(2-Hydroxyethyl) Triphenylphosphonium Chloride Large Molecule/Small Molecule Interactions Rhode Island College July 14-18, 2008 Bailey Sarber, Samantha.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warm-Up: to be turned in Write the electron configuration, noble-gas configuration and orbital notation for: Sulfur and Calcium.
Advertisements

INTERMOLECULAR FORCES (IMF). INTERMOLECULAR FORCES ARE BETWEEN MOLECULES WHEREAS INTRAMOLECULAR FORCES ARE WITHIN THE MOLECULE INTERMOLECULAR FORCES ARE:
1. This will cover the following: Genomic organization of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Structure of DNA, RNA and polypeptide. Watson and Crick Model.
T ETRAPHENYLPHOSPHONIUM B ROMIDE (TPP) L ARGE M OLECULE ~S MALL M OLECULE I NTERACTIONS Pilgrim High School Mr. Dubois, Mr. Lobdell C.J. Beneduce, Bryan.
By: C.J. Beneduce Maria Guirguis Amanda Rode Mr. Normand Dubois.
Large Molecule ~ Small Molecule Interactions Projects By the Woonsocket Team: Toni DiMarzio Andrea Harnois Alyshia Johnson Claire Laquerre.
SHEA HIGH SCHOOL July 13-17, 2009 Ms. La Roche Cesar Luzon, Janice Miranda, Maldine Santos, Estefania Tabares.
Triphenyl (2-pyridylmethyl) Phosphonium Chloride Large Molecule – Small Molecule Interactions Rhode Island College July 13 – 17, 2009.
South Kingstown High School Kenny Chappell Trevor Hosley Catherine Jones Andrew Sharkey Stephen Vincelette.
Section 6.5 – Molecular Geometry
Large Molecule ~ Small Molecule Interactions Project Times Squared Academy Sorys E. Cepeda Jeffrey Doddio Instructor: Kerri Krawczyk.
JOINT PROJECT WITH RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES JULY , 2009 Interaction of o-Xylylenebis (triphenylphosphonium bromide) and.
Molecules of Life. Polymers Are Built of Monomers Organic molecules are formed by living organisms – have a carbon-based core – the core has attached.
Shapes and Polarity Vocabulary Polar covalent bond VSEPR model
Organic Chemistry Larry Scheffler Lincoln High School 1 Revised September 12, 2010.
1962: Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine James D. Watson Francis H. Crick Maurice H. F. Wilkins What about? Rosalind Franklin.
VSEPR Theory
Ch Chemical Bonding Covalent Bonds ____________ electrons between two atoms in order to fill the outer energy level (or shell) Each bond involves.
Molecular Polarity & Intermolecular Forces
Chapter 8. ◦ These toy models are made from circular pieces joined together in units by sticks. Atoms can also be arranged in different ways to make a.
Chapter 8 Covalent Compounds. Covalent Bonds Sharing Electrons –Covalent bonds form when atoms share one or more pairs of electrons nucleus of each atom.
II III I Hydrogen Bonding and The Nature of Solutions Ch. 13 & 14 - Solutions 1.
1 Mr. Shields Regents Chemistry U10 L01 2 Ionic Bonds involve a force of attraction that develops through… ELECTRON TRANSFER In covalent bond formation.
Chemistry of Life A Brief … Overview. Matter Matter occupies space and has weight. It can exist as a solid, liquid, or gas. It may be possible to break.
CHEMICAL BONDS Chemical Bond  Mutual electrical attraction between the nuclei and valence electrons of different atoms that binds the atoms together.
Chapter Five Molecular Compounds Fundamentals of General, Organic & Biological Chemistry 4th Edition Mohammed Hashmat Ali Southeast Missouri State University.
Noncovalent Molecular Forces - Part 1 Lecture Supplement page 200 F-F-        
The Double Helix The Complementary Model J.D. Watson F.H. Crick.
Polarity Chapter 6.1. Review A covalent bond is formed between two non-metals. Electrons are shared. Orbitals are overlapping.
Intermolecular Forces The attractions between molecules are not nearly as strong as the intramolecular attractions that hold compounds together.
Molecular Shape and Polarity The Importance of Geometry in Determining Physical Properties.
VSEPR Theory: Molecular Shapes Most shapes are based on a __________________. Examples: CH 4 CCl 4 Removing the top of the tetrahedral makes the ________________.
Chapter 4 Formation of Compounds
Chapter 6 Section 1.
Covalent Compounds Chapter 8. Section 1, Covalent Bonds –Remember, ionic compounds are formed by gaining and losing electrons –Atoms can also share electrons.
Introduction to Organic Chemistry Section Organic Chemistry The chemistry of carbon compounds Not including metal carbonates and oxides Are varied.
Intermolecular Forces. What are intermolecular forces? NOT chemical bonds, less strength Attractive forces between molecules Molecular level, not individual.
Ch. 12 Notes---Covalent Bonds
Lewis Dot Structures on Board Ionic uses charges (NaCl) Covalent 1: Find total # Valence e- 2: Each H gets 2, all others get 8 3: Line indicates shared.
Pujarini Banerjee & Tapas Chakraborty Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Kolkata, India International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy,
What are Intermolecular forces? Intermolecular forces are weak forces of attraction between some covalent molecules. These attractions are responsible.
INTERMOLECULAR FORCES OF ATTRACTION - A- A- A- Attraction existing between molecules in a given substance - R- R- R- Responsible for the phase of the.
CHAPTER 2, SECTION 2.2 MOLECULAR COMPOUNDS. MOLECULAR ELEMENT & MOLECULAR COMPOUND Diatomic: made up of two atoms. Molecular element: consists of molecules.
DNA structure (with a side of RNA). The sugar HOCH 2 OH H H H H HOCH 2 OH H H H.
COVALENT BONDING. STRUCTURE AND BONDING The physical properties of a substance depend on its structure and type of bonding present. Bonding determines.
Ch. 8 Covalent Bonding Pre AP Chemistry. I. Molecular Compounds  A. Molecules & Molecular Formulas  1. Another way that atoms can combine is by sharing.
© 2009, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 11 Intermolecular Forces, Liquids, and Solids.
Aim: What attraction forces exist among neighboring molecules? I.O.SWBAT: 1)Use the KMT to explain the differences in motion of particles in the gas, liquid,
Structure and Properties of Organic Molecules
Intermolecular Forces
. The greek symbol  indicates “partial charge”. H2H2 HClLiCl ++ –– 00 00 +– 1. Non-polar covalent 2. Polar covalent3. Ionic HH H Cl [Li] + [
Intermolecular Forces
CHE2060 4: Physical properties & interactions
Bonding.
Chapter 11 Intermolecular Forces, Liquids, and Solids
Biology I Covalent Bonds
Small Molecule Large Molecule Interactions
Polarity and Intermolecular (IM) Forces (Interactions)
Does TPEOB Interact with DNA?
α-Triphenylphosphonium-p-toluic acid bromide
INTERMOLECULAR FORCES OF ATTRACTION
Polarity within a Molecule
Chemical Bonding 10/18/12.
“CTP” cinnamyltriphenylphosphonium chloride
Notes: 13.2 OBJECTIVES: Students will be able to (SWBAT)
Real Molecule Shapes Any molecule containing only 2 atoms has a linear shape. To predict shapes of molecules with more than 2 atoms we use VESPR theory.
3.1 Bonding. 3.1 Bonding Ionic Bonding • • • • • Cl Na • • • • • [ Na ]+ [ Cl ]- • • • • • • Form between a metal and a nonmetal Simplest expressed.
Chapter 11 Liquids, solids, and intermolecular forces
Unit 7: Bonding.
Jeff Venables Northwestern High School
Presentation transcript:

(2-Hydroxyethyl) Triphenylphosphonium Chloride Large Molecule/Small Molecule Interactions Rhode Island College July 14-18, 2008 Bailey Sarber, Samantha Barrus Westerly High School

TPPEO Molecular Formula-- HOCH 2 CH 2 P(C 6 H 5 ) 3 Cl Molecular Weight— AMU Physical State— white, crystalline powder Solubility in Water– not available LD 50– not available

Electrophoresis Well 2 - kb Ladder Well 3 - Plasmid DNA sample uncut (5 μL) base pairs Well 4 - Plasmid DNA sample uncut (5 μL) with 1 µL of TPPEO base pairs Well 5 - Plasmid DNA sample linearized (5 μL) base pairs Well 6 - Plasmid DNA sample linearized (5 μL) with 1 µL of TPPEO base pairs Possible Conclusions: The doping agent failed to bind with the DNA samples. The agent bound, but had no effect. The agent’s concentration was too low. Final conclusion: Additional tests yielded the same results despite higher concentrations of TPPEO doping agent (3 µL and 5 µL).

Melting Point of Genomic (Salmon) DNA with Varying Concentrations of TPPEO Melting points Control (DNA + Distilled Water) -77.5°C DNA + 1 μL TPPEO-82.5°C DNA + 3 μL TPPEO-82.5°C DNA + 5 μL TPPEO-82.5°C

Molecular Modeling Benzene ring - planar surface may provide the best chance of intercalation within DNA Distance in Å Energy in Kcals Optimization Distance in Å Energy in Kcals Optimization Minor Groove – Single Point Energy Atom - C11 of TPPEO Atom - P193 of DNA Major Groove – Single Point Energy Atom - C11 of TPPEO Atom - C3*442 Small Molecule/Large Molecule Interaction

Attempting to Intercalate TPPEO within Adenine-Thymine Base Pairs Optimizing… TPPEO fails to intercalate, instead causing the DNA molecule to distort itself away from the drug.

Attempting to Intercalate TPPEO within Cytosine- Guanine Base Pairs Optimizing… TPPEO fails to intercalate, instead causing the DNA to distort and the base pairs to move apart.

Attempting to Bind TPPEO to the Major Groove of DNA Optimizing… TPPEO fails to interact with the major groove, instead causing DNA to distort away from the TPPEO.

Attempting to Bind TPPEO to the Minor Groove of DNA Optimizing… TPPEO appears to interact with the minor groove, causing little DNA distortion.

Conclusions Electrophoresis- TPPEO did not affect the migration of the DNA through the gel. The drug either did not bind with DNA or it did bind with the DNA with no affect to the migration through the gel. Melting Point of Genomic DNA- There was a change in melting temperature between the control sample and those doped with various concentrations TPPEO including 1 μL, 3 μL and 5 μL. The possible shift was 5 ° Celsius indicating some sort of interaction between the drug and the DNA samples. Further testing is needed to substantiate an actual interaction. Molecular Modeling- Single point optimization between atoms on TPPEO and DNA revealed that when TPPEO approached the major groove on DNA the optimal energy level was Å. This suggests that the interaction based upon these two points is forced. Optimization on the minor groove had a greater overall distance than that of the major groove, at a distance of Å. The energy level implies the two atoms do not interact well at the minor groove.

Adenine-Thymine Intercalation- TPPEO failed to intercalate within base pairs containing adenine-thymine sequences. The double hydrogen bonds connecting the two bases were not strong enough to withstand the distortion caused by the attempted intercalation. Cytosine-Guanine Intercalation-TPPEO again failed to intercalate between base pairs containing cytosine-guanine. These base pairs moved apart but not as far as the adenine-thyamine base pairs because the three hydrogen bonds are stronger then two. Warning: Hyperchem has its limitations. Some sort of interaction appeared to take place in the minor groove of the DNA sequence when both molecules were optimized using the Amber program. This occurred despite the single point optimization not supporting the interaction. Single point optimization only configures two atoms but with so many configurations to test it would be realistically impossible to test them all using a program such as this. Intercalating within a DNA sequence has as many variables; base pair sequences, the size of the DNA molecule, and the location and configurations of the drug yield hypothetical results. Conclusion : Actual experimentation should be the primary source from which to draw conclusions. Recreating the experiment will quantify/support the data collected and verify the possible binding properties of TPPEO. Hyperchem is a tool, but not to be solely relied on.

Further Research… Replicating the experiments Confirming the assumed minor curve non-covalent bonding nature of TPPEO and DNA using X-Ray Crystallography Investigate other molecules for possible DNA interaction ex: acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, acetaminophen