23–1. 23–2 Chapter Twenty-Three Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constraint Management
Advertisements

Strategic Decisions (Part II)
© 2007 Pearson Education Constraint Management Chapter 7.
19–1. 19–2 Chapter Nineteen Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998 Irwin/McGraw-Hill Module 11 Operations Scheduling Chapter 16 (pp ) Work Center and definitions  Objectives.
11–1. 11–2 Chapter Eleven Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
7 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Constraint Management (Short-term Capacity Planning) 7.
Theory of Constraints Scheduling APICS PDM January 14, 2009.
Theory of Constraints Part II: TOC Concepts
Chapter 17 Inventory Control.
20–1. 20–2 Chapter Twenty Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Sales and Operations Planning
Theory of Constraints. IF: Clients never changed their minds And Vendors always supply, whatever we ask for, on time, And We do not have any absenteeism.
1 Presentation by: Tim Sullivan CIRAS (Center for Industrial Research and Service) Iowa State University Extension.
Systems Thinking and the Theory of Constraints Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius.
Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints
1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Nov-2010Theory of Constraints 1- Basics Practice; Follow the 5 Steps Process Purchased Part $5 / unit RM1 $20 per unit RM2 $20 per.
7 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Constraint Management 7 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS Session 6 SCHEDULING E
Throughput World. 2 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Nov-2010Theory of Constraints: 2- Basics Systems Thinking and TOC  TOC Premise 1: The Goal of a business is to.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints.
Ch 3 Manufacturing Models and Metrics
22–1. 22–2 Chapter Twenty-Two Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
21–1. 21–2 Chapter Twenty-One Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Inventory System Inventory system: the set of policies and controls that monitor levels of inventory and determines: –what levels should be maintained.
Operations Scheduling. Scheduling in a Process-Focused Environment.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Manufacturing Planning and Control MPC 6 th Edition Chapter.
Operations Management Contemporary Concepts and Cases Chapter Thirteen Scheduling Operations Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
1 Slides used in class may be different from slides in student pack Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints  Goldratt’s Rules.
Inventory Costing and Capacity Analysis Lecture 22 1 Readings Chapter 09,Cost Accounting, Managerial Emphasis, 14 th edition by Horengren Chapter 07, Managerial.
Ricardo Ernst Top Management Program in Logistics & Supply Chain Management (TMPLSM) Production and Operations Management 6: Theory of Constraints.
Scheduling.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16 Scheduling.
Operations and Production Management
CHAPTER 12 Inventory Control.
Introduction to Theory of Constraints
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
Inventory Fundamentals
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16 Scheduling.
Topics To Be Covered 1. Tasks of a Shop Control Manager.
TOC 1 Theory Of Constraints. TOC 2 Theory of Constraints How does TOC differ from the conventional shop control theory? Throughput definition * Emphasis.
Theory of constraints Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Inventory Management FIN 340 Prof. David S. Allen Northern Arizona University.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
The Theory of Constraints
20-1 Inventory Management: Economic Order Quantity, JIT, and the Theory of Constraints 20.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 17 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints.
1 Session 18 Implementation of TOC at Tosoh, SMD Laura Blum Production and Inventory Control Manager.
Performance Measurement Financial
Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 7 Variable Costing: A Tool for Management.
Scheduling McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER FIVE Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 25 Managerial Accounting Concepts and Principles.
Purposes of Inventory 1. To maintain independence of operations. 2. To meet variation in product demand. 3. To allow flexibility in production scheduling.
Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing Chapter Five Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 16 Sales and Operations Planning.
Constraint Management Chapter 7 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
MODULE 3 Manufacturing Methodologies
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Inventory System Inventory system: the set of policies and controls that monitor levels of inventory and determines: what levels should be maintained when.
Synchronous Manufacturing
Constraint Management
The Goal.
Goldratt's Theory of Constraints (TOC)
Theory of Constraint.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Presentation transcript:

23–1

23–2 Chapter Twenty-Three Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

23–3 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. LO23–1: Explain the Theory of Constraints (TOC). LO23–2: Analyze bottleneck resources and apply TOC principles to controlling a process. LO23–3: Compare TOC to conventional approaches. LO23–4: Evaluate bottleneck scheduling problems by applying TOC principles.

23–4 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Do not balance capacity, balance the flow. The level utilization of a non-bottleneck resource is not determined by its own potential but by some other constraint in the system. Utilization and activation of a resource are not the same. An hour lost at a bottleneck is an hour lost for the entire system. An hour saved at a non-bottleneck is a mirage.

23–5 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Bottlenecks govern both throughput and inventory in the system. Transfer batch may not, and many times should not, be equal to the process batch. A process batch should be variable both along its route and in time. Priorities can be set only by examining the system’s constraints, and lead time is a derivative of the schedule.

23–6 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Identify the system constraints. Decide how to exploit the system constraints. Subordinate everything else to that decision. Elevate the system constraints. If, in the previous steps, the constraints have been broken, go back to step 1, but do not let inertia become the system constraint.

23–7 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. The goal of a firm is to make money.

23–8 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Net profit – An absolute measurement in dollars Return on investment – A relative measure based on investment Cash flow – A survival measurement

23–9 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Throughput – The rate at which money is generated by the system through sales Inventory – All the money that the system has invested in purchasing things it intends to sell Operating expenses – All the money that the system spends to turn inventory into throughput

23–10 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Productivity typically measured in terms of output per labor hour. Does not guarantee profitability. – Has throughput increased? – Has inventory decreased? – Have operational expenses decreased? Productivity is all the actions that bring a company closer to its goals.

23–11 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. In earlier chapters, we discussed balancing assembly lines. – The goal was a constant cycle time across all stations. Synchronous manufacturing views constant workstation capacity as a bad decision. – Random variations must be handled using inventory. – When one process takes longer than the average, the time can not be made up.

23–12 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Capacity: the available time for production Bottleneck: what happens if capacity is less than demand placed on resource Non-bottleneck: what happens when capacity is greater than demand placed on resource Capacity-constrained resource (CCR): a resource where the capacity is close to demand on the resource

23–13 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.

23–14 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.

23–15 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Setup time: the time that a part spends waiting for a resource to be set up to work on this same part Process time: the time that the part is being processed Queue time: the time that a part waits for a resource while the resource is busy with something else

23–16 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Wait time – the time that a part waits not for a resource but for another part so that they can be assembled together Idle time – the unused time that represents the cycle time less the sum of the setup time, processing time, queue time, and wait time

23–17 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Run a capacity resource profile – Obtained by looking at the loads placed on each resource by the products that are scheduled through them Use your knowledge of the particular plant – Look at the system in operation – Talk with supervisors and workers

23–18 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Bottlenecks govern both throughput and inventory in the system. An hour lost at a bottleneck is an hour lost for the entire system. An hour saved at a non-bottleneck is a mirage.

23–19 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.

23–20 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. More tolerant than JIT systems – Excess capacity throughout system Except for the bottleneck – Quality control needed before bottleneck

23–21 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. What is the batch size? – One? – Infinity? Larger batch sizes require fewer setups and therefore leave more time for processing. – Desirable for bottleneck resources. For non-bottleneck resources, smaller batch sizes are desirable. – Reduces WIP inventory.

23–22 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. A bottleneck – With no setup required when changing from one product to another  Process jobs in the order of the schedule.  Without setups, only sequence is important. – With setup times required to change from one product to another  Large batch sizes combine separate jobs into the sequence.  This means reaching ahead in the schedule.  Some jobs will be done early.  Large batches saves setup and increases throughput.

23–23 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. A capacity constrained resource (CCR) – With no setup required to change from one product to another – With setup time required when changing from one product to another Handling similar to a non-bottleneck – Smaller batches so there can be more frequent changes of product – Decreased lead time

23–24 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Traditional view is the only negative impact of inventory is carrying cost. However, can also lengthen lead times and create problems with engineering changes. – Less WIP reduces the number of engineering changes.

23–25 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Marketing – Discourages holding large amounts of finished goods inventory Purchasing – Discourages placing large purchase orders that, on the surface, appear to take advantage of quantity discounts Manufacturing – Discourage large work-in-process and producing earlier than needed Project management – Quantify a project’s limited resource investment as a function of time

23–26 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. MRP – Uses backward scheduling. – Schedules through a BoM explosion. – MRP develops capacity utilization profiles. – Trying to smooth capacity is difficult. Synchronous manufacturing – Uses forward scheduling. – This ensures a feasible schedule. – Batch sizes can vary.

23–27 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. JIT is limited to repetitive manufacturing. JIT requires a stable production level. JIT does not allow very much flexibility in the products produced. JIT still requires work-in-process when used with Kanban so that there is “something to pull.” Vendors need to be located nearby because the system depends on smaller, more frequent deliveries.

23–28 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Accounting’s influence – Global measurements show net profits, ROI, and cash flow. – Local cost accounting measurements show efficiency or utilization rates. Marketing and production – Marketing and production should work in harmony. – In practice, they act independently. – Data for evaluating marketing and manufacturing are different.

23–29 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. For a set of production processes described in Exhibit 23.14, with the data given in the table below, what should be the products produced and what should be the quantities of those products? Product Limiting Resources Time Required (min) Number produced per hour Selling price ($) Sales revenue per hour ($) AY BX CZ

23–30 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.

23–31 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Solution Three different objectives could exist that lead to different conclusions – 1. Maximize sales revenue because marketing personnel are paid commissions based on total revenue. – 2. Maximize per unit gross profit. – 3. Maximize total gross profit. In this example, we use gross profit as the objective and provide a solution. Other objectives can be worked out similarly.

23–32 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. We can solve this problem by finding either – Total gross profit for the period – Rate at which profit is generated We use rate to solve the problem both because it is easier and because it is a more appropriate measure. We use profit per hour as the rate. Note that each product has a different work center that limits its output. The rate at which the product is made is then based on this bottleneck work center.

23–33 Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved. Conclusion: It is clear that product C provides the highest profit per hour and in order to maximize total gross profit, one should produce as much of the C as possible. Product Limiting Workcen- ter Time Required (min) Number produced per hour Selling price ($) Raw material cost($) Profit per unit ($) Profit per hour ($) AY BX CZ