V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Post-Mortem Ultra-Structural Analysis of a Cornea Transplanted With DMEK Jack Parker Jr, MD; Eitan Livny, MD; Vasilis S. Liarakos, MD, PhD; Gerrit R. Melles,
Advertisements

Endothelial Cell Changes as an Indicator for Upcoming Allograft Rejection Following Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Jack Parker Jr, MD; Lamis.
Hemi-DMEK Transplantation: Novel Method to Increase the Pool of Endothelial Graft Tissue Lam FC 1-4, Baydoun L 2-4, Dirisamer M 2-4, Lie J 2-4, Dapena.
Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group
Venting Incisions in DSAEK Patients: Is It an Absolute Necessity?
Use of a Novel Y- Suture Technique to Reduce Detachments in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Habeeb Ahmad, MD Martin Heur,
The authors have no financial interests to disclose
Transplantation of Suboptimal Corneal Donor Tissue: A Case Series Elsie Chan, FRANZCO Graeme Pollock, PhD Rasik B. Vajpayee, FRANZCO World Cornea Congress,
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم IN THE NAME OF GOD. Implantation of an Artisan phakic intraocular lens for the correction of high myopia, high hyperopia, aphakia.
Early Outcomes of Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes with Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Preeya K. Gupta.
Katsuya Yamazoe, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD, Kazuki Hotta, MD, Yoshiyuki Satake, MD, Kenji Konomi, MD, Seika Den, MD, Jun Shimazaki, MD Presented by: Abdulrahman.
Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon.
Jeffrey J. Ing, MD, FACS, (Delta Eye Medical Group, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology) Thanh T. Nguyen, OD (Delta Eye.
DSAEK in Eyes With Severe Pre-operative Visual Acuity Loss. 1. Sightline Ophthalmic Associates, Pittsburgh, PA 2. Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR 3.
Repeat DMEK for unsuccessful
Corneal Densitometry and Visual Outcome Comparisons of DSAEK and DMEK Eyes Xiaolin Zhang MD Robert L. Schultze MD Robert A. Eden MD Rahul Raghu.
Introduction To Corneal Transplantation
Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis and Silicone Oil for the Treatment of Hypotony in Prephthisis Kristiana D. Neff 1, William I. Sawyer 2, Michael R. Petersen.
Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.
Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore
Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Table 2.1.1: New Transplant Rate per million population (pmp), Year New transplants
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in Tohoku University, Japan T Hariya MD, A Kubota MD PhD, M Uematsu MD, S Yokokura MD PhD,K Nishida MD PhD,
Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.
Postoperative Visual Acuity in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy Undergoing Descemet Membrane–Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Correlation With.
EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR CHAMBER SULCUS SUPPORTED INTRAOCULAR LENS BY PROF. HAMED NASER EL- DIN TAHA HAED OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DEPT. SAUDI GERMAN HOSPITAL JEDDAH.
Evaluation of Corneal Graft Profile Following Deep Anterior and Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Procedures by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with Toxic anterior segment syndrome induced endothelial failure First and Presenting.
AlphaCor TM : A Novel Approach to Minimize Late Post-operative Complications V. Ngakeng MD, M. Price PhD. MBA, F. Price MD.
Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with a Graft Insertion Device : Technique and Early Results Dr Wei-Boon KHOR, MRCS(Ed), Dr Jodhbir.
Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,
Successful Use of Corneal Tissue from LASIK Donors in Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series Mark D. Mifflin, MD Majid Moshirfar,
J. Brian Foster, MD No Financial Disclosures
Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg.
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Vs Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) in patients with Keratoconus (KC). Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital.
Jodhbir S Mehta, Donald Tan The Authors have a financial Interest in the Endoglide patent/royalty.
World Cornea Congress VII - April 15-17, 2015 Electronic Poster
DSEK for the treatment of endothelial disease in India -Initial Experience in 80 eyes- Authors have no financial interest Dr Ashish Nagpal MD, FRCS Dr.
Post-Operative Management of Vitreous Adhesion after DSAEK with YAG Laser Vitreolysis Sherif Idris 1, Ahmed Al-Ghoul 2 MD FRCSC DipABO 1 University of.
Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty by novice endothelial keratoplasty surgeons Jason W. Much, M.D. 1 Paul M. Phillips, M.D. 1,2 Leslie.
First 25 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Outcomes for an Experienced DSAEK Surgeon Authors: Victoria Epstein, MS.,DO, Josh Wallsh, MS-III,
Jae Woo Kim M.D. ; Sung Kun Chung M.D. Nam Ho Baek M.D. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Catholic University of Korea Clinical Result.
Predicting Visual Acuity after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty using Corneal Topography, Pachymetry and Posterior Curvature Asymmetry Indices.
Liquifaction Method and Extent of Posterior Capsule Opacification: Two-Year Follow-up Marie Kalfertova, Mariya Burova, Pavel Rozsival, Nada Jiraskova Nada.
Management of corneal perforations and deep ulcers with patch grafts Dariusz Dobrowolski¹, Edward Wylęgała¹ ׳ ², Dorota Tarnawska¹, Dominika Janiszewska¹.
CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL PROFILE AFTER FERRARA RING IMPLANTATION Leonardo Torquetti, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara Eye Clinic Belo Horizonte.
Effect of Donor Processing and Storage Time and Preoperative Endothelial Cell Counts on DSAEK Detachment Rates Daniel Demsey BScE Stephanie Baxter MD,
FreeVis LASIK Zentrum Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with a Pre-Existing Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens S. Elderkin1A, E. Tu1A,
Comparison of Endothelial Cell Loss After Phacoemulsification Performed by Third Year Residents and Anterior Segment Surgeons Alexandra Braunstein, MD.
Late In-the-bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation:
Outcomes and Complications of DSEK in Eyes with Tube shunts or ACIOLs
Endothelial keratoplasty in failed grafts
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Anil Vedula MD Financial Disclosures: None Richard M. Awdeh MD
Clinical results of the aphakia correction using iris-fixated anterior chamber intraocular lens (Artisan) Authors have no financial interest Luis Izquierdo.
Hong A, Boehlke CS, Afshari NA, Kim T Duke University Medical Center
Michael R. Banitt, MD, João Baptista Malta, MD, Roni M
R. Toyos, M.D. Memphis,Tennessee,USA
Roxana Ursea, MD Matthew T. Feng, MD Ovette Villavicencio, PhD
DARIUSZ DOBROWOLSKI¹, EDWARD WYLĘGAŁA¹ ², DOROTA TARNAWSKA¹
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
I.J.E van der Meulen1, C.P. Nieuwendaal1,
Matthew Caldwell, Alan Proia, Francis DeCroos, and Natalie Afshari
Presentation transcript:

V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, Amnitrans Eye Bank Rotterdam, The Netherlands Financial Disclosure: Dr Melles is a consultant for D.O.R.C. / Dutch Ophthalmic USA

To present endothelial survival after DMEK for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) and compare the outcomes in eyes with an AC-IOL with those with a posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL). Purpose 1.Liarakos VS, et al. Endothelial Keratoplasty for Bullous Keratopathy in eyes with an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens. J Cataract Refract Surg Melles GRJ, et al. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea Dapena I, et al. Standardized “no-touch” technique for DMEK. Arch Ophthalmol Liarakos VS, et al. Intraocular graft unfoldings technique in DMEK. JAMA Ophthalmol In our previous studies we have already presented the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in the presence of an anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC-IOL). 1 Specific modifications of the DMEK technique may be used to facilitate such surgeries. 2-4 Background

A B DMEK was performed in 34 consecutive eyes diagnosed with PBK In 7 eyes, DMEK was performed in the presence of an iris-claw AC-IOL In 27 eyes, DMEK was performed in the presence of a PC-IOL Methods

DMEK for PBK in the presence of a stable iris-claw AC-IOL A D BC EF A-C: Preoperative slit-lamp (A,B) and specular microscopy (C) images of an 83-year-old patient with PBK and an iris-claw AC-IOL. D-F: Postoperative slit-lamp (D,E) and specular microscopy (F) images of the same patient 6 months after DMEK. Vision is restored, the DM graft remains well attached and endothelial cell loss was measured to be 39%.

IOL = Intraocular lens AC = Anterior chamber PC = Posterior chamber ECD = Endothelial cell density, expressed in cells/mm 2 (mean±SD) BCVA = Best corrected visual acuity, expressed in decimal Snellen (mean) ACD = Anterior chamber depth, expressed in mm (mean±SD) Results Type of IOL Preop ECD (donor) Postop ECD at 6 months ECD decrease at 6 months Preop BCVA BCVA at 6m Preop central ACD Postop central ACD Preop peripheral ACD Postop peripheral ACD Significant detachment AC-IOL (iris claw) (n=7) 2514 ± ±42644% ±15% ± ± ± ±0.081 (14%) PC-IOL (n=27) 2463 ± ±457 43% ±18% (19%) P=0.91 P=0.4P=0.03 Outcomes after DMEK for PBK in eyes with an AC-IOL vs PC-IOL

The presence of a stable iris-claw AC-IOL did not affect ECD decrease or complications rate and was not considered a contra-indication in cases with PBK operated on with DMEK. Conclusion DMEK was successfully completed without any significant intraoperative complications in all eyes, regardless of the type of the IOL. No AC-IOL was removed or exchanged. No significant difference in ECD decrease was observed between the two groups at 6 months (P=0.91). The most common postoperative complication was significant partial graft detachment, observed in 1 case with an AC-IOL and 5 cases with a PC-IOL (14% and 19%, respectively). Results