Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Act of 2009 H.R Becky Hammer – Associate Advocate, Water Program – Natural Resources Defense Council.
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.
ENTITY and DATE HERE Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium TMDL and Reasonable Assurance Overview.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Introduction to TMDLs for Nutrients Presented by: Dr. Scott Emery January 15, 2009.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
CT DEP LONG ISLAND SOUND MONITORING PROGRAM. TOTAL NITROGEN LOAD DELIVERED TO LONG ISLAND SOUND (Lbs TN/Day) Total Load from all Sources = 366K Lbs TN/day.
2010 Water Quality Assessment MARINE WATER Presented by Mike Herold.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research Douglas J. Norton USEPA Office of Water October 2005 Douglas J.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee January 8, 2009 Briefing to the Water Resources Technical.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Nutrient Effects on Springs Biota Synthesis: Springs Management and Research Needs Mark Brown & Richard Hamann.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
MPCA: An Agency & Legislative Update Brad Moore, Commissioner June 22, 2007.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Protecting Georgia’s Waters Jennifer Welte Program Manager Regulatory Development & Regional Water Planning Georgia EPD – Watershed Protection Branch.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments
Module 2 Overview of EPA, the Clean Water Act, and Water Quality Standards - What will we we learn in this Academy? - Who plays what roles in.
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Tackling Stormwater Runoff in Puget Sound
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total Maximum Daily Load program David Croxton U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Watershed Unit Manager– EPA Region 10

What is a TMDL? A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a water body (or segment) can receive and still meet the state/tribe’s water quality standards. TMDLs are required by the Clean Water Act when a water body’s designated uses are determined to be impaired or threatened. The pollutants causing or expected to cause the impairment are what are limited under a TMDL.

What is a TMDL? (cont’d) A TMDL is the sum of the following : Waste load allocation (WLA). Total amount of the pollutant from existing point sources (e.g., sewage treatment plant, industrial facility, stormwater). Load allocation (LA). Total amount of pollutant from existing nonpoint sources and natural background (e.g., farm runoff, atmospheric mercury). Margin of safety (MOS). Expressed as an explicit factor (e.g., percent of total, such as 10%) or an implicit factor (e.g., conservative assumption in modeling).

Pilot Approach Underway Will select a TMDL (or two) based on suggested criteria: – Timing of model development (i.e., so that new thinking can be incorporated in next six months) – Tribal involvement (i.e., clear role for EPA) – Watershed is in a location where analyses of potential changes have been conducted (e.g., vulnerability assessments) – Connection with other priorities (e.g., salmon recovery, Puget Sound) Identify commonly occurring variables that relate to TMDL assumptions in models, analyses (e.g., T, flow) Coordinate with EPA Region 1 on Lake Champlain phosphorus TMDL being revised to consider climate change.

From Washington Technical Advisory Group Built Intrastructure Report (Dec. 2010) – Appendix C

What will be Success for this Pilot? Overall our goal is to determine the science needs to support potential future changes into TMDL analyses. Learn/adapt – Begin with one program to learn which impacts are most relevant and identify knowledge gaps; adapt this process for other programs Identify needed tools, data sources, models, etc., and where they are available – Federal partnerships in the region, e.g., C3, will be useful – Climate Science Center and Climate Decision Support Center, Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Identify policy issues and decisions

Potential Policy Issues Is climate change part of “background” conditions that aren’t assigned to any source category to address (e.g., lower flows)? How much can the “margin of safety” be used to account for climate change uncertainty versus uncertainty of the models themselves? Can /should we leverage more stringent limits or move to watershed-scale permits for point sources, to get more investments in green infrastructure in the watershed?