UNC ROVERSAT IV University of Northern Colorado Critical Design Review Friday, June 25 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Left to Right: Michael Kelton, Ethan Hall, Greg Wegman, Vashisht Lakhmani.
Advertisements

Kenmore Front Load Washer & Dryer
Engineer Training XL1200 Mechanics. Engineer Training XL1200 Mechanics Confidential 2 The XL1200 is both a Roll to Roll and a Roll to Sheet Printing Machine.
Offensive/defensive evaluation: Define all functionalities of the game brainstorm early designs, evaluate feasibility, resource requirements Shooting (High.
Introduction  If you have ever been to shooting range before, you know that firing a gun is fun. Time flies when you’re sending hundreds of rounds down.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
High altitude airborne developments have presented huge advantages in the US military’s arsenal through: environmental monitoring precision navigation.
ECE 480 Design Team 3 Doug’s Kitchen Robot Team Members - Thomas Manner - Ali Alsatarwah - Ka Kei Yeung - Daniel Phan Team Facilitator - Professor Lixin.
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
DemoSat III Launch Readiness Review - July 29, 2005 Presented by: David Gooding Erik Andersen Anna Vigil Matt Elsner Al Crawley.
The Gaze Controlled Robotic Platform creates a sensor system using a webcam. A specialized robot built upon the Arduino platform responds to the webcam.
2003 CSU RoverSat. RoverSat: Team Members Structures: Ehren Ehmann Christopher Mai Electronics: John Rhoades Jesse Wilson.
Launch Readiness Review 4/21/06 -David Gooding -Erik Andersen -Anna Vigil -Matt Elsner -Augustine Trujillo DemoSat IV.
Senior Project Design Review Remote Visual Surveillance Vehicle (RVSV) Manoj Bhambwani Tameka Thomas.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Guitar Neck Duplicator By Eric Hall. Background  Difficult to Replicate  Time Consuming  Generally done by hand.
Critical Design Review Colorado State University - Pueblo April 15, 2005.
Minnesat SHOTII Presentation, June 16 th, Minnesat University of Minnesota Jason Mintz Jim Pogemiller Abdul Azeem Khan Vincent Jusuf SHOT II Presentation.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
R3R3 Ethan Hall Michael Kelton Greg Wegman Vashisht Lakhmani.
Engineer Training Mechanical Overview. Engineer Training Confidential 2 XL1500 is both Roll-to-Roll and Roll-to-Sheet Printer MachineXL1500-2mXL1500-3mXL1500-5m.
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Design and Implementation of Metallic Waste Collection Robot
Carbon-Epoxy Composite Base Plates for the PHOBOS Spectrometer Arms J.Michalowski, M.Stodulski The H.Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow.
Concept Design Review THE DUKES OF HAZARD CAMILLE LEGAULT, NEIL KENNEDY, OMAR ROJAS, FERNANDO QUIJANO, AND JIMMY BUFFI April 24, 2008.
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
CanSat Concept Generation
SHANTILAL SHAH ENGINEERING COLLEGE ,BHAVNAGAR
Hang Seven Critical Design Review Sierra Williams, Lucas Migliorini, Abby Caballero, Chase Goodman, Paul Smith, Becca Lidvall, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil.
CanSat Mid-Term Presentation Group Members: Samuel Rustan,Yasmin Belhaj, Andrew Grant, Andrew Guerr, Maxwell Sandler Technical Advisors: Dr. David Cartes,
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Wall-E Prototype I Team 1 Xin Jin
M E T ROVER MSCD Engineering Technology Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 2004.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
Robot sensors MVRT 2010 – 2011 season. Analog versus Digital Analog Goes from 0 to 254 Numerous values Similar to making waves because there are not sudden.
1 Robotics Challenge Overview. 2 Why? -Viking was tested at the Dunes -Develop intelligent robots -Explore Robotics.
Space Cadets Ali Javed Ravneet Singh Ravneet Singh Brock Couvillion Dean Slama Dean Slama Temperature, Pressure, Humidity, and Imaging Characteristics.
Phong Le (EE) Josh Haley (CPE) Brandon Reeves (EE) Jerard Jose (EE)
By Rachel Hoffman DrumBot.  Mission  Overview  Hardware  Software  Special Sensor  Behaviors  Timeline  Questions Objectives.
Ashley Clark Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
DemoSat II Colorado Space Grant Consortium Design (EPICS) Division Colorado School of Mines Golden Colorado Critical.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
Bully Blue Lock Midterm Presentation 2014 Senior Design II.
Abstract The Infrarat is an autonomous toy car that will use proximity sensors and a pivoting array of Infrared sensors for tracking a body and to avoid.
FUFO project Final report.
DemoSat V: Team Name Casey Kuhns Erik Travis James Wiley Casey Kuhns Erik Travis James Wiley July 28, 2006.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Aero Week 9 ROBBIE MCNALLY. SAE Competition Rule Changes.
1 Team Mieux Critical Design Review ASME Bulk Material Transporter AME 470 Ltd. December 7, 2004.
P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System. Team Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) Mike Kochanski – Software.
DemoSat IV: RedRoverSat University of Colorado at Boulder Jaime Catchen, Chris Homolac, Emily Walters August 9, 2006.
Detection of Patient Falls Using Three-Axis Accelerometer Umer Jamshaid Tyler Quarles Parampal Randhawa Martha Serna Matthew Treinish April 26, 2011 School.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
TigerBot IV Rochester Institute of Technology. Group Members Mike Lew (ISE) Dan Wiatroski (ME) Tom Whitmore (ME) Geoff Herman (ME) Sean Lillis (CE) Brian.
MSD II System Demonstration P15044 – Intelligent Mobility Cane4/16/2015.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Rover Chassis Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stu Heys, Dimi.
Sophisticated Design Automatic Tailgate Week Five and Six Deliverables September 26, 2001 Ted Akiskalos June Doan Tarek Elshazly Maggie Kim David Nimitz.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122 – Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin (EE – Team Leader) Courtney Walsh (ME – Aero) Richard Nichols (EE) Glenn Kitchell (CE) Jeff Welch (ME) Dr.
Group #3 RC Ghost Rider Adolph Arieux (EE) James Russick (EE) Paul Shimei (EE) Sponsored by: Workforce Central Florida Mentor: Richard Barrett - ITT.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Cloud Cap Technologies
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
RoverSat Critical Design Review UCCS Space Grant Team
Starting Student Space Hardware Programs IV
Balanduino Supervisor: Dr. Raed Al-Qadi Prepared by: Nadeen Kalboneh Nardeen Mabrouk.
Presentation transcript:

UNC ROVERSAT IV University of Northern Colorado Critical Design Review Friday, June

UNC ROVERSAT IV Mission Overview: To sucsefully deploy an autonomous rover from a balloon payload. To improve upon previous RoverSat missions by reducing mass. To improve upon previous RoverSat missions by increasing reliability. To engage highschool students in the design and testing of a Balloon payload.

UNC ROVERSAT IV Mission Objective: 1.Using a COTS Accelerometer determine when the payload has landed. 1.Upon landing determine that conditions are stable (no movement) and begin deployment. 1.Deploy a rover by first opening the payload then activating the rover. 1.Rover will then exit the payload and begin operations.

UNC ROVERSAT IV Mission History: The RoverSat project has been on going for the last 4 years at UNC. Three payloads have been built using similar methods of sensing and deployment. The payloads have deployed successfully but in all cases the rover has failed to leave the box. Each failure has demonstrated new problems in payload “Box”designs. Other failures included the failure of activation devices.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat I RoverSat I – First Attempt at rover payload Sucsesses – Gained video footage of flight and box sucssessfully opened Failures – Rover activated early in the flight causing batteries to be drained before landing.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat II RoverSat II – Attempted to integrate camera into rover for flight and operation. Sucsesses – Gained video footage of flight and box sucssessfully opened. Failures – Rover activated early in the flight. Rover also was damaged by rough landing.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat III RoverSat III – Attempt at rover simplification and deployment mechanism revisited. Sucsesses – Box successfully opened Rover successfully activated. Failures – Rover failed to leave box due to software failure involving obstacle avoidance sensors.

UNC ROVERSAT IV Support From Frontiers of Science Institute: This will be the first year FSI students will assist in a balloon project. FSI students have been developing the concept and designs for the latch mechanism and over all box design.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Design Features: RoverSat IV – We intend to improve on the design of RoverSat III with a new type of locking latch. The former payloads relied on a fishing line that was destroyed to “un-lock” the box. This is being replaced with a non-destructive linear actuator and dead-bolt method. The rover will have a wireless communication path to the box to prevent premature activation. Activation will only come after the doors are verified to be open. This will also enable ground support to manually deploy the rover in the event of an autonomous failure.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Mechanical Hardware: Two Components: “Box” – Rover enclosure and deployment - Mechanical latch to ensure box remains closed during flight - Mechanical device to open box facilitating deployment - Use of composites to decrease weight of payload Rover – Small autonomous rover to be deployed - Light weight plastic design - Small rocker-bogie design for traction - Press fit frame for quick assembly and durability

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Latch Mechanism: Small linear actuator provides motion to un-lock “bolt” Locked Open (Pin in locked position)

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Deployment Mechanism: A servo will be used to push the box open. The servo will have an arm and two push rods much like RoverSat III.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Box Materials: Sandwich Foam Carbon Fiber Sheet This material is very rigid for its weight Available from Hobby Stores online Tongue and groove construction improves reliability. Cargo Strapping will provide the hinge Material for the box.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Box Dimensions: Box Dimensions:

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Rover Construction: All Parts are 2D and can be cut on laser table for quick production.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Rover Suspension: Rocker-bogie design provides superior traction with minimal effort.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Rover Dimensions: Side View

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Rover Dimensions: Bottom View

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Electronics: “Box” – Electronics for the box will be based around the arduino pro. - Accelerometer - Door Lock actuator - Deployment mechanism actuator - Xbee Radio (Communication between rover and box) Rover – Electronics for the rover will be based around the arduino pro. - Motor Controllers - IR sensors (Obstacle avoidance) - Xbee Radio (Communication between rover and box)

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Electronics (Box) : Arduino pro ADXL213AE ADC PWM Linear Actuator UART

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Software (Box) : Description: 1.Program begins with 1.5hr sleep cycle. 2.Sleep cycle exits 1.Accelerometer measures 2 axis 2.Accelerometer makes about 100 measurements over 30 seconds 3.Arduino calculates standard deviation. 4.If standard deviation is acceptable for landing program proceeds to deploymene 3.Linear actuator is drawn in by arduino, unlocking the payload doors. 4.Servo pushes the doors open for rover to exit. 5.Xbee radio sends communication to rover telling it to deploy.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Electronics (Rover) : Arduino pro ADC PWM Motors UART IR Ranger

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Software (Rover) : Description: 1.Program begins with sleep cycle. 2.Sleep cycle exits when told by main box through Xbee radio 3.Rover begins automated deployment routine 4.Rover then enters autonomous mode for exploration 5.If accessed by user through Xbee rover can switch from autonomous to manual mode.

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Major Parts List: “Box” - mechanical carbon fiber foam plate delrin plastic aluminum angle iron cargo strap material linear actuator joint assembly large servo deployment mechanism - electrical 7.4 lipoly pack 1000mah arduino pro ADXL Series Accelerometer Xbee wireless radio Rover - mechanical delerin plate for chassis 50:1 Copal motors 2” Light flight tires ¾” standoffs - electrical 7.4 lipoly pack 1000mah arduino pro Sharp Irvrangefinder motor controller Xbee wireless radio

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Testing : Tests to be performed: 1.Drop Test (15 ft) 2.Cold Test (70f to -70f over one hour) 3.Deployment testing (Premature) 4.Deployment testing (Ideal) 5.Deployment testing (Non-Ideal) 6.Rover test drive (Terrain evaluation) 7.Day in life test (Full program, full environment)

UNC ROVERSAT IV RoverSat IV Mass Breakdown : Mass Budget: Rover – 500g -motors 200g -battery 100g -wheels 40g -electronics 60g -chassis 100g Box – 1000g -locking mechanism 200g -deployment mechanism 250g -battery 100g -electronics 60g -chassis 390g