIDGWAY.
General Budget Orientation and Discussion Mr. Gavin Leach, Vice President for Finance and Administration.
Leading and Managing Budgets University of Mary Washington FY
  Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense - Auxiliary Exp.   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an.
Clemson University- Budgeting. Why Bother to Budget? Plan that helps identify known and anticipated financial problems Needs generally always greater.
April, 2005 Texas Public University Cost Study. April, 2005 Charge To develop a defensible and acceptable “Instruction and Operations Formula” Matrix.
Consistent distribution of revenues and costs Distribute revenues to units Units pay for all the costs associated with their programs Eliminate the “General.
BUDGET OVERVIEW Barbara L. Johnson Vice Chancellor Business and Finance October 2010.
Legislative Accountability Measures – Part I. AB 94 Budget Trailer Bill Section Costs of Education Due October 1, 2014, and October 1 of each.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Budget and Budget Process.
Sources of University Funds How money is different within a University.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
FY2015 Supplemental Operating Budget FY2015 Operating Budget Board of Trustees Meeting – June 27,
Fiscal Advisory Committee Highlights. Committee Charge The purpose of this committee shall be to review the University's fiscal resources and.
SAN JACINTO COLLEGE DISTRICT BUDGET HEARING AUGUST 3, 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
Florida International University G-51 April 9, 2010.
Presented September 2013 Board of Trustees Meeting Financial Review for the Board of Trustees Year End: FY 2012 – 2013 Budget: FY 2013 – 2014 Kurt Buttleman,
© 2015 Boise State University1 Boise State University Bronco Budget 2.0 Committee Ken Kline AVP, Budget and Planning.
F UNCTION /NACUBO C ODES – W HAT ARE T HEY AND W HY ARE T HEY I MPORTANT ? May 25, 2016 Sheri Hardison, Asst. VP for Financial Affairs & Controller May.
Mandatory Fees at UMBC Overview on Mandatory Fees for Graduate Program Directors April 10, 2013.
© 2015 Boise State University1 Boise State University Bronco Budget 2.0 Committee Ken Kline AVP, Budget and Planning.
New Faculty Orientation Dr. Nicholas P, Jones, Executive Vice President and Provost Thursday, August 20, 2015 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND.
Sandra Perez Alan Williams. Review [Important Concepts and Definitions] Fund Groups Fund Uses Restrictions & Designations Questions Agenda.
Board of Trustees Retreat Budget Overview
Update: UMKC Spending, Staffing and Benefits /16
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
PROGs at Oregon State University
University Budget and Marginal Cost Components
San Jacinto College District Budget Hearing August 3, 2009
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
University of Oregon Financial Briefing
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
College Senate February 10, Broad-Based Fees January to March 2017
Tuition and Fees Setting tuition for the academic year
Budgeting and Financial Management
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE
SPACE II Presentation to Facilities Information System Users Fall 2005
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE
THE COLOR OF MONEY FUND U$E
BOARD of GOVERNORS State University System of Florida
Presentation transcript:

1 Overview of NACUBO Cost of College Model January 7, 2004 Presented by: Nancy D. Suttenfield Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration

2 Why The Model Was Developed How NACUBO Developed The Model Costs Included Costs Excluded Limitations/Cautions Carolina’s Projected Cost of College - FY Carolina’s Projected State Subsidy - FY Comparison With Office of President’s Methodology NACUBO Cost of College Model

3 Public concerns with the cost of college Congressional response: National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education Price Versus Cost Misunderstanding: the price the student pays (his/her cost) is not the same as the institution’s cost of educating the student “Why” The Model Was Developed

4 “How” The Model Was Developed The National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) undertook a “Cost of College Project” to create a uniform methodology that any college or university in the nation could use to explain how much it costs to provide one year of undergraduate education and related expenses.

5 NACUBO charged an Ad Hoc Committee on College Costs to develop methodology Ad Hoc Committee consisted of various workgroups and solicited many perspectives (presidents, business officers, accountants, budget officers, faculty, economists, consultants, policy analysts, university relations personnel, and representatives from national associations) Extensive consultations with outside experts (including a national CPA firm) “How” The Model Was Developed

6 Almost three years of work to develop methodology Three pilot tests were run in 1999 and 2000 (involved 40 institutions) Field test was run in 2001 (involved 150 institutions, Carolina being one) “How” The Model Was Developed

7 The challenge was to develop a uniform approach that was…. – Simple for the institution to use – Simple for the public to understand – Tied to audited annual financial statements – Applicable to the full range of institutions – Reasonably accurate when compared with detailed cost studies (based on an institution’s internal accounting methods)

8 “How” The Model Was Developed Other Key Principles Guided The Study: – Reliance on basic averaging techniques – Concentration on the cost of undergraduate education – Use existing accepted cost allocation methods whenever possible (e.g. Methodologies Used to Allocate Research Costs / A-21)

9 Instruction and Student Service Costs Institutional and Community Costs Undergraduate Financial Aid Costs NACUBO’s Model “Includes” 3 Major Categories of Cost

10 Instruction & Student Services Costs Instruction (includes direct teaching costs) Department Administration (admin. in academic departments) Instructional Information Technology Student Services (social and cultural development, counseling and career guidance, financial aid administration, admissions, registrar’s office, and student services administration) Libraries

11 Central Administration (e.g. executive management, fiscal operations, human resources, administrative computing, etc.) Allocation of Operation and Maintenance of Physical Plant Allocation of Facilities/Equipment Depreciation Instruction & Student Services Costs

12 Extracurricular cultural, religious, and recreational amenities, museums and gardens (for Carolina examples include Ackland Art Museum, Botanical Gardens, Morehead) Portion of Intercollegiate Athletics & Auxiliary Operations supported by student fees Allocation of Operation and Maintenance of Physical Plant Allocation of Facilities/Equipment Depreciation Institutional and Community Costs

13 Institutional financial aid considered an investment in educational quality (expense) as opposed to discounts to fill empty seats Focus is on identifying source of funds and the control over disbursing the funds Institution Institution Does Source Controls Not Control Institution include NA Government exclude exclude Private include exclude Undergraduate Financial Aid

14 Professional School Costs (including overhead costs supporting those schools) Public Service Costs (activities established to provide non-instructional services beneficial to individuals and groups external to institution e.g. AHEC and Institute of Government Outreach) Sponsored Research Costs (including overhead costs attributable to research) NACUBO’s Model “Excludes” The Following Categories of Cost

15 “Auxiliary Enterprise” costs are excluded, except for portion supported by student fees Example of auxiliaries where all or most of costs are excluded are: Athletics, Housing, Food Service, Parking, Printing Services, Telecommunications, and Health Services The charges related to excluded auxiliaries are, however, considered part of the “price of attendance” calculation. NACUBO’s Model “Excludes” The Following Categories of Cost

16 Cost study is a reasonable approximation, it is not an exact science Less precision within individual cost categories than in the total costs Data should not stand alone (character and mission of the institution affect costs) Methodology not developed to benchmark, but to assist in explaining each institution’s costs – Does not claim to have the “right” answer on every issue – Does not explain differences in costs – Does not measure quality or efficiency Limitations and Cautions

17 $15,230 = Cost of College Analysis NACUBO Methodology $15,626 = Projected Cost Using HE Price Index (2.6%) Tuition & Fees : Undergraduate Tuition Fees Total – Resident $ 2,955 $1,117 $ 4,072 – Non Resident $14,803$1,117 $15,920 Carolina’s Projected Cost of College for FY

18 Carolina’s Projected Undergraduate State Subsidy for FY Non Resident Resident $15,626* $15,626* (15,920) (4,072) ($294) $11,554 *Cost of Education projected to be 2.6% above actual costs. With the projected values… - The State’s subsidy to resident students is $11, Non-resident students pay the full cost of education plus $294.

19 Comparison With Office of President’s Costing Methodology NACUBOOffice of President Type Model Costing ModelFunding Policy Model Source for Calculation Audited Financials & Recognized Costing Principles OP Analysis/BOG Policy Instructional Costs Actual CostsMixture of National Data & Carolina’s Data Other Academic, Library & Central Support Costs Actual CostsPredetermined Percentages O&M Physical Plant Costs Actual CostsNot Included Depreciation Included Using Recognized Costing Principles Equipment Funded on Cash Basis, Depreciation of Buildings Not Included Financial Aid Actual CostsPer Student Fixed Amount