EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, 2005 1 EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET DESIGN Adonai Herrera-Martínez.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
EAR2 simulation update Collaboration board meeting Christina Weiss & Vasilis Vlachoudis.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Neutron energy spectrum from U and Th traces in the Modane rock simulated with SOURCES (full line). The fission contribution is also shown (dashed line).
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL GIMM Conference Call.
SPES -Thin target calculations: isotope production and power deposition (ENEA-INFN Legnaro) Carlo Petrovich (ENEA, Bologna) INFN – Legnaro, 24 th January.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
1 A.I.Ryazanov, E.V.Semenov and A.Ferrari DPA calculations in irradiated graphite collimator materials under 7 TeV and 450 GeV proton beams ,
2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Powered Target Workshop, Y. KadiNovember 6, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET DESIGN Y. Kadi On behalf of the.
EURISOL DS Target Meeting, CERN, CHY.KADIMarch 10-11, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET 1st year planning Y. Kadi (AB/ATB) European Organization.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
1 cm diameter tungsten target Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
Fission and Fusion 3224 Nuclear and Particle Physics Ruben Saakyan UCL.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
ELI-NP: the way ahead, March Anna Ferrari An overview of the shielding problems around high energy laser-accelerated beams Anna Ferrari Institute.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.
Y. Romanets 1, R. Luis 1,J. Bermudez 3, J.C. David 5, D. Ene 5, I. F. Goncalves 1, Y. Kadi 2, C. Kharoua 2, F. Negoita 4, R. Rocca 2, L. Tecchio 3, P.
BENE Week, CERN, SwitzerlandY.KADIMarch 16-19, MULTI-MW TARGET DEVELOPMENT FOR EURISOL & EUROTRANS Y. Kadi & A. Herrera-Martinez (AB/ATB) European.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.
EURISOL – Task 11 meeting 2007S. Chabod 1 OUR CONTRIBUTION INSIDE EURISOL TASK 11 OPTIMIZATION OF IN-TARGET NUCLEI YIELDS Target parameters: material (Al.
FLUKA Meeting Milan Jul 2010 Work in the frame of the LHC Phase II Upgrade Previous work was dedicated to the study of the.
O FF - LINE TECHNIQUE FOR DEUTERON BEAM PARAMETERS DETERMINATION USING SOLID STATE NUCLEAR TRACK DETECTORS E XPERIMENTS AT THE QUINTA TARGET (D UBNA, R.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
Neutron production in Pb/U assembly irradiated by deuterons at 1.6 and 2.52 GeV Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech.
SECONDARY-BEAM PRODUCTION: PROTONS VERSUS HEAVY IONS A. Kelić, S. Lukić, M. V. Ricciardi, K.-H. Schmidt GSI, Darmstadt, Germany  Present knowledge on.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
Radiation protection and radiation safety issues for HIE-ISOLDE. FLUKA calculations Y. Romanets ISOLDE Workshop and Users meeting 2010 CERN, 8 December.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Welcome to the CHARMS See – Tea Saturday, March 05, 2016 Comparison of ISOLDE yields with calculated in- target production rates Strahinja Lukić,
Adam Para, Fermilab, February 16, Who Cares? What is the Problem? 2 Dual Readout Total Absorption calorimeter has very good energy resolution.
Alex Howard PH-SFT LCG-PV 10 th May 2006 Neutron Benchmark for Geant4 using TARC – initial status 1)TARC – experimental set-up and aims 2)Geant4 Simulation.
EURISOL Town Meeting, GANIL – Caen, France 28 – 29 November, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET DESIGN STUDIES Adonai Herrera-Martínez &
EURISOL DS Target Meeting, CERN, CHY.KADIMarch 10-11, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET Y. Kadi (AB/ATB) European Organization for Nuclear.
BENE/EURISOL-DS Joint Meeting, CERN, SwitzerlandFebruary 22, Progress in the Liquid Mercury Multi-MW Target Design Studies Y. Kadi On behalf of.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Task2: Liquid Metal Target Thermo hydraulic and structural analysis of the Eurisol liquid metal target Ashrafi-Nik M. * C.E.R.N, AB Department, ATB Group.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
Paul Scherrer Institut 5232 Villigen PSI EURISOL Town Meeting Pisa, March 30-April 2, 2009 / W. Wagner PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT EURISOL Spallation Neutron.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.
ADSR Workshop, May ‘08 ADSR Systems for Power Generation: some practical considerations Bob Cywinski 7 May 2008, Daresbury.
Ali Ahmad FLUKA code validation of nuclear data required for the spallation target design in Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactors ThorEA Meeting – Daresbury.
Transmutation of 129 I with high energy neutrons produced in spallation reactions induced by protons in massive target V.HENZL Nuclear Physics Institute.
Comprehensive investigation of the decay losses in the ISOL extraction method KP2 Seminar, Strahinja Lukić.
EURISOL: European Collaboration towards the ultimate ISOL facility Yorick Blumenfeld IPN – Orsay We acknowledge the financial support of the European Community.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
EURISOL-DS 6th Coordination Board, IPN-Orsay, FranceJune 12, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET DESIGN Y. Kadi On behalf of Task#2 European.
P1 – GANIL P2 – CNRS/IN2P3 P3 – INFN P4 – CERN P6 – CEA Saclay P7 – NIPNE Bucarest P18 – PSI Switzerland P19 – IPUL Latvia C2 – BINP Novosibirsk C3 – VNIITF.
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
BEAM INTENSITIES WITH EURISOL
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Russian Research Center “ Kurchatov Institute”
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET DESIGN Adonai Herrera-Martínez & Yacine Kadi on behalf of T2 European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN CH-1211 Geneva 23, SWITZERLAND

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Overview 1.Baseline Parameters 2.Baseline Design (BLD) vs. Hg Jet (Hg-J) → Intermediate Solution (IS) 3.Comparison of the FLUKA Simulation Results –Primary Particle Flux → Proton Escapes –Neutron Flux and Energy Spectra –Fission Densities → Isotopic Yields –Energy Deposition → Temperature Increase 4.Conclusions

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Sensitivity Study

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Baseline Parameters of the MMW Hg Target ParameterSymbolUnitsNvalRange Converter Target materialZ conv -Hg (liquid)LBE Secondary Target materialZ targ -UC x, BeO Beam particlesZ beam -ProtonDeuteron Beam particle energyE beam GeV1  2 Beam currentI beam mA42 – 5 Beam time structure--dcac 50Hz 1ms pulse Gaussian beam geometrys beam mm15  25, parabolic Beam powerP beam MW4  5 Converter lengthl conv cm45  85 Converter radius (cylinder)r conv cm158 – 20 Hg temperatureT conv ºC150 (tbc)< 357 Hg flow rateQ conv kg/s200 (tbc)< 3000 Hg speedV conv m/s2 (tbc)< 30 Hg pressure dropΔP1ΔP1 bartbc<< 100 Hg overpressureΔ P 2 bartbc<< 100 UC x temperatureT targ ºC – 2500

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, MMW Hg Target Configuration BLD: Shape of Hg target optimised for neutron production (neutron balance) 15 mm sigma proton beam, fully contained in the Hg target Possibility of further reduction in Hg target dimensions → Intermediate solution (IS) Hg Target Reflector Target container UCx/BeO Target Protons 73 cm 30 cm Protons Reflector Hg Jet UCx/BeO Target 40 cm 4 cm Hg-J: designed for high-energy neutron fluxes in the U nat C 3 (3 g/cm 3 ) fission target 4 mm sigma proton beam, mostly contained in the 4 cm diameter Hg Jet Use of reflector to improve neutron economy and to shield HE particles Hg Target Reflector Target container UCx/BeO Target Protons 68 cm 16 cm

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Primary Proton Flux Distribution Primary flux (prim/cm 2 /s/MW of beam) 1GeV proton range ~ 46 cm BLD: Beam fully contained inside Hg-J: Important HE primary escapes (~10 13 prim/cm 2 /s/MW of beam), mostly at small polar angles (up to 25% losses)→ Beam dump IS: Some primary escapes through the endcap, mostly contained by the reflector BLD and IS: Beam window suffering ~100 μA/cm 2 /MW (radiation damage limit)

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Neutron Flux Distribution Neutron flux (n/cm 2 /s/MW of beam) Neutron fluxes in the fission target ~10 14 n/cm 2 /s/MW of beam BDL and IS: Partial containment by the reflector of the escaping neutron flux Hg-J: Higher neutron flux in the fission target (~2×10 14 n/cm 2 /s/MW of beam)

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Significantly harder spectrum for the Hg-J, with a peak neutron energy between 1 − 2 MeV, compared to 300 keV for BLD and 700 keV for IS Very low fission cross-section in 238 U below 2 MeV (~10 -4 barns). Optimum energy: 35 MeV Use of natural uranium:  f in 235 U (0.7% wt.): at least 2 barns Further gain if neutron flux is reflected (e.g. BeO) Neutron Energy Spectrum vs Fission Cross-Section in Uranium

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Fission Density Distribution in U nat C 3 Fission density (fissions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) High-energy fissions in Hg → Radioactive isotopes in Hg BLD: fiss/cm 3 /s/MW, homogenously distributed Hg-J: High and anisotropic fission density (~4×10 11 fiss/cm 3 /s/MW) IS: 2×10 11 fiss/cm 3 /s/MW, homogenously distributed → ~10 15 fissions/s for 4 MW of beam and a 1 litre U nat C 3 (3 g/cm 3 ) fission target

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, HE Fission Density Distribution in U nat C 3 Non-homogenous HE fissions in all cases BLD: ~10% of the fissions are HE (>20 MeV), compared to ~20% in IS and ~40% in Hg-J HE fission density (fissions[>20 MeV]/cm 3 /s/MW of beam)

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, LE Fission Density Distribution in U nat C 3 LE fission density (fissions[<20 MeV]/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) BLD: LE fissions account for 90% of the radial fissions BDL and IS: Important effect of the reflector ← More LE fissions in the outside surface of the fission target Hg-J: Stronger anisotropy in the LE fissions and lack of containment for LE neutrons

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Maximum energy deposition in the first 10 cm beyond the interaction point, in Hg BLD and IS, maximum power density in Hg: ~2 kW/cm 3 /MW of beam Hg-J, maximum power density in Hg: ~22 kW/cm 3 /MW of beam! Power density in the U nat C 3 target: ~3 W/cm 3 /MW of beam in the BLD and ~5 W/cm 3 /MW the IS, homogenously distributed in both ~20 W/cm 3 /MW of beam U nat C 3 target for the Hg-J, following the fission density distribution → Strongly anisotropic Power Densities (1) Power density (W/cm 3 /MW of beam)

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Power Densities (2) Hg Beam Window More than one order of magnitude difference between the free surface Hg-J (~22 kW/cm 3 /MW) and the confined Hg targets (BLD, ~2 kW/cm 3 /MW) BDL and IS: Beam window suffering important power densities (~1 kW/cm 3 /MW → extra cooling plus radiation resistant material needed)

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Power Densities (3) Increasing  beam from 15 to 25 mm or taking parabolic beam of at least 45 mm radius → reduce  T in Hg by a factor Doubling the flow rate (~2 m/s) will reduce  T by factor 2 →  T ~ ºC

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Radioisotope Yields in U nat C 3 Target (1) Harder neutron spectrum for the Hg Jet → more high-energy neutron induced fissions → large increase in the symmetrical fission products Small differences in terms of asymmetrical (low energy) fission fragments

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Radioisotope Yields in the U nat C 3 (1) 28-Ni (A)Baseline designIntermediate solutionHg Jet 701.7E+052.9E E E+052.3E E E+052.9E E Ni isotopic yields (Ions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) and ratio over BLD 31-Ga (A)Baseline designIntermediate solutionHg Jet 733.7E+059.8E E E+062.1E E E+062.8E E E+065.1E E E+076.2E E E+071.0E E E+077.4E E E+077.7E E Ga isotopic yields (Ions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) and ratio over BLD

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Radioisotope Yields in the U nat C 3 (2) Ga isotopic yields (Ions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) and ratio over BLD 31-Ga(A)Baseline designIntermediate solutionHg Jet 827.4E+063.1E E E+061.6E E E+068.9E E E+052.3E E Kr (A)Baseline designIntermediate solutionHg Jet 841.9E+065.4E E E+073.5E E E+071.2E E E+084.8E E E+091.8E E E+093.4E E E+094.8E E E+093.8E E E+092.4E E Kr isotopic yields (Ions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) and ratio over BLD

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Radioisotope Yields in the U nat C 3 (3) Kr isotopic yields (Ions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) and ratio over BLD 36-Kr (A)Baseline designIntermediate solutionHg Jet 935.5E+089.6E E E+083.8E E E+076.6E E E+075.3E E E+062.0E E E+064.0E E E+047.9E E Sn isotopic yields (Ions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) and ratio over BLD 50-Sn (A)Baseline designIntermediate solutionHg Jet E E E E E E E E E E E E

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Radioisotope Yields in the U nat C 3 (4) Sn isotopic yields (Ions/cm 3 /s/MW of beam) and ratio over BLD 50-Sn (A)Baseline designIntermediate solutionHg Jet E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E+096.0

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Conceptual Design of the MMW Hg Target Conclusions The Intermediate Solution brings us closer to the ideal performance of a Hg Jet in terms of fission density and relevant isotopic yields, additionally reducing the particle escapes and power densities in Hg The Hg Jet presents important technical issues regarding Hg cooling, radiation damage to the nearby structures and radiation shielding Need to clearly establish the beam requirements (i.e. CW vs. pulsed, beam frequency and beam shape) and fission target configuration

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, The End (... or The Beginning)

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, times more fissions with U nat C compared to U nat C 3 (proportional to density) With 238 UC less isotropic distribution and fission yield reduced by factor 3 Fission Density Distribution: U nat C vs 238 UC U nat C 238 UC

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October,  At high masses it is characterized by the presence of three peaks corresponding to (i) the initial target nuclei, (ii) those obtained after evaporation below and (iii) those obtained after acivation above (A+1)  Three very narrow peaks corresponding to the evaporation of light nuclei such as (deuterons, tritons, 3 He and a) ïAn intermediate zone corresponding to nuclei produced by high-energy fissions (symmetric distr.) ï At higher proton energy nuclei from evaporation and multi-fragmentation (ligth nuclei) are more abundant Residual Nuclei Distributions in Hg

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October,  At high masses it is characterized by the presence of acivation products (Pu239 !!) ==> dominates over fission !!  Three very narrow peaks corresponding to the evaporation of light nuclei such as (deuterons, tritons, 3 He and  ) ==> very few ïAn intermediate zone represented double humped distribution corresponding to nuclei produced by low- energy fissions ï twice as much fission in radial position Radioisotope yields in UC x targets

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October,  5 times less fissions with U238 overall but…  equal amount of high- energy neutron induced fissions (sym. distribution) Radioisotope yields in UC x targets (2)

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Radioisotope yields in UC x targets (3)  harder neutron spectrum along the beam axis with 2 GeV protons ==> more high-energy neutron induced fissions and few evaporations  no differences radially

EURISOL DS Progress Meeting T2-03, CEA Saclay, France 27 – 28 October, Radioisotope yields in BeO target  aim for 2x He at/s