VPS and Research Overview Barry P. Markovitz MD MPH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

AmeriCorps is introducing a new online payment system for the processing of AmeriCorps forms
TISSUE BANKING Challenging to Say the Least
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Member.
New Trials If you are seeking a collaboration with the UCL CCTU we require you to apply: At least 3 months before the application deadline By using the.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
Milestones from the Past / A Spotlight on the Future Quality Improvement Operations Management Research Randall Wetzel, MD, MBA - Chief Executive Officer,
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
HIPAA – Privacy Rule and Research USCRF Research Educational Series March 19, 2003.
Gall C, Katch A, Rice T, Jeffries HE, Kukuyeva I, and Wetzel RC
Proposal Submission 101. Proposal Timeline As soon as you have decided to submit, notify our SPPD contracts and grants coordinators, Nicole Burelli and.
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Implementation of Privacy Board Reviews at PCMC Mary Thomason, Intermountain Healthcare Privacy Board Chair.
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE PROGRAM WORKSHOP OFFICE OF RESEARCH LINDA M. GARDINER, Ph.D. DIRECTOR RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Decreasing Hospital LOS for Bronchiolitis Sandweiss DR, Mundorff MB, Hill T, et al.
Punkaj Gupta, MBBS Division of Pediatric Cardiology Arkansas Children’s Hospital March 26, 2015.
Module 2 Sealy Center on Aging What kinds of scholarly products can I produce?
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
Grant Writing for Projects Involving Human Subjects A case study of a junior investigator Leticia Manning Ryan, MD Children’s National Medical Center Washington,
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Hand Hygiene Compliance: The Role of Interactive vs. Passive Education in Improving Hand Hygiene A Randomized Control Study Christine Klucznik Telana Fairchild.
Impact of Process Flow Tool on Wait Times from Emergency Department to ICU. Presenter: Pratik Doshi, MD Assistant Professor, Director of Emergency Critical.
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 06/18/2015 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Guidance for Investigators NHLBI Grant Funding Application.
Using VPS to Assess Impact of Advance Practice Staffing Changes Emilie Henry, MD, FAAP Amy Harrell, RN, BSN Pediatric Critical Care The Children’s Hospital.
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Operational Adjustment Grants.
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations in Research using Residual Specimens Jeffrey R. Botkin, M.D., M.P.H. Professor of Pediatrics and Medical Ethics Associate.
H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…
INDEXATION CRITERIA Christian Kieling, MD Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Engaging with best editorial and publication practice Shreeya Nanda Deputy Editor.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
Authorship in Multicenter studies: GEMINI as an example.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Intermittent vs Continuous Pulse Oximetry McCulloh R, Koster M, Ralston S, et al.
Validation and Refinement of a Prediction Rule to Identify Children at Low Risk for Acute Appendicitis Kharbanda AB, Dudley NC, Bajaj L, et al; Pediatric.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Is Veteran User Status an Independent Risk Factor for Mortality After Private Sector CABG? William B. Weeks, MD, MBA Dorothy A. Bazos, Ph.D. David M. Bott,
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
HA Central Register of Clinical Research 1 Dec 04 HA REC.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
A Tutorial: Simple Steps for Trial Registration.
Proposals by Paramedical Staff to Initiate Rehabilitation in Patients with Critical Illness on Mechanical Ventilation Acknowledgements This study was approved.
CIRTL Data Sharing 10/9/15. New Opportunities The CIRTL Network Commons (CNC) offers the potential for easier access to data for evaluation purposes.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Ethical Considerations Dr. Richard Adanu Editor-in-Chief International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (IJGO)
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
REFLECT: Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment
REFLECT: Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
How to Apply for and Receive Industry Funding for Investigator Sponsored Research Chuck Simonton MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief Medical Officer Abbott Vascular.
Navigating eIRB and eIRB Submission Types
GMAS Preproposal Entry
HREC Operating Procedures for the Review of Low and Moderate to High Risk Projects
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

VPS and Research Overview Barry P. Markovitz MD MPH

Why Research? Epidemiology – What disease is out there? Etiology – What causes disease Diagnosis – How do we diagnose disease Therapy – How do we treat this disease If you can’t measure it, you can’t understand it – If you can’t understand it, you can’t make it better 2

Types of Research Randomized controlled clinical trial – “Gold standard” for therapeutic interventions Expensive, time-consuming, generalizability issues Prospective cohort – Can be high quality Expensive, slow, care variation issues Retrospective cohort – Dependent on data source and level of detail – Improving with EHR’s, computational power, statistical methods – Increasing recognition by funding agencies – Increasing interest by hospitals: benchmarking, quality improvement 3

Begin with the end in mind: VPS Premiere international clinical multi-center database in pediatric critical care Validated data entry and quality control Site profiles: beds, care models, etc. Patient level data: diagnosis, risk adjustment, interventions, outcomes VPS was built and continually updated as a data source for research 4

5 > 73 publications to date

Examples (more to follow as individual presentations) 6 (Crit Care Med 2003; 31:2657–2664)

Kurachek et al. 2,794 patients in 16 PICU’s 6.2% failure rate Predisposing conditions: age, genetic syndrome, duration of intubation… 7

8 Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009; 10:562–570

Typpo et al. 44,693 patients from 28 hospitals Patients with Day 1 MODS mortality: 10.0% vs. those without MODS on Day 1: 1.2% Longer length of stay and worse functional outcomes as well 9

10 Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 12:184 –189

Czaja et al. 9,208 patients with cardiac surgery PIM 2 with fair discrimination and poor calibration Overpredicted mortality for perioperative patients and underpredicted for preoperative patients 11

12

Sala et al. 3,318 children with status asthmaticus admitted to 48 PICU’s in % with respiratory failure (invasive ventilation) African-American children more likely to be intubated (OR 1.4, 95% CI ) 13

14

15

16 Crit Care Med Jul;40(7):

Edwards et al. 52,791 admissions to 54 PICUs 53% had a complex chronic condition (CCC) 74% of deaths had a CCC Increased risk of death with most CCC’s: aOR 1.7 (95% CI 1.43 – 2) Interestingly, adding CCC’s to a model did not change the SMR by PICU 17

18 J Pediatr 2013;163:835-40

Ghuman et al. 74 PICU’s from Postpubertal females had lower mortality from sepsis than postpubertal males Postpubertal female gender was independently associated with lower risk of mortality. 19

20 JAMA Pediatr Mar;168(3):243-9.

21

22 Clin Cardiol Feb 23. doi: /clc [Epub ahead of print]

VPS Research Policy/Procedures Policy and study list at myvps.org Research staff and committee review – Avoid duplicate studies – Gauge feasibility – Accountability: timeliness, VPS updates, etc. – Appropriate representation of VPS – Protection of subjects and institutions – Advice but no editorial restriction 23

24 Feedback welcome!!

VPS Research Policy highlights Distinction between internal benchmarking and research Must be a VPS site or collaborate with one Data use agreement Brief study proposal, data request form – Aims, hypotheses – Design – ? Funding – Timetable Local IRB approval or waiver first VPS acknowledgement 25 VPS data was provided by the VPS, LLC. No endorsement of editorial restriction of the interpretation of these data or opinions of the authors has been implied or stated.

VPS Research policy highlights (2) New – One year limitation on a study question (extensions possible) – Quarterly updates – Data destruction upon completion – Requesting additional VPS resources? (Appropriate costs charged) Data analysis Statistical support Project coordination Quality control – Research committee to review all abstracts, manuscripts, presentations in advance “to ensure proper representation of the use of VPS data and to offer comments regarding other aspects of the publication/presentation.” – Must submit all final publications to VPS 26

VPS Research Policy highlights (3) Research committee review: – Turn around time: 4 weeks – Outcomes (2 reviewers): Consensus agreement to proceed Full committee quorum review needed Clarification requested from PIs Rejection – PIs may then request full committee review 27

VPS Research Policy highlights (4) “Failure of the Principal Investigator to follow these requirements may result in the suspension of permission to continue the research with VPS data, including denial of future requests for VPS data for research purposes, notification of a PI’s institutional privacy officer and/or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and/or civil or criminal prosecution.” 28

START Researcher interested in using VPS data for study Affiliated with a PICU participating in VPS? Review VPS Research Policy available at Is there an active VPS study with same question? Secure IRB approval/ exemption from your local IRB Complete VPS Research Request form available at Submit signed VPS Research Request form and project proposal to Christine Gall at Review Data Use Agreement prior to signing form Research Committee Reviews Research Request Options: Select another topic or request collaboration with PI of active study Need to have a co- investigator from an ICU participating in VPS Respond to questions/ comments from Research Committee and resubmit Committee Approves Study? Request sent to VPS Data Manager- Processing time depends on # of studies in queue The VPS Data Manager will contact you for preferences on file format and data file delivery Data File Received: Commence Research Submit quarterly status updates to VPS Research Committee Will project be finished in one year? Apply for an extension from the VPS Research Committee Extension Granted? Do you intend to publish or present findings? Complete research by original study end date Following completion of the analysis and publication/ presentation of the findings, the data file should be destroyed and may not be used for other purposes Researchers may be contacted in the future by PI’s interested in studying the same question. Inform VPS research coordinator if you have concerns. The VPS maintains a library of all publications and presentations- Please resubmit accepted abstracts/ publications in final form along with the reference citation. The VPS Research Committee will forward any comments to you for consideration and incorporation into final work. Submit final abstract, manuscript or presentation to VPS Research Committee >= 10 business days prior to deadline for submission Provide rationale regarding decision not to publish/ present results to VPS Research Committee PROCESS FOR USE OF VPS DATA FOR RESEARCH END No Yes No Yes

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

Research Staff and Committee VPS – RoxAnne Dent – Nancy Brundage – Casey Lauer Committee – Matt Scanlon MD – Howard Jeffries MD, MPH, MBA – Ron Dechert PhD – Tom Rice MD – Ramesh Sachdeva MD, PhD, MBA 38

Questions? or RoxAnne Dent 39