FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Your Career at Queen’s The annual review process for QUFA faculty Brenda Brouwer Vice-Provost and Dean School of Graduate Studies.
THE NSF BUDGET Overview of Agency Funding Processes Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management.
Streamlined Consultation Training Modules Module #1 - Frequently Asked Questions on the Section 7 Consultation Process Module #2 - An Overview of Streamlined.
Reaching for Success Grant Writing Workshop November 20, 2014.
How to Submit an ADED Conference Proposal. Objectives Identify the necessary steps for submitting a conference proposal Identify information required.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
SLAC Accelerator Research and Introduction to SAREC Tor Raubenheimer FACET Users Meeting August 29 th - 30 th, 2011.
FACET: A National User Facility Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Assessments of Student Achievement REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL on behalf of the Indiana Department of Education /
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Strategies for a well thought out and researched proposal GRANT-WRITING 101.
Science What is “Safety” Freedom from danger Safety is the condition of being protected against failure, breakage, error, accidents, or harm. (Protection.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
Magnet Lab User Portal August 2010.
SuperB. SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14 “flagship” projects within the new national research plan. The national research plan has.
Andrew Hime Physics Division, LANL e-e- e-e- e SNOLAB Scientific Development Andrew Hime Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory SNOLAB Workshop.
Legal Services Advisory Committee (LSAC) Grant Applicant Workshop February 11, 2013.
4) It is a measure of semi-independence and your PI may treat you differently since your fellowship will be providing salary support. 2) Fellowship support.
Quadrennial Review Retrospective performance review every 4 years Standardized to fairly evaluate Staff Scientists despite various roles Success judged.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
Status of Linear Collider Activities Rika Takahashi on behalf of the LC Communicators 104 November, 2013 Interactions US.
Nuclear Science User Facilities NSUF Solicitation Overview Jeff Benson NSUF Program Administrator Idaho National Laboratory NSUF User Meeting 6/22/15 INL/MIS
THE CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM playing a vital and integral role in improving the overall quality of care and daily nutritional health of participants.
March 4, 2011Outlook and Guidance - Zisman1 MAP Outlook and Guidance Michael S. Zisman* Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division.
DOE Annual Review of SLAC HEP Research Program June 14-16, 2005 SLAC Charge to Committee Issues Procedures.
THE CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM playing a vital and integral role in improving the overall quality of care and daily nutritional health of participants.
Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013.
LST SAFETY INSTALLATION READINESS REVIEW 5/5/2004 FRANK O’NEILL (SLAC)
Communications Service Pricing & Industry Analysis EACO WORKING GROUP 8 : Communications Service Pricing & Industry Analysis Chairperson : Mr. Matano Ndaro,
Council assistance – we are here to help. Program Introduction Traffic Management Council assistance including food handling Finding and applying for.
End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.
CFI Call 7 Get ready…set….go! 100M on the line. Type of proposal? Build on past successful CFI from calls 1-5 – Majority to be funded will be Leading.
2015 P&E Group Meeting P&E Tech Excellence Awards Update 2015 P&E Forum, Orlando, Florida 26 July 2015 Joaquin Castro, Deputy Director for Rocket, Space.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
The AstraZeneca Research Grant Nigeria
Parts of an NSF full grant proposal
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
SABER, “maybe” a new facility in the South Arc (South Arc Beam Experimental Region) End Station A (ESA) in 2007 ILC Test Beams in 2008 Test Beams beyond.
End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.
Approach Section: The “Meat” of the Proposal INBRE Grant Writing Workshops 2015 Helen Beneš, Ph.D. Director, AR INBRE Developmental Research Project Program.
Universität für Bodenkultur Wien Dr. Margarita Calderón-Peter, ZIB Purpose of the fund for incentives 2.Procedure for applications for funding.
Experiment Readiness Review P. Rossi – Hall C Coll. Meeting Jan 21, 2016.
Grants Management Policies and Procedures. Requirements for Submitting a Carry Over Budget (COB) Detailed description of the objectives/goals not completed.
CIRTL Data Sharing 10/9/15. New Opportunities The CIRTL Network Commons (CNC) offers the potential for easier access to data for evaluation purposes.
Reaching for Success Grant Writing Workshop January 24, 2011.
André Hoddevik, Project Director Enlargement of the PEPPOL-consortium 2009.
Essentials of Technical Communication Chapter 9: Proposals and Progress Reports.
Grant Management Seminar 1 DISTRICT GRANTS Applying for and Implementing a District Grant
The CED’s & DED’s role in the Tenure & Promotion of Agents
The AstraZeneca Research Grant Nigeria
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
WP13: Access to Plasma Beam testing facilities
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
FEASIBILITY STUDY Feasibility study is a means to check whether the proposed system is correct or not. The results of this study arte used to make decision.
Request Process For US Participants
Chair of Chemistry Graduate School
General Grants Program Process
Step 1 Know the guidelines!.
New Jersey Department of Education
DISTRICT GRANTS Applying for and Implementing a District Grant
DISTRICT GRANTS Applying for and Implementing a District Grant
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Minnesota Job Skills Partnership
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

FACET: A National User Facility  National User Facilities are DOE’s research flag ships and provide excellent infrastructure to the community (funding)  Your FACET User Organization will be there to help  FACET proposals are reviewed by SAREC 2FACET User Meeting August 2011

FACET: A National User Facility Experimental Evaluation  SLAC Accelerator Research Experimental program Committee » Appointed by Accelerator Research Division Head  SAREC Charge: » Evaluate the merit of proposed R&D in SLAC’s experimental accelerator research facilities for advancing world-class accelerator science or accelerator technology » Evaluate the feasibility of proposed R&D in SLAC’s accelerator research facilities » Review the progress of existing R&D in SLAC’s accelerator research facilities  1 st SAREC Review was January 10 th - 12 th 2011  2 nd SAREC Review in January 2012 (2 days) 3FACET User Meeting August 2011

Already Approved Experiments  For each SAREC review present status, achievements, publications and plans » You can assume that SAREC members will remember your experiments, so only a short introduction will be needed » Submit a Request for Beam Time (by November 15th) » Describe major changes in sufficient details » Technical changes will be evaluated by FACET Division » Prepare a talk for the SAREC meeting  Both, achievements and plans will be evaluated by SAREC » SAREC will give preference to continuing experiments » But run time is not guaranteed 4FACET User Meeting August 2011

New Experiment Proposals  Prepare written proposal outlining your experiment (detailed) » Physics » Personnel » Detailed experimental description » Submit by deadline (October 15th)  Evaluation by FACET Division (FD) for safety and executabilty » If necessary PIs are asked for additional information » FD will prepare non judgmental statements to SAREC  Present to SAREC  SAREC will prepare written evaluations  Run time is allocated by the FACET Division following SAREC’s evaluation, recommendation and practical considerations 5FACET User Meeting August 2011

New Test Beam Proposals  Prepare written proposal outlining your experiment (short) » Physics » Personnel » Detailed experimental description » Submit to FACET Division Director anytime  Evaluation by FACET Division for safety and executabilty » If necessary PIs are asked for additional information  Short beam time requests will be granted by FACET Division  You might be asked to present your research at a future User or SAREC meeting 6FACET User Meeting August 2011

Letter of Intent  Prepare written LoI outlining your experiment » Physics » Personnel » Experimental description (as much as you know) » Submit by November 15th  Evaluation by FACET Division for safety and executabilty » If necessary PIs are asked for additional information  Present to SAREC  If appropriate, SAREC will prepare written evaluations 7FACET User Meeting August 2011

After Your Experiment is Approved  Detailed technical evaluation by FACET Division (FD)  Experimental Readiness Review » Safety » Ways to combine with existing infrastructure » Enough personnel for operation » etc. » Your timely cooperation with FD is most necessary  Before operation » PI will sign that his/her experiment is ready to receive beam and that it is safe to do so » Operations Manager will sign that all necessary personnel is available and trained » FACET Division Director will sign that the experiment is safe, poses no harm to the facility or others and is ready to go 8FACET User Meeting August 2011