Team USYD National Aircraft Design-Build-Fly Competition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4 2 . Parts of the Airplane.
Advertisements

 A radio controlled aircraft (model) is controlled remotely by a hand held transmitter & receiver within the aircraft.  The.
College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
Basic Aircraft Structure
UMaine Aero Design. Proposed Spring Timeline ResearchDesignSolidModelingFabricationFlight Testing/Iteration Week 1 Week 2 2 Weeks Week 3 5 Weeks Week.
SOSI 2013 CeAnn Chalker Matthew Chalker
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
SAE Aero Design Guidelines Rev A, 2013 Aero Design Oral Presentation Guidelines How to Deliver a Presentation The Judges will Notice.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
PISTON ENGINES Part 8 Propeller Control.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Christopher Cottingham
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Rear spar for control surface hinges Styrene foam wing core Balsa spars carry bending load 0.25 in x 0.25 in T.E. Reinforcement Materials Employed: Balsa:
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Group #1 Matthew Chin, Aaron Dickerson Brett J. Ulrich, Tzvee Wood Advisor: Professor Siva Thangam December 9 th, 2004.
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Advisor: Siva Thangam Group Members: Will Gerboth Jon Landis Scott Munro Harold Pahlck.
DR2 Structures PDR Structures and Weight Preliminary Design Review October 5, 2000 Presented By: Jeff Rodrian & Chris Curtis Team DR2 Loren Garrison Chris.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Minimum Weight Wing Design for a Utility Type Aircraft MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AE 462 – Aerospace Structures Design DESIGN TEAM : Osman Erdem.
Wright Flyer Competition Commemorating 100 years of powered flight.
Balsa Glider Construction
Balsa Glider Construction
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Replicating the 1903 Wright Flyer
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
Forces of Flight and Stability
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon A IR HERCULES 1.
2015 SAE Aero East Design Team 2015 SAE Aero Design East Team Mid-Term Status Report (3/5/2015)
Dane Batema John Tapee Audrey Serra Patricia Roman Kyle RyanCarlos Vergara Benoit BlierDrew Capps Team 1: Lessons Learned and Vehicle Summary Team “Canard”
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
BASICS OF RC PLANE. Overview  What is RC Plane?  RC Planes’ Parts and their Role  How planes fly?  Concepts and Terminologies of RC Plane  Stability.
Western Hills HS Aeronautical Engineering A Primer to Aircraft Structure and Design: Project Lead the Way - A Discussion on Career Potential and Opportunities.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
AVAT11001: Course Outline 1.Aircraft and Terminology 2.Radio Communications 3.Structure, Propulsion, Fuel Systems 4.Electrical, Hydraulic Systems and Instruments.
P15462 – TETHERED WIND ENERGY PLANE Devin Bunce Matthew Kennedy Matthew Maginn Carl Stahoviak Matthew Zebert.
Final Design Team 6 December 2 nd, UAV Team Specializations David Neira – Power & Propulsion Josiah Shearon – Materials Selection & Fabrication.
What Makes a Good Glider Louie Turek
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
Structures PDR 1 Team Boiler Xpress Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal VanMeter October 12, 2000.
R15901: Student-Initiated-Project SAE Aero Aircaft.
Basic Aircraft Structure
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Joe Lojek Justin Sommer James Koryan Ramy Ghaly November 7, 2006 Ducks on a Plane.
6.01 Aircraft Design and Construction References: FTGU pages 9-14, 27
Aircraft Design Process
Sae – aero micro capstone
Conceptual Design Report
Aerospace System Prototyping and Validation- Lecture 2
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Voice of Customer Presentation
4 2 . Parts of the Airplane.
Warm-Up – 9/5 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What are the four forces of flight? Describes what.
FINAL REVIEW UAV AIRFRAME B
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Balsa Glider Construction
SAE Aero East 2017 MAE 435 Mid-Term Progress Presentation
NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Team 5 Cost QDR Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile
Balsa Glider Construction
Managerial REVIEW UAV AIRFRAME B
Balsa Glider Construction
ASU Satellite Laboratory
Presentation transcript:

Team USYD National Aircraft Design-Build-Fly Competition

Overview Design process Design reasoning Problems solving construction methods and specifications Flight test DESIGN BUILD FLY

Design Process Preliminary Design Detailed design & construction Flight-testing Rebuild Conceptual Design Mission Requirements DESIGN Computational estimation

– Blended wing/body aircraft – 10 cc engine – Remote controlled by human pilot – Must carry payload of four Dick Smith Gravy packets (1.6kg total weight) – Aspect ratio ≥ 2.0 – Project cost ≤ $1000 Critical Specifications DESIGN

–Highest possible wing loading –Minimum take-off weight –Minimum planform area –Stable flight in all conditions Desirable Specifications DESIGN

Configuration studied – Standard boxwing – C-wing – Closed box-wing

Computational Design Solid Works – airframe design, weight and balance Solid Works – airframe design, weight and balance Desktop Aerodynamics – aerodynamic prediction Desktop Aerodynamics – aerodynamic prediction Flight Sim – flight simulation and performance estimation Flight Sim – flight simulation and performance estimation DESIGN

Box-wing configuration advantages – Minimal planform area – End caps improve wing strength – Fully effective upper wing surface – less run way area

DESIGN V-tail selected – Ease of construction – Comparatively light Tractor configuration – Move C.G forward – Propeller intake clear of wing interference

INITIAL DESIGN Upper wing constructed from ply spar and balsa ribs, surfaced with solar film Upper wing constructed from ply spar and balsa ribs, surfaced with solar film Foam core lower wing surfaced with balsa sheet an solar film Foam core lower wing surfaced with balsa sheet an solar film V-tail made up from balsa sticks and fibre- glassed to 12mm diameter carbon boom V-tail made up from balsa sticks and fibre- glassed to 12mm diameter carbon boom Aurora Mk I DESIGN

INITIAL DESIGN Bulkheads fore and aft of payload made from light ply Bulkheads fore and aft of payload made from light ply Firewall located and set at specific angle relative to wings Firewall located and set at specific angle relative to wings Steel wire (3mm) folded and cut for undercarriage Steel wire (3mm) folded and cut for undercarriage Aurora Mk I DESIGN

BUILD Detailed design and construction – Detailed calculations were completed – Design continually modified as practical problems arose during construction Aurora Mk I

BUILD

DESIGN Problems Faced and Fixed PROBLEM Structural joints introduced weak points SOLUTION Structure rebuilt with 6:1 ratio joints

PROBLEM Weak materials SOLUTION Tail boom replaced, aluminium plate undercarriage DESIGN

SOLUTION Rebuilt fuselage with more efficient payload configuration DESIGN PROBLEM Too large frontal area front

PROBLEM Wing area too small SOLUTION Chord and span increased DESIGN

PROBLEM Fuselage not strong enough SOLUTION Fibre-glassed fuselage surfaces DESIGN

PROBLEM CG too far forward SOLUTION Moved controls to rear of fuselage Added ballast to tail boom DESIGN

Wings constructed by a hot-wire cut foam core, surrounded with balsa sheeting Wings constructed by a hot-wire cut foam core, surrounded with balsa sheeting Spar laminated from 2 pieces of 3mm birch ply wood with carbon fibre between them Spar laminated from 2 pieces of 3mm birch ply wood with carbon fibre between them V-tail of slightly increased area was fibre-glassed to a 7/8” diameter carbon tube V-tail of slightly increased area was fibre-glassed to a 7/8” diameter carbon tube REVISED DESIGN Aurora Mk II BUILD

Wing/Body fillets sculpted from foam and fibre- glassed for strength and durability Wing/Body fillets sculpted from foam and fibre- glassed for strength and durability 1.5 o right side thrust and 1.5 o down thrust were built into the engine mount 1.5 o right side thrust and 1.5 o down thrust were built into the engine mount 4mm Aluminium undercarriage bought-off-shelf and re-shaped to suit aircraft 4mm Aluminium undercarriage bought-off-shelf and re-shaped to suit aircraft REVISED DESIGN Aurora Mk II BUILD

Specifications Span: 1.4m Span: 1.4m Length:1.5 Length:1.5 Area: ~ 0.58m 2 (900in 2 ) Area: ~ 0.58m 2 (900in 2 ) Mass:4 Kg Mass:4 Kg Engine: Thunder Tiger 61 Pro (10c.c.) Engine: Thunder Tiger 61 Pro (10c.c.) Servos: 5 Servos: 5 Channels: 5 Channels: 5 BUILD

Test flight Pre-flight Ground Run Engine Adjust mixture First Flight Zero payload flight Adjust trim for straight flight FLY

Test flight FLY Second Flight Confirm trimming Third Flight Confirm flight characteristics with payload Fuel consumption check Fly actual circuit

DESIGN - BUILD - FLY For more details, please visit our web site: Thanks to all our sponsors

Please feel free to ask any questions about our design Finally, thanks for your attention!!