Adrian Grocott *, Steve Milan, Mark Lester, Tim Yeoman University of Leicester, U.K. *currently visiting NIPR, Japan Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron Acceleration in the Van Allen Radiation Belts by Fast Magnetosonic Waves Richard B. Horne 1 R. M. Thorne 2, S. A. Glauert 1, N. P. Meredith 1.
Advertisements

The influence of solar wind parameters on pseudobreakups, substorms and polar auroral arcs Anita Kullen.
SAPS intensification during substorm recovery: A multi-instrument case study Roman A. Makarevich University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA A. C. Kellerman, J.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
VT SuperDARN Group2011 SuperDARN WorkshopJoseph Baker Testing the Equipotential Magnetic Field Line Assumption Using Interhemispheric.
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Occurrence and properties of substorms associated with pseudobreakups Anita Kullen Space & Plasma Physics, EES.
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, substorms, and ramifications for ionospheric convection Steve Milan Adrian Grocott (Leics,
Peter Boakes 1, Steve Milan 2, Adrian Grocott 2, Mervyn Freeman 3, Gareth Chisham 3, Gary Abel 3, Benoit Hubert 4, Victor Sergeev 5 Rumi Nakamura 1, Wolfgang.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
PLASMA TRANSPORT ALONG DISCRETE AURORAL ARCS A.Kullen 1, T. Johansson 2, S. Buchert 1, and S. Figueiredo 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
AJ Ribeiro Irregs.Short Meeting Title, Date A survey of plasma irregularities seen by the mid-latitude Blackstone SuperDARN radar.
Ionospheric Convection and Field-Aligned Currents During Strong Magnetospheric Driving: A SuperDARN/AMPERE Case Study L. B. N. Clausen (1), J. B. H. Baker.
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
Sub-auroral flow shear observed by King Salmon HF radar and RapidMAG T. Hori 1, T. Kikuchi 1, Y. Tsuji 1, A. Shinbori 2, K. Ohtaka 3, M. Kunitake 3, S.
Radar Remote Sensing Laboratory University of Washington Melissa Meyer, Andrew Morabito, Zac Berkowitz, John Sahr University of Washington Electrical Engineering.
On the importance of IMF |B Y | on polar cap patch formation Qinghe Zhang 1, Beichen Zhang 1, Ruiyuan Liu 1, M. W. Dunlop 2, M. Lockwood 2, 3, J. Moen.
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group The formation of transpolar arcs R. C. Fear and S. E. Milan University of Leicester.
M. Menvielle and A. Marchaudon ESWW2 M. Menvielle (1) and A. Marchaudon (2) (1) Centre d’études des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires UMR 8615 IPL/CNRS/UVSQ.
Geospace Variability through the Solar Cycle John Foster MIT Haystack Observatory.
Julie A. Feldt CEDAR-GEM workshop June 26 th, 2011.
Solar wind-magnetosphere- atmosphere coupling: effects of magnetic storms and substorms in atmospheric electric field variations Kleimenova N., Kozyreva.
Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey
Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.
EISCAT Svalbard Radar studies of meso-scale plasma flow channels in the polar cusp ionosphere Y. Dåbakk et al.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
A. Kullen (1), L. Rosenqvist (1), and G. Marklund (2) (1) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden (2) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel, H Frey, E Donovan, D G Sibeck, W Liu, H U Auster, X Li, M Nose, and M O Fillingim Outline  Conjunction.
Large electric fields near the nightside plasmapause observed by the Polar spacecraft K.-H. Kim 1, F. Mozer 2, and D.-H. Lee 1 1 Department of Astronomy.
Ionospheric Current and Aurora CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 12 Spring 2007 April 24, 2007 References: Prolss: Chap , P (main) Tascione: Chap.
Fractal reconnection at the Earth’s magnetopause and associated ionospheric convection. Gary Abel, Iain Coleman, Mervyn Freeman and Gareth Chisham British.
Energy conversion at Saturn’s magnetosphere: from dayside reconnection to kronian substorms Dr. Caitríona Jackman Uppsala, May 22 nd 2008.
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
Testing the Equipotential Magnetic Field Line Assumption Using SuperDARN Measurements and the Cluster Electron Drift Instrument (EDI) Joseph B. H. Baker.
GEOSYNCHRONOUS SIGNATURES OF AURORAL SUBSTORMS PRECEDED BY PSEUDOBREAKUPS A. Kullen (1), S. Ohtani (2), and H. Singer (3) A. Kullen (1), S. Ohtani (2),
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
CEDAR 2008 Workshop Observations at the Plasmaspheric Boundary Layer with the Mid-latitude SuperDARN radars Mike Ruohoniemi, Ray Greenwald, and Jo Baker.
Ionospheric Convection during an extended period of Northward IMF
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
New Science Opportunities with a Mid-Latitude SuperDARN Radar Raymond A. Greenwald Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation.
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
© Research Section for Plasma and Space Physics UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Daytime Aurora Jøran Moen.
Substorms: Ionospheric Manifestation of Magnetospheric Disturbances P. Song, V. M. Vasyliūnas, and J. Tu University of Massachusetts Lowell Substorms:
Mike Ruohoniemi 2012VT SuperDARN Remote Sensing of the Ionosphere and Earth’s Surface with HF Radar J. Michael Ruohoniemi and Joseph Baker.
SuperDARN Observations of ULF Pulsations During a Substorm Expansion Phase Onset N. A. Frissell, J. B. H. Baker, J. M. Ruohoniemi, L. B. N. Clausen, R.
Statistical Characterization of sub-auroral polarization stream using using large scale observations by mid- latitude SuperDARN radars B. S. R. Kunduri.
TBD: Contributions of MIT Coupling to Important Features… Open-closed field line boundary Equatorward boundaries of particle precipitation Plasmapause.
Postmidnight ionospheric trough in summer and link to solar wind: how, when and why? Mirela Voiculescu (1), T. Nygrén (2), A. Aikio(2), H. Vanhamäki (2)
Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission and the Ionosphere-Thermosphere RPSP SWG Meeting June 2009.
VT SuperDARN Group Joseph Baker Ground-Based Observations of the Plasmapause Boundary Layer (PBL) Region with.
Baker Tech SuperDARN Large-Scale Observations of the Sub-Auroral Polarization Stream (SAPS) From.
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
N. Pramodkumar (1), J. B. H. Baker (1), J. M. Ruohoniemi (1), L. B. N
Dynamics of the AMPERE R1 Oval during substorms and SMCs
Thermosphere-Ionosphere Issues for DASI - I:
Evidence for Dayside Interhemispheric Field-Aligned Currents During Strong IMF By Conditions Seen by SuperDARN Radars Joseph B.H. Baker, Bharat Kunduri.
The Physics of Space Plasmas
Penetration Jet DMSP F April MLT
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Magnetosphere response to impulse space weather events: relationships between PC, AE and SymH indices O. Troshichev and D.Sormakov Arctic and Antarcrtic.
Subauroral heliosphere-geosphere coupling during November 2004 ionospheric storms: F2-region, North-East Asia Chelpanov M. A., Zolotukhina N.A. Institute.
Magnetosphere: Bow Shock Substorm and Storm
Determination of the Substorm Initiation Region From a Major Conjunction Interval of THEMIS Satellites A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel,
On Strong Coupling between the Harang Reversal Evolution and Substorm Dynamics: A Synthesis of SuperDARN, DMSP and IMAGE Observations Shasha Zou1, Larry.
Determination of the Substorm Initiation Region From a Major Conjunction Interval of THEMIS Satellites A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel,
Presentation transcript:

Adrian Grocott *, Steve Milan, Mark Lester, Tim Yeoman University of Leicester, U.K. *currently visiting NIPR, Japan Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey, U.K. Jo Baker Virginia Tech., U.S. Dynamic sub-auroral ionospheric electric fields observed by the Falkland Islands radar during the course of a geomagnetic storm 日本学術振興会 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

The Falkland Islands radar (FIR) Deployed in February 2010 at mid-latitudes to extend the existing antarctic SuperDARN fields-of-view to provide: (a) continued auroral observations during severe geomagnetic storms (b) sub-auroral observations during modest geomagnetic storms

Observations of ionospheric electric fields in the auroral zone and polar cap provide direct evidence for magnetospheric driving by the solar wind During magnetospheric substorms, processes in the inner magnetosphere drive sub-auroral electric fields which couple to the auroral zones adding to the complexity of the electrodynamics A variety of sub-auroral electric fields have been reported as polarisation jets (PJ), sub-auroral ion drifts (SAID), substorm associated radar auroral surges (SARAS), sub-auroral electric fields (SAEF), sub- auroral polarisation streams (SAPS), and auroral-westward flow channels (AWFC) These observations have tended to be described in terms of phenomenology, rather than in relation to the magnetospheric physics with which they are associated In this talk we present observations of an interval of dynamic sub- auroral ionospheric electric fields and relate them to the prevailing interplanetary and geomagnetic activity Introduction

Observations of ionospheric electric fields in the auroral zone and polar cap provide direct evidence for magnetospheric driving by the solar wind Polar Cap and Auroral Convection Convection Electric Field 12 MLT 00 MLT 06 MLT18 MLT Auroral Oval Ionospheric Plasma Streamlines E

Sub-auroral Electric Field 12 MLT 00 MLT 06 MLT18 MLT During magnetospheric substorms, processes in the inner magnetosphere drive sub-auroral electric fields which couple to the auroral zones adding to the complexity of the electrodynamics [e.g. Grocott et al., 2006, 2010]. Substorm ‘Harang’ Electric Fields Auroral Oval Ionospheric Plasma Streamlines E Polar Cap and Auroral Convection

Polarisation jets (PJ) [Galperin et al., 1973] Sub-auroral ion drifts (SAID) [Spiro et al., 1979] Substorm associated radar auroral surges (SARAS) [Freeman et al., 1992] Sub-auroral electric fields (SAEF) [Karlsson et al., 1998] Sub-auroral polarisation streams (SAPS) [Foster and Burke, 2002] Auroral westward flow channels (AWFC) [Parkinson et al., 2003] Generally observed to be westward, pre-midnight phenomena The term SAPS used to encompass the full range of electric fields observed in the sub-auroral region including the broad ( ∼ 5 ◦ ), weak ( ∼ 100 m s −1 ) background flows which persist beyond midnight into the pre- dawn sector. SAID are fast (1 − 4 km s −1 ), latitudinally narrow ( ∼ 1 ◦ − 2 ◦ ) regions of rapid westward ion drift explicitly associated with substorm electrodynamics. Sub-Auroral Ionospheric Convection

Sub-auroral Electric Field 12 MLT 00 MLT 06 MLT18 MLT Substorm ‘Harang’ Electric Fields Auroral Oval Ionospheric Plasma Streamlines E Sub-Auroral Ionospheric Convection Falkland Islands Radar (FIR) field-of-view This study focusses on storm-time radar observations of an interval of dynamic sub-auroral electric fields and their relationship to the prevailing interplanetary conditions, auroral particle precipitation, and geomagnetic activity

Introduction A variety of sub-auroral electric fields have been reported... auroral-westward flow channels (AWFC) polarisation jets (PJ) sub-auroral polarisation streams (SAPS) sub-auroral electric fields (SAEF) sub-auroral ion drifts (SAID) 12 MLT 00 MLT 06 MLT18 MLT Substorm ‘Harang’ Electric Fields Auroral Oval Ionospheric Plasma Streamlines...but their relationship to geomagnetic storms is yet to be fully elucidated substorm associated radar auroral surges (SARAS) E

SuperDARN radar propagation E F Mesospheric scatter, e.g. meteor scatter E-region ionospheric scatter Different propagation paths lead to radar backscatter from different physical regimes: F-region ionospheric scatter Ground backscatter Multiple ‘hop’ and 1 / 2 ‘hop’ paths are also possible, enabling ranges of > 3000 km to be reached

Instrumentation SuperDARN FIR and BKS radar observations of sub-auroral electric fields (BKS is northern hemisphere near-conjugate radar to FIR) Upstream Driving: ACE solar wind and IMF data Magnetospheric Morphology: DMSP auroral precipitation boundaries Ring Current Dynamics: Ground geomagnetic storm-time indices 0300 UT FIR BKS

Observations: Storm Overview Time-series of data spanning 5 days between 3 and 7 August 2010 Solar wind and IMF data indicate the arrival of a fast solar wind front at ~1800 UT on 3 August AE indices reveal intervals of enhanced auroral electrojet activity Sym-H index shows the characteristic signature of a geomagnetic storm At the peak of storm activity on Aug 4th an interval of ionospheric backscatter was observed Pwr (dB)

Observations: Storm Main Phase Vel (ms -1 ) Time-series of data from 1600 UT on 3 August to 0900 UT on 4th i. Solar wind shock and sudden storm commencement (SSC) ii. Start of a ~3 h interval of strongly southward IMF iii. Peak in Asym-H index iv. Start of a sequence of 4 substorms and appearance of ionospheric radar scatter v. Start of storm recovery phase Between (iv) and (v) the radar scatter, IMF, and ground magnetic indices all exhibit oscillatory behaviour

Observations: Flow Channel Characteristics Comparing the FIR data with BKS data reveals a similar fast flow region at similar latitudes in both hemispheres. BKS observed a wider band of scatter, illustrating that the high speed, narrow flow channel is embedded within a wider, slower band of flow. This is consistent with previous studies of sub-auroral ion drifts (SAID) [Spiro et al., 1979] and sub-auroral polarisation streams (SAPS) [Foster and Burke, 2002]. SAID S A P S sub-auroral polarisation streams (SAPS) sub-auroral ion drifts (SAID)

00 MLT 18 MLT sub-auroral electric fields (SAEF) sub-auroral polarisation streams (SAPS) sub-auroral ion drifts (SAID) Sub-auroral electric fields are associated with charge separation - caused by the penetration of partial ring current ions to lower L-shells than plasma sheet electrons [Foster, 1995]. Sub-Auroral Convection

00 MLT 18 MLT This study focusses on storm-time radar observations of an interval of dynamic sub-auroral ion drifts and their relationship to the prevailing interplanetary conditions and geomagnetic activity Falkland Islands Radar (FIR) field-of-view E Sub-Auroral Convection

Observations: Flow Channel Location Fast westward flows Electron precipitation boundary a. Polar projections of FIR data with DMSP overpasses b. Electron and c. ion energy spectrograms Circle fits to electron and ion equatorward boundaries

Observations: Flow Channel Location Comparison of FIR backscatter location with DMSP spectrogram data reveals the location of the flow channel to be close to, or equatorward of, the electron precipitation boundary and generally poleward of the ion boundary e-e- i+i+

Observations: Flow Channel Velocity Vel (ms -1 ) Vel (ms -1 ) The velocity varies across the field-of-view such that with increasing MLT it changes from strongly negative to positive i.e. the direction of flow is generally westward Time series reveal smaller-scale variations within the flow channel The data from all beams reveal the evolution of the flow with time along the length of the channel

Observations: Flow Channel Velocity Vel (ms -1 ) The lowest velocities were observed in beam 10 We therefore assume that the direction of the flow is perpendicular to this direction A simple beam swinging analysis then enables estimation of the full vector velocity along each beam Non-uniformity of the velocity estimated on each beam indicates variability within the flow channel

Observations: Flow Channel Velocity The lowest velocities were observed in beam 10 We therefore assume that the direction of the flow is perpendicular to this direction A simple beam swinging analysis then enables estimation of the full vector velocity along each beam Non-uniformity of the velocity estimated on each beam indicates variability within the flow channel

Reconnection rates and changes in open flux Reconnection rates [after Milan et al. 2006, 2007] : V D = v sw B L sin 4 ( θ / 2 ) : commonly used empirical formula for dayside reconnection rate V N = −AL × c : proxy for nightside reconnection rate, derived from studies of flux closure observed during substorms c, a constant, was chosen to give quasi-steady long-term level of open flux over the whole interval

Flow Channel Analysis Location of flow channel and ion / electron precipitation equatorward boundary latitudes Flow channel velocity variability fluctuates on similar time-scales to channel latitude Magnetic indices AU, AL and Sym-H variations of a similar nature to the flow channel latitude variation Rec’n rates [after Milan et al. 2006, 2007] : V D = v sw B L sin 4 ( θ / 2 ), V N = −AL × c c, a constant, was chosen to give net zero flux change over the interval Shorter time-scale open flux variations match the inverse flow channel latitude

Summary and Conclusions 1.Continuous observations of a highly dynamic, narrow channel of enhanced flow, spanning a number of substorm cycles during the main phase of a geomagnetic storm 2.Conjugate, hemisphere observations place the flows at the poleward edge of the SAPS, consistent with satellite observations of SAID [e.g. Foster and Burke, 2002] 3.Simultaneous particle precipitation data place the SAID close to the equatorward boundary of auroral electron precipitation, but generally poleward of the ion boundary 4.The separation of these boundaries increases following the onset of substorm activity; the electron boundary moves poleward with the SAID, whereas the ion boundary remains at lower latitudes 5.This latitudinal motion of the SAID is well correlated with changes in polar cap open flux content, substorm injections, small-scale velocity variations, and peaks in Asym-H - indicates a direct relationship with large-scale magnetospheric dynamics

Future Work Relationship between polar cap and auroral convection, and the large- scale modification of this relationship during magnetospheric substorms is well understood Next is to study the coupling of the polar cap, auroral and sub-auroral convection With the FIR radar we now have continuous coverage from 40 ◦ magnetic latitude to the pole

Geomagnetic Storm Overview Time-series of data spanning 5 days between 3 and 7 August 2010 Solar wind and IMF data indicate the arrival of a fast solar wind front at ~1800 UT on 3 August AE indices reveal intervals of enhanced auroral electrojet activity Sym-H index shows the characteristic signature of a geomagnetic storm At the peak of storm activity on Aug 4th an interval of ionospheric backscatter was observed Pwr (dB)

PWR (dB) An Interhemispheric survey of travelling ionospheric disturbances and their relationship to geomagnetic activity Adrian Grocott 1,2, Steve Milan 1, and Sessai Yukimatu 2 1 Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K. 2 Upper Atmospheric Physics Group, NIPR, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan.