Critical Design Review Patrick Weber, Dorin Blodgett, Michael Stephens, Heather Choi, Kevin Brown, Ben Lampe, Anne-Marie Suriano, Eric Robinson November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Advertisements

Design and Implementation of Low- Cost Optical Telemetry to Support Radiometric Analysis of the Atmosphere University of Colorado at Boulder Alexandra.
Full Mission Simulation Report Temple University Fred Avery, Gene Council, Ny’Jaa Bobo, Salvatore Giorgi, Jay Shukla 4/21/12.
Critical Design Review ….. Royal Ordnance,Summerfield 17 th February 2001 National Rocketry Competition 2001 Open Rocketry Association Slide 1/14.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Preliminary Design Review Patrick Weber, Eric Robinson, Dorin Blodgett, Michael Stephens, Heather Choi, Kevin Brown, Ben Lampe November 1, /1/20101.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Patrick Weber, Michael Stephens, Heather Choi, Kevin Brown, Ben Lampe, Anne-Marie Suriano, Eric Robinson, Dorin Blodgett.
Rock it rocke Temple University
University of Wyoming Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,
Stevens Institute of Technology - New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Critical Design Review Mike Giglia, Ethan Hayon Robert Hopkins.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
2012 CoDR Nitric Oxide and Piezo Dust Detector Probe Conceptual Design Review Virginia Tech Presented by Stephen Noel November 18,
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
2011 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
GloboGym Fighting Cobras Conceptual Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards September 21, 2006 Project.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN 1400 / ASTR 2500 Class #12 Gateway To Space ASEN 1400 / ASTR 2500 Class #12 T-58.
Critical Design Review 27 February 2007 Black Box Car System (BBCS) ctrl + z: Benjamin Baker, Lisa Furnish, Chris Klepac, Benjamin Mauser, Zachary Miers.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Lighting Tool Box Winter 2004 ECE 498 Team Members: Nick Sitarski Blaine Thompson Brandon Harris Dave.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
Undergraduate Space Research Symposium University of Colorado Boulder
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Zero Tilt Conceptual Design Review Frostburg State University Michael Stevenson, Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Andrew Huntley, Derek.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report WVU Rocketeers West Virginia University 2/14/ Team Members Justin Yorick Ben Provence Mike.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
DemoSat IV: Metro Triple Threat Metropolitan State College of Denver Matt Hanley David Fifield Jason Igo Evan I Spitler Devlin Thyne Matt Hanley David.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Mark Randall & Kevin Claycomb Faculty Advisor: David Mitchell Industrial Sponsor: IEEE.
DemoSat IV: RedRoverSat University of Colorado at Boulder Jaime Catchen, Chris Homolac, Emily Walters August 9, 2006.
BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
2016 FMSR Team Name Full Mission Simulation Review (FMSR) University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
SENSOR SELECTION CALIBRATION OVERVIEWOVERVIEW DESIGN ROADMAP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project would not have been possible without the extensive.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
2016 STR Team Name Subsystem Testing Review (STR) University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Space Proximity Atmospheric Research above Tropospheric Altitudes
RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
Presentation transcript:

Critical Design Review Patrick Weber, Dorin Blodgett, Michael Stephens, Heather Choi, Kevin Brown, Ben Lampe, Anne-Marie Suriano, Eric Robinson November 19, /19/20101

2 Mission Overview /19/2010 Presenter: Eric Robinson

Mission Overview Scientific Mission o Primary: Collect space dust. o Provide a perspective of what is in our upper atmosphere. o Particle size = nano and micro level o Donate collected aerogel tablets to UW Geology Department for further analysis o SEM photographs of particle trails – velocity analysis o Identify particles – material property analysis o Secondary: o Capture optical images/video of the Earth. o Measure thermal and seismic effects throughout the duration of the launch. o Collect data for future projects. 3 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

Mission Overview Engineering Mission o Engineer an extendable boom to mount a dust collector. o Use aerogel and acrylic tablets as dust collectors. o Aerogel Density = 95 kg/m 3 o Acrylic Density = 1200 kg/m 3 o Engineer a water shield to protect dust collector. o Engineer modular electronic systems for: o Capturing and storing images from optical devices. o Recording thermal and seismic data in real time throughout launch using sensors and transferring recording data via provided NASA Wallops Telemetry. 4 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

Mission Overview Organizational Chart 5 Presenter: Eric Robinson Project Manager Shawn Carroll Team Leader Patrick Weber Physics Faculty Advisor Dr. Paul Johnson Engineering Faculty Advisor Dr. Carl Frick Integrated Sensors (IS) Michael Stephens Heather Choi Electrical Power System (EPS) Michael Stephens Ben Lampe Telescopic Boom (TB) Patrick Weber Eric Robinson Dorin Blodgett Optical Camera (OC) Kevin Brown Nick Roder Charles Galey 11/19/2010

Mission Overview Theory and Concepts o Underlying Science and Theory o Attempt to capture space particles using telescoping boom, aerogel, and acrylic discs. o Quantification of varying flight parameters. 6 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

Mission Overview Theory and Concepts o Previous Experimentation o Previous flights have included multi-sensor packages. o Temperature, Humidity, and Pressure Sensors o Accelerometers / Seismic Sensors o Magnetometers o Data Storage (SD Cards) o Results provided a basis for improvement on future data collection and retrieval. o SD Cards impervious to low exposure to salt water o Payload electrical orientation 7 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

Mission Overview Concept of Operations 8 Presenter: Eric Robinson t ≈ 0 min Launch Systems Power On (t = -2 min) -Collection of Sensor Data Begins t ≈ 0.7 min End of Orion Burn t ≈ 1.7 min Shedding of Skin Boom Extends via First Timed Event t ≈ 2.8 min Apogee t ≈ 4.0 min Boom Retracts via Arduino Controller Boom Power Shut Down t ≈ 8.2 min Chute Deploys t ≈ 15 min Splash Down Payload Power Down 11/19/2010

Mission Overview Expected Results o Successfully collect space dust o Space Dust Composition (10 -6 ) o Exhausted Rocket Fuel o Meteor / Metal Fragments o Other Miscellaneous Gases o Detailed data throughout flight duration o Thermal Data o Seismic/Vibration Data o Earth images/video 9 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

10 Design Description /19/2010 Presenter: Eric Robinson

Design Description Design Changes Since PDR o Payload water shield has been removed o Complex manufacturability o Electrical components do not need to be salvaged o New Telescopic Boom Control Mechanism o Steel tape reel design (akin to a tape measure) o New high torque gear box DC motor instead of stepper motor o Mission Objective Changes o Pressure sensors have been removed from secondary objective 11 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

Design Description De-Scopes and Off-Ramps o De-Scopes o No mission objectives have been removed o All objectives are still considered feasible o Off-Ramps o We do not believe we will run into schedule/budget constraints that would require a contingency. 11/1/ Presenter: Eric Robinson

Design Description Subsystem Overview 11/1/ Presenter: Eric Robinson MCU Arm Control Temp. Sensor Optical Camera PWR Wallops Telemetry Wallops EPS EPS/STR Interface OC/STR Interface TB/STR Interface TB/EPS Interface OC/EPS Interface STR TB OC Boom Aerogel Motor Boom IS IS/EPS Interface IS/STR Interface Temperature Sensor Accelerometers Optical Camera Accel. Sensor Control Box

Design Description Mechanical Design Elements 11/1/ Presenter: Eric Robinson

Design Description Mechanical Design Elements 11/1/ Presenter: Eric Robinson

Design Description Mechanical Design Elements 11/1/ Presenter: Eric Robinson o Retracted – 11 in boom o Extended – ~19 in boom – ~12 in reach

Design Description Electrical System : Components o Arduino Controller o 5M Digital Camera o 16 Mbit data flash o 100:1 Metal gear motor o 250 G Accelerometer 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens o 16G 2-Axis Accelerometer o Temperature Sensors o Motor Driver o Encoders o Power Regulators

Design Description Electrical System : Arduino o Atmega 16 MHz o 32Kb of Program Storage o 2KB of Ram o Digital Pins : 14 o 6 PWM o Analog Pins : 6 o 10 Bit o 10 KHz sample time o Provide control over payload 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : XY Accel. o 2 axis ± 18G o 36 / (2^10) = G 10 bit o 350 µA o 50 Hz cut off filter o Used last year as well o Provide acceleration in the non extreme XY axis. 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Z Accel. o 1 axis ± 250 G o 500 / (2^10) = G 10 bit o 1.5 mA o 400 Hz cutoff filter o Provide acceleration data in the extreme Z (up) axis 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Motor o 100:1 gear ratio o 6V o 90mA o 800mA stall 6V o in-lb motor 6V o Provide winding action of tape. 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Motor Driver o 3 wire interface (In1, In2, PWM) o 1.2 A 15 V 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Temp. Sensor o TMP36 o -50C to 125C = 175C range o 175 / (2^10) = degree 10 bits o SLOW (300s for full range change) o 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Optics DVR 623V 5M DSC/DV module o 5.1 megapixel o Internal shutter trigger o SD Data up to 4GB o ? mA o Provide photos/video of flight 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Flash Storage o 16 Mbit (2MB) o 7 mA o 36 Kbytes/second write time o SPI Interface (4 digital pins) 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Storage o Used for redundant storage of acceleration data o Maximum sensor sampling time 400 Hz o 3 x 10 bit = 30 bits ~ 4 bytes o ((( / 8) / 4) / 400) / 60 = minutes of recording time. 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Power o 12 V regulators o 6V regulators o 780X series max input voltage 35 volts. 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Encoder o Digital light sensor o 2 Wires (1 enable, 1 output) o 25 mA o Used to sense black and white pattern on spool. o Used to detect stalls o Used to verify extension 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Telem. IF 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Electrical System : Power IF 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Software Design Elements 11/1/ o Programmed on Arduino in “C” o Heavy use of interrupts Presenter: Michael Stephens

Design Description Software Design Elements 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

33 Prototyping/ Analysis /19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

Analysis Results o Telescopic Boom o Finite Element Analysis o Deflections, stress, and strain o Newtonian Laws o Payload Frame o Finite Element Analysis o Deflections, stress, and strain 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Analysis Results Telescopic Boom - Stress Key Results o Stress o Peak von Mises o 11 MPa at truss convergence point Loading of 100G 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Analysis Results Telescopic Boom – Deflection Key Results o Deflection o 6061 Aluminum o 1.12E -2 mm at o center of boom. o 1023 Carbon Steel o 1.099E -2 mm at o center of boom. Loading of 100G 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Analysis Results Telescopic Boom – FOS Key Results o Factor of Safety o 6061 Aluminum o Min o 1023 Carbon Steel o Min – 8.59 Loading of 100G 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Analysis Results Material Decision o Material Strength o Results showed that both materials could handle the loadings with minimal deflection o Material density o Aluminum 6061 o ρ = lb/cu.in. o 1023 Carbon Steel o ρ = lb/cu.in. o Therefore 6061 Aluminum Alloy will be the chosen as the material for our mechanical components. 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Analysis Results Material Decision o Aerogel Design o Results from aerogel studies have proven that an Aerogel Density of 95 kg/m 3 will be sufficient in capturing the micro-scaled particles. [1] o [1] – Horz, Friedrich, Mark J. Cintala, Thomas H. See, and Keiko Nakamura-Messenger. "Penetration Tracks in Aerogel. Produced by Al2O3 Spheres." Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Prototyping Results o Most prototyping is theoretical and conducted using SolidWorks. o Further prototyping and testing will occur once the parts are manufactured and assembled. o Late January/Early February 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Detailed Mass Budget o Total Mass Budget (15±0.5 lbs) o Structure (5.95 lbs) o Boom (5.05 lbs) o Circuit Trays (0.9 lbs) o Camera (0.25 lb) o Other Sensors (1 lb) o Modular Electrical System (1 lb) o Ballasting (~6.80 lbs) 41 Presenter: Patrick Weber 11/19/2010

Detailed Power Budget 42 Presenter: Michael Stephens 11/19/2010 o Redundant Power T0 launch (17%) o Event Power T+5 shield ejection (80%) SourceConsumption (in Amps) Arduino0.02 Encoder0.025 Camera0.1 Temp Sensors XY Acc Z Acc Motor Driver0.025 Total SourceConsumption (in Amps) Motor0.8 Total0.8

Wallops Interfacing: Power 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens Power Connector--Customer Side PinFunction 1NC 2 Controller redundant T0 3 4 Motor T+5 after shield ejection 5Common Ground NC 10NC 11NC 12Common Ground 13Common Ground 14Common Ground 15Common Ground

Wallops Interfacing: Telemetry 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens Telemetry Connector--Customer Side PinFunctionPinFunction 1 TMP120 NC 2 TMP221 NC 3 TMP322 NC 4 X Accelerometers23 NC 5 Y Accelerometers24 NC 6 Z Accelerometers25 NC 7 26 NC 8 27 NC 9 28 NC 10 NC29 NC 11 NC30 NC 12 NC31 NC 13 NC32 TX send temp data as well as Baud 14 NC33 TX GNG tied to common ground 15 NC34 NC 16 NC35 NC 17 NC36 NC 18 NC37 NC 19

45 Manufacturing Plan /19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

Manufacturing Plan Mechanical Elements o Payload Frame – 6061 Aluminum Alloy o Machined o Bolted together o Telescopic Boom – Precision DOM Aluminum Tubing o Boom Housing o Tubing with Epoxied Flange o Intermediate Arm o Epoxied Rail o Aerogel Arm o CNC machined from Aluminum Barstock o Aerogel Purchased o Parts submitted for machining by Tuesday, November 23 rd 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Manufacturing Plan Electrical Elements o Electrical Power System o Arduino Board o Integrated Sensors o Purchase o All wires will be soldered o All wires and boards will be epoxied to acrylic mounting plates. o Acrylic will comply with no-voltage requirement. o Parts ordered by Wednesday, December 1 st. 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Manufacturing Plan Software Elements o Software will be developed next semester starting mid- January o Software will be developed in modules and integrated as a whole as they become functional. Software developed in Arduino “C” language. 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

49 Testing Plan /19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

Testing Plan System Level Testing o Full mission simulation testing using physical model. o Vibration testing at the University as well as Wallops. o Boom extension/retraction test using electronics and mechanical models. o Payload drop testing o Thermal Expansion testing 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Testing Plan Mechanical Testing o Prove mechanical functionality on ground o Boom tests o Cyclic Extension/Retraction Tests o Friction Tests o Bending/Binding Tests o Tape Reel Buckling Strength Tests o Thermal Expansion Tests o Water sealant testing o Pool submersion test on canister o Drop impact test on canister sealing o Testing will be performed as models and utilities become available. 11/1/ Presenter: Patrick Weber

Testing Plan Electrical Testing o Temperature sensor testing o Measure sensors 24 hours a day and correlate with other temperatures measurements. o Place sensor unit in oven until reading stabilizes. Remove sensor and place outside at night until reading stabilizes. Do this multiple times to determine time delay. o Hot / Cold system test o Place entire system in oven, place outside. Examine for solder disconnects. o Accelerometer testing o Use elevators and cars to verify acceleration readings. 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

Testing Plan Software Testing o Asynchronous data capture test o Run Sine wave into ADC. Verify consistent timing. o Motor control test o Extend boom o Retract boom o Verify extension and retraction and analyze fault conditions o Integration testing o Use sine wave generators as sensor inputs o Run simulated mission to detect possible data anomalies / control anomalies. o Multiple day in the life (DITL) tests on ground. o Simulate entire mission with actual sensors. 11/1/ Presenter: Michael Stephens

54 Risks /19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

Risk Walk-Down o Risk Matrix / Mitigation o STR/TB.RSK.1: Canister seals fail at splashdown and aerogel is saturated with water. o TB.RSK.2: Boom jams when skins are shed. Boom fails to open and mission objectives are not met. o IS.RSK.1: Telemetry or flash memory fail and data to be collected for next year’s team is lost. Secondary mission objectives are not met. o EPS.RSK.1: Should the NASA telemetry or Timed Event circuits fail, the boom may prematurely extend causing failure of the UW payload as well as possible damage to the rocket. 55 Presenter: Patrick Weber Consequence EPS.RSK.1 STR/TB.RSK.1 TB.RSK.2 IS.RSK.1 Possibility 11/19/2010

56 User Guide Compliance /19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

User Guide Compliance 5711/19/2010 RequirementStatus/Reason (if needed) Center of gravity in 1" plane of plate? Unsure Max Height < 12" In compliance Within Keep-Out In compliance Using < 10 A/D Lines In compliance Using/Understand Parallel Line In compliance Using/Understand Asynchronous Line Baud Using X GSE Line(s) Not at this time Using X Redundant Power Lines 1 Using X Non-Redundant Power Lines 1 Using < 1 Ah 0.152Ah total (all lines) Using <= 28 V 3.3V - 12V Presenter: Patrick Weber

Sharing Logistics o Who are we sharing with? – We don’t know. o University of Northern Colorado o Re-entry Experiment Sat: Recover a reusable deployable, attempt to dynamically control the descent of the payload, and gather data during the return trip. o The possibility of a communication system between the AstroX payload and the UNC Re-entry Experiment Sat payload is being considered. o Plan for collaboration? o , phone, road-trips to Greeley and Boulder o Communication with Max Woods on a weekly basis. o Grant UNC access to the AstroX private website. 5811/19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

59 Project Management Plan /19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

Mechanical Schedule o Major Mechanical Milestones: o Design Freeze at CDR (Friday, November 19, 2010) o Blueprints submitted for manufacturing on Nov. 23 o Mechanical prototype constructed mid-January, 2011 o Mechanical prototype fully tested by end of January, 2011 o Impact and submersion testing o Aerogel testing 60 Presenter: Patrick Weber 11/19/2010

Electrical Schedule o Major Electrical Milestones: o Electrical Schematics completed by CDR o Components ordered by December 1 o Electrical assembly and testing done by Mid February o Control function test o Telemetry and flash memory output test o Fully functioning payload by end of February 61 Presenter: Patrick Weber 11/19/2010

Monetary Budget o Monetary Budget (~$1200) o Structure ($600) o Boom ($300) o Aerogel ($300) o Camera ($100) o Other Sensors ($110) o Modular Electrical System ($200) o Correcting Factor (+$20%) 62 Presenter: Patrick Weber 11/19/2010

Work Breakdown Structure 63 Presenter: Patrick Weber Integrated Sensors (IS) Electrical Power System (EPS) Telescopic Boom (TB) Optical Camera (OC) Design Freeze at CDR Submit Work Request Manufacture Boom Parts Assemble Boom and Structure Design Freeze at CDR Order Parts by End of Fall Semester Build Circuits Program Microcontrollers Test Systems Integrate with Boom Design Freeze at CDR Order Parts by End of Fall Semester Build Circuits Program Microcontrollers Test Systems Test functionality of camera If functional: Integrate with Electrical Power System and Integrated Sensors If non-functional: Order another camera 11/19/2010

64 Conclusions /19/2010 Presenter: Patrick Weber

Mission Overview Scientific Mission o Primary: Collect space dust. o Provide a perspective of what is in our upper atmosphere. o Particle size = nano and micro level o Donate collected aerogel tablets to UW Geology Department for further analysis o SEM photographs of particle trails – velocity analysis o Identify particles – material property analysis o Secondary: o Capture optical images/video of the Earth. o Measure thermal and seismic effects throughout the duration of the launch. o Collect data for future projects. 65 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

Mission Overview Engineering Mission o Engineer an extendable boom to mount a dust collector. o Use aerogel and acrylic tablets as dust collectors. o Aerogel Density = 95 kg/m 3 o Acrylic Density = 1200 kg/m 3 o Engineer a water shield to protect dust collector. o Engineer modular electronic systems for: o Capturing and storing images from optical devices. o Recording thermal and seismic data in real time throughout launch using sensors and transferring recording data via provided NASA Wallops Telemetry. 66 Presenter: Eric Robinson 11/19/2010

Questions?