Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Excited State Spectroscopy from Lattice QCD
Advertisements

HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Extraction of Neutrino Flux from Inclusive Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Osaka Univ. Tomoya Murata, Toru Sato.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Neutrino-induced meson productions Satoshi Nakamura Osaka University, Japan Collaborators : H. Kamano (RCNP, Osaka Univ.), T. Sato (Osaka Univ.) T.-S.H.
Nuclear effects in neutrino quasielastic interaction Phys. Rev. C (2009) Phys. Rev. C (2010) Phys. Rev. C (2011) Phys. Rev.
Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei Tina Leitner, Ulrich Mosel LAUNCH09 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuterium and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li November 3, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Is B s 0 production by neutrino interactions interesting? Presented at the Super-B factory workshop as an alternative approach Nickolas Solomey 21 April.
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
K. Mawatari (Kobe)1 Decay distribution of tau produced by neutrino-nucleon scattering Kentarou Mawatari (Kobe U.) with M. Aoki, K.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
P461 - particles VIII1 Neutrino Physics Three “active” neutrino flavors (from Z width measurements). Mass limit from beta decay Probably have non-zero.
Toyota National College of Technology A.Takamura Collaboration with K.Kimura and T.Yoshikawa GLoBES 2007 Measuring the Leptonic CP Phase in Oscillations.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Tina Leitner, Oliver Buss, Ulrich Mosel, Luis Alvarez-Ruso Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
1 V. Antonelli, G. Battistoni, P. Ferrario 1, S. Forte (Università degli Studi di Milano e I.N.F.N. Sezione di Milano and 1 University of Valencia) Standard.
Chapters 9, 11, 12 Concepts covered that will also be candidates for exam questions.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Monday, Feb. 24, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #11 Monday, Feb. 24, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Brief Review of sin 2  W measurement 2.Neutrino.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
Dott. Antonio Botrugno Ph.D. course UNIVERSITY OF LECCE (ITALY) DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.
April 23, 2008 Workshop on “High energy photon collisions at the LHC 1 Cem Güçlü İstanbul Technical University Physics Department Physics of Ultra-Peripheral.
How to extract Neutrino Factory flux from IMD and neutrino elastic scattering? Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler.
1 Physics Requirements on Reconstruction and Simulation Software Jorge G. Morfín - Fermilab.
Current Knowledge of Neutrino Cross-Sections and Future Prospects D. Casper University of California, Irvine.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
March 3, 2009Tom Gaisser1 Neutrino oscillations Review of particle physics, neutrino interactions and neutrino oscillations.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
K2K near detector: Measurement of the  flux in absence of oscillations and of the beam direction 3 different detectors: 1 Kton Water Čerenkov: Small replica.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
Claudia Strabel, ETH Zurich SPS Annual Meeting June 21 – 22, 2010 Hadro-production measurements for T2K with NA61/SHINE at the CERN SPS.
Bormio (Villars) Meeting 1969 Bormio Jan Participants!
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Near Detector Tasks EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Paul Soler.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Path forward: theory vs experiment needs, QE discussion input Comments/Observations: R. Tayloe, Nuint'09.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
Quasielastic Scattering at MiniBooNE Energies
F.Sánchez for the K2K collaboration UAB/IFAE
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Beam composition not fully known Beam composition not fully known Beam diameter ~ 0.5 m at its source Beam diameter ~ 0.5 m at its source Beamline ~ 300 – 1000 km Beamline ~ 300 – 1000 km Beam diameter ~ 600 m at the detector Beam diameter ~ 600 m at the detector Cross sections ~ mb Cross sections ~ mb Only a small part of the final state known Only a small part of the final state known Winter Park 2011 The Impossible Experiment

Tina Leitner, Oliver Buss, Ulrich Mosel Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAAAAAAA Winter Park 2011

1300 km Winter Park 2011 Soudan Mine, Nova 770 km Homestake Mine Dusel Long Baseline Experiments T2K: JPARC-Kamioka ~ 300 km, OPERA: CERN –Gran Sasso ~730 km

Long baseline experiments M. Wascko Winter Park 2011

Neutrino oscillation search neutrino oscillations: probability for 2 flavors: neutrino oscillations: probability for 2 flavors: Crucial parameter: neutrino energy E Crucial parameter: neutrino energy E Need to understand ‚classical‘ hadronic interactions Flux: obtained from Event-Generators for hadronic production and subsequent weak decay Energy must be reconstructed from hadronic final state Winter Park 2011

Neutrino nucleon cross section QE P. Lipari, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 112, 274 (2002) cm² = mb R+R+ ¼ N N' ‚ DIS Winter Park 2011 QE is used for energy reconstruction

Quasielastic scattering axial form factors F A  F P and F A (0) via PCAC dipole ansatz for F A with M A = 1 GeV: W, Z Winter Park 2011

Axial Formfactor of the Nucleon neutrino data agree with electro-pion prod. data neutrino data agree with electro-pion prod. data Winter Park 2011 M A ¼ 1.02 GeV world average M A ¼ 1.07 GeV world average

Axial Formfactor of the Nucleon Recent Data give significantly larger values for M A Recent Data give significantly larger values for M A One difference: all old data use H (or D) as target One difference: all old data use H (or D) as target all new data use nuclei (C, O, Fe) as target all new data use nuclei (C, O, Fe) as target MiniBooNE (2010): M A = 1.35 GeV Winter Park 2011

M A Problem Old neutrino experiments used H and D as targets Old neutrino experiments used H and D as targets All modern experiments use heavy nuclei All modern experiments use heavy nuclei Quasielastic scattering kinematics is used to reconstruct neutrino energy also in oscillation experiments Quasielastic scattering kinematics is used to reconstruct neutrino energy also in oscillation experiments Problem to identify QE on nuclear targets Problem to identify QE on nuclear targets Winter Park 2011

QE Identification Winter Park 2011 Need event generator to reduce data to true QE event

 what is GiBUU? semiclassical coupled channels transport model  general information (and code available):  GiBUU describes (within the same unified theory and code) heavy ion reactions, particle production and flow heavy ion reactions, particle production and flow Pion, proton and antiproton induced reactions Pion, proton and antiproton induced reactions low and high energy photon and electron induced reactions low and high energy photon and electron induced reactions neutrino induced reactions neutrino induced reactions ……..using the same physics input! And the same code! Winter Park 2011 GiBUU transport

Winter Park 2011 CC nucleon knockout:  56 Fe   - N X w FSI w/o FSI E = 1 GeV Dramatic FSI Effect

Detector Types: QE Identification Winter Park 2011 Tracking detector (Sci-BooNE, K2K, SciFi) Cerenkov detector (MiniBooNE, K2K 1kt) Too high QE: misidentifies about 20%, pion-induced fakes QE identification is clean, but 30% of total QE cross section is missed measured

Detector Sensitivities Winter Park 2011 K2K SciFi Example: SciFi sees only 50% of total QE cross section. MiniBooNE sees 20% too much QE Experiments need major corrections from event generators

Detector Sensitivities: T2K Winter Park 2011 T2K has different detector types: 1.Tracking for near detector 2.Cherenkov for far detector Near Detector sees only about 50% of all QE events

Energy Reconstruction and Detector Thresholds Winter Park 2011 Energy reconstruction sensitive to the detector pion thresholds

Energy reconstruction via CCQE Winter Park 2011 Rms energy deviations S ~15% energy uncertainty from quasifree qe kinematics alone ~21% uncertainty for Cerenkov detectors, error grows with neutrino energy ~16% uncertainty for tracking detectors Errors in reconstructed º energies larger than expected

Energy reconstruction via CCQE Energy uncertainties affect mixing masses, Event identification affects mixing angles Winter Park 2011

± CP with LBNE Winter Park 2011 Event reconstruction hampers determination of CP violating phase Wilson, LBNE workshop Uncertainties at the oscillation maximum due to detector as large as dependence on CP violating phase

Experiments have to rely heavily on event-generators to identify QE events needed for energy reconstruction Experiments have to rely heavily on event-generators to identify QE events needed for energy reconstruction Quasielastic scattering events contain admixtures of Delta excitations Quasielastic scattering events contain admixtures of Delta excitations  excitations affect nucleon knockout, contaminate QE experiments  excitations affect nucleon knockout, contaminate QE experiments Energy reconstruction good up to 15 – 20%. Combined error from near and far detectors ~ 20 – 30%. Experiments Energy reconstruction good up to 15 – 20%. Combined error from near and far detectors ~ 20 – 30%. Experiments want 5%! Challenge for event generators! want 5%! Challenge for event generators!  Extraction of axial mass (1 GeV) strongly affected by nuclear structure (RPA correlations), difficult to get both absolute height and slope. both absolute height and slope. Winter Park 2011 Physics Summary

Winter Park 2011 Low-Energy Nuclear Physics determines response of nuclei to neutrinos  Need excellent event generators To extract fundamental science Need for Low Energy Nuclear Physics in Neutrino Physics