ISSI Working Group on Atmospheric Water Vapor, 11 Feb 2008 Holger Vömel Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado Water vapor observations using the CFH
Overview Science issues: Trend (stratosphere / upper troposphere) Supersaturation Use in forecasting and modelsScience issues: Trend (stratosphere / upper troposphere) Supersaturation Use in forecasting and models Measurement issues: Absolute accuracy In-cloud measurements Frostpoint above 0CMeasurement issues: Absolute accuracy In-cloud measurements Frostpoint above 0C Logistical issues: World wide coverage Instrument availability Cost Radiosonde manufacturer interactionLogistical issues: World wide coverage Instrument availability Cost Radiosonde manufacturer interaction
Cryogenic Frostpoint Hygrometer (CFH) Microprocessor control Microprocessor control Vertical Range: surface to ~28 km (surface to ~25 km on ascent) Vertical Range: surface to ~28 km (surface to ~25 km on ascent) Uncertainty: troposphere: > 4% MR stratosphere: ~ 9 % Uncertainty: troposphere: > 4% MR stratosphere: ~ 9 % Phase sensitive detector: electronic sunlight filter Phase sensitive detector: electronic sunlight filter No liquid/ice ambiguity No liquid/ice ambiguity Weight: ~ 400 gr Weight: ~ 400 gr Currently interfaced with ECC ozone sonde and Vaisala RS80 Currently interfaced with ECC ozone sonde and Vaisala RS80 >300 soundings >300 soundings Detector IR LED μ Controller Cryogen Air flow Lens Mirror Heater Frost layer Thermistor
Science issue: Trends
Boulder trend From Scherer et al., ACPD 2007
Boulder trend From Scherer et al., ACPD 2007
Where to measure trend? Processes controlling entry of water into stratosphere Methane oxidation and PSCs From Holton et al., Rev. Geophys. 1995
Science issue: Supersaturation
Supersaturation from WB-57 From Gao et al., Science, 2003
Harvard Lyman alpha - CFH
RH ice from tropical CFH soundings
Supersaturation in cloud
Measurement issue: Absolute accuracy
Mixing Ratio (ppmv) Pressure (hPa) Sep 2004 Sep 2005 Ft Sumner (~35ºN) Balloon comparisons Aura MLS / FIRS-2 / MkIV / NOAA FP Mixing Ratio (ppmv) Pressure (hPa) 1 Frostpoint vs balloon remote sensing
CFH vs ACE-FTS
CFH vs MLS
CFH vs FISH
CFH vs WB-57 instruments JPL TDL
CFH vs. FLASH TC4 Costa Rica August 2007
CFH vs. FLASH AMMA/Ticosonde Veranillo: Niger vs Costa Rica August 2006
CFH vs WB-57 instruments Harvard Lyman alpha
CFH must be considered an absolute reference instrument
Measurement issue: In (liquid) clouds
Measurement in clouds
Wet bias with liquid phase?
Comparison with groundbased GPS PWV
Condensate phase Liquid : Coarse frost: Fine frost:
Logistical issues: World wide coverage
CFH Observation sites (campaign based)
Instrument availability Instrument needs (low estimate): 6 sites (2 tropical, 2 mid latitude, 2 polar) 2x per month 144 soundings per year Industrial manufacturing
Instrument availability BUT conflict of Business interests ProfitProfit Trade secretsTrade secrets Science interests Economical observationsEconomical observations Understanding of instrumentUnderstanding of instrument Open access policyOpen access policy
Discussion points CFH observations provide highest level of confidenceCFH observations provide highest level of confidence Improve confidence in observations by cross checks of observations (ground and balloon based, satellites, aircraft)Improve confidence in observations by cross checks of observations (ground and balloon based, satellites, aircraft) Science issues to be addressed need large number of soundingsScience issues to be addressed need large number of soundings Need to address industrial production issue, involvement of radiosonde manufacturersNeed to address industrial production issue, involvement of radiosonde manufacturers