SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 1 Electromagnetic Fields
Advertisements

Small Coupled Oscillations. Types of motion Each multi-particle body has different types of degrees of freedom: translational, rotational and oscillatory.
Plasma Astrophysics Chapter 3: Kinetic Theory Yosuke Mizuno Institute of Astronomy National Tsing-Hua University.
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 第2回 2.Interaction between atoms and the lattice properties of crystals.
Lecture 2 Free Vibration of Single Degree of Freedom Systems
Chapter 16 Wave Motion.
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Chapter 16 Waves (I) What determines the tones of strings on a guitar?
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / some plasma physics.
Gravity and Orbits The gravitational force between two objects:
RF EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture4 : Quasi-neutrality Force on the plasma.
Motion of a mass at the end of a spring Differential equation for simple harmonic oscillation Amplitude, period, frequency and angular frequency Energetics.
Chapter 7 Electrodynamics
Quadrupole Transverse Beam Optics Chris Rogers 2 June 05.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Astra A Space Charge Tracking Algorithm
1nC 10ps square pulse, 1 mm uniform transverse laser pulse No Thermal emittance 110MV/m Solenoid kG 1nC 10ps square pulse, 1 mm uniform transverse.
Steve LidiaICFA Workshop, Chia LagunaJuly, 2002 Flat Beam Photoinjectors for Ultrafast Synchrotron Radiation Sources Steve Lidia Lawrence Berkeley National.
Transition from isotropic to anisotropic beam profiles in a uniform linear focusing channel Wilson Simeoni Jr In space-charge dominated beams the nonlinear.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
1 Three views on Landau damping A. Burov AD Talk, July 27, 2010.
Final review Help sessions scheduled for Dec. 8 and 9, 6:30 pm in MPHY 213 Your hand-written notes allowed No numbers, unless you want a problem with numbers.
K. Floettmann30 th Nov XFEL Injector matching The present XFEL injector foresees operation of the first four cavities of the first module to operate.
1 Honors Physics 1 Summary and Review - Fall 2013 Quantitative and experimental tools Mathematical tools Newton’s Laws and Applications –Linear motion.
Wednesday, Sep. 14, PHYS Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 04 Lecture #5 Chapter 21: E-field examples Chapter 22: Gauss’ Law Examples.
Firohman Current is a flux quantity and is defined as: Current density, J, measured in Amps/m 2, yields current in Amps when it is integrated.
A.Shapovalov (DESY, Zeuthen) (MEPhI, Moscow, Russia)
Self-consistent non-stationary theory of multipactor in DLA structures O. V. Sinitsyn, G. S. Nusinovich, T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and R. Kishek 13 th Advanced.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
Wave Dispersion EM radiation Maxwell’s Equations 1.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
Theory of dilute electrolyte solutions and ionized gases
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance) M. Zobov.
Christopher Gerth DL/RAL Joint Workshop 28-29/4/04 Modelling of the ERLP injector system Christopher Gerth ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Oscillations Readings: Chapter 14.
Central Force Umiatin,M.Si. The aim : to evaluate characteristic of motion under central force field.
ELECTROMAGNETIC PARTICLE: MASS, SPIN, CHARGE, AND MAGNETIC MOMENT Alexander A. Chernitskii.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
1 Short Electron Pulses from RF Photoinjectors Massimo Ferrario INFN - LNF.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
1 10. Harmonic oscillator Simple harmonic motion Harmonic oscillator is an example of periodic motion, where the displacement of a particle from.
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Equilibrium and Stability
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Space-Charge Effects in RF Photoinjectors
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
101° Congresso della societa italiana fisica
Electromagnetics II.
Review Lecture Jeffrey Eldred Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism
Space-charge Effects for a KV-Beam Jeffrey Eldred
Oscillations Readings: Chapter 14.
Beam Dynamics in a Spilt SRF-Gun
Physics of fusion power
calculation with 107 particles
Superconducting High Brightness RF Photoinjector Design
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 3
Accelerator Physics Statistical Effects
Accelerator Physics Statistical and Collective Effects I
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Statistical Effects
Presentation transcript:

SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2

Space Charge Dominated Beams Cylindrical Beams Plasma Oscillations

Space Charge: What does it mean? Space Charge Regime self field Collective Effects Space Charge Regime ==> The interaction beween particles is dominated by the self field produced by the particle distribution, which varies appreciably only over large distances compare to the average separation of the particles ==> Collective Effects

A measure for the relative importance of collective effects is the Debye Length D non-neutralizedidentical charged particles Let consider a non-neutralized system of identical charged particles We wish to calculate the effective potential of a fixed test charged particle surrounded by other particles that are statistically distributed. N N total number of particles n n average particle density

The particle distribution around the test particle will deviate from a uniform distribution so that the effective potential of the test particle is now defined as the sum of the original and the induced potential: Local deviation from n Local microscopic distribution Poisson Equation

Presupposing thermodynamic equilibrium,n m will obey the following distribution: Where the potential energy of the particles is assumed to be much smaller than their kinetic energy The solution with the boundary condition that  s vanishes at infinity is: D

Conclusion: Debye length Conclusion: the effective interaction range of the test particle is limited to the Debye length The charges sourrounding the test particles have a screening effect Smooth functions for the charge and field distributions can be used D

If collisions can be neglected the Liouville’s theorem holds in the 6-D phase space (r,p). This is possible because the smoothed space-charge forces acting on a particle can be treated like an applied force. Thus the 6-D phase space volume occupied by the particles remains constant during acceleration. In addition if all forces are linear functions of the particle displacement from the beam center and there is no coupling between degrees of freedom, the normalized emittance associated with each plane (2-D phase space) remains a constant of the motion Important consequences

Continuous Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model Gauss’s law Ampere’s law Linear with r

Lorentz Force The attractive magnetic force, which becomes significant at high velocities, tends to compensate for the repulsive electric force. Therefore, space charge defocusing is primarily a non-relativistic effect radial has only radial component and linear is a linear function of the transverse coordinate

Equation of motion: Alfven current Generalized perveance

If the initial particle velocities depend linearly on the initial coordinates then the linear dependence will be conserved during the motion, because of the linearity of the equation of motion. Laminar Beam This means that particle trajectories do not cross ==> Laminar Beam Laminar Beam

x x’ x rms x’ rms What about RMS Emittance (Lawson)?

In the phase space (x,x’) all particles lie in the interval bounded by the points (a,a’). x x’ a a’ What about the rms emittance? When n = 1 ==>  r = 0

x x’ a a’ The presence of nonlinear space charge forces can distort the phase space contours and causes emittance growth

Space Charge induced emittance oscillations

Bunched Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model Longitudinal Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame: L(t) R(t) z (0,0) l

Radial Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame by series representation of axisymmetric field:

Lorentz Transformation to the Lab frame

Beam Aspect Ratio It is still a linear field with r but with a longitudinal correlation 

 = 1  = 5  = 10 L(t) R s (t) tt

Simple Case: Transport in a Long Solenoid ==> Equilibrium solution ? ==> g(  

Small perturbations around the equilibrium solution

Plasma frequency

x pxpx Projected Phase Space Slice Phase Spaces Emittance Oscillations are driven by space charge differential defocusing in core and tails of the beam

R(  )  (z) Envelope oscillations drive Emittance oscillations

X X’ Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes

Q =1 nC R =1.5 mm L =20 ps  th = 0.45 mm-mrad E peak = 60 MV/m (Gun) E acc = 13 MV/m (Cryo1) B = 1.9 kG (Solenoid) I = 50 A E = 120 MeV  n = 0.6 mm-mrad  n [mm-mrad] Z [m] HOMDYN Simulation of a L-band photo-injector 6 MeV 3.5 m