The Path Less Completed

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
The NMP: An Introduction an initiative of the Charles A. Dana Center and the Texas Association of Community Colleges Amy Getz, Manager of Community College.
THE NEW MATHWAYS PROJECT NMP Alison Garza & Cynthia Martinez.
Goodbye 19 th Century Math Courses – Hello... Modern Accelerated Pathways Amy Getz Strategic Implementation Lead, Higher Education Team Amy Getz Strategic.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Math: Two-semester model Mary Parker Austin Community College
Basic Skills Workgroup October 12, 2010 Basic Skills Workgroup Basic Skills/College Skills Definition: “Basic skills are those foundation skills in reading,
QEP/NSE Timeline Topic Development and Articulation.
CBMS Forum 5: October 2014 Treisman, Rotman, Fong.
Context for El Paso’s K-16 Partnership K-12 Enrollment in twelve El Paso area school districts:167,269 Ethnic breakdown of student enrollment: Hispanic:88.1%
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
MASTERS DEGREE IN CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION. WHY CHOOSE TEXAS TECH? Texas Tech graduates develop expertise that prepares them to assume professional leadership.
Preparing the Underprepared for Academic Success: St. Petersburg College’s Approach to Implementing SB1720 A Conversation with the Jobs for the Future.
Broadening the Pipeline Comprehensive Math Reform that Increased Completion without Limiting Options Erik Scott Developmental Mathematics Committee Chair.
Transforming Community Colleges to Accelerate Student Success Thomas Bailey Shanna Jaggars Davis Jenkins Community College Research Center June 2011.
Developmental Education: Job One October 21, :00 p.m. (CST)
Forces Shaping Undergraduate Education in Mathematics Jenna Cullinane, Ph.D. Washingtin October 16, 2014 Jenna Cullinane, Ph.D. Washingtin October 16,
Addressing the Pre-service Learning Needs of Education Majors in Math and Science Through Technology
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS TEACHER INITIATIVE Improving the Undergraduate Pipeline to Math and Science Teaching Credentials Program Overview.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
Reform at Scale: Lessons from the Dana Center’s New Mathways Project Uri Treisman and Amy Getz Innovations 2014 March 4, 2014 Uri Treisman and Amy Getz.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Advising Strategic Plan University of Cincinnati August 10,2015.
Carla Wade Digital Learning and STEM Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Accelerating Achievement Designing a State-Level Response to the Developmental Education Challenge Presentation for Southern Regional Education Board June.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A joint presentation of the Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher Education Collaboration and the Stanford University School of Education.
Rethinking Developmental Mathematics, High School Math Courses, and College Readiness Advisory Team for Quantitative Reasoning HS and HE courses Charles.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
The Role of Mathematics in Structured Pathways Amy Getz Strategic Implementation Lead, Higher Education an initiative of the Charles A. Dana Center and.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Indiana Commission for Higher Education September 1, 2015 Jenna Cullinane, Ph.D. Building Math Pathways to Programs of Study.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?
The NMP: An Introduction Amy Getz Washington State Community College Mathematics Conference May 10, 2013 Amy Getz Washington State Community College Mathematics.
From Dialogue to Action Michelle L. Younker New Mexico Mathematics Summit October 2, 2015.
National Perspective on Mathematics Pathways Amy Getz, New Mexico Mathematics Summit Amy Getz, New Mexico.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
New Approaches to Old Problems: how “guided pathways” can lead to student success Paul N. Markham Program Officer, Postsecondary Success TASS Conference.
Modernizing Undergraduate Mathematics Programs a Charles A. Dana Center higher education initiative Dr. Uri Treisman, Professor of Mathematics and Public.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Modernizing Mathematics Pathways: A Call to Action a Charles A. Dana Center higher education initiative Amy Getz, Strategic Implementation Lead, Higher.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Tarrant County College New Math Pathways
State Mathematics Transfer Inventory Guide Webinar
Improving Student Success with Mathematics Pathways at Scale
Key features of the first draft
Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula
The Right Math for the Right Student at the Right Time
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

The Path Less Completed Redesigning the developmental math sequence to help students get through, get a job, and get on with their lives SPONSORED BY #PearsonLearn

Meet Your Guide Amy Getz, M.A. Strategic Implementation Lead Higher Education Charles A. Dana Center University of Texas at Austin getz_a@austin.utexas.edu

Before We Begin We are using Adobe Connect. Please enter questions in the text field at the bottom of the Q&A Window. We are monitoring the discussion and will try to bring the Q&A comments into the conversation. We will not use the “raise your hand” feature. We are recording the webinar; the webinar archive and slides will be available later today.

The Places We’ll Go Today’s presentation will cover: What the New Mathways Project (NMP) is and the impact it’s making on students Lessons we’ve learned along the way Recommendations and resources for institutions implementing math pathways

Polling Questions: Which of the following best describes your role? Select all that apply. Higher Ed Math Faculty Higher Ed Administrator Higher Ed Advisor Higher Ed Other Staff Other

What we know: Completion of a college-level math course is an obstacle to program or degree completion for too many students. Completion of a college-level math course is an obstacle to program or degree completion for too many students.

It’s NOT A Closer Look: What’s the real problem? Developmental math… College-level mathematics courses… Student supports… Programs of study… Transfer or policy… It’s NOT

between all these things A Closer Look: What’s the real problem? DISCONNECT between all these things It IS the

New Mathways Project Definition: 1: Noun new · math · ways · pro · ject │ nü \ math-,wāz \ ‘prä-jekt Definition: A systemic approach to improving student success and completion by reforming developmental and gateway mathematics based on four principles. 1:

Four Principles of Reform at All Levels of the System The Dana Center’s Role Four Principles of Reform at All Levels of the System 1 Multiple pathways aligned to specific fields of study NATIONAL Acceleration that allows most students to complete a college-level math course in one year or less 2 STATE INSTITUTIONAL 3 Intentional use of strategies to help students develop skills as learners 4 Curriculum design and pedagogy based on proven practice FACULTY & CLASSROOM utdanacenter.org

The Dana Center’s Role NATIONAL KEY ACTIVITIES: GOAL: Legitimize math pathways through professional associations and mathematics leadership Common Vision 2025: Collaboration of five math professional associations to modernize undergraduate pathways Transforming Post-secondary Education in Mathematics through thought leaders promoting constructive change in college mathematics KEY ACTIVITIES:

The Dana Center’s Role NATIONAL STATE KEY ACTIVITIES: GOAL: Legitimize math pathways through professional associations and mathematics leadership STATE GOAL: Coordinate policy, institutional and organizational efforts across state to promote NMP model Texas: Support policy change, engage 21 universities and 47 community college systems Other States: Mobilize faculty to set vision for math pathways in Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Ohio, and Oklahoma KEY ACTIVITIES:

These resources are available now. The Dana Center’s Role NATIONAL GOAL: Legitimize math pathways through professional associations and mathematics leadership STATE GOAL: Coordinate policy, institutional and organizational efforts across state to promote NMP model INSTITUTIONAL GOAL: Build tools and services that help colleges to implement systematic reform Texas: Offer institutional mentorship Everywhere: Provide detailed implementation guide and scaling toolkit Develop tools and strategies to help train advisors and plan for student recruitment KEY ACTIVITIES: These resources are available now.

The Dana Center’s Role NATIONAL STATE INSTITUTIONAL GOAL: Legitimize math pathways through professional associations and mathematics leadership STATE GOAL: Coordinate policy, institutional and organizational efforts across state to promote NMP model INSTITUTIONAL GOAL: Build tools and services that help colleges to implement systematic reform FACULTY & CLASSROOM GOAL: Develop professional learning and curricular resources informed by faculty Course Materials: Mathematics & Learning Frameworks Faculty Training for Dana Center courses and for general active learning pedagogy KEY ACTIVITIES:

Questions about the NMP Principles or Levels of Work? 1 Multiple pathways aligned to specific fields of study NATIONAL Acceleration that allows most students to complete a college-level math course in one year or less 2 STATE INSTITUTIONAL 3 Intentional use of strategies to help students develop skills as learners 4 Curriculum design and pedagogy based on proven practice FACULTY & CLASSROOM

One Year Down the Road Year One Student Outcomes in Texas

Year One Texas Student Outcomes Staying the Course NMP students were more likely to… Complete developmental math requirements Enroll in a college-level math course Pass a college-level math course

Year One Texas Student Outcomes Students and faculty reported that students were highly engaged with math content and students built stronger learning communities.

Developmental Levels Down of Math Courses Enrolled In Year One Texas Student Outcomes Comparison Data: Students in non-NMP Courses Outcome Developmental Levels Down of Math Courses Enrolled In One Level Two Levels Students enrolled in a traditional dev math class in fall 2013 5,000 5,600 Among those enrolled in fall 2013 traditional dev math class, by spring 2014: Completed dev math requirement 60% 18% Enrolled in a non-NMP college-level math class 37% 5% Passed non-NMP college-level math class with “C” or higher 23% 3%

All Colleges Offering Foundations Year One Texas Student Outcomes Year One Data: Students in NMP Courses Outcome All Colleges Offering Foundations Colleges Offering Foundations that Promoted Enrollment in Statistical Reasoning Number of codevelopment colleges 7 5 Students enrolled in Foundations in fall 2013 233 136 Among students enrolled in fall 2013 Foundations, by spring 2014: Completed dev math requirement with a “C” or higher 65% 70% Enrolled in college-level statistics course 46% 64% Passed college-level statistics course with “C” or higher 30% 49%

Year One Texas Student Outcomes Newly Published Report Laying the Foundations: Early Findings from the New Mathways Project, an external review of the NMP is now available at www.mdrc.org/publication/laying-foundations

Lessons Learned What we’ve discovered along the way

Lessons Learned: Role of Leadership Set the charge Connect to mission and strategic plan Establish structures for cross-institutional work “Faculty-driven, administrator-supported”

Lessons Learned: Context Matters Take the time to build a shared understanding of the current context Build on strengths and success

Lessons Learned: Pathways, Not Courses

Faculty & Staff Supports Lessons Learned: Multiple Dimensions Faculty & Staff Supports Content Delivery Placement Articulation PATHWAYS Student Supports Sequence Structure

Lessons Learned: Design for Scale Set goals for scaling early Balance bold vision with practicality Engage broadly from beginning Excerpt from NMP Institutional Scaling Toolkit

Lessons Learned: Work Systemically Include all stakeholders early Communicate, communicate, communicate Engage, don’t just tell Excerpt from NMP Implementation Guide

Polling Questions: I am most interested in learning more about: Select one. Integration of student success strategies and supports Math courses Implementation process for colleges Transfer and applicability

Resources

NMP Resources: Implementation NMP Implementation Guide NMP Institutional Scaling Toolkit (end of May) Pathways Workshop

NMP Resources: Transfer & Applicability Program of Study Briefs: nursing, social work, communications, criminal justice Mathematics Pathways Transfer Inventory (Texas)

NMP Resources: Professional Learning College-Based Learning Modules – to support active learning pedagogy New Faculty Workshops for Dana Center courses Annotated bibliographies for NMP principles, curriculum design and learning frameworks content

NMP Resources: Curriculum Frameworks of Mathematics and Collegiate Learning Math courses are being released through Pearson

Student Success Strategies & Supports

Student Success Strategies & Supports Goals Students receive coherent and consistent support to become intentional and independent learners. The full college experience helps students develop and practice good skills and habits over time.

Student Success Strategies & Supports Recommended strategies Learning Frameworks course: Develops skills, knowledge and mindsets for independent learners Integration and support of key skills and concepts into content courses – including math! Critical to provide faculty training Cross-institutional alignment of key concepts

Mathematics Courses

NMP Course Characteristics Designed to promote active learning Includes strong embedded support for instructors College-level content integrated into developmental course Support development of strong reasoning, problem solving and communication skills Create a coherent experience for students and reinforce retention across terms Student success strategies embedded in math courses

NMP Courses

Curriculum Development Timeline Course Status Frameworks* Developed, available as a free resource on the Dana Center website Foundations Online version will be released through Pearson in fall 2015 Statistical Reasoning Currently available in PDF format. Online version will be released through Pearson in spring 2016 Quantitative Reasoning Reasoning with Functions I and II In development, will be piloted in spring 2016 and fall 2017

Implementation Process

Implementation Process Primary Responsibilities Key Activities by Phase Suggested Timeline Phase I: Organizing for Change College Leadership Set the Charge Establish the Leadership Team 1 month Phase II: Planning for Change Leadership Team Understand the Current Context Assess the Needs Explore the Options Make a Plan 4 months Phase III: Preparing for Implementation Leadership Team & Course-specific Instructional Teams College-wide Work Plan Campus-wide Communication Allocate Resources Schedule Courses Plan Advising & Recruitment Prepare for Evaluation Plan for Academic Support Conduct Outreach to External Partners Instructional-level Work Establish the Instructional Teams Identify Obstacles and Opportunities Plan Instructional-level Communication Prepare to Teach the Courses: Logistical Planning Instructional Planning 6 months

Transfer & Applicability

Transfer and Applicability What we have found: In most cases, transfer is not the problem; applicability to programs of study is the problem. The issues vary widely from state to state. There is increasing momentum behind math pathways.

Transfer and Applicability Recommended Strategies: Separate myth from reality Verify information about math requirements Look at data on student transfer from both the 2-year and the 4-year perspective Prioritize Where are most students going? And in what programs?

Transfer and Applicability Recommended Strategies: Facilitate regional discussions between 2-year and 4-year institutions and get the right people in the room The Dana Center can help…

More questions?

Related Reports California Acceleration Project Evaluation, http://www.rpgroup.org/projects/cap Statway/Quantway (multiple reports), http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/in- action/pathways-improvement-communities/ Changing Equations: How Community Colleges are Re-Thinking College Readiness in Math, http://www.learningworksca.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/10/LWBrief_ChangingEquations_WEB.pdf Degrees of Freedom: Diversifying Math Requirements for College Readiness and Graduation, http://edpolicyinca.org/publications/degrees-freedom- diversifying-math-requirements-college-readiness-and-graduation

Benefit from the NMP Sign up for monthly updates of new information, services and tools at mathways@austin.utexas.edu Use the resources on our website: www.utdanacenter.org To learn more about the courses, contact Heather Cook at hcook@austin.utexas.edu Contact Amy at getz_a@austin.utexas.edu

About the Dana Center The Charles A. Dana Center at The University of Texas at Austin works with our nation’s education systems to ensure that every student leaves school prepared for success in postsecondary education and the contemporary workplace. Our work, based on research and two decades of experience, focuses on K–16 mathematics and science education with an emphasis on strategies for improving student engagement, motivation, persistence, and achievement. We develop innovative curricula, tools, protocols, and instructional supports and deliver powerful instructional and leadership development.

More questions? Amy Getz, M.A. Strategic Implementation Lead Higher Education Charles A. Dana Center University of Texas at Austin getz_a@austin.utexas.edu