PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geminis Future AO Program A Decade of AO Evolution at Gemini Recent AO Program Highlights Doug Simons Gemini Observatory.
Advertisements

GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Active & Adaptive Optics AS4100 Astrofisika Pengamatan Prodi Astronomi 2007/2008 B. Dermawan.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
Light and Telescopes Please pick up your assigned transmitter
Reminder:. Robo-AO at South Pole Station Tony Travouillon Thirty Meter Telescope / Caltech Richard Dekany Associate Director for Instrumentation Development,
LBT AO Progress Meeting, Arcetri Walter Seifert (ZAH, LSW) The LBT AO System and LUCIFER 1.Requirements for the commissioning of LUCIFER:
May 2001Venice Workshop1 The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle and Adaptive Optics Time Constant derived from DIMM data Marc Sarazin (1) and Andrei Tokovinine.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Thermal Infrared Observation using Adaptive Secondary Mirror (ASM) Hiroshi TERADA (Subaru Telescope)  Ground-based Thermal IR w/AO  Subaru Thermal IR.
An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presented by Julian C. Christou Gemini Observatory.
AO188/LGS status AO188 development group(Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) (JST)
Turbulence and Seeing measurements at Dome C A collaboration UNSW, CTIO and the University of Nice.
LBT AGW units Design Review Mar.2001 General Concept Performance specifications and goals The off-axis unit The mechanical support structure The control.
GMT Phasing GLAO – not needed LTAO – Phase stabilization done at ~1kHz with edge sensing at M1 and M2 – Phase reference set at ~.01Hz using off-axis star.
ELT Stellar Populations Science Near IR photometry and spectroscopy of resolved stars in nearby galaxies provides a way to extract their entire star formation.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
A Short Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presentation for NGAO Controls Team Erik Johansson August 28, 2008.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
1 Atmospheric Limits to Precision William van Altena Yale University Basic Astrometric Methods Yale University July 18-22, 2005.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
Diffraction-limited imaging in the visible at the WHT Craig Mackay, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge. 22 March 2010: Science with WHT.
An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Mike Hein PH 464 – Applied Optics Winter 2005.
Keck Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: 1 st & 2 nd Milestones AOWG Telecon Oct. 17, 2003 A. Bouchez, J. Chin, A. Contos, S. Hartman, E. Johansson,
Some large-telescope design parameter considerations: Distributed pupil telescopes J.R.Kuhn Institute for Astronomy, UH How to “distribute the glass” in.
Diffraction Limited Imaging from the Largest Ground-Based Telescopes in the Visible Craig Mackay, Jonathan Crass, David L. King Institute of Astronomy,
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
Next generation wide field AO (GLAO) and NIRMOS for Subaru Telescope.
Big Bear Solar Observatory NST Main Features  All reflecting, off-axis Gregory optical configuration  PM: 1.6 m clear aperture with f/2.4  Figuring.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Closed Loop Performance Laird Close and MagAO team SAC review.
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
“Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star”: An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Mt. Hamilton Visitor’s Night July 28, 2001.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
ASTR 3010 Lecture 18 Textbook N/A
Conference “Feeding the Giants: ELTs in the era of Surveys” -- Ischia 31/08/2011 Large field of view and ELTs: an impossible marriage? Paolo Ciliegi (INAF.
Vancouver, June Models of the ground layer and free atmosphere at some sites A. Tokovinin, CTIO Need for OTP “models”: Adaptive Optics!
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
1 Comparative Performance of a 30m Groundbased GSMT and a 6.5m (and 4m) NGST NAS Committee of Astronomy & Astrophysics 9 th April 2001 Matt Mountain Gemini.
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. AO corrected average Strehl ratios at different field positions and Sun elevations.
Characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence & Systems engineering François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz)
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
MASS-DIMM and SODAR at Cerro Pachon
MASS-DIMM – a turbulence monitor for Adaptive Optics
Comparative Performance of a 30m Groundbased GSMT and a 6
A telescope for an ANtarctica Imaging & Survey
“Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star”: An Introduction to Adaptive Optics
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Presentation transcript:

PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian Observatory Jon Lawrence

The data Turbulence: –SODAR (winter 2003/4) –MASS (winter 2004) –DIMM (summer 2003/04) Sky temperature and opacity –SUMMIT (winter 2003/4) –MIR FTI (summer 2003/4) Met data –COBBER (winter 2003/4) –ICECAM (summer 2003/4) –AWS (winter 2004) –met balloons (summer ) Turbulence: –SODAR (winter 2000/1) –DIMM (winter 2000/01) –microthermals (winter 1996) Sky temperature and opacity –SUMMIT (winter 2003/4) –MIR FTI (summer 2002/3) –MISM (winter 1998) –NISM (winter 2000) Met data –AWS –met balloons DOME C South Pole

Seeing Data Dome C /3 DIMM summer 2002: median seeing 1.2 arcsec (Aristidi et al, 2003) SODAR summer/ winter 2003: median seeing ~0.08 arcsec (33 % floor 0.05)

Seeing Data Dome C /4 DIMM summer 2003/4: data not yet reduced median seeing < 1.1 arcsec (~ arcsec) isoplanatic angle ~ 10 arcsec

C N 2 profile Dome C Bad r 0 = 0.05 m (1.8 arcsec seeing) r 0 = 0.2 m (0.5 arcsec seeing)  iso = 9.5 arcsec f G = 30 Hz  iso = 13.5 arcsec f G = 7 Hz

C N 2 profile Dome C Good r 0 = 0.05 m (1.8 arcsec seeing) r 0 = 0.7 m (0.15 arcsec seeing) r 0 = 0.2 m (0.5 arcsec seeing)  iso = 9.5 arcsec f G = 30 Hz  iso = 30 arcsec f G = 2Hz  iso = 13.5 arcsec f G = 7 Hz

C N 2 profile Mauna Kea  iso = 2 arcsec f G = 50 Hz r 0 = 0.20 m (0.50 arcsec seeing)  iso = 9.5 arcsec f G = 30 Hz r 0 = 0.05 m (1.8 arcsec seeing)  iso = 30 arcsec f G = 2Hz r 0 = 0.7 m (0.15 arcsec seeing)  iso = 13.5 arcsec f G = 7 Hz r 0 = 0.2 m (0.50 arcsec seeing)

Atmospheric parameters seeing (arcsec)isoplanatic angleGreenwood (arcsec)Frequency (Hz) Mauna Kea Dome C

Atmospheric parameters seeing (arcsec)isoplanatic angleGreenwood (arcsec)Frequency (Hz) Mauna Kea Dome C ? ?

Adaptive Optics wavefront sensor wavefront analysis wavefront control centroid sensor dichroic beam splitters to tip-tilt secondary image camera telescope optics guide star object tip-tilt control deformable mirror

PILOT AO systems Tip-tilt –tip-tilt mirror + quad sensor Low Order AO –ds=0.3 (30-50 actuators) High Order AO –ds=0.08 ( actuators)

PILOT AO system performance Low Greenwood frequency: –lower feedback loop frequency –higher integration time –fainter stars lower SNR/bandwidth errors Large isoplanatic angle –larger fields –brighter stars low anisoplanatic error Better seeing (lower r0) –less actuators lower fitting error

Strehl ratio - V band On-axis low order DCG DCB MK

Strehl Ratio

Strehl ratio - K band (tip-tilt correction) DCB DCG On-axis Off-axis

Diff lim 2m Uncomp DCB Uncomp DCG

Diff lim 2m DCB off-axis DCG off-axis on-axis Uncomp DCB Uncomp DCG

Diff lim 2m DCB off-axis DCG off-axis on-axis Uncomp MK Uncomp DCG Uncomp DCB Gemini altair Diff lim 8 m

Sky emission MK Emission = 0° C

Sky emission Emission = -63° C SP

Sky emission Emission = -66° C DC

Sky Transmission - NIR/MIR MK

Sky Transmission - NIR/MIR DC

Relative integration time : MK versus SP, DC, DA

Relative integration time : 8m MK versus 2 m DC PILOT diffraction limit

Relative integration time : 8m MK versus 2 m DC PILOT Seeing limit - extended object

Relative integration time : 8m MK versus 2 m DC PILOT Seeing limit - extended object

Possible PILOT Instruments Visible (AO-on) imaging:  4k array (0.03 arcsec/pixel) = 2.3 arcmin FOV NIR wide field imaging JHK bands:  4k array (0.6 arcsec/pixel) = 10 arcmin FOV DF imaging KLM bands:  1k array (0.23 arcsec/pixel) = 4 arcmin FOV MIR imaging N band:  0.5k array (0.7 arcsec/pixel) = 6 arcmin FOV

V band imaging - AO on Point source ext object

K band imaging - tip tilt Point source ext object

N band imaging Point source ext object

Summary Visible AO system ( actuators plus tip-tilt): –near diff lim for on-axis stars 8-12 mag –off-axis reasonable performance up to 1-2 arcmin –highest ground based resolution!! –mirror figure error is very important < 50 nm rms required –spectroscopy? Near Infrared K band imaging: –tip-tilt correction is enough for near diff lim ( arcsec) –equivalent to 8m ML telescope for extended object, 5m for point source –wide field or narrow field science? Mid-Infrared imaging: –niche is wide field sensitivity