EPS, July 2003 1  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Advertisements

August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
1 D 0 -D 0 Mixing at BaBar Charm 2007 August, 2007 Abe Seiden University of California at Santa Cruz for The BaBar Collaboration.
Oct.,  Overview of the CLEO experiment  D and D S leptonic decays to  and  : Measurements of absolute branching fractions Measurements of absolute.
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
Direct CP and Rare B A B AR BEAUTY 05 - Assisi Jamie Boyd Bristol University On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.
1 Charm Decays at Threshold Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota Determination of |V cb | Using Moments of Inclusive B Decay Spectra BEACH04 Conference June 28-July 3, 2004 Chicago,
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
First Observation of the Baryon; Properties of,,, and Baryons Andreas Warburton Cornell University CLEO Collaboration XXX th International Conference on.
B decays to charm hadrons at Belle M.-C. Chang Fu Jen Catholic University (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) European Physical Society HEP2007 International.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Xiaoyan LinQuark Matter 2006, Shanghai, Nov , Study B and D Contributions to Non- photonic Electrons via Azimuthal Correlations between Non-
Search for CP violation in  decays R. Stroynowski SMU Representing CLEO Collaboration.
Charmonium Production at BaBar Jamie Boyd University of Bristol Photon 2003, Frascati 7 th -11 th April 2003 On behalf of the Collaboration.
August 20, 2007 Charmless Hadronic B decays at BaBar1 Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar Woochun Park University of South Carolina Representing the BaBar.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo Suppressed D 0 Decays Kalanand Mishra, G. Mancinelli, B. T. Meadows, M. D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
New Observations on Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Yanping HUANG For BESIII Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) ICHEP2010, Paris,
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
Evidence for the Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decays ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam, July 27, 2002 Jeffrey D. Richman UC Santa Barbara for the B A B AR Collaboration.
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Summary of  2 measurements at Super KEKB Hirokazu Ishino Tokyo Institute of Technology 19 Dec., 2006.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
On quasi-two-body components of (for 250fb -1 ) (for 250fb -1 ) J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Krakow DC Meeting May 16, 2005 B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D 0 D 0.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
DCPV/Rare George W.S. Hou (NTU) Beauty Assisi 1 Direct CP and Rare Decays June 21, 2005 B Physics at Hadronic Machines, Assisi.
Guglielmo De Nardo for the BABAR collaboration Napoli University and INFN ICHEP 2010, Paris, 23 July 2010.
1 Inclusive B → X c l Decays Moments of hadronic mass and lepton energy PR D69,111103, PR D69, Fits to energy dependence of moments based on HQE.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
D0 mixing and charm CP violation
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
How charm data may help for φ3 measurement at B-factories
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  - (EPS-123) Victor Pavlunin Purdue University the CLEO collaboration EPS-2003, Aachen, Germany Searches for CP asymmetries in the:

EPS, July  CPV in decay (direct): Time integrated asymmetries; but strong phases are hard to calculate.  CPV in mixing (indirect): Time integrated asymmetries ( e.g., like-sign di-lepton events); expected to be small in the SM.  CPV in the interference between decays with and without mixing: Time dependent analyses; avoid hadronic uncertainties in some important cases. CP violation in the Standard Model In the SM, the origin of CPV resides in flavor changing quark transitions (V CKM ):

EPS, July The CLEO II and II.V detector  Tracking system: SVX (3 layers) or Gas Vertex Detector, Vertex Detector, Drift Chamber (B=1.5T, Ar 2 +C 2 H 6 or He 2 +C 3 H 8 ) (  p/p ~ 0.6% for a 2 GeV track)  Time of Flight system S cintillating plastic (  t ~ 170ps)  Crystal Calorimeter CsI crystals(  E/E ~ 2% for a 2 GeV photon  Muon chambers Proportional chambers at 3, 5 and 7 I The size of the data sample is 13.7 fb -1. 2/3 (1/3) is taken with CLEOII.V (CLEOII). 2/3 (1/3) is taken ON (50 MeV OFF)  (4S). ~10M of and ~18M of events.

EPS, July CPV studies at CLEO Type of CPV DirectMixingInterference Bottom Yes No Charm Yes All results reported today are on searches for direct CP asymmetries  CESR is a symmetric ( ) GeV e + e – collider.  On  (4S),  B =  B  B c  B is ~30  m,  D =  D  D c  D is  m (assuming  D  D = 1 ),  B < Vertex resolution <  D Time integrated asymmetries in B and D systems, and time dependent asymmetries in the D system are accessible.

EPS, July A CP in the Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Interference of different intermediate resonances in the Dalitz plot makes amplitudes and phases of the resonances accessible. Expected contributions are from resonant decays through  0,  + and  -, as well as a non-resonant contribution.  A CP is predicted to be as large as 0.1% (F.Buccella et al., Phys.Lett.B 379, 249 (1996)).  E791 found strong evidence for  (500) in D +   -  +  + ( PRL 86, 770 (2001)). Does  (500) contribute in D 0   -  +  0 ?

EPS, July Event selection for D 0   -  +  0 (CLEOII.V data only)  Standard criteria on charged tracks and  0 ’s  Constrain D 0 and  slow to the beam spot  D 0 (  -  +  0 ) and D* + (  -  +  0  + slow ): GeV < M(D 0 ) < GeV MeV < Q – Q expected < 0.691MeV, where Q  M(D *+ ) - M(D 0 ) X p  P (D *+ ) / P (D *+ ) max > 0.7 D *+  D 0  + slow, D 0   -  +  0,  0  . The sign of   slow determines the flavor of the D 0. Signal yield: 1.1K events in the signal box, of which ~20% are background.

EPS, July The Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0

EPS, July Fit to the Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0  The likelihood function has the form  The matrix element is parameterized as  A CP across the Dalitz plot is obtained as

EPS, July All Preliminary Results for A CP in D 0   -  +  0 Resonance AmplitudePhaseFit Fraction + (fixed)0 (fixed)76.5±1.8±4.8 00 0.56±0.02±0.0710±3±323.9±1.8±4.6  0.65±0.03±0.04  4±3±4 32.3±2.1±2.2 Non res 1.03±0.17±0.3177±8±112.7±0.9±1.7  Systematic errors (on-going): Parameterization of efficiencies; Parameterization of background; Signal fraction; Event selection criteria. Fit fraction of  (500) is consistent with zero.  The results of a fit with no CPV assumed (systematic errors are included):  The integrated A CP across the Dalitz plot:

EPS, July Form factor measurement and search for CPV in the decay  c   e + (EPS-138)  In the heavy quark symmetry limit, particles with a heavy quark are subject to a larger symmetry group. The Lorentz structure of  -type baryons is due to the polarization states of the heavy quark only (light quarks form a spin zero state). Due to this simplicity, the predictions of HQET for  - type baryons are more reliable than for mesons.  Four kinematic variables describe the decay sequence  c   e +,  p  + : t = q 2 /q 2 max, cos  , cos  W and .  The four-fold decay rate has the form: are helicity amplitudes containing the dependence on the form factors.

EPS, July Form factor predictions for  c   e +  Traditional parameterization of the hadronic current:  HQET implies relations among form factors and reduces their number to two:  In order to fit the data, the q 2 dependence of the form factors must be assumed. We follow the Korner-Kramer (KK) model (Phys.Lett. B 275, 495 (1992)) and assume the same dipole dependence for both form factors:  The fit is made for R = f 2 /f 1 and M pole.

EPS, July Yields and Estimation of kinematic variables  Event selection and background studies:  Estimation of kinematic variables (neutrino is missing): kinematic constraints of the decay, the thrust vector of the event, the fragmentation function of  c. ~3K of signal events and S/B=3.7

EPS, July ML fit for form factors in  c   e +  The fitting method used in the analysis was first suggested in D.M.Schmidt, R.J.Morrison and M.S.Witherell, Nucl.Instr. and Methods A (1993), in the measurement of form factors in D  K * l.  The following samples are used as separate components in the fit (10 different components):  c   e + for CleoII/CleoII.V (2 components)  c   e - for CleoII/CleoII.V (2 components)  c   e + (2 components) fake positron background (3 components with different momentum ranges) fake  background (1 component)  Simultaneous fit for R=f 2 /f 1 and M pole :  Major systematic errors Background shapes in 4D, Feeddown from modes  c   Xe +, X  0, Background normalizations, Uncertainties intrinsic to the fitter M(D s * (1 - )) = 2.11 GeV

EPS, July  The fit results correspond to  If CP is conserved then. Therefore, a CP violating parameter can be defined as.  Fitting the charge conjugate states separately for and, and using the relation we obtain where correlations among systematic errors are taken into account. All Preliminary A CP in the kinematic distributions of  c   e + for = 0.67 GeV 2.

EPS, July A CP in the decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  - (EPS-123)  In SU(3) symmetry limit:  Measuring and allows the extraction of both  and the strong phase, .  CLEO measured ( PRL 89, (2002)):  This study extends the previous analysis and measures:

EPS, July Event selection in B 0  K * (892) +  -  Standard cut on tracks and showers   0 ’ s: P(  0 ) > 1.0 GeV  Beam constrained mass:  B candidate energy:  Veto some b  c background : B  D , D  K  ; B  J/  K 0 (or J/  0 ), J/    +  - Example:  Suppress background :. K * (892) + is reconstructed in two submodes: K * (892) +  K S 0  + and K * (892) +  K +  0.

EPS, July UML fit for B 0  K * (892) +  - and A CP  The likelihood function is given by Variables (plot on the right): M B, E B, the Fisher discriminant, cos(  B ), dE/dx for the faster of the primary tracks ( h - =  - or K - ) and Dalitz plot variables. Components: the signal, the continuum, the BBbar bckg, the B 0  R *+ h –, where h – is  - or K -, R *+ can be any of the intermediate state resonances - K * (1430),  (770), or f 0 (980) ; and non-resonant (phase space) decays.  The fit is made for f j ’ s and ’s, where, for B 0  K * (892) +  -  PDFs are functions of the event location in the Dalitz plot (plot of the right) and are derived from the off-resonance data, the D 0  K -  + data and MC. K * (892) + (K S 0  - )  -

EPS, July Results for A CP in B 0  K * (892) +  -  Fit to 30 free parameters ( f j ’s and ’s) Yield for B 0  K * (892) +  -, K * (892) +  K S 0  + : Yield for B 0  K * (892) +  -, K * (892) +  K +  0 : Combined significance 4.6 .  Major systematic errors Dalitz PDF shapes Fitting method Interference among intermediate resonances  Final results for A CP (Phys.Rev. D 68, (2003)): B 0  K * (892) +  -

EPS, July SUMMARY  A CP in the Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208):, No evidence for  (500) is found.  Form Factors and Search for CPV in  c   e + (EPS-138):  Charge Asymmetry in B  K * (892) +  - (EPS-123):